Properties and potential use of biochars from residues of two rice varieties, Japanese Koshihikari and Vietnamese IR50404

  • Phuong T. M. Do
  • Taro Ueda
  • Ryota Kose
  • Loc X. Nguyen
  • Takayuki Okayama
  • Takayuki MiyanishiEmail author


Converting rice straw or rice husk into biochars is one of the most effective ways to reuse them. This study examined the effect of rice variety and pyrolysis temperature on the properties of biochars, produced from rice straw and rice husk of Koshihikari (a typical rice variety of Japan) and IR50404 (a typical rice variety of Vietnam), in the temperature range from 300 to 800 °C. Biochars produced at high pyrolysis temperatures (> 500 °C) showed higher surface area (approximately 3 times) and higher Si content (by more than 15%), but lower H/C and O/C ratios in comparison with biochars produced at lower temperature. With regard to rice variety, Japanese Koshihikari biochars possessed higher Si content (almost 20%), but lower specific surface area and O/C and H/C ratios than Vietnamese IR50404 rice residue biochars. The surface area of Vietnamese-rice-straw biochars at 600 and 700 °C was ~ 30% more than Japanese-rice-straw biochars, while the surface area of Vietnamese-rice-husk biochars was slightly more than that of Japanese-rice-husk biochars. Higher Si content in Japanese Koshihikari biochars was predicted as one of the main reasons for the lower surface area in their biochars, due to the higher possibility of pore-filling or blocking by silica.


Biochar Physicochemical properties Japanese Koshihikari Vietnamese IR50404 Rice variety 



The authors would like to acknowledge Prof. Yasuhiro Shimizu and Dr. Hiroshi Asakura at Nagasaki University for their technical and equipment support in BET measurement and proximate analysis.


This work was supported in part by The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT).

Supplementary material

10163_2018_768_MOESM1_ESM.doc (341 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 341 KB)


  1. 1.
    World Rice Production (2017) World Rice Production 2017/2018. Accessed 20 Oct 2015
  2. 2.
    Matsumura Y, Minowa T, Yamamoto H (2005) Amount, availability, and potential use of rice straw (agricultural residue) biomass as an energy resource in Japan. Biomass Bioenerg 29(5):347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agency NL (2012) Biomass business opportunities Viet Nam. Netherlands Programmes Sustainable BiomassGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verheijen F, Jeffery S, Bastos A, Van Der Velde M, Diafas I (2010) Biochar application to soils—a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties. Processes and functions, European Commission Joint Research Centre for scientific and Technical reports, pp 51–68Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ścisłowska M, Włodarczyk R, Kobyłecki R, Bis Z (2015) Biochar to improve the quality and productivity of soils. J Ecol Eng 16:3Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brockhoff SR, Christians NE, Killorn RJ, Horton R, Davis DD (2010) Physical and mineral-nutrition properties of sand-based turfgrass root zones amended with biochar. Agron J 102(6):1627–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Basso AS, Miguez FE, Laird DA, Horton R, Westgate M (2013) Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water-holding capacity of sandy soils. Gcb Bioenergy 5(2):132–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Warnock DD, Lehmann J, Kuyper TW, Rillig MC (2007) Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil—concepts and mechanisms. Plant soil 300(1–2):9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saito M, Marumoto T (2002) Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: the status quo in Japan and the future prospects. Plant Soil 244:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    JiangZhou L, QingZhong Z, YiLai L, LiMeng Z, ZhangLiu D, XingRen L, YiDing W (2015) Effects of biochar addition on nutrient leaching loss of typical tobacco-planting soils in Yunnan Province, China. J Agric Resour Environ 32(1):48–53Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Riha SJ, Lehmann J (2012) Nutrient leaching in a Colombian savanna Oxisol amended with biochar. J Environ Qual 41(4):1076–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang X, Wang H, He L, Lu K, Sarmah A, Li J, Bolan NS, Pei J, Huang H (2013) Using biochar for remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(12):8472–8483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Denyes MJ, Langlois VS, Rutter A, Zeeb BA (2012) The use of biochar to reduce soil PCB bioavailability to Cucurbita pepo and Eisenia fetida. Sci Total Environ 437:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lorenz K, Lal R (2014) Biochar application to soil for climate change mitigation by soil organic carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177(5):651–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun 1:56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu W, Yang M, Feng Q, McGrouther K, Wang H, Lu H, Chen Y (2012) Chemical characterization of rice straw-derived biochar for soil amendment. Biomass Bioenergy 47:268–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peng X, Ye L, Wang C, Zhou H, Sun B (2011) Temperature-and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Tillage Res 112(2):159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiang J, Yongbo P, Min Y, Zhineng H, Dejian W, Renkou X (2015) Rice straw-derived biochar properties and functions as Cu(II) and Cyromazine Sorbents as influenced by pyrolysis temperature. Pedosphere 25(5):781–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang Y, Ma Z, Zhang Q, Wang J, Ma Q, Yang Y, Luo X, Zhang W (2017) Comparison of the physicochemical characteristics of Bio-char pyrolyzed from Moso bamboo and rice husk with different pyrolysis temperatures. BioResources 12(3):4652–4669Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Standards TAPPI (2002) Acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp T 222 om-02. Atlanta, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wise LE, Murphy M, D’addieco AA (1946) Chlorite holocellulose, its fractionation and bearing on summative wood analysis and studies on the hemicelluloses. Pap Trade J 122(2):35–43Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ronsse F, Van Hecke S, Dickinson D, Prins W (2013) Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions. GCB Bioenergy 5(2):104–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Demirbas A (2009) Biofuels securing the planet’s future energy needs. Energy Convers Manag 50(9):2239–2249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    de Wild P, Reith H, Heeres E (2011) Biomass pyrolysis for chemicals. Biofuels 2(2):185–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Sonoki T (2014) Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences 11(23):6613–6621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang Y, Hu Y, Zhao X, Wang S, Xing G (2013) Comparisons of biochar properties from wood material and crop residues at different temperatures and residence times. Energy Fuels 27(10):5890–5899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Prins MJ, Ptasinski KJ, Janssen FJ (2006) Torrefaction of wood: Part 1. Weight loss kinetics. J Anal Appl Pyrol 77(1):28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Capareda S (2013) Introduction to biomass energy conversions. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen B, Zhou D, Zhu L (2008) Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 42(14):5137–5143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lua AC, Yang T, Guo J (2004) Effects of pyrolysis conditions on the properties of activated carbons prepared from pistachio-nut shells. J Anal Appl Pyrol 72(2):279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mukome FN, Parikh SJ (2015) Chemical, physical, and surface characterization of biochar. In: Ok YS, Uchimiya SM, Chang SX, Bolan N (eds) Biochar: production, characterization, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 68–96Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chia CH, Downie A, Munroe P (2015) Characteristics of biochar: physical and structural properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 89–110Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lopez-Capel E, Zwart K, Shackley S, Postma R, Stenstrom J, Rasse DP, Budai A, Glaser B (2016) Biochar properties. In: Shackley S, Ruysschaert G, Zwart K, Glaser B (eds) Biochar in European soils and agriculture: science and practice. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 41–72Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Song W, Guo M (2012) Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. J Anal Appl Pyrol 94:138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schimmelpfennig S, Glaser B (2012) One step forward toward characterization: some important material properties to distinguish biochars. J Environ Qual 41(4):1001–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Parikh SJ, Goyne KW, Margenot AJ, Mukome FN, Calderón FJ (2014) Soil chemical insights provided through vibrational spectroscopy. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol 126. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–148Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xiao X, Chen B, Zhu L (2014) Transformation, morphology, and dissolution of silicon and carbon in rice straw-derived biochars under different pyrolytic temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 48(6):3411–3419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Guo J, Chen B (2014) Insights on the molecular mechanism for the recalcitrance of biochars: interactive effects of carbon and silicon components. Environ Sci Technol 48(16):9103–9112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mukome FN, Kilcoyne AL, Parikh SJ (2014) Alteration of biochar carbon chemistry during soil incubations: SR-FTIR and NEXAFS investigation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78(5):1632–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jaafar NM (2014) Biochar as a habitat for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In: Johnson NC, Gehring C, Jansa J (eds) Mycorrhizal fungi: use in sustainable agriculture and land restoration. Springer, Berlin, pp 297–311Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Koide RT (2016) Biochar-arbuscular mycorrhiza interaction in temperate soils. In: Johnson NC, Gehring C, Jansa J (eds) Mycorrhizal mediation of soil: fertility, structure, and carbon storage. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 461–478Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Inoue Y, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Res 111(1):81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal-a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35(4):219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chen B, Yuan M (2011) Enhanced sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by soil amended with biochar. J Soils Sedim 11(1):62–71MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yu X-Y, Ying G-G, Kookana RS (2006) Sorption and desorption behaviors of diuron in soils amended with charcoal. J Agric Food Chem 54(22):8545–8550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Melo LC, Coscione AR, Abreu CA, Puga AP, Camargo OA (2013) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on cadmium and zinc sorption capacity of sugar cane straw—derived biochar. BioResources 8(4):4992–5004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nguyen TH, Cho H-H, Poster DL, Ball WP (2007) Evidence for a pore-filling mechanism in the adsorption of aromatic hydrocarbons to a natural wood char. Environ Sci Technol 41(4):1212–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ma JF (2003) Functions of silicon in higher plants. In: Müller WEG (ed) Silicon biomineralization: biology–biochemistry–molecular biology–biotechnology, vol 33. Springer, Berlin, pp 127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Koyama S, Katagiri T, Minamikawa K, Kato M, Hayashi H (2016) Effects of rice husk charcoal application on rice yield, methane emission, and soil carbon sequestration in andosol paddy soil. Jpn Agric Res Q 50(4):319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Koyama S, Hayashi H (2017) Rice yield and soil carbon dynamics over three years of applying rice husk charcoal to an Andosol paddy field. Plant Prod Sci 20(2):176–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Thangarajan R, Bolan N, Mandal S, Kunhikrishnan A, Choppala G, Karunanithi R, Qi F (2015) Biochar for inorganic contaminant management in soil. In: Ok YS, Uchimiya SM, Chang SX, Bolan N (eds.) Biochar: production, characterization, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 100–139Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Spokas KA (2010) Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios. Carbon Manag 1(2):289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental SciencesNagasaki UniversityNagasakiJapan
  2. 2.College of the Environment and Natural ResourcesCan Tho UniversityCan ThoVietnam
  3. 3.Graduate School of EngineeringNagasaki UniversityNagasakiJapan
  4. 4.Institute of AgricultureTokyo University of Agriculture and TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations