Advertisement

Accessibility in video games: a systematic review

  • Juan Aguado-Delgado
  • José-María Gutiérrez-Martínez
  • José R. Hilera
  • Luis de-Marcos
  • Salvador Otón
Review Paper
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

Video games are software products with several purposes that are growing in strength and weight in society. However, there is one noticeable problem about them; in most cases, their developers most often do not take into consideration people with disabilities when they are creating video game applications. People with disabilities are thus partially or completely excluded from their use. Prior to any additional work, it is required to have an updated state of the art about this topic. This paper shows the results of a systematic literature review conducted to define the current status of video games accessibility. The type of review is broader than usual, so it is a systematic mapping study (a specific class of systematic review). Besides elaborating the state of the art (qualitative information), we identified and analyzed related works (45 relevant studies) to provide quantitative information of the performed search (including graphs and tables), such as the number of articles found by phases, their sources, their research type, the research questions answered, the kind of disability addressed, and the type and year of publications. None of the studied initiatives can guarantee universally accessible video game applications. Our proposal is to create an integral software engineering methodology that considers accessibility guidelines, techniques, strategies, human factors, etc. in the video game software development process.

Keywords

Video games Accessibility Human–computer interface Systematic mapping study Systematic literature review Interdisciplinary projects 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the EC-funded project ESVI-AL (ALFA III program), the PMI and TIFyC research groups at the University of Alcalá (UAH) and the Master’s Programme in Software Engineering for the Web, of the University of Alcalá (UAH). In addition, the authors are thankful for the funding of the research process to the ESVI-AL observatory and the access to the search resources to the UAH, without which it would have been impossible to consult the bibliography and reach the knowledge acquired during the review. Finally, we would like to also thank Euan Short for his invaluable help in the paper translation process.

References

  1. 1.
    Ampatzoglou, A., Stamelos, I.: Software engineering research for computer games: a systematic review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52, 888–901 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anam, A.I., Yeasin, M.: Accessibility in smartphone applications: what do we learn from reviews? In: Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, vol. 35, pp. 1–35. ACM, Bellevue (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Badia, A., García, O., Labrador, E., et al.: Experiencia De Usuario En Los Serious Games Para Personas Con Necesidades De Accesibilidad. Buenas prácticas de accesibilidad en videojuegos, pp. 60–67 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barlet, M.C., Spohn, S.D.: A practical guide to game accessibility. The Ablegamers Foundation, Charles Town (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barnett, P., Humphreys, S.: Game accessibility guidelines (online). (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bierre, K., Hinn, M., Martin, T., et al.: Accessibility in games: motivations and approaches. White paper, International Game Developers Association (IGDA) (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boutsika, E.: Kinect in education: a proposal for children with autism. Proced. Comput. Sci. 27, 123–129 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carrington, P., Hurst, A., Kane, S.K.: Wearables and chairables: inclusive design of mobile input and output techniques for power wheelchair users. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 3103–3112. ACM, Toronto (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crespo, ÁG., Tejedor, ÁG.: Análisis De Videojuegos Comerciales Y Sus Lagunas En La Accesibilidad Para Las Personas Con Discapacidad Sensorial. Buenas prácticas de accesibilidad en videojuegos, pp. 48–52 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Díez Alegre, M.I.: La Accesibilidad En Los Videojuegos: Una Asignatura Pendiente. Rev. Esp. Discapac. 1, 155–158 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fernández, A.: La Importancia De Los Idiomas En La Mejora De La Accesibilidad En Videojuegos Para Personas Mayores. Buenas prácticas de accesibilidad en videojuegos, pp. 35–38 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garber, L.: Game accessibility: enabling everyone to play. Computer 46:14–18 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerling, K.M.: Motion-based game interaction for older adults. SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 108:27–30 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gerling, K.M., Dergousoff, K.K., Mandryk, R.L.: Is movement better?: Comparing sedentary and motion-based game controls for older adults. Proc. Gr. Interface 2013, 133–140 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gerling, K.M., Kalyn, M.R., Mandryk, R.L.: KINECT wheels: wheelchair-accessible motion-based game interaction. In: CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3055–3058. ACM, Paris (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerling, K., Livingston, I., Nacke, L., et al.: Full-body motion-based game interaction for older adults. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1873–1882. ACM, Texas (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gerling, K.M., Mandryk, R.L., Kalyn, M.R.: Wheelchair-based game design for older adults. In: Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, vol. 27, pp. 1–27. ACM, Bellevue (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gil Juárez, A., Vida Mombiela, T.: Los videojuegos. Editorial UOC (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gómez, I.M., Molina, A.J., Cabrera, R., et al.: The possibilities of kinect as an access device for people with cerebral palsy. Int Conf Comput Handicap Pers 8548, 252–255 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    González, C., Vela, J.: Propuesta De Evaluación De Videojuegos Accesibles. Buenas prácticas de accesibilidad en videojuegos, pp. 53–59 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grammenos, D.: Game over: learning by dying, pp. 1443–1452 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grammenos, D., Savidis, A., Stephanidis, C.: Unified design of universally accessible games. Int. Conf. Univers. Access Hum. Comput. Interact. 4556:607–616 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hiraga, R., Hansen, K.F.: Sound preferences of persons with hearing loss playing an audio-based computer game. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international workshop on Interactive multimedia on mobile & portable devices, pp. 25–30. ACM, Barcelona (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karray, F., Alemzadeh, M., Saleh, J.A., et al.: Human–computer interaction: overview on state of the art. Int. J. Smart Sens. Intell. Syst. 1:137–159 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim, J., Ricaurte, J.: TapBeats: accessible and mobile casual gaming. In: The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, pp. 285–286. ACM, Dundee (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim, Y., Sutreja, N., Froehlich, J., et al.: Surveying the accessibility of touchscreen games for persons with motor impairments: a preliminary analysis. In:Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 68:1–68:2. ACM, Bellevue (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Brereton, P.: O.: Using mapping studies as the basis for further research—a participant–observer case study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53, 638–651 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. In: EBSE technical report, ver. 2.3. School of Computer Science and Mathematics. Keele University (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., et al.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering—a tertiary study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52, 792–805 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kurschl, W., Augstein, M., Stitz, H.: Adaptive user interfaces on tablets to support people with disabilities. Mensch Comput. 2012, 91–94 (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    LeBlanc, A.G., Chaput, J., McFarlane, A., Colley, R.C., Thivel, D., Biddle, S.J.H., Maddison, R., Leatherdale, S.T., Tremblay, M.S.: Active video games and health indicators in children and youth: a systematic review. PLOS One 8, e65351 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Leigh, S.: eyeCan: affordable and versatile gaze interaction. In: Proceedings of the adjunct publication of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 79–80. ACM, St. Andrews (2013)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J., Moher, D.: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLOS Med. 6, e1000100 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mangiron, C., Orero, P.: ¿ Videojuegos Para Todos? Panorama Actual De La Accesibilidad En Videojuegos. Buenas prácticas de accesibilidad en videojuegos, pp. 23–28 (2012)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Miesenberger, K., Ossmann, R., Archambault, D., et al.: More than just a game: accessibility in computer games. In: Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group, vol. 5298, pp. 247–260. Springer, Graz (2008)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., The, P.G.: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med. 6, e1000097 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Morelli, T., Foley, J., Folmer, E.: Vi-bowling: a tactile spatial exergame for individuals with visual impairments. In: Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, pp. 179–186. ACM, Orlando (2010)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Morelli, T., Folmer, E.: Real-time sensory substitution to enable players who are blind to play video games using whole body gestures. Entertain. Comput. 5, 83–90 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mueller, F., Edge, D., Vetere, F., et al.: Designing sports: a framework for exertion games. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2651–2660. ACM, Vancouver (2011)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Plaza, I., Martín, L., Martin, S., et al.: Mobile applications in an aging society: status and trends. J. Syst. Softw. 84, 1977–1988 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Poor, G.M., Leventhal, L.M., Kelley, S., et al.: Thought cubes: exploring the use of an inexpensive brain–computer interface on a mental rotation task. In: The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, pp. 291–292. ACM, Dundee (2011)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Porter, J.R.: Understanding and addressing real-world accessibility issues in mainstream video games. In: ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, pp. 42–45. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Porter, J.R., Kientz, J.A.: An empirical study of issues and barriers to mainstream video game accessibility. In: Proceedings of the 15th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility, pp. 3:1–3:8. ACM, Bellevue (2013)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Roy, A., Soni, Y., Dubey, S.: Enhancing effectiveness of motor rehabilitation using kinect motion sensing technology. In: Global humanitarian technology conference: South Asia satellite (GHTC-SAS), pp. 298–304. IEEE, Trivandrum (2013)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sehaba, K., Estraillier, P., Lambert, D.: Interactive educational games for autistic children with agent-based system. International Conference on Entertainment Computing, vol. 3711, pp. 422–432. Springer, Sanda (2005)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Suma, E.A., Krum, D.M., Lange, B., et al.: Adapting user interfaces for gestural interaction with the flexible action and articulated skeleton toolkit. Comput. Gr. 37, 193–201 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vickers, S., Istance, H., Heron, M.J.: Accessible gaming for people with physical and cognitive disabilities: a framework for dynamic adaptation. In: CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 19–24. ACM, Paris (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Villaroman, N., Rowe, D., Swan, B.: Teaching natural user interaction using OpenNI and the Microsoft kinect sensor. In: Proceedings of the 2011 conference on Information technology education, pp. 227–232. ACM, West Point (2011)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Westin, T.: Game accessibility case study: terraformers—a real-time 3D graphic game. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies, pp. 95–100. ICDVRAT/University of Reading, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wieringa, R., Maiden, N., Mead, N., et al.: Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion. Requir. Eng. 11, 102–107 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yuan, B., Folmer, E.: Blind Hero: enabling guitar hero for the visually impaired. In: Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, pp. 169–176. ACM, Halifax (2008)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yuan, B., Folmer, E., Harris, F.,Jr: Game accessibility: a survey. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10, 81–100 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, Superior Polytechnic SchoolUniversity of AlcaláAlcalá de HenaresSpain

Personalised recommendations