Advertisement

AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis

, Volume 103, Issue 4, pp 527–561 | Cite as

MDCgo takes up the association/correlation challenge for grouped ordinal data

  • Emanuela RaffinettiEmail author
  • Fabio Aimar
Original Paper
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

The subjective assessment of quality of life, personal skills and the agreement with a certain opinion are common issues in clinical, social, behavioral and marketing research. A wide set of surveys providing ordinal data arises. Beside such variables, other common surveys generate responses on a continuous scale, where the variable actual point value cannot be observed since data belong to certain groups. This paper introduces a re-formalization of the recent “Monotonic Dependence Coefficient” (MDC) suitable to all frameworks in which, given two variables, the independent variable is expressed in ordinal categories and the dependent variable is grouped. We denote this novel coefficient with \(\mathrm{MDC}\mathrm{go}\). The \(\mathrm{MDC}\mathrm{go}\) behavior and the scenarios in which it presents better performance with respect to the alternative correlation/association measures, such as Spearman’s \(r_\mathrm{S}\), Kendall’s \(\tau _b\) and Somers’ \(\varDelta \) coefficients, are explored through a Monte Carlo simulation study. Finally, to shed light on the usefulness of the proposal in real surveys, an application to drug-expenditure data is considered.

Keywords

Grouped ordinal data Dependence Correlation coefficients Association coefficients Monte Carlo simulations 

Mathematics Subject Classification

62-07 62H20 62P25 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the ASL CN1 of Cuneo (Italy) for making available the dataset representing the case study illustrated and discussed in the paper. A special thanks goes to the Associate Editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions that allowed to improve the paper.

References

  1. Agresti, A.: Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahrens, W., Pigeot, I.: Handbook of Epidemiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aimar, F.: Local reimbursed pharmaceutical expenditure monitoring through the use of statistical tools. Ph.D. Dissertation Thesis, University of Turin (2012)Google Scholar
  4. Bernardini, A.C., Spandonaro, F.: Pharmaceutical Assistance: access to innovation, sustainability and selectivity. 10th Health Report, Chapter 9 (in Italian) (2014)Google Scholar
  5. Blitz, R.C., Brittain, J.A.: An extension of the Lorenz diagram to the correlation of two variables. Metron XXIII(1–4), 137–143 (1964)Google Scholar
  6. Denuit, M., Lambert, P.: Constraints on concordance measures in bivariate discrete data. J. Multivar. Anal. 93, 40–57 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferrari, P.A., Raffinetti, E.: A different approach to Dependence Analysis. Multivar. Behav. Res. 50(2), 248–264 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodman, L.A., Kruskal, W.H.: Measures of association for cross classifications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 49, 732–764 (1954)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Hofert, M.: On sampling from the multivariate \(t\) distribution. R J. 5(2), 129–136 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. Jonckheere, A.R.: A distribution-free \(k\)-sample. Tests against ordered alternatives. Biometrika 41, 133–145 (1954)Google Scholar
  11. Kendall, K.: New measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30(1–2), 81–89 (1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 22(140), 5–55 (1932)Google Scholar
  13. Lorenz, M.O.: Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publ. Am. Stat. Assoc. 9(70), 209–219 (1905)Google Scholar
  14. Martin, J., Gonzales, M.P.L., Garcia, D.C.: Review of the literature of the determinants of healthcare expenditure. Appl. Econ. 43, 19–46 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marshall, A.W., Olkin, I., Arnold, C.A.: Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Norman, G.: Likert scales, levels of measurement and the law of statistics. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 15, 625–632 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. OECD: Estimating expenditure by disease, age and gender under the system of health accounts (SHA) framework. Final report. http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/EstimatingExpenditurebyDiseaseAgeandGender_FinalReport.pdf (2008). Accessed 15 Mar 2017
  18. Owens, G.M.: Gender differences in health care expenditures, resource utilization, and quality of care. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 14(3 Suppl), 2–6 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. Pearson, K.: Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution–XVI. In: Pearson, K. (ed.) On Further Methods for Determining Correlation. Draper’s Company Research Memoirs, Biometric Series, vol. IV. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp. 1–39 (1907)Google Scholar
  20. Rodgers, J.L., Nicewander, W.A.: Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. Am. Stat. 42(1), 59–66 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roth, M.: On the multivariate t distribution. Report no.: LiTH-ISY-R-3059 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. Schezhtman, E., Yitzhaki, S.: A measure of association based on Gini’s mean difference. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 16(1), 207–231 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Somers, R.H.: A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables. Am. Sociol. Rev. 27, 799–811 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stuart, A.: The estimation and comparison of strengths of association in contingency tables. Biometrika 40, 105–110 (1953)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spearman, C.: The proof and measurement of correlation between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 15, 72–101 (1904)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Terpstra, T.J.: The asymptotic normality and consistency of Kendall’s test against trend, when ties are present in one ranking. Indigationes Mathematicae 14, 327–333 (1952)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative MethodsUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.School of Management and EconomicsUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
  3. 3.ASL CN1CuneoItaly

Personalised recommendations