Higher maternal care and tolerance in more experienced giraffe mothers

  • Markéta Gloneková
  • Karolína BrandlováEmail author
  • Jan Pluháček
Original Paper


Maternal investment and maternal care provided by mammalian females can change during their ontogeny. Differences may be related to the age and/or experience (parity) of the female. Several hypotheses have been postulated to explain changes in the rate of maternal care of females during their lifetime. The residual reproductive value hypothesis supposes a higher rate of maternal care in older and more experienced females, in contrast the targeted reproductive effort hypothesis predicts lower levels of maternal care in older and/or more experienced females. To test these hypotheses we investigated nursing bout frequency and time devoted to nursing as predictors of the rate of maternal care, and rate of successful nursing bouts as a predictor of maternal investment, in captive giraffe (22 females, 47 calves in four zoos). We also considered the high rate of allonursing (nursing of non-filial calves) which appeared in all herds. The nursing and allonursing bout frequency as well as the total time devoted to nursing and allonursing increased with increasing parity and age of the female, thus supporting the residual reproductive value hypothesis. In addition, maternal experience of individual females in terms of parity rather than age was responsible for variation in maternal behaviour. This suggests that variation depends on individual experiences.


Parity Female Age Maternal Care Terminal investment Reproductive effort Allonursing 



We would like to express our gratitude to zoo managers and staff for cooperation during the data collection, especially Jaroslav Šimek, Barbora Dobiášová and Jan Marek from Prague Zoo, Libuše Veselá from Olomouc Zoo, Luděk Čulík from Safaripark Dvůr Králové and Luboš Melichar from Liberec Zoo. We are thankful to Francisco Ceacero Herrador for his help with Akaike weights and also Radka Šárová for her comments during data processing. We gratefully acknowledge Sarah R. B. King for improving the English.

Funding information

This work was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (MZERO0714) CIGA 20185008 and IGA 20185021.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Abrams PA (1991) The fitness costs of senescence: the evolutionary importance of events in early adult life. Evol Ecol 5:343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Birgersson B, Ekvall K (1994) Suckling time and fawn growth in fallow deer (Dama dama). Zoology 232:641–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broussard DR, Risch TS, Dobson FS, Murie JO (2003) Senescence and age-related reproduction of female Columbian ground squirrels. J Anim Ecol 72:212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byers JA, Bekoff M (1990) Inference in social evolution theory: a case study. In: Bekoff M, Jamieson D (eds) Interpretation and explanation in the study of animal behavior. Colo, Westview, Boulder, pp 84–97Google Scholar
  6. Cameron EZ, Linklater WL, Stafford KJ, Minot EO (1999) A case of cooperative nursing and offspring care by mother and daughter feral horses. J Zool 249:486–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron EZ, Linklater WL, Stafford KJ, Minot EO (2000) Aging and improving reproductive success in horses: declining residual reproductive value or just older and wiser? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47(4):243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron EZ, Linklater WL, Stafford KJ (2003) Social grouping and maternal behaviour in feral horses (Equus caballus): the influence of males on maternal protectiveness. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:92–101Google Scholar
  9. Clutton-Brock TH (1984) Reproductive effort and terminal investment in iteroparous animals. Am Nat 123:212–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Das SM, Redbo I, Wiktorsson H (2000) Effect of age of calf on suckling behaviour and other behavioural activities of Zebu and crossbred calves during restricted suckling periods. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67(1-2):47-57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolhinow P, McKenna JJ, Vonder Haar Laws J (1979) Rank and reproduction among female langur monkeys: aging and improvement (they’re not just getting older, they’re getting better). Aggressive Behav 5:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ekvall K (1998) Effects of social organization, age and aggressive behaviour on allosuckling in wild fallow deer. Anim Behav 56:695–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fairbanks LA (1996) Individual differences in maternal style: causes and consequences for mothers and offspring. Adv Stud Behav 25:579–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gadgil M, Bossert WH (1970) Life historical consequences of natural selection. Am Nat 104:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gittleman JL, Thompson SD (1988) Energy allocation in mammalian reproduction. Am Zool 28:863–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gloneková M, Brandlová K, Pluháček J (2016) Stealing milk by young and reciprocal mothers: high incidence of allonursing in giraffes, Giraffa camelopardalis. Anim Behav 113:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gloneková M, Vymyslická PJ, Žáčková M, Brandlová K (2017) Giraffe nursing behaviour reflects environmental conditions. Behaviour 154:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gomendio M (1991) Parent/offspring conflict and maternal investment in rhesus macaques. Animal Behaviour 42(6):993-1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green WCH (1990) Reproductive effort and associated costs in bison (Bison bison): do older mothers try harder? Behav Ecol 1:148–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green WCH (1993) Social effects of maternal age and experience in bison: pre- and post- weaning contact maintenance with daughters. Ethology 93:146–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heard D, Barry S, Watts G, Child K (1997) Fertility of female moose (Alces alces) in relation to age and body composition. Alces 33:165–176Google Scholar
  23. Kirkwood TBL, Austad SN (2000) Why do we age? Nature 408:233–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krebs JR, Davies NB, Parr J (1993) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Landete-Castillejos T, Garciá A, Garde J, Gallego L (2000) Milk intake and production curves and allosuckling in captive Iberian red deer, Cervus elaphus hispanicus. Anim Behav 60:679–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meikle DB, Drickame LC, Vessey SH, Arthur RD, Rosenthal TL (1996) Dominance rank and parental investment in swine (Sus scrofa domesticus). Ethology 102:969–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mendl M, Paul ES (1989) Observation of nursing and sucking behaviour as an indicator of milk transfer and parental investment. Anim Behav 37(3):513–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mysterud A, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC, Langvatn R (2001) The effects of age, sex and density on body weight of Norwegian red deer: evidence of density-dependent senescence. P R Soc London 268:911–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nicol CJ, Badnell-Waters AJ (2005) Suckling behaviour in domestic foals and the development of abnormal oral behaviour. Animal Behaviour 70(1):21-29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oftedal OT (1985) Pregnancy and lactation. In: Hudson RJ, White RG (eds) Bioenergetics of wild herbivores. Fla pp, CRC, Boca Raton, pp 215–238Google Scholar
  31. Ozoga JJ, Verme LJ (1986) Relation of maternal age to fawn rearing success in white-tailed deer. J Wildlife Manage 50:480–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Packer C, Lewis S, Pusey A (1992) A comparative analysis of non-offspring nursing. Anim Behav 43:265–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Packer C, Tatar M, Collins A (1998) Reproductive cessation in female mammals. Nature 392:807–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Payne EH, Genreghziaber M, Hardin J, Edge LE (2017) An empirical approach to determine a threshold for assessing overdispersion in Poisson and negative binomial models for count data. Communication in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 47(5):1–17Google Scholar
  35. Pianka ER, Parker WS (1975) Age-specific reproductive tactics. Am Nat 109:453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pluháček J, Bartošová J, Bartoš L (2010) Suckling behavior in captive plains zebra (Equus burchellii): sex differences in foal behavior. J Anim Sci 88:131–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pluháček J, Bartošová J, Bartoš L (2011) A case of adoption and allonursing in captive plains zebra (Equus burchellii). Behav Process 86(2):174–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pluháček J, Olléová M, Bartoš L, Bartošová J (2014) Time spent suckling is affected by different social organization in three zebra species. J Zool 292:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Redondo T, Gomendio, M, Medina R (1992) Sex-biased parent-offspring conflict. Behaviour 123:261-289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roulin A (2002) Why do lactating females nurse alien offspring? A review of hypotheses and empirical evidence. Animal Behaviour 63(2):201-208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Therrien JF, Cote SD, Festa-Bianchet M, Ouellet JP (2007) Maternal care in white-tailed deer: trade-off between maintenance and reproduction under food restriction. Anim Behav 75:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  43. Trivers RL (1974) Parent-offspring conflict. Am Zoo 14:219–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wagenmakers EJ, Farrell S (2004) AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychon B Rev 11:192–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weladji RB, Mysterud A, Holand Ø, Lenvik D (2002) Age related reproductive effort in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus): evidence of senescence. Oecologia 131:79–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolff A, Hausberger M (1994) Behaviour of foals before weaning may have some genetic basis. Ethology 96:1-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISPA, CRL 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal Science and Food Processing in TropicsCzech University of Life Sciences PraguePragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of EthologyInstitute of Animal Science104 00 Praha-UhříněvesCzech Republic
  3. 3.Ostrava Zoo710 00 OstravaCzech Republic
  4. 4.Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of OstravaOstravaCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations