Advertisement

Use of copper mine tailing in concrete: strength characteristics and durability performance

  • Jamshid EsmaeiliEmail author
  • Hossein Aslani
REGIONAL CASE STUDY
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

The increasing use of copper and its allied materials across many industries is ramping up copper mining activities in many countries, and proper management and disposal of huge volumes of copper mine tailings arising thereof is a huge challenge. Sungun mine is the biggest open-cast copper mine in the northwest of Iran. Approximately 13.7 million tons of copper mine tailing as a solid waste is generated annually as a result of mining and ore processing activities in the region. This study investigates the possibility of utilizing these waste tailings of Sungun as a partial substitute for cement in concrete. Several concrete mixtures were prepared by replacing cement with 0–30% of copper mine tailing. The specimens were tested to determine the mechanical and durability performance of concrete mixtures. Furthermore, the microstructure of concrete mixtures was also evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. Results not only revealed that these solid waste tailings could be used successfully as a partial replacement material for the cement in concretes, but also statistical analysis showed that the mechanical and durability properties of concrete were significantly influenced by copper mine tailing.

Keywords

Copper mine tailing Concrete Waste material Mechanical properties Durability 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Meyer C (2009) The greening of the concrete industry. Cem Concr Compos 31(8):601–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Malhotra VM (2000) Role of supplementary cementing materials in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In: Infrastructure regeneration and rehabilitation improving the quality of life through better construction. International conferenceGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sata V, Jaturapitakkul C, Kiattikomol K (2007) Influence of pozzolan from various by-product materials on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 21(7):1589–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Valipour M, Pargar F, Shekarchi M, Khani S (2013) Comparing a natural pozzolan, zeolite, to metakaolin and silica fume in terms of their effect on the durability characteristics of concrete: a laboratory study. Constr Build Mater 41:879–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramezanianpour A, Karein SM, Vosoughi V, Isapour S, Moodi F (2014) Effects of calcined perlite powder as a SCM on the strength and permeability of concrete. Constr Build Mater 66:222–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murari K, Siddique R, Jain K (2015) Use of waste copper slag, a sustainable material. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 17(1):13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siddique R (2014) Utilization (recycling) of iron and steel industry by-product (GGBS) in concrete: strength and durability properties. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 16:460–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geological Survey US (2018) Mineral commodity summaries, 2018. Government Printing Office, p 200 p.  https://doi.org/10.3133/70194932
  9. 9.
    Gordon RB (2002) Production residues in copper technological cycles. Resour Conserv Recycl 36(2):87–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00019-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee MR, Correa JA (2005) Effects of copper mine tailings disposal on littoral meiofaunal assemblages in the Atacama region of northern Chile. Mar Environ Res 59(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pandey PK, Sharma R, Roy M, Pandey M (2007) Toxic mine drainage from Asia’s biggest copper mine at Malanjkhand, India. Environ Geochem Health 29(3):237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shahabpour J, Doorandish M (2008) Mine drainage water from the Sar Cheshmeh porphyry copper mine, Kerman, IR Iran. Environ Monit Assess 141(1–3):105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nasrabadi T, Bidhendi GRN, Karbassi AR, Hoveidi I, Nasarbadi I, Pezeshk H, Rashidnegad F (2009) Influence of Sungun copper mine on groundwater quality, NW Iran. Environ Geol 58(4):693–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomas BS, Damare A, Gupta R (2013) Strength and durability characteristics of copper tailing concrete. Constr Build Mater 48:894–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ahmari S, Zhang L (2012) Production of eco-friendly bricks from copper mine tailings through geopolymerization. Constr Build Mater 29:323–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Onuaguluchi O, Eren Ö (2012) Durability-related properties of mortar and concrete containing copper tailings as a cement replacement material. Mag Concr Res 64(11):1015–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Onuaguluchi O, Eren Ö (2012) Rheology, strength and durability properties of mortars containing copper tailings as a cement replacement material. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 17(1):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Onuaguluchi O, Eren Ö (2016) Reusing copper tailings in concrete: corrosion performance and socioeconomic implications for the Lefke-Xeros area of Cyprus. J Cleaner Prod 112:420–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fang Y, Gu Y, Kang Q, Wen Q, Dai P (2011) Utilization of copper tailing for autoclaved sand–lime brick. Constr Build Mater 25(2):867–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang X, Ni W, Cur W, Wang Z, Zhu L (2012) Preparation of autoclaved aerated concrete using copper tailings and blast furnace slag. Constr Build Mater 27(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    ASTM (2005) C618-05, Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/C618-05 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vargas F, Lopez M (2018) Development of a new supplementary cementitious material from the activation of copper tailings: Mechanical performance and analysis of factors. J Cleaner Prod 182:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ASTM (2017) C150/C150M-17, Standard Specification for Portland cement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/C150-17 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    ASTM (2016) C188-16, standard test method for density of hydraulic cement. International ASTM, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/C188-16 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    ASTM (2016) C204-16, Standard Test Methods for Fineness of Hydraulic Cement by Air Permeability Apparatus. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/C204-16 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    BS EN 12390-3 (2009) Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens. BSI, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    ASTM (2017) C496/C496M-17, Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens Annu B ASTM Stand.  https://doi.org/10.1520/C469-17 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    ASTM (2014) C469/C469M-14, Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poissons ratio of concrete in compression. Annu B ASTM Stand.  https://doi.org/10.1520/C469-14 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    BS EN 12390-8 (2012) Testing hardened concrete. Depth of penetration of water under pressure. BSI, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    ASTM (2013) C642-13, Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete Annu B ASTM Stand.  https://doi.org/10.1520/C642-13 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Build NT 492 (1999) Concrete, mortar and cement-based repair materials: chloride migration coefficient from non-steady-state migration experiments. Nordtest Method 492Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ramezanianpour AA, Pilvar A, Mahdikhani M, Moodi F (2011) Practical evaluation of relationship between concrete resistivity, water penetration, rapid chloride penetration and compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 25(5):2472–2479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luther MD, Hansen W (1989) Comparison of creep and shrinkage of high-strength silica fume concretes with fly ash concretes of similar strengths. Special Publication 114:573–592Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Martys NS, Ferraris CF (1997) Capillary transport in mortars and concrete. Cem Concr Res 27(5):747–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shekarchi M, Bonakdar A, Bakhshi M, Mirdamadi A, Mobasher B (2010) Transport properties in metakaolin blended concrete. Constr Build Mater 24(11):2217–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Poon CS, Kou S, Lam L (2006) Compressive strength, chloride diffusivity and pore structure of high performance metakaolin and silica fume concrete. Constr Build Mater 20(10):858–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shannag M (2000) High strength concrete containing natural pozzolan and silica fume. Cem Concr Compos 22(6):399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nilsson L, Hgo MH, GjQrv OE (1998) High-performance repair materials for concrete structures in the port of Gothenburg. In: Second international conference on concrete under severe conditions: environment and loading, vol 2. pp 1193–1198Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Teng S, Lim TYD, Divsholi BS (2013) Durability and mechanical properties of high strength concrete incorporating ultra fine ground granulated blast-furnace slag. Constr Build Mater 40:875–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sadrmomtazi A, Tahmouresi B, Kohani KR (2017) Effect of fly ash and silica fume on transition zone, pore structure and permeability of concrete. Mag Concr Res 70(10):519–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations