Properties and potential use of biochars from residues of two rice varieties, Japanese Koshihikari and Vietnamese IR50404
- 30 Downloads
Converting rice straw or rice husk into biochars is one of the most effective ways to reuse them. This study examined the effect of rice variety and pyrolysis temperature on the properties of biochars, produced from rice straw and rice husk of Koshihikari (a typical rice variety of Japan) and IR50404 (a typical rice variety of Vietnam), in the temperature range from 300 to 800 °C. Biochars produced at high pyrolysis temperatures (> 500 °C) showed higher surface area (approximately 3 times) and higher Si content (by more than 15%), but lower H/C and O/C ratios in comparison with biochars produced at lower temperature. With regard to rice variety, Japanese Koshihikari biochars possessed higher Si content (almost 20%), but lower specific surface area and O/C and H/C ratios than Vietnamese IR50404 rice residue biochars. The surface area of Vietnamese-rice-straw biochars at 600 and 700 °C was ~ 30% more than Japanese-rice-straw biochars, while the surface area of Vietnamese-rice-husk biochars was slightly more than that of Japanese-rice-husk biochars. Higher Si content in Japanese Koshihikari biochars was predicted as one of the main reasons for the lower surface area in their biochars, due to the higher possibility of pore-filling or blocking by silica.
KeywordsBiochar Physicochemical properties Japanese Koshihikari Vietnamese IR50404 Rice variety
The authors would like to acknowledge Prof. Yasuhiro Shimizu and Dr. Hiroshi Asakura at Nagasaki University for their technical and equipment support in BET measurement and proximate analysis.
This work was supported in part by The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT).
- 1.World Rice Production (2017) World Rice Production 2017/2018. https://www.worldriceproduction.com/. Accessed 20 Oct 2015
- 3.Agency NL (2012) Biomass business opportunities Viet Nam. Netherlands Programmes Sustainable BiomassGoogle Scholar
- 4.Verheijen F, Jeffery S, Bastos A, Van Der Velde M, Diafas I (2010) Biochar application to soils—a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties. Processes and functions, European Commission Joint Research Centre for scientific and Technical reports, pp 51–68Google Scholar
- 5.Ścisłowska M, Włodarczyk R, Kobyłecki R, Bis Z (2015) Biochar to improve the quality and productivity of soils. J Ecol Eng 16:3Google Scholar
- 10.JiangZhou L, QingZhong Z, YiLai L, LiMeng Z, ZhangLiu D, XingRen L, YiDing W (2015) Effects of biochar addition on nutrient leaching loss of typical tobacco-planting soils in Yunnan Province, China. J Agric Resour Environ 32(1):48–53Google Scholar
- 19.Zhang Y, Ma Z, Zhang Q, Wang J, Ma Q, Yang Y, Luo X, Zhang W (2017) Comparison of the physicochemical characteristics of Bio-char pyrolyzed from Moso bamboo and rice husk with different pyrolysis temperatures. BioResources 12(3):4652–4669Google Scholar
- 20.Standards TAPPI (2002) Acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp T 222 om-02. Atlanta, USAGoogle Scholar
- 21.Wise LE, Murphy M, D’addieco AA (1946) Chlorite holocellulose, its fractionation and bearing on summative wood analysis and studies on the hemicelluloses. Pap Trade J 122(2):35–43Google Scholar
- 28.Capareda S (2013) Introduction to biomass energy conversions. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- 31.Mukome FN, Parikh SJ (2015) Chemical, physical, and surface characterization of biochar. In: Ok YS, Uchimiya SM, Chang SX, Bolan N (eds) Biochar: production, characterization, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 68–96Google Scholar
- 32.Chia CH, Downie A, Munroe P (2015) Characteristics of biochar: physical and structural properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 89–110Google Scholar
- 33.Lopez-Capel E, Zwart K, Shackley S, Postma R, Stenstrom J, Rasse DP, Budai A, Glaser B (2016) Biochar properties. In: Shackley S, Ruysschaert G, Zwart K, Glaser B (eds) Biochar in European soils and agriculture: science and practice. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 41–72Google Scholar
- 36.Parikh SJ, Goyne KW, Margenot AJ, Mukome FN, Calderón FJ (2014) Soil chemical insights provided through vibrational spectroscopy. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol 126. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–148Google Scholar
- 40.Jaafar NM (2014) Biochar as a habitat for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In: Johnson NC, Gehring C, Jansa J (eds) Mycorrhizal fungi: use in sustainable agriculture and land restoration. Springer, Berlin, pp 297–311Google Scholar
- 41.Koide RT (2016) Biochar-arbuscular mycorrhiza interaction in temperate soils. In: Johnson NC, Gehring C, Jansa J (eds) Mycorrhizal mediation of soil: fertility, structure, and carbon storage. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 461–478Google Scholar
- 51.Thangarajan R, Bolan N, Mandal S, Kunhikrishnan A, Choppala G, Karunanithi R, Qi F (2015) Biochar for inorganic contaminant management in soil. In: Ok YS, Uchimiya SM, Chang SX, Bolan N (eds.) Biochar: production, characterization, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 100–139Google Scholar