Advertisement

Waste shipments for energy recovery as a waste treatment strategy for small islands: the case of Kinmen, Taiwan

  • Hsin-Tien LinEmail author
  • Eiji Yamasue
  • Keiichi N. Ishihara
  • Hideyuki Okumura
SPECIAL FEATURE: ORIGINAL ARTICLE The 4th International Conference on Final Sinks (4th ICFS 2017)
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

Waste management is more challenging in small islands due to islands’ special characteristics. For small islands where energy recovery by incineration is difficult due to smaller waste generation amount with large seasonal fluctuations, waste shipments outside of island can make energy recovery possible. This study evaluated the cost effectiveness and environmental performance of waste shipments for energy recovery in case of small islands. The results shown that the direct shipment for incineration is expensive, but the emission prevention by energy recovery can surpass the emission from waste transportation. Waste shipments in the form of refused derived fuel (RDF) can reduce the transportation and incineration cost, but the high fossil fuel consumption in RDF production process resulted in high greenhouse gas emissions. The shipping distance, RDF gate fee, and emission from RDF production process have high influence on the cost effectiveness and environmental performance of the waste treatment process. The results of this study revealed the cost effective and environmental beneficial choosing criteria of waste shipments’ destination.

Keywords

Waste shipments Refused derived fuel Small islands Cost-effective analysis Greenhouse gas emissions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the corporation of Kinmen Environmental Protection Bureau for kindly providing the information required in this study, and especially, to Mr. Ding-Yu Tsai, and Mr. Yu-Yi Li, who provided the invaluable data for this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Eckelman MJ, Ashton W, Arakaki Y et al (2014) Island waste management systems: statistics, challenges, and opportunities for applied industrial ecology. J Ind Ecol 18:306–317.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sealey KS, Smith J (2014) Recycling for small island tourism developments: food waste composting at Sandals Emerald Bay, Exuma, Bahamas. Resour Conserv Recycl 92:25–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mateu-Sbert J, Ricci-Cabello I, Villalonga-Olives E, Cabeza-Irigoyen E (2013) The impact of tourism on municipal solid waste generation: the case of Menorca Island (Spain). Waste Manag 33:2589–2593.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saito O (2013) Resource use and waste generation by the tourism industry on the big island of Hawaii. J Ind Ecol 17:578–589.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mohee R, Mauthoor S, Bundhoo ZMA et al (2015) Current status of solid waste management in small island developing states: a review. Waste Manag 43:539–549.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission (2002) WTE-ISLE waste management in Island communities. 5th Framework Programme of the European Commission, DG-TRENGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chung S-S, Poon C-S (1997) Quantifying externalities in solid waste management in Hong Kong. J Environ Eng 123:282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bai R, Sutanto M (2002) The practice and challenges of solid waste management in Singapore. Waste Manag 22:557–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miranda ML, Hale B (2005) Paradise recovered: energy production and waste management in island environments. Energy Policy 33:1691–1702.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fallah SF, Vahidi H, Pazoki M et al (2013) Investigation of solid waste disposal alternatives in Lavan Island using life cycle assessment approach. Int J Environ Res 7:155–164Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zsigraiová Z, Tavares G, Semiao V, Carvalho M de G (2009) Integrated waste-to-energy conversion and waste transportation within island communities. Energy 34:623–635.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Basel Convention Home Page (1995) http://www.basel.int/. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
  13. 13.
    Jofra Sora M, Puig Ventosa I (2013) Incineration overcapacity and waste shipping in Europe: the end of the proximity principle?. http://www.no-burn.org/incineration-overcapacity-and-waste-shipping-in-europe-the-end-of-the-proximity-principle/. Accessed 13 Nov 2017
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Market CW (2015) 2015 Briefing report: RDF exports: here for good? A report into the combustible waste market in Europe. http://www.tolvik.com/wp-content/uploads/2015-Tolvik-RDF-Exports-Final.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
  16. 16.
    Chen MC, Ruijs A, Wesseler J (2005) Solid waste management on small islands: the case of Green Island, Taiwan. Resour Conserv Recycl 45:31–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pariatamby A, Tanaka M (2013) Municipal solid waste management in Asia and the Pacific Islands, challenges and strategic solutions, 1st edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Environment Resource Database, Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan, ROC (Taiwan). https://erdb.epa.gov.tw/ENG/. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  19. 19.
    Green DW, Perry RH (2008) Capital cost estimation. Perry’s chemical engineers. Handbook, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Industrial Technology Research Institute (2006) Application and promotion of refuse derived fuel. Industrial Technology Research Institute, ZhudongGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martinez-Sanchez V, Kromann MA, Astrup TF (2015) Life cycle costing of waste management systems: overview, calculation principles and case studies. Waste Manag 36:343–355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Central Bank of the Republic of China (Taiwan) (2016). https://www.cbc.gov.tw/mp2.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  23. 23.
    Matsuto T, Tanaka N, Kim Y (1996) Energy, cost, and environmental impact analysis of five RDF production facilities. J Jpn Soc Waste Manag Expert 7:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carbon Footprint Calculation Platform. Environmental Protection Administration (EPA), R.O.C. https://cfp-calculate.tw/eng/WebPage/LoginPage.aspx. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  25. 25.
    Monden Y (2012) Management of an inter-firm network. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Guideline for calculating CO2 emission in transportation branch. http://www.greenpartnership.jp/co2brochure.pdf (in Japanese)
  27. 27.
    MarineTraffic: global ship tracking intelligence|AIS marine traffic. https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/voyage-planner. Accessed 29 Jan 2018
  28. 28.
    Guendehou GHS, Koch M, Hockstad L et al (2006) Incineration and open burning of waste. In: 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, vol 5. WAS-01, Waste, pp 1–26. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/5_Volume5/V5_5_Ch5_IOB.pdf Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Incineration operation management and information system, Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan, ROC (Taiwan). https://swims.epa.gov.tw/swims/swims_net/index.aspx. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  30. 30.
    Wada Y, Miura H, Nakano K (1996) Quantitative evaluation method of environmental impact of recycling and refuse disposal for life-cycle assessment. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng 1996:155–165Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Word Bank (1999) Municipal solid waste incineration. World Bank Technical Guidance ReportGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    EPA (2014) Emission factors for greenhouse gas inventories. US EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership, pp 1–5. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/emission-factors_2014.pdf
  33. 33.
    Yi S, Jang YC (2016) Life cycle assessment of solid refuse fuel production from MSW in Korea. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0541-9 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yu J-S, Yasuda Y (1999) Is an RDF system with energy recovery available? Evaluation of environmental impact and social cost-benefit analysis of total process. J Jpn Soc Waste Manag Expert 10:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yamanari M, Shimada S (2007) Life cycle assessment of RDF power generation in Northern Ishikawa Prefecture. J Jpn Soc Waste Manag Expert 18:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Energy ScienceKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Science and EngineeringRitsumeikan UniversityKusatsuJapan

Personalised recommendations