Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

15 Years of Stanca Act: Are Italian Public universities websites accessible?


With the increasing spread and usage of Internet technologies, the challenge of ensuring Web accessibility for all, including anyone with a form of disability, has become an hot issue, pursued both by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and by governments in different countries. In particular, W3C has developed technical Web accessibility guidelines (WCAG), while governments have legally addressed the problem, by emanating specific laws and policies. In Italy, the Stanca Act, a law regulating the design and creation of governmental and public sector websites, recently updated according to last WCAG 2.1 was enacted in 2004. To analyze its impact, this paper presents a study about the accessibility of Italian public universities websites, by particularly analyzing their conformance to the Stanca Act. The reported analysis shows that, despite that the Stanca act dates back 15 years ago, Italian public universities are still struggling to satisfy all its requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Map credits:

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10


  1. 1.

    For a detailed list of all checkpoints see the WCAG webpage at

  2. 2.

  3. 3.

  4. 4.

  5. 5.

  6. 6.

  7. 7.

  8. 8.


  1. 1.

    Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act: The Act (AODA). (2014). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  2. 2.

    Acosta-Vargas, P., Acosta, T., Lujan-Mora, S.: Challenges to assess accessibility in higher education websites: a comparative study of latin america universities. IEEE Access 6, 36500–36508 (2018).

  3. 3.

    Australian Government: Accessibility. Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  4. 4.

    Barricelli, B.R., Sciarelli, P., Valtolina, S., Rizzi, A.: Web accessibility legislation in italy: a survey 10 years after the stanca act. Univers Access Inf Soc 17(1), 211–222 (2018).

  5. 5.

    Dardailler, D.: WAI early days. Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  6. 6.

    Dattolo, A., Luccio, F.: Accessible and usable websites and mobile applications for people with autism spectrum disorders: a comparative study. EAI Endorsed Trans Energy Web (2017).

  7. 7.

    Dattolo, A., Luccio, F.: A review of websites and mobile applications for people with autism spectrum disorders: towards shared guidelines. In: Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST, vol. 195, pp. 264–273 (2017).

  8. 8.

    EUR-Lex: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/2048 of 20 December 2018 on the harmonised standard for websites and mobile applications drafted in support of Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2018). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  9. 9.

    EUR-Lex: Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies. (2016). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  10. 10.

    Gambino, O., Pirrone, R., Di Giorgio, F.: Accessibility of the Italian institutional web pages: a survey on the compliance of the Italian public administration web pages to the Stanca Act and its 22 technical requirements for web accessibility. Univ Access Inf Soc 15(2), 305–312 (2016).

  11. 11.

    ISO: The international organization for standardization. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). (1998). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  12. 12.

    Israeli Ministry of Justice: Commission for Equal Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Accessibility Legislation. Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  13. 13.

    Pinsent Masons: Disabled access to websites under uk law. (2011)

  14. 14.

    Segarra-Faggioni, V., Campoverde, J.: Evaluation of the web accessibility of university web portal. case study: Universidad tecnica particular de loja. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 203–206 (2017). Conference of 9th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, ICETC 2017 ; Conference Date: 20 December 2017 Through 22 December 2017; Conference Code:134654

  15. 15.

    United States Access Board: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Final Standards and Guidelines (2017). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  16. 16.

    United States Access Board: Final Regulatory Impact Analysis: Final Rule to Update the Section 508 Standards and Section 255 Guidelines (2017). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  17. 17.

    Venturini, G., Gena, C.: Testing web-based solutions for improving reading tasks in students with dyslexia. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. Part F131371 (2017). Conference of 12th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter: Towards the Mediterranean, CHItaly 2017; Conference Date: 18 September 2017 Through 20 September 2017

  18. 18.

    W3: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. (2008). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  19. 19.

    W3C: Web Accessibility Initiative. Strategies, standards, resources to make the Web accessible to people with disabilities.

  20. 20.

    W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 1.0. (1999). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  21. 21.

    W3C: Accessibility, usability, and inclusion: Related aspects of a Web for all (2016). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  22. 22.

    W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. (2018). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  23. 23.

    W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Overview. (2018). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  24. 24.

    W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2—Working draft. (2019). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  25. 25.

    We are Social: We Are Social and Hootsuite. Global Digital Report. (2019) Accessed 18 Nov 2019

  26. 26.

    WHO: World Health Organization. Disability and health (2018). Accessed 17 Nov 2019

  27. 27.

    Zarish, S., Habib, S., Islam, M.: Analyzing usability of educational websites using automated tools. In: 2019 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences, ICCIS 2019 (2019).

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Barbara Rita Barricelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barricelli, B.R., Casiraghi, E., Dattolo, A. et al. 15 Years of Stanca Act: Are Italian Public universities websites accessible?. Univ Access Inf Soc (2020).

Download citation


  • Web accessibility
  • Stanca Act
  • Universities websites
  • WCAG