Advertisement

Limnology

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 181–190 | Cite as

The role of spatial and temporal variations in habitat uses and food habits of larvae in persistent occurrence of multiple odonate species in Mizorogaike Pond, Kyoto, Japan

  • Sayumi YamadaEmail author
  • Riyou Tsujino
  • Yasuhiro Takemon
  • Jotaro Urabe
Research paper

Abstract

Larvae of many odonate species commonly appear within the same freshwater ecosystem. However, it remains unknown whether there is a dietary separation among the larvae of different species. In this study, we collected different species of odonate larvae in different seasons at various sites on the floating mat of Mizorogaike Pond in Kyoto, Japan, and examined the abundance and gut contents of the dominant species. Our analyses showed that habitat and seasonal abundance of the odonate larvae did not significantly overlap between most pairs of the dominant species. Moreover, the degree of dietary overlap was not related to larval biomass in microhabitats. These results suggest that, although larval food habits were similar among species, the existence of various vegetation types on the floating mat allowed many odonate species to inhabit Mizorogaike Pond.

Keywords

Coexistence Gut contents Habitat uses Odonate larvae Phenology Prey preference Wetland 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Drs. Y. Kato and T. Kazama for their encouragement, Mr./Ms. Y. Kimura, Y. Sakai, Y. Matsutani, and M. Fukagawa for their help with field work, and Dr. M. Kyle and two anonymous reviewers for their fruitful comments. We are also grateful to the Preservation of Cultural Properties Section, City of Kyoto, for permission to undertake the research. This study is partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI 16H02522).

Supplementary material

10201_2018_564_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (46 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 45 kb)
10201_2018_564_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (636 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 636 kb)
10201_2018_564_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (3.9 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 3992 kb)

References

  1. Abekura K, Hori M, Takemon Y (2004) Changes in fish community after invasion and during control of alien fish populations in Mizoro-ga-ike, Kyoto City. Glob Environ Res 8:145–154Google Scholar
  2. Aoki J (2015) Pictorial keys to soil animals of Japan, 2nd edn. Tokai University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker RL, Clifford HF (1981) Life cycles and food of Coenagrion resolutum (Coenagrionidae: Odonata) and Lestes disjunctus disjunctus (Lestidae: Odonata) populations from the boreal forest of Alberta, Canada. Aquatic Insects 3:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benke AC (1978) Interactions among coexisting predators—a field experiment with dragonfly larvae. J Anim Ecol 47:335–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blois C (1985) The larval diet of three anisopteran (Odonata) species. Freshw Biol 15:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bried JT, McIntyre NE, Dzialowski AR, Davis CA (2015) Resident-immigrant dichotomy matters for classifying wetland site groups and metacommunities. Freshw Biol 60:2248–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chase JM, Leibold MA (2003) Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. Univ Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng YC, Lin CP (2016) Dietary niche partitioning of Euphaea formosa and Matrona cyanoptera (Odonata: Zygoptera) on the basis of DNA barcoding of larval feces. J Insect Sci 16:73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesson J (1978) Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 59(21):1–215Google Scholar
  10. Cloarec A (1977) Alimentation de larves d’ Anax imperator Leach dans un milieu naturel (Anisoptera: Aeshnidae). Odonatologica 6:227–243Google Scholar
  11. Corbet PS (1980) Biology of odonate. Annu Rev Entomol 25:189–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crowley PH, Johnson DM (1982) Habitat and seasonality as niche axes in an odonate community. Ecology 63:1064–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolédec S, Chessel D, Gimaret-Carpentier C (2000) Niche separation in community analysis: a new method. Ecology 81:2914–2927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elkin CM, Baker RL (2000) Lack of preference for low-predation-risk habitats in larval damselflies explained by costs of intraspecific interactions. Anim Behav 60:511–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Febria CM, Magnusson AK, Williams DD (2005) Seasonal abundance and prey selection of the nymphs of three sympatric species of Sympetrum (Odonata: Libellulidae) in an intermittent pond. Can Entomol 137:723–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Folsom TC, Collins NC (1982) Food availability in nature for the larval dragonfly Anax junius (Odonata: Aeshnidae). Freshw Invertebr Biol 1:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fujita N (2008) Vegetation and water quality. In: 7 Men’s Editorial Board of Mizorogaike (ed) Nature and human lives in and around Mizorogaike Pond. Sunrise Co., Ltd, HIkone, pp 161–163 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  18. Galbreath GH, Hendricks AC (1992) Life history characteristics and prey selection of larval Boyeria vinosa (Odonata: Aeshnidae). J Freshw Ecol 7(2):201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffiths D (1970) Observations on the food of dragonfly nymphs from a bog water in north Norway. Entomol Mon Mag 106:41–47Google Scholar
  20. Harabiš F, Tichanek F, Tropek R (2013) Dragonflies of freshwater pools in lignite spoil heaps: restoration management, habitat structure and conservation value. Ecol Eng 55:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ishida S, Ishida K, Kojima K, Sugimura M (1988) Illustrated guide for identification of the Japanese Odonata. Tokai University Press, TokaiGoogle Scholar
  22. Johansson F (1993) Intraguild predation and cannibalism in odonate larvae: effects of foraging behaviour and zooplankton availability. Oikos 66:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson JH (1995) Diel feeding ecology of three species of aquatic insects. J Freshw Ecol 10:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson DM, Crowley PH (1980) Habitat and seasonal segregation among coexisting odonate larvae. Odonatologica 9:297–308Google Scholar
  25. Kato Y, Takemon Y, Hori M (2009) Invertebrate assemblages in relation to habitat types on a floating mat in Mizorogaike Pond, Kyoto, Japan. Limnology 10:167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kawai T, Tanida K (2005) Aquatic insects of Japan: manual with keys and illustrations. Tokai University Press Division, TokaiGoogle Scholar
  27. Khelifa R, Zebsa R, Moussaoui A, Kahalerras A, Bensouilah S (2013) Niche partitioning in three sympatric congeneric species of dragonfly, Orthetrum chrysostigma, O. coerulescens anceps, and O. nitidinerve: the importance of microhabitat. J Insect Sci 13:71 (Tokai University Press Division) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koshikawa MK, Fujita N, Sugiyama M, Hori T (2005) Distributions of pH and chemical components in Mizorogaike, a pond with a floating-mat bog. Limnology 6(1):27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lamoot EH (1977) The food of the damselfly larvae of a temporary tropical pond (Zygoptera). Odonatologica 6:21–26Google Scholar
  30. Larson DJ, House NL (1990) Insect communities of Newfoundland bog pools with emphasis on the Odonata. Can Entomol 122:469–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Legendre P, Legendre LF (2012) Numerical ecology, vol 24. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multiscale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCauley SJ, Davis CJ, Relyea RA, Yurewicz KL, Skelly DK, Werner EE (2008) Metacommunity patterns in larval odonates. Oecologia 158:329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McPeek MA (1990a) Behavioral differences between Enallagma species (Odonata) influencing differential vulnerability to predators. Ecology 71:1714–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McPeek MA (1990b) Determination of species composition in the Enallagma damselfly assemblages of permanent lakes. Ecology 71:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McPeek MA, Schrot AK, Brown JM (1996) Adaptation to predators in a new community: swimming performance and predator avoidance in damselflies. Ecology 77:617–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merrill RJ, Johnson DM (1984) Dietary niche overlap and mutual predation among coexisting larval Anisoptera. Odonatologica 13:387–406Google Scholar
  38. Mizuno T, Takahashi E (1991) An illustrated guide to freshwater zooplankton in Japan. Tokai University Press, TokaiGoogle Scholar
  39. Mori M, Kitayama A (2002) Dytiscoidea of Japan, (revised edition). Bun-ichi Sogo, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  40. Morikawa M, Aizawa A, Kobayashi T (2013) The litter supply regulates the structure of the dragonfly larva community. J Japan Soc Reveget Technol 39(1):15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Narita K (2008) Odonate in Mizorogaike pond. In: Men’s Editorial Board of Mizorogaike (ed) Nature and human lives in and around Mizorogaike Pond. Sunrise Co. Ltd., HIkone, 55–56 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  42. Ozono A, Kawashima I, Futahashi R (2012) Dragonflies of Japan. Bunichi-Sogo, Tokyo Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Paterson MJ (1994) Invertebrate predation and the seasonal dynamics of microcrustacea in the littoral zone of a fishless lake. Archiv Für Hydrobiologie 1–2:1–36Google Scholar
  44. Pritchard G (1964) The prey of dragonfly larvae (Odonate, Anisoptera) in ponds in northern Alberta. Can J Zool 42:785–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seifert LI, Scheu S (2012) Linking aquatic and terrestrial food webs–Odonata in boreal systems. Freshw Biol 57:1449–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shimamura T, Takemon Y, Osaka K. I, Itoh M, Ohte N (2007) Spatial distribution of nitrate in Mizoro-ga-ike, a pond with floating mat bog. In: Advances in geosciences, volume 6. pp 129–137Google Scholar
  47. Siepielski AM, Mertens AN, Wilkinson BL, McPeek MA (2011) Signature of ecological partitioning in the maintenance of damselfly diversity. J Anim Ecol 80:1163–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stoks R, McPeek MA (2003) Antipredator behaviour and physiology determine Lestes species turnover along the pond-permanence gradient. Ecology 84:3327–3338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tabata H (2008) Woody plant species on the floating mat. In: Men’s Editorial Board of Mizorogaike (ed) Nature and human lives in and around Mizorogaike Pond. Sunrise Co. Ltd., HIkone, 159–160 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  50. Tanaka M (2002) Illustrations of the Japanese freshwater plankton. Nagoya University Published, NagoyaGoogle Scholar
  51. Thompson DJ (1978) Prey size selection by larvae of the damselfly, Ischnura elegans (Odonata). J Anim Ecol 47:769–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tsujino R, Fujita N, Katayama M, Kawase D, Matsui K, Seo A, Shimamura T, Takemon Y, Tsujimura N, Yumoto T, Ushimaru A (2010) Restoration of floating mat bog vegetation after eutrophication damage by improving water quality in a small pond. Limnology 11(3):289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ueno S, Kurosawa Y, Sato M (1985) The Coleoptera of Japan in color (II). Osaka Childcare Company, Osaka, p 514Google Scholar
  54. Werner EE, Anholt BR (1996) Predator-induced behavioral indirect effects: consequences to competitive interactions in anuran larvae. Ecology 77:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Limnology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sayumi Yamada
    • 1
    Email author
  • Riyou Tsujino
    • 1
  • Yasuhiro Takemon
    • 1
  • Jotaro Urabe
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Life SciencesTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations