Advertisement

Universal Access in the Information Society

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 927–938 | Cite as

Middle-aged adults’ attitudes toward health app usage: a comparison with the cognitive-affective-conative model

  • Yong-Ming Huang
  • Shi-Jer Lou
  • Tien-Chi Huang
  • Yu-Lin JengEmail author
Long Paper
  • 247 Downloads

Abstract

Middle-aged adults have a stronger sense of urgency about health apps that not only enhance their health management but also help them administer self-treatment. However, middle-aged adults’ attitudes toward health app usage have received surprisingly little scholarly attention, which has hampered the promotion of this kind of apps among them. To remedy this deficiency, this research specifically investigated this vital issue and presents findings contributory to promoting health apps. Our research findings indicated that (1) middle-aged adults with no health management habit tend to find health apps valuable and get a favorable impression about them, while those who already have the habit do not; (2) most middle-aged adults do not decide to use health apps out of sentimental reasons; and (3) middle-aged adults’ confidence in using smartphones significantly influences their cognitive evaluation of health apps. In sum, these research findings suggested that middle-aged adults look at health apps in a non-affective manner, and their confidence in using smartphones facilitates their use of health apps.

Keywords

Middle-aged adult Attitude Health app Cognitive-affective-conative model 

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H.M., Shaalan, K.: Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Comput. Hum. Behav. 56, 93–102 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alpar, P., Engler, T.H., Schulz, M.: Influence of social software features on the reuse of business intelligence reports. Inf Process Manag. 51(3), 235–251 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84(2), 191–215 (1977)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bilbrough, N.R.: The FDA, congress, and mobile health apps: lessons from DSHEA and the regulation of dietary supplements. Md. Law Rev. 74(4), 921–964 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chin, W.W., Newsted, P.R.: Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In: Hoyle, R. (ed.) Statistical strategies for small sample research, pp. 307–341. Sage Publications, California (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cho, J., Quinlan, M.M., Park, D., Noh, G.Y.: Determinants of adoption of smartphone health apps among college students. Am. J. Health Behav. 38(6), 860–870 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chun, J.R., Hong, H.G.: Factors affecting on personal health record. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 8(S8), 173–179 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deng, Z., Mo, X., Liu, S.: Comparison of the middle-aged and older users’ adoption of mobile health services in China. Int. J. Med. Inform. 83(3), 210–224 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eng, D.S., Lee, J.M.: The promise and peril of mobile health applications for diabetes and endocrinology. Pediatr. Diabetes 14, 231–238 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farley, S.D., Stasson, M.F.: Relative influences of affect and cognition on behavior: are feelings or beliefs more related to blood donation intentions? Exp. Psychol. 50(1), 55–62 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fishbein, M., Azjen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hasan, B.: The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Comput. Hum. Behav. 19(4), 443–450 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R.: The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv. Int. Mark. 20, 277–320 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hill, T., Smith, N.D., Mann, M.F.: Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advance technologies: the case of computers. J. Appl. Psychol. 72(2), 307–313 (1987)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holzinger, A., Dorner, S., Födinger, M., Valdez, A.C., Ziefle, M.: Chances of increasing youth health awareness through mobile wellness applications. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) HCI in work and learning, life and leisure. USAB 2010. Lecture notes in computer science, 6389. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Wernbacher, M.: The effect of previous exposure to technology on acceptance and its importance in usability engineering. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10(3), 245–260 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Auinger, A., Ziefle, M.: Informatics as semiotics engineering: lessons learned from design, development and evaluation of ambient assisted living applications for elderly people. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal access in human–computer interaction. Context diversity. UAHCI 2011. Lecture notes in computer science, 6767. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang, Y.M.: Exploring the factors that affect the intention to use collaborative technologies: the differing perspectives of sequential/global learners. Austr. J. Educ. Technol. 31(3), 278–292 (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huang, Y.M.: The factors that predispose students to continuously use cloud services: social and technological perspectives. Comput. Educ. 97, 86–96 (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huang, Y.M.: Exploring students’ acceptance of team messaging services: the roles of social presence and motivation. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 48(4), 1047–1061 (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang, Y.M.: Exploring the intention to use cloud services in collaboration contexts among Taiwan’s private vocational students. Inf. Dev. 33(1), 29–42 (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hung, M.C., Jen, W.Y.: The adoption of mobile health management services: an empirical study. J. Med. Syst. 36(3), 1381–1388 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim, Y.H., Kim, D.J., Wachter, K.: A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 361–370 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lazar, J.: Introduction to universal usability. In: Lazar, J. (ed.) Universal usability: design computer interfaces for diverse users. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 1–12 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee, M.C., Tsai, T.R.: What drives people to continue to play online games? an extension of technology model and theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 26(6), 601–620 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li, C.Y.: Persuasive messages on information system acceptance: a theoretical extension of elaboration likelihood model and social influence theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(1), 264–275 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li, H., Gupta, A., Zhang, J., Sarathy, R.: Examining the decision to use standalone personal health record systems as a trust-enabled fair social contract. Decis. Support Syst. 57, 376–386 (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lin, J.: The effects of gratifications on intention to read citizen journalism news: the mediating effect of attitude. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36, 129–137 (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu, C.H., Huang, Y.M.: An empirical investigation of computer simulation technology acceptance to explore the factors that affect user intention. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14(3), 449–457 (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Memmel, T., Reiterer, H., Holzinger, A.: Agile methods and visual specification in software development: a chance to ensure universal access. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal access in human computer interaction. Coping with diversity. UAHCI 2007. Lecture notes in computer science, 4554. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ozok, A.A., Wu, H., Gurses, A.P.: Exploring patients’ use intention of personal health record systems: implications for design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 33(4), 265–279 (2017)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Peischl, B., Ferk, M., Holzinger, A.: The fine art of user-centered software development. Softw. Qual. J. 23(3), 509–536 (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Price, M.M., Pak, R., Müller, H., Stronge, A.: Older adults’ perceptions of usefulness of personal health records. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 12(2), 191–204 (2013)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M.: Multi-group analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: alternative methods and empirical results. Adv. Int. Mark. 22, 195–218 (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stephanidis, C., Savidis, A.: Universal access in the information society: methods, tools, and interaction technologies. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 1(1), 40–55 (2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Teo, T.: Modelling technology acceptance in education: a study of pre-service teachers. Comput. Educ. 52(2), 302–312 (2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Teo, T.: A path analysis of pre-service teachers’ attitudes to computer use: applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context. Interact. Learn. Environ. 18(1), 65–79 (2010)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Terzis, V., Economides, A.A.: The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Comput. Educ. 56(4), 1032–1044 (2011)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Terzis, V., Moridis, C.N., Economides, A.A.: Continuance acceptance of computer based assessment through the integration of user’s expectations and perceptions. Comput. Educ. 62, 50–61 (2013)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang, C.S., Jeng, Y.L., Huang, Y.M.: What influences teachers to continue using cloud services? The role of facilitating conditions and social influence. Electr. Libr. 35(3), 520–533 (2017)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yuan, S., Ma, W., Kanthawala, S., Peng, W.: Keep using my health apps: discover users’ perception of health and fitness apps with the UTAUT2 model. Telemed. e-Health 21(9), 735–741 (2015)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yueh, H.P., Huang, J.Y., Chang, C.: Exploring factors affecting students’ continued Wiki use for individual and collaborative learning: an extended UTAUT perspective. Austr. J. Educ. Technol. 31(1), 16–31 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Multimedia and Entertainment ScienceSouthern Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaiwanTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Vocational and Technical EducationNational Pingtung University of Science and TechnologyTaiwanTaiwan, ROC
  3. 3.Department of Information ManagementNational Taichung University of Science and TechnologyTaiwanTaiwan, ROC
  4. 4.Department of Information ManagementSouthern Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaiwanTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations