Advertisement

A mini literature review on sustainable management of poultry abattoir wastes

  • 116 Accesses

Abstract

Poultry slaughtering and post-processing activities generate different kinds of highly perishable organic wastes and by-products. Poultry carcass yields are typically about 70–75% of the live bird weight, the rest is accepted as inedible waste. Depending on the efficiency of the processing methods birds’ blood, feather, head, feet, offal and inedible viscera, and in some cases, treated solids make up the slaughterhouse solids in the poultry industry. The management of nutritive organic waste should aim to produce value-added by-products such as pet animal or aquaculture feed components, energy through thermochemical or biochemical processes, and agricultural fertilizer. Conventional rendering at specified temperatures and pressures are widespread processing and well-established methods to produce sellable products in the form of protein-rich meals such as poultry powder, feather powder, and fat. The utilization of raw or processed poultry by-products for animal feed is become strictly banned in both national and international scales for the poultry industry. There has been increasing stress to find alternative areas demanding nutrient-rich solid by-products. The objective of this study is to review several studies with a special focus on poultry abattoir-related activities to draw attention to proper management practices from the environmental point of view. The review shows that best management of the process, high-quality wastes need further innovative and effective processing methods to find possible feed additive either for fish or other animal meal, as well as alternative waste treatment process that provides an opportunity for energy recovery and high-quality bio-nutrient source to be used for crop production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Ferreira A, Kunh SS, Cremonez PA, Dieter J, Teleken JG, Sampaio SC, Kunh PD (2018) Brazilian poultry activity waste: destinations and energetic potential. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:3081–3089

  2. 2.

    Jayathilakan K, Sultana K, Radhakrishna K, Bawa AS (2012) Utilization of byproducts and waste materials from meat, poultry and fish processing industries: a review. J Food Sci Technol 49(3):278–293

  3. 3.

    Dede OH, Ozer H (2018) Enrichment of poultry manure with biomass ash to produce organomineral fertiliser. Environ Eng Res 23(4):449–455

  4. 4.

    Del Nery V, De Nardi IR, Damianovic MHRZ, Pozzi E, Amorim AKB, Zaiat M (2007) Long-term operating performance of a poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment plant. Resour Conserv Recycl 50:102–114

  5. 5.

    Kantarli IC, Kabadayi A, Ucar S, Yanik J (2016) Conversion of poultry wastes into energy feedstocks. Waste Manage 56:530–539

  6. 6.

    Yetilmezsoy K, Turkdogan-Aydinol I, Gunay A, Ozis I (2011) Post treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater and appraisal of the economic outcome. Environ Eng Manag J 10(11):1635–1645

  7. 7.

    Ozdemir S, Sezer B (2013) Utilization of poultry litter as organic fertilizer or bio-fuel. J Poult Res 10:20–24

  8. 8.

    Yoon Y, Kim S, Oh S, Kim C (2014) Potential of anaerobic digestion for material recovery and energy production in waste biomass from a poultry slaughterhouse. Waste Manage 34:204–209

  9. 9.

    Kazemi-Bonchenari M, Alizadeh A, Javadi L, Zohrevand M, Odongo NE, Salem AZ (2017) Use of poultry pre-cooked slaughterhouse waste as ruminant feed to prevent environmental pollution. J Clean Prod 145:151–156

  10. 10.

    Sari OF, Ozdemir S, Celebi A (2016) Utilization and management of poultry slaughterhouse wastes with new methods. In: Eurasia 2016 Waste Management Symposium. 02–04 May 2016, Istanbul, Turkey

  11. 11.

    EU (2000) Council Decision 2000/766/EC. Concerning certain protection measures with regard to transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and the feeding of animal protein

  12. 12.

    Ozdemir S, Er A (2018) Investigation of biofuel characteristics of poultry litter and crop residues. Sakarya Univ J Sci 22(2):489–494

  13. 13.

    Seekins W, Hutchinson M, King M, MacDonald G (2015) Pile structure in large animal carcass compost piles: zone differences in physical and chemical characteristics. Compost Sci Util 23(2):67–86

  14. 14.

    European Commission (2013) Amending Annexes I and IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies

  15. 15.

    Regulation (2011) Insan tüketimi amaciyla kullanilmayan hayvansal yan ürünler yönetmeliği. Official Gazette, Issue number 28152 (in Turkish)

  16. 16.

    Regulation European Commission (2009) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels, Belgium

  17. 17.

    Leiva A, Granados-Chinchilla F, Redondo-Solano M, Arrieta-Gonzalez M, Pineda Salazar E, Molina A (2018) Characterization of the animal by-product meal industry in Costa Rica: manufacturing practices through the production chain and food safety. Poult Sci 97:2159–2169

  18. 18.

    Salminen JE, Rintala J (2002) Anaerobic digestion of organic slaughterhouse waste—a review. Bioresour Technol 83(1):13–26

  19. 19.

    Papuc C, Goran GV, Predescu CN, Nicorescu V (2017) Mechanisms of oxidative processes in meat and toxicity induced by postprandial degradation products: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 16(1):96–123

  20. 20.

    Franke-Whittle IH, Insam H (2013) Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: a review. Crit Rev Microbiol 39(2):139–151

  21. 21.

    Farmanesh A, Mohtasebi SS, Omid M (2019) Optimization of rendering process of poultry by-products with batch cooker model monitored by electronic nose. J Environ Manag 235:194–201

  22. 22.

    Budych-Gorzna M, Smoczynski M, Oleskowicz-Popiel P (2016) Enhancement of biogas production at the municipal wastewater treatment plant by co-digestion with poultry industry waste. Appl Energy 161:387–394

  23. 23.

    Latifi P, Karrabi M, Danesh S (2019) Anaerobic co-digestion of poultry slaughterhouse wastes with sewage sludge in batch-mode bioreactors (effect of inoculum-substrate ratio and total solids). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 107:288–296

  24. 24.

    Ware A, Power N (2017) Modelling methane production kinetics of complex poultry slaughterhouse wastes using sigmoidal growth functions. Renew Energy 104:50–59

  25. 25.

    Wang S, Jena U, Das KC (2018) Biomethane production potential of slaughterhouse waste in the United States. Energy Convers Manag 173:143–157

  26. 26.

    Brandelli A, Sala L, Kalil SJ (2015) Microbial enzymes for bioconversion of poultry waste into added-value products. Food Res Int 73:3–12

  27. 27.

    Campos I, Matos E, Marques A, Valente LM (2017) Hydrolyzed feather meal as a partial fishmeal replacement in diets for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) juveniles. Aquaculture 476:152–159

  28. 28.

    Mezes L, Nagy A, Galya B, Tamas J (2015) Poultry feather wastes recycling possibility as soil nutrient. Eurasian J Soil Sci 4(4):244

  29. 29.

    Tesfaye T, Sithole B, Ramjugernath D (2018) Valorisation of chicken feather barbs: utilisation in yarn production and technical textile applications. Sust Chem Pharm 8:38–49

  30. 30.

    Marquez E, Bracho M, Archile A, Rangel L, Benitez B (2005) Proteins, isoleucine, lysine and methionine content of bovine, porcine and poultry blood and their fractions. Food Chem 93(3):503–505

  31. 31.

    Debik E, Coskun T (2009) Use of the Static Granular Bed Reactor (SGBR) with anaerobic sludge to treat poultry slaughterhouse wastewater and kinetic modeling. Bioresour Technol 100:2777–2782

  32. 32.

    Bayar S, Yıldız YŞ, Yılmaz AE, İrdemez Ş (2011) The effect of stirring speed and current density on removal efficiency of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater by electrocoagulation method. Desalination 280(1–3):103–107

  33. 33.

    Regulation (2004) Water pollution control regulation. Official Gazette, Issue number 25687 (in Turkish)

  34. 34.

    Ozdemir S, Ozdemir S, Yetilmezsoy K (2019) Agro-economic and ecological assessment of poultry abattoir sludge as bio-nutrient source for walnut plantation in low-fertility soil. Environ Progr Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13225

  35. 35.

    Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Gurbuz Y, Ozay O (2005) In situ ruminal dry matter and crude protein degradability of plant- and animal-derived protein sources in Southern Turkey. Small Rumin Res 58:135–141

  36. 36.

    Hidalgo D, Martín-Marroquín JM, Corona F (2018) The effect of feed composition on anaerobic co-digestion of animal-processing by-products. J Environ Manag 216:105–110

  37. 37.

    Wang Y, Guo JL, Bureau DP, Cui ZH (2006) Replacement of fish meal by rendered animal protein ingredients in feeds for cuneate drum (Nibea miichthioides). Aquaculture 252(2–4):476–483

  38. 38.

    Vasileva-Tonkova E, Gousterova A, Neshev G (2009) Ecologically safe method for improved feather wastes biodegradation. Int Biodeter Biodegr 63:1008–1012

  39. 39.

    Bertsch A, Coello N (2005) A biotechnological process for treatment and recycling poultry feathers as a feed ingredient. Bioresour Technol 96:1703–1708

  40. 40.

    Lewis MJ, Francis DS, Blyth D, Moyano FJ, Smullen RP, Turchini GM, Booth MA (2019) A comparison of in vivo and in vitro methods for assessing the digestibility of poultry by-product meals using barramundi (lates calcarifer); impacts of cooking temperature and raw material freshness. Aquaculture 498:187–200

  41. 41.

    Yigit M, Erdem M, Koshio S, Ergün S, Türker A, Karaali B (2006) Substituting fish meal with poultry by-product meal in diets for black Sea turbot Psetta maeotica. Aquac Nutr 12(5):340–347

  42. 42.

    Al-Souti A, Gallardo W, Claereboudt M, Mahgoub O (2019) Attractability and palatability of formulated diets incorporated with chicken feather and algal meals for juvenile gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata. Aquac Rep 14:100199

  43. 43.

    Tacon AGJ, Metian M, Hasan MR (2009) Feed ingredients and fertilizers for farmed aquatic animals. Sources and composition. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, 540, FAO, Roma, Italy

  44. 44.

    Khan SH (2018) Recent advances in role of insects as alternative protein source in poultry nutrition. J Appl Anim Res 46:1144–1157

  45. 45.

    Inaoka T, Okubo G, Yokota M, Takemasa M (1999) Nutritive value of house fly larvae and pupae fed on chicken faeces as food source for poultry. J Poult Sci 36(3):174–180

  46. 46.

    Allegretti G, Talamini E, Schmidt V, Bogorni PC, Ortega E (2018) Insect as feed: an energy assessment of insect meal as a sustainable protein source for the Brazilian poultry industry. J Clean Prod 171:403–412

  47. 47.

    Hwangbo J, Hong EC, Jang A, Kang HK, Oh JS, Kim BW, Park BS (2009) Utilization of house fly-maggots, a feed supplement in the production of broiler chickens. J Environ Biol 30(4):609–614

  48. 48.

    Van Huis A, Van Itterbeeck J, Klunder H, Mertens E, Halloran A, Muir G, Vantomme P (2013) Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security (No. 171). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

  49. 49.

    Xu X, Ma Z, Chen Y, Gu X, Liu Q, Wang Y, Sun M, Chang D (2018) Circular economy pattern of livestock manure management in Longyou, China. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:1050–1062

  50. 50.

    Ozdemir S, Yetilmezsoy K, Nuhoglu NN, Dede OH, Turp SM (2018) Effects of poultry abattoir sludge amendment on feedstock composition, energy content, and combustion emissions of giant reed (Arundo donax L.). J King Saud Univ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2018.04.002

  51. 51.

    Sakar S, Yetilmezsoy K, Kocak E (2009) Anaerobic digestion technology in poultry and livestock waste treatment—a literature review. Waste Manage Res 27(1):3–18

  52. 52.

    Yamashiro T, Lateef SA, Ying C, Beneragama N, Lukic M, Masahiro I, Ihara I, Nishida T, Umetsu K (2013) Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy cow manure and high concentrated food processing waste. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 15(4):539–547

  53. 53.

    Thyagarajan D, Barathi M, Sakthivadivu R (2013) Scope of poultry waste utilization. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci 6(5):29–35

  54. 54.

    Lee Y, Oa SW (2016) Resource-recovery processes from animal waste as best available technology. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18(2):201–207

  55. 55.

    Komiyama T, Kobayashi A, Yahagi M (2013) The chemical characteristics of ashes from cattle, swine and poultry manure. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 15(1):106–110

  56. 56.

    Oshita K, Sun X, Kawaguchi K, Shiota K, Takaoka M, Matsukawa K, Fujiwara T (2016) Aqueous leaching of cattle manure incineration ash to produce a phosphate enriched fertilizer. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18(4):608–617

  57. 57.

    Emiroglu AO, Keskin A, Sen M (2018) Experimental investigation of the effects of turkey rendering fat biodiesel on combustion, performance and exhaust emissions of a diesel engine. Fuel 216:266–273

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Saim Ozdemir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozdemir, S., Yetilmezsoy, K. A mini literature review on sustainable management of poultry abattoir wastes. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22, 11–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00934-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Poultry abattoir waste
  • Characterization
  • Sustainable management
  • Value-added products