Advertisement

Integration of community-based waste bank programs with the municipal solid-waste-management policy in Makassar, Indonesia

  • Rieko KubotaEmail author
  • Masahide Horita
  • Tomohiro Tasaki
REGIONAL CASE STUDY
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Municipal solid-waste management (MSWM) in developing countries has faced common challenges such as no separation at source, complicated collection processes, and open landfills. Previous studies suggested that it is essential that MSWM policy adapts to local contexts and situations in its implementation. In Indonesia, neighborhood associations exist to enhance cooperation among community members. Community-based recycling activities called waste banks (WBs) in Indonesia utilize the functions of neighborhood associations. This study analyzed how local governments supported community-based WB programs and examined the institutional mechanism of the central WB which was established as part of the community-based WB integration to the city’s MSWM policy in Makassar, Indonesia. Through a desk study and semi-structured interviews with key actors in community-based WBs, it was found that the local government’s major intervention was the establishment of a mayor’s regulation to set up a central WB using the municipal budget to facilitate waste transaction between community-based WBs and recyclers. The institutional framework of the central WB and the functions performed by the central WB, such as recyclable waste collection from community-based WBs and market price analysis on recyclable waste, were clarified through this study.

Keywords

Solid-waste management Community-based recycling Government intervention Institutional framework 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere appreciation to all the stakeholders who contributed to the data collection in Makassar. Our appreciation goes out to those from the Indonesian national government, NGOs, neighborhood associations, and the private sector who inspired us to continue this research. Field surveys were strongly supported by staff members of Yayasan Peduli Neguri and Mr. Iman Utomo in the field of waste management. Last but not least, this research is partially financially supported by the Center for Material Cycles and Waste Management of the National Institute for Environmental Studies in Japan and was also partly supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Japan Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency (Project ID: S-16).

References

  1. 1.
    Wilson DC (2007) Development drivers for waste management. Waste Manag Res 25(3):198–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meidiana C, Gamse T (2010) Development of waste practices in Indonesia. Eur J Sci Res 40(2):199–210Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McDougall F et al (2001) Integrated solid waste management: a life cycle inventory, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marshall RE, Farahbakhsh K (2013) Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries. Waste Manag 33:988–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pasang H et al (2007) Neighborhood-based waste management: a solution for solid waste problems in Jakarta, Indonesia. Waste Manag 27:1924–1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (2015) Laporan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup adan Kehutanan 2013. Ministry of Environment and Forestry, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) (2015) Statistik Indonesia: statistical yearbook of Indonesia. https://-istmat.info/files/uploads/47409/statistical_yearbook_of_indonesia_2015.pdf (Last accessed on the 8 Nov 2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damanhuri E (2017) Country chapter state of the 3Rs in Asia and the Pacific, United Nations Centre for Regional DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mehra R et al (1996) Women in waste collection and recycling to Ho Chi Minh City. Popul Environ 18(2):187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mongkolnchaiarunya J (2005) Promoting a community-based solid-waste management initiative in local government: Yala municipality Thailand. Habitat Int 29(2005):27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wijayanti DR, Suryani S (2015) CBWB as community-based environmental governance: a lesson learned from Surabaya. Proc Soc Behav Sci 184:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ministry of Environment (2012) Regulation of the State Minister for environment of the Republic of Indonesia, number 13 of 2012 on implementing guidelines for reduce, reuse and recycle through CBWBGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ulung A., (2018) Children take center stage in waste bank initiative. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/life/2018/04/17/children-take-center-stage-in-waste-bank-initiative.html (Last accessed on 8 Nov 2019)
  14. 14.
    Yanti W., (March 14, 2019) Personal communication with Utomo I. and Limbong DGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tallei TE et al (2013) Local community-based initiatives of waste management programs on Bunaken Island in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Res J Environ Earth Sci 12(5):737–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Indrianti N (2016) Community-based Solid CBWB model for sustainable education. Proc-Soc Behav Sci 224:158–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tahir M et al (2009) Solid waste management at neighborhood level in Jakarta, Indonesia. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management, pp. 277–277, Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste ManagementGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Purba H et al (2014) Waste management scenario through community based CBWB A case study of Kepanjen district Malang regency, Indonesia. Int J Environ Sci Dev 5(2):212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murase N et al (2015) Analysis on relationship between residents’ awareness and waste bank activities in Indonesia—Case of Balikpapan city, (In Japanese). Kankyou-Jouhou Kagaku Ronbunshu 29:267–272Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ulhasanah N (2017) Assessment of citizens’ environmental behavior toward municipal solid waste management for a better and appropriate system in Indonesia: a case study of Padang City. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20(2):1257–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Premakumara D et al (2016) Transition from waste management to resource management a potential of CBWB program. JSM Environ Sci Ecol 4(4):1037Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Badan Pusat Statistik., (2015) Intermediate population censusGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Creswell J (2014) Research design: qualitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publishing, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bouabid A, Louis G (2015) Capacity factor analysis for evaluating water and sanitation infrastructure choices for developing communities. J Environ Manag 161:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wilson D et al (2009) Building recycling rates through the informal sector. Waste Manag 29:629–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Soderborg S (2015) Volunteer spies, volunteer bureaucrats: neighborhood governance in Indonesia and around the world, in Midwest political science Association 2015 Conference. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ministry of Interior, Permendagri No. 61 Tahun 2007 Pedoman Teknis Pengelolaan Keuangan Badan Layanan Umum Derah Dengan Rahmat Tuhan Yang Maha Esa Menteri Dalam Negeri, https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/blu/Permenkeu61-2007PengelolaanKeuBLUDaerah.pdf. Last access: 17 May 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International Studies, Graduate School of Frontier SciencesThe University of TokyoKashiwa-shiJapan
  2. 2.Center for Material Cycles and Waste Management ResearchNational Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukuba-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations