Advertisement

Usability investigation of an educational mobile application for individuals with intellectual disabilities

  • Sabiha YeniEmail author
  • Kursat Cagiltay
  • Necdet Karasu
Long Paper

Abstract

This research examined the usability of an interactive mobile application (tablet application) designed to teach daily living skills to individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). Effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction aspects were investigated. The persistence of a newly learned skill, operating a vacuum cleaner, was assessed following training sessions. The study also examined how well participants generalized the skill to a different tool and setting after learning via the interactive tablet application. In addition, to determine the social validity of the study, five special education teachers’ views (satisfaction levels) about the tablet application were examined. To determine the efficiency of the tablet application, differences in time of intervention sessions between the pilot study and the main study were investigated. A single-case research methodology was employed with a multiple baseline design. Furthermore, to identify the usability issues of educational tablet applications, heuristic evaluation and user test methods were used together. One male and four females with a diagnosis of intellectual disability took part in the study. All participants improved their ability to use the vacuum cleaner and performed the skill correctly following the intervention sessions. Performance during generalization and maintenance sessions also met defined success criteria. Efficiency data show that changes in the tablet application decrease the significant amount of time spent for intervention. It is an important result for individuals with ID who might not be able to focus attention over a longer period of time. The results of this study show that using the interactive tablet applications in the education of individuals with ID is an effective method for improving their daily living skills.

Keywords

Intellectual disabilities Tablet application (mobile application) Daily living skills Tablets Mobile devices Usability test Heuristic evaluation 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Acungil, A.T.: Bilgisayar destekli etkinlik çizelgeleriyle sunulan öğretimin otizm spektrum bozukluğu gösteren çocukların çizelge izleme ve rol oyun becerilerini öğrenmedeki etkileri [Effectiveness of a Tablet Computer Instruction Program (TACIP) Presented Via Audio-Visual Technologies on Teaching the Use of Tablet Computers to Students with Intellectual Disabilities] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armutçu, O.A.: Zihinsel yetersizlikten etkilenmiş öğrencilere word belgesi üzerine yazi yazma becerisinin kazandirilmasinda eşzamanli ipucu işlem süreci ile yapilan öğretimin etkililiği [The Effects of Simultaneous Prompting Procedures When Teaching Writing Skills to Children with Mental Retardation Using Word Documents] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aruk, I.: Bilişim teknolojilerinin zihinsel engellilerin e-eğitiminde kullanılması ve örnek bir uygulama geliştirilmesi [The Usage of Informatics Technologies for the Mentally Disabled in e-Learning and the Improvement of an Application as an Example] (Unpublished master’s thesis) (Unpublished master’s thesis). Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ayres, K.M., Maguire, A., McClimon, D.: Acquisition and generalization of chained tasks taught with computer based video ınstruction to children with autism. Educ. Train. Dev. Disabil. 44(4), 493–508 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., Risley, T.R.: Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 1, 91–97 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Başoğlu, E.D.: Zihinsel engelli öğrenciler için bir eğitim yazılımının geliştirilmesi, uygulanması ve değerlendirilmesi [Developing, Implementing and Evaluating an Education Software for Students with Mental Retardation] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bertini, E.S., Kimani, S.: Mobile devices: opportunities for users with special needs. In: Chittaro, L. (ed.) Mobile HCI 2003, LNCS 2795, pp. 486–491. Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Billingsley, F., White, O.R., Munson, R.: Procedural reliability: a rationale and an example. Behav. Assess. 2, 229–241 (1980)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown, D.J., Powell, H.M., Battersby, S., Lewis, J., Shopland, N., Yazdanparast, M.: Design guidelines for interactive multimedia learning environments to promote social inclusion. Disabil. Rehabil. 24(11–12), 587–597 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burke, R.V., Andersen, M.N., Bowen, S.L., Howard, M.R., Allen, K.D.: Evaluation of two instruction methods to increase employment options for young adults with autism spectrum disorders. Res. Dev. Disabil. 31, 1223–1233 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cagiltay, K., Karasu, N., Cakir, H., Kaplan-Akilli, G., Cicek, F.: Innovative educational technology for special education and usability issues. Paper presented at HCI International, Crete, Greece (2014, June)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cannella, H.I., O’Reilly, M.F., Lancioni, G.E.: Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature. Res. Dev. Disabil. 26, 1–15 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Çatak, A.: Powerpoint sunu programıyla hazırlanan okuma materyalinin eğitilebilir zihin engelli öğrencilerin okuduğunu anlama becerisi üzerine etkisi [The Effect of PowerPoint Software on Educable Mentally Retarded Students’ Reading Comprehension Skill] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cihak, D., Fahrenkrog, C., Ayres, K., Smith, C.: The use of video modeling via a video iPod and a system of least prompts to improve transitional behaviors for students with autism spectrum disorders in the general education classroom. J. Posit. Behav. Interv. 12(2), 103–115 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    da Cunha, R.D., Neiva, F.W., da Silva, R.L.D.S.: Virtual reality as a support tool for the treatment of people with intellectual and multiple disabilities: a systematic literature review. Rev Inform. Teór. Apl. 25(1), 67–81 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dalgın-Eyyip, Ö.: Bilgisayar destekli etkinlik çizelgeleriyle sunulan öğretimin otizm spektrum bozukluğu gösteren çocukların çizelge izleme ve rol oyun becerilerini öğrenmedeki etkileri [The Effects of Teaching Process with Computer-Based Activity Schedules on the Schedule Following and Pretend Play Skills of Children with ASD] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edwards, B.J., Blackhurst, A.E., Koorland, M.A.: Computer-assisted constant time delay prompting to teach abbreviation spelling to adolescents with mild learning disabilities. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 12, 301–311 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fernández-Lopez, Á., Rodríguez-Fórtiz, M.J., Rodríguez-Almendros, M.L., Martínez-Segura, M.J.: Mobile learning technology based on iOS devices to support individuals with special education needs. Comput. Educ. 61, 77–90 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flanagan, S., Bouck, E.C., Richardson, J.: Middle school special education teachers’ perceptions and use of assistive technology in literacy instruction. Assist. Technol. 25(1), 24–30 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2012.682697 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Flores, M., Musgrove, K., Renner, S., Hinton, V., Strozier, S., Franklin, S., Hil, D.: A comparison of communication using the Apple iPad and a picture-based system. Augment. Altern. Commun. 28(2), 74–84 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Foster, S.L., Mash, E.J.: Assessing social validity in clinical treatment research issues and procedures. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 67(3), 308–319 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gast, D.L., Ledford, J.R. (eds.): Single Case Research Methodology: Applications in Special Education and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holstein, J.: Tablets for Autism: Tablet Computers Provide a Voice for the Autistic. ViewSonic Corporation, Walnut (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hourcade, J.P., Williams, S.R., Miller, E.A., Huebner, K.E., Liang, L.J.: Evaluation of tablet apps to encourage social interaction in children with autism spectrum disorders. In: Proceedings of CHI’13: The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3197–3206. ACM, New York (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466438
  25. 25.
    Jhangiani, R.S., Chiang, I.A., Price, P.C.: Research Methods in Psychology-2nd Canadian Edition (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kagohara, D.M., Sigafoos, J., Achmadi, D., van der Meer, L., O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, G.: Teaching students with developmental disabilities to operate an iPod Touch to listen to music. Res. Dev. Disabil. 32(6), 2987–2992 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kagohara, D.M., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M.F., Lancioni, G.E., Davis, T.N., Rispoli, M., Lang, R., Marschik, P.B., Sutherland, D., Green, V.A.: Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Res. Dev. Disabil. 34(1), 147–156 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kanpolat, Y.E.: Otistik bireylere adı söylenen giysiyi gösterme becerisinin öğretiminde bilgisayar aracılığıyla sunulan eşzamanlı ipucuyla öğretimin etkililiği [The Effectiveness of Simultaneous Prompting Procedures Presented by Computers on Teaching the Skill of Naming Items of Clothing to Individuals with Autism] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kazdin, A.E.: Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behav. Modif. 1, 427–452 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P.: What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 9(1), 60–70 (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Korozi, M., Leonidis, A., Ntoa, S., Arampatzis, D., Adami, I., Antona, M., Stephanidis, C.: Designing an augmented tabletop game for children with cognitive disabilities: the “Home game” case. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 49(4), 701–716 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kuzu, A., Cavkaytar, A., Odabaşı, H.F., Erişti, S.D., Çankaya, S.: Development of mobile skill teaching software for parents of individuals with intellectual disability. Turk. Online J. Qual. Inq. 5(2), 11–26 (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lopez, A.F., Fortiz, M.J.R., Garcia, M.N.: Designing and supporting cooperative and ubiquitous learning systems for people with special needs. In: Meersman, R., Herrero, P., Dillon, T. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2009 Workshops, LNCS 5872, pp. 423–432. Springer, Berlin (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Martin, S.S.: A sampling of activities used in special education teacher preparation coursework: meeting the standards. In: Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, vol. 2004, no. 1, pp. 4930–4935. AACE, Norfolk (2004)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Microsoft External Research: Mobile Device Uses Images to Help Children with Autism Interact (2013). http://web.cgu.edu/faculty/leroy/content/Other-content/health_smartphone_autism_communication_final.pdf
  36. 36.
    Nam, C.S., Bahn, S., Lee, R.: Acceptance of assistive technology by special education teachers: a structural equation model approach. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 29(5), 365–377 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.711990 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Boston (1993)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Özak, H.: Zihinsel yetersizliği olan ögrencilere okuma becerilerinin ögretiminde bilgisayar aracılığıyla sunulan eş zamanlı ipucuyla öğretimin etkililiği [The Effects of Simultaneous Prompting Presented Via Computer on the Reading Skills of Mentally Disabled Students] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey (2008)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tanju, E.H.: 4–5 yaş grubu zihinsel engelli çocuklara şekil, renk ve sayı kavramlarının kazandırılmasında bilgisayar destekli eğitimin etkisinin incelenmesi [An Investigation Into the Effects of Computer-Assisted Education on the Acquisition Of Shape, Color, and Number Concepts by Mentally Handicapped Children Aged 4–5] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (2004)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tawney, J.W., Gast, D.L.: Single Subject Research Design in Special Education. Merrill, Columbus (1984)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Uçar, Ö.: Engelli çocuklar için yapay zeka tabanlı eğitim-destek araçları geliştirilmesi [Development of Artificial Intelligence-Based Assistive Tools for the Education of Disabled Children] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey (2007)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Upadhyay, N.: M-learning: a new paradigm in education. Int. J. Instr. Technol. Distance Learn. 3(2), 31–34 (2006)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Van Laarhoven, T., Johnson, J.W., Van Laarhoven-Myers, T., Grider, K.L., Grider, K.M.: The effectiveness of using a video iPod as a prompting device in employment settings. J. Behav. Educ. 18, 119–141 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    William, P., Nicholas, D.: Testing the usability of information technology applications with learners with special educational needs (SEN). J. Res. Spec. Educ. Needs 6(1), 31–41 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wolf, M.M.: Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 11, 203–214 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yee, H.S.S.: Mobile technology for children with autism spectrum disorder: major trends and issues. In: Proceedings of IS3e 2012: IEEE Symposium on E-Learning, E-Management and E-Services, pp. 1–5 (2012, October).  https://doi.org/10.1109/is3e.2012.6414954
  47. 47.
    Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H.: Qualitative Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 2nd edn. Seçkin, Ankara (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Faculty of EducationYildiz Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Computer Education and Instructional TechnologyMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Special EducationGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations