Advertisement

Effect of additional outdoor yard on behaviour of lactating domestic goats (Capra hircus) in different seasons

  • Paolo Negretti
  • Giovanna Bianconi
  • David Meo ZilioEmail author
  • Lorenzo Noè
  • Settimio Bartocci
  • Sabrina Di Giovanni
  • Stefano Terramoccia
Article

Abstract

This study covered the effects of an improvement of the breeding environment on the behaviour of lactating goats. Two groups of 25 lactating Saanen goats were used: animals were reared in indoor pen (1.6 m2/head) without (control IP group) or with (experimental OY group) access to an outdoor yard (1.0 m2/head). For the trial, carried out in two different periods (winter and spring) 5 days lasting, a specific ethogram including feeding, resting, moving and play fighting (mock butting) or socio-positive (nuzzling) social behaviour was developed. Animals’ behaviour was continuously video monitored. Goats in experimental OY group showed greater moving (P < 0.01), a tendency to less feeding and resting (P < 0.10). Social behaviour (butts + nuzzles), in both periods, showed significant differences (P < 0.01) between the two groups while as for the comparison among periods of the year, within the group, there were meaningful differences only for OY group (P < 0.01). Experimental OY group’s social behaviour analysis, between periods, revealed a significant difference in the outdoor yard only. On the other hand, the differences between indoor and outdoor were significant for both the periods (P < 0.01). Butts and nuzzles of the goats in the control IP group are statistically different only in the second period (P < 0.05). The OY group showed higher nuzzling in both periods, even though it was statistically confirmed only for the first one (P < 0.05). Comparing the OY group butts and nuzzles between the two periods, only butts proved statistically different (P < 0.05) according to an improvement in climatic conditions. Giving the goats the possibility to use an outdoor yard, their competitiveness increases. As for the use of the space by OY group, staying in the indoor pen and in the outdoor yard as well as the looking out activity time suggests that the behaviour of goats was influenced by climatic conditions with regard to the utilization of the outdoor yard exclusively (P < 0.01). Goats that have an external space available are more active in socialization and show greater disposition to perform their normal, natural and complete behaviour patterns.

Keywords

Lactating Saanen goat Social relationship Butting Nuzzling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Regione Lazio within the Project “OPTOZOOTEC”. Many thanks to “Azienda Agricola Manzi Annunziata” (Montefiascone, Viterbo) for their assistance during the entire experimentation period carried out at their breeding farm.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. Barroso FG, Alados CL, Boza J (2000) Social hierarchy in the domestic goats: effect on food habitats and production. Appl Anim Behav Sci 69:35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bøe KE, Ehrlenbruch R (2013) Thermoregulatory behavior of dairy goats at low temperatures and the use of outdoor yards. Can J Anim Sci 93:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen M, Oppermann Moe R, Spruijt B, Keeling L (2007) Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol Behav 92:375–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canali E (2008) Il concetto di benessere nelle produzioni animali. Benessere animale e sistemi zootecnici alpini, Saint Vincent, Aosta, Italia, Quaderno SooZooAlp. 5:9–17Google Scholar
  5. Council Regulation (EC) No 1804 (1999) Supplementing regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs to include livestock productionGoogle Scholar
  6. Croney CC, Millman ST (2007) Board-invited review: the ethical and behavioural bases for farm animal welfare legislation. J Anim Sci 85:556–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehrlenbruch R, Pollen T, Andersen I, Bøe K (2010) Competition for water at feeding time. The effect of increasing number of individuals per water dispenser. Appl Anim Behav Sci 126:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galindo FM, Broom DM, Jackson PC (2000) A note on possible link between behaviour and occurrence of lameness in dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 67:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Houpt KA (2005) Domestic animal behavior for veterinarian and animal scientists, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, AmesGoogle Scholar
  10. Jørgensen GHM, Bøe KE (2011) Outdoor yards for sheep during the winter—effect of feed location, roof and weather factors on resting and activity. Can J Anim Sci 91:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kilgour R, Dalton C (1984) Livestock behaviour a pratical guide. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  12. Loretz C, Wechsler B, Hauser R, Rusch P (2004) A comparison of space requirements of horned and hornless goats at the feed barrier and in the lying area. Appl Anim Behav Sci 87:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McGregor BA (2002) A extent and source of short and cotted mohair RIRDC Research Paper, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Burton A.C.T., 02/108 RIRDC, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  14. Miranda-de la Lama GC, Mattiello S (2010) The importance of social behaviour for goat welfare in livestock. Small Rumin Res 90:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicolussi P (2008) Il benessere degli animali di allevamento. Il mensile del medico veterinario 66–78Google Scholar
  16. Orgeur P, Mimouni P, Signoret J (1990) The influence of rearing conditions on the social relationship of young male goats. Appl Anim Behav Sci 27:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pakhretia S, Pirta RS (2010) A behavioural study of the sheep and goats of the transhumant gaddis. J Hum Ecol 29(2):93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Panzera M (2013) Sickness and behaviors as indicators of animal suffering. In Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism. Inside the emotional lives of nonhuman animals, vol. I. 1(1), 23–31. LED on line, Milano. ISSN 2280-9643Google Scholar
  19. SAS, Statistical Analysis System Institute (2001) SAS user’s guide, statistics. Sas Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
  20. Sevi A, Casamassima D, Pulina G, Pazzona A (2009) Factors of welfare reduction in dairy sheep and goats. Ital J Anim Sci 8(Suppl 1):81–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Špinka M (2006) How important is natural behaviour in animal farming systems? Appl Anim Behav Sci 100:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Terramoccia S, Bartocci S, Di Giovanni S, Negretti P, Bianconi G (2009) Analisi comportamentale di caprini e ovini eseguita con monitoraggio video. In: Monitoraggio video dei comportamenti e termorilevazione, in condizioni di allevamento mirate al benessere e alla salute degli animali, e analisi di immagine computerizzata per gli aspetti morfologici correlati con le produzioni di qualità, Viterbo, ItaliaGoogle Scholar
  23. Tønnesen HG, Bøe KE, Andersen IL (2008) Group size and social interactions in goats. In: Proceedings of the 18th Nordic Symposium of the ISAE, Oscarsborg, Norway, pp 16–18Google Scholar
  24. Tosi M, Canali E, Gregoretti L, Ferrante V, Rusconi C, Verga M (2001) A descriptive analysis on welfare indicator measured in Italian dairy farms: preliminary result. Acta Agric Scand Sect A Anim Sci 30:69–72Google Scholar
  25. Tosi M, Canali E, Mattiello S, Ferrante V, Carenzi C, Verga M (2003) Il benessere dei suini e delle bovine da latte: punti critici e valutazioni in allevamento, vol 53. Fondazione Iniziative Zooprofilattichee e Zootecniche, BresciaGoogle Scholar
  26. Toussaint G (1997) The housing of milk goat. Livest Prod Sci 49:151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CRF-Cooperativa Ricerca Finalizzata-Parco Scientifico dell’Università Tor VergataRomaItaly
  2. 2.CREA-Centro di ricerca Zootecnia e AcquacolturaRomaItaly
  3. 3.Ager-Agricoltura e RicercaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations