Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 213–219 | Cite as

Sticky trap predation in the Neotropical resin bug Heniartes stali (Wygodzinsky) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Harpactorinae)

  • Jorge Luis Avila-NúñezEmail author
  • Marlene Naya
  • L. Daniel Otero
  • Miguel E. Alonso-Amelot
Article

Abstract

Certain species of assassin bugs have evolved the sticky trap strategy to capture prey using adhesive substances on their legs. The resin bug Heniartes stali collects a sticky exudate from the trichomes of a blackberry plant and smears its legs with it through an intriguing gathering process. We report laboratory experiments aimed at understanding the capture behavior of H. stali when it encountered three insect prey species with different mobility: the coleopteran larvae of Tribolium castaneum, a slow-moving organism; workers of the aggressive and highly mobile ant Camponotus rufipes; and winged prey, the fly Drosophila sp. Bugs stalked prey approaching within reach of their forelegs. After the bug threw forwards its forelegs, the prey became stuck and was subsequently held firmly by clutching with the aid of the middle legs, also smeared with trichome exudate. The bugs took longer to catch ants and immobilize them than larvae. Attacks on flies were unsuccessful because of flight escape before contact with H. stali occurred. A clear association between exudate harvesting and prey-capture behavior was unequivocally demonstrated. This is the first detailed description of a sticky leg trap from harvested plant exudate in Heniartes and related prey-capture behavior.

Keywords

Resin bug Apiomerini Prey-capture behavior Insect tool use 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to CDCHTA of the Universidad de Los Andes of Mérida, Venezuela, for financial support (Grant Nos. C-1773-12-01-B and SE-C-06-14-01).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

10164_2017_512_MOESM1_ESM.mpeg (21.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (MPEG 22250 kb) Larva-capture behavior of Heniartes stali in the laboratory
10164_2017_512_MOESM2_ESM.mpeg (26.3 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (MPEG 26966 kb) Ant-capture behavior of H. stali in the laboratory

Supplementary material 3 (MPG 3644 kb) Failed attempts of Heniartes stali to capture a Drosophila fly

References

  1. Adis J (1984) Eco-entomological observations from the Amazon. V. Feeding habits of Neotropical “bee killers” and “resin bugs” (Apiomerini: Reduviidae: Hemiptera). Rev Biol Trop 32:151–153Google Scholar
  2. Adlassnig W, Lendl T, Peroutka M, Lang I (2010) Deadly glue—adhesive traps of carnivorous plants. In: von Byern J, Grunwald I (eds) Biological adhesive systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambrose DP (1987) Biological behavioural and morphological tools in the biosystematics of Reduviidae (Insecta–Heteroptera–Reduviidae). Proc Indian Acad Sci Anim Sci 96:499–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambrose DP, Kumar SP, Nagarajan K, Das SSM, Ravichandran B (2006) Redescription, biology, life table, behaviour and ecotypism of Sphedanolestes minusculus Bergroth (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Entomol Croat 10:47–66Google Scholar
  5. Avila-Núñez JL, Naya M, Otero LD, Alonso-Amelot M (2016) A resin bug (Reduviidae: Harpactorinae: Apiomerini) harvesting the trichome secretion from an Andean blackberry. Neotrop Biodivers 2(1):151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentley-Condit VR, Smith EO (2010) Animal tool use: current definitions and an updated comprehensive catalog. Behavior 147:185–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bérenger JM, Pluot-Sigwalt D (1997) Relations privilègiées de certains Heteroptera Reduviidae prédateurs avec les végétaux. Premier cas connu d`un harpactoriane phytophage. C R Acad Sci Paris Sci la Vie Life Sci 320:1007–1012Google Scholar
  8. Betz O, Kölsch G (2004) The role of adhesion in prey capture and predator defence in arthropods. Arthropod Struct Dev 33:3–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brembs B (2010) Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates. Proc R Soc B 278:930–939. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2325 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Brembs B (2013) Invertebrate behavior- actions or responses? Front Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00221 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman RF (2013) The insects: structure and function. In: Simpson SJ, Douglas AE (eds). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Choe DH, Rust M (2007) Use of plant resin by a bee assasin bug, Apiomerus flaviventris (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 100(2):320–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dornhaus A, Franks NR (2008) Individual and collective cognition in ants and other insects (Hymenotera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 11(215):226Google Scholar
  14. Edwards JS (1966) Observations on the life history and predatory behaviour of Zelus exsanguis (STÅL) (Heteroptera: Reduviidae). Proc R Entomol Soc Lond A 41:21–24Google Scholar
  15. Eisner Th, Eisner M, Seigler M (2005) Secret weapons: defenses of insects, spiders, scorpions and other legged creatures. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Forero D, Weirauch C (2016) Resin-enabled maternal care is an old evolutionary strategy in New World resin bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Zool J Linn Soc. doi: 10.1111/zoj.12454 Google Scholar
  17. Forero D, Choe DH, Weirauch C (2011) Resin gathering in Neotropical resin bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Reduviidae): functional and comparative morphology. J Morphol 272:204–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gil-Santana HR, Costa LAA, Forero D, Zeraik S (2003) Sinopse dos Apiomerini, com chave ilustrada para os géneros (Hemiptera-Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Harpactorinae). Pub Av Mus Nac 97:1–24Google Scholar
  19. Giurfa M (2015) Cognition with few neurons: higher-order learning in insects. Trends Neurosci 36:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gorb S (2001) Attachment devices of the insect cuticle. Kluwer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Haridass ET, Balu A, Noble ME (1987) Feeding and behavioural parameters and egg ultrastructure in the biosystematics of Reduviidae (Insecta–Heteroptera). Proc Indian Acad Sci Anim Sci 96(5):485–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirayama K, Catanho M, Brown JW, Gillett R (2012) A core circuit module for cost/benefitdecision. Front Neurosci 6:123. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00123 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson LK (1983) Apiomerus pictipes (reduvio, chinche asesina, assassin bug). In: Janzen DH (ed) Costa Rican natural history. University Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 684–687Google Scholar
  24. Krimmel BA, Pearse IS (2012) Sticky plant traps insects to enhance indirect defence. Ecol Lett 16:219–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar AG, Rajan K, Rajan J, Ambrose DP (2011) Predatory behavior of an assassin bug, Coranus spiniscutis (Reuter) on rice meal moth, Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) and leaf armyworm, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). Insect pest management, a current scenario. St. Xavier’s College, PalayamkottaiGoogle Scholar
  26. Law YH, Sediqui A (2010) Sticky substance on eggs improves predation success and substrate adhesion in newly hatched Zelus renardii (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) instars. Ann Entomol Soc Am 103:771–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller NCE (1942) On the structure of the legs in Reduviidae (Rhynchota). Proc R Entomol Soc Lond 17:49–58Google Scholar
  28. Miller NCE (1956) The biology of the Heteroptera. Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Pierce JD (1986) A review of tool use in insects. Fla Entomol 69:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roepke W (1932) Uber “Harzwanzen” von Sumatra und Java. Misc Zool Sumatrana 68:1–5Google Scholar
  31. Schuh RT, Slater JA (1995) True bugs of the world (Hemiptera: Heteroptera): classification and natural history. Cornell University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Swadener SO, Yonke T (1973) Immature stages and biology of Apiomerus crassipes (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 66:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weirauch C (2006) Observations on the sticky trap predator Zelus luridus Stál (Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Harpactorinae), with the description of a novel gland associated with the female genitalia. Denisia 50:1169–1180Google Scholar
  34. Zhang G, Weirauch C (2013) Sticky predators: a comparative study of sticky glands in harpactorinae assassin bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Acta Zool Stockh 94:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang G, Weirauch C (2014) Molecular phylogeny of Harpactorini (Insecta: Reduviidae): correlation of novel predation strategy with accelerated evolution of predatory leg morphology. Cladistics 30:339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang J, Weirauch C, Zhang G, Forero D (2016) Molecular phylogeny of Harpactorinae and Bactrodinae uncovers complex evolution of sticky trap predation in assassin bugs (Heteroptera: Reduviidae). Cladistics 32:538–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Luis Avila-Núñez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marlene Naya
    • 1
  • L. Daniel Otero
    • 2
  • Miguel E. Alonso-Amelot
    • 1
  1. 1.Grupo de Química Ecológica, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de Los AndesMéridaVenezuela
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Ecología de Insectos, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de Los AndesMéridaVenezuela

Personalised recommendations