Advertisement

Effect of Middle-Ear Pathology on High-Frequency Ear Canal Reflectance Measurements in the Frequency and Time Domains

  • Gabrielle R. MerchantEmail author
  • Jonathan H. Siegel
  • Stephen T. Neely
  • John J. Rosowski
  • Hideko H. Nakajima
Research Article
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of middle-ear pathology on wideband acoustic immittance and reflectance at frequencies above 6–8 kHz have not been documented, nor has the effect of such pathologies on the time-domain reflectance. We describe an approach that utilizes sound frequencies as high as 20 kHz and quantifies reflectance in both the frequency and time domains. Experiments were performed with fresh normal human temporal bones before and after simulating various middle-ear pathologies, including malleus fixation, stapes fixation, and disarticulation. In addition to experimental data, computational modeling was used to obtain fitted parameter values of middle-ear elements that vary systematically due to the simulated pathologies and thus may have diagnostic implications. Our results demonstrate that the time-domain reflectance, which requires acoustic measurements at high frequencies, varies with middle-ear condition. Furthermore, the extended bandwidth frequency-domain reflectance data was used to estimate parameters in a simple model of the ear canal and middle ear that separates three major conductive pathologies from each other and from the normal state.

Keywords

conductive hearing loss power reflectance time-domain reflectance wideband acoustic immittance middle-ear pathology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is dedicated to the memory of our friend and colleague Saumil N. Merchant MD. The authors thank Mike E. Ravicz who provided software to aid in the administration and analysis of velocity measurements and Daniel M. Rasetshwane for discussions surrounding data analysis and interpretation of time-domain reflectance. We also thank Diane Jones who enabled our ability to experiment on fresh human temporal bones and Salwa Masud for assistance in ear canal diameter measurements.

Funding Information

This work was supported by NIH Grants R01 DC004798, R01 DC008318, and a donation from Mr. Lakshmi Mittal.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allen JB (1986) Measurements of eardrum acoustic impedance. In: Allen JB, Hall JH, Hubbard AE, Neely ST, Tubis A (eds) Peripheral auditory mechanisms. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen J, Jeng P, Levitt H (2005) Evaluation of human middle ear function via an acoustic power assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev 42:63–78PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Brass D, Locke A (1997) The effect of the evanescent wave upon acoustic measurements in the human ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am 101:2164–2175PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. de La Rochefoucauld O, Kachroo P, Olson ES (2010) Ossicular motion related to middle ear transmission delay in gerbil. Hear Res 270(1):158–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dong W, Varavva P, Olson ES (2013) Sound transmission along the ossicular chain in common wild-type laboratory mice. Hear Res 301:27–34PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Farmer-Fedor BL, Rabbitt RD (2002) Acoustic intensity, impedance and reflection coefficient in the human ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am 112:600–620PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Feeney MP, Grant IL, Marryott LP (2003) Wideband energy reflectance in adults with middle-ear disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res 46:901–911PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Feeney MP, Grant IL, Mills DM (2009) Wideband energy reflectance measurements of ossicular chain discontinuity and repair in human temporal bone. Ear Hear 30:391–400PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Feeney MP, Hunter LL, Kei J, Lilly DJ, Margolis RH, Nakajima HH, Neely ST, Prieve BA, Rosowski JJ, Sanford CA, Schairer KS (2013) Consensus statement: Eriksholm workshop on wideband absorbance measures of the middle ear. Ear Hear 34:78s–79sPubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Fowler CG, Shanks JE (2002) Tympanometry. In: Katz J, Burkard RF, Medwetsky L (eds) Handbook of clinical audiology, 5th edn, pp 175–204Google Scholar
  11. Gouws N, Swanepoel DW, De Jager LB (2017) Wideband acoustic immittance for assessing middle ear functioning for preterm neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit. S Afr J Commun Disord 64(1):1–11Google Scholar
  12. Harford E (1980) Tympanometry. In: Jerger J, Northern J (eds) Clinical impedance audiometry, 2nd edn. American Electromedics Corp, Acton, pp 40–64Google Scholar
  13. Huang GT, Rosowski JJ, Puria S, Peake WT (2000) Test of some common assumptions of ear-canal acoustics in cats. J Acoust Soc Am 108:1147–1161PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Hudde H (1983) Measurement of the eardrum impedance of human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 73:242–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunter LL, Bagger-Sjöbäck D, Lundberg M (2008) Wideband reflectance associated with otitis media in infants and children with cleft palate. Int J Audiol 47:S57–S61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hunter LL, Feeney MP, Miller JAL, Jeng PS, Bohning S (2010) Wideband reflectance in newborns: normative regions and relationship to hearing screening results. Ear Hear 31(5):599–610PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Keefe DH, Bulen JC, Arehart KH, Burns EM (1993) Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 94:2617–2638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis JD, Neely ST (2015) Non-invasive estimation of middle-ear input impedance and efficiency. J Acoust Soc Am 38:977–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Margolis RH, Osguthorpe JD, Popelka GR (1978) The effects of experimentally-produced middle ear lesions on tympanometry in cats. Acta Otolaryngol 86:428–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Masud SF, Raufer S, Neely ST, Nakajima HH (2018) The effect of middle ear cavity and superior canal dehiscence on wideband acoustic immittance in fresh human cadaveric specimens. AIP Conf Proc 1965(1):050003-1:8Google Scholar
  21. Merchant SN, Ravicz ME, Voss SE, Peake WT, Rosowski JJ (1998) Middle-ear mechanics in normal, diseased and reconstructed ears. J Laryngol Otol 112:715–731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merchant GR, Roosli C, Niesten MF, Hamade MA, Lee DJ, McKinnon ML, Ulku CH, Roswoski JJ, Merchant SN, Nakajima HH (2015) Power reflectance as a screening tool for the diagnosis of superior Semicircular Canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol 36:172–177PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Merchant GR, Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ, Nakajima HH (2016) Controlled exploration of the effects of conductive hearing loss on wideband acoustic immittance in human cadaveric preparations. Hear Res 341:19–30PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakajima HH, Ravicz ME, Merchant SN, Peake WT, Rosowski J (2005) Experimental ossicular fixations and the middle ear’s response to sound: evidence for a flexible ossicular chain. Hear Res 204:60–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakajima HH, Pisano DV, Roosli C, Hamade MA, Merchant GR, Mafoud L, Halpin CF, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN (2012) Comparison of ear canal reflectance and umbo velocity in patients with conductive hearing loss. Ear Hear 33:35–43PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakajima HH, Rosowski JJ, Shahnaz N, Voss SE (2013) Assessment of ear disorders using power reflectance. Ear Hear 34:48s–53sPubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olson ES (1998) Observing middle and inner ear mechanics with novel intracochlear pressure sensors. J Acoust Soc Am 103:3445–3463PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Prieve BA, Feeney MP, Stenfelt S, Shahnaz N (2013) Prediction of conductive hearing loss using wideband acoustic immittance. Ear Hear 34:54s–59sPubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Puria S (2003) Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 113:2773–2789PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Rasetshwane DM, Neely ST (2011) Inverse solution of ear-canal area function from reflectance. J Acoust Soc Am 130:3873–3881PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ravicz ME, Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ (2000) Effect of freezing and thawing on stapes-cochlear input impedance in human temporal bones. Hear Res 150:215–224PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosowski JJ, Davis PJ, Merchant SN, Donahue KM, Coltrera MD (1990) Cadaver middle ears as models for living ears: comparisons of middle ear input impedance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99:403–412PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosowski JJ, Chien W, Ravicz ME, Merchant SN (2007) Testing a method for quantifying the output of implantable middle ear hearing devices. Audiol Neurotol 12:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosowski JJ, Nakajima HH, Merchant SN (2008) Clinical utility of laser-doppler vibrometer measurements in live normal and pathologic human ears. Ear Hear 29:3–19PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosowski JJ, Nakajima HH, Hamade MA, Mafoud L, Merchant GR, Halpin CF, Merchant SN (2012) Ear canal reflectance, umbo velocity and tympanometry in normal hearing adults. Ear Hear 33:19–34PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scheperle RA, Neely ST, Kopun JG, Gorga MP (2008) Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability. J Acoust Soc Am 124:288–300PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scheperle RA, Goodman SS, Neely ST (2011) Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration. J Acoust Soc Am 130:882–3892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shahnaz N, Bork K, Polka L, Longridge N, Bell D, Westerberg BD (2009a) Energy reflectance and tympanometry in normal and otosclerotic ears. Ear Hear 30:219–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shahnaz N, Longridge N, Bell D (2009b) Wideband energy reflectance patterns in preoperative and post-operative otosclerotic ears. Int J Audiol 48(5):240–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Siegel JH (1995) Cross-talk in otoacoustic emission probes. Ear Hear 16:150–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stepp CE, Voss SE (2005) Acoustics of the human middle-ear air space. J Acoust Soc Am 118:861–871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stinson MR (1990) Revision of estimates of acoustic energy reflectance at the human eardrum. J Acoust Soc Am 88:1773–1778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stinson MR, Lawton BW (1989) Specification of the geometry of the human ear canal for the prediction of sound-pressure level distribution. J Acoust Soc Am 85:2492–2503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tonndorf J, Pastaci H (1986) Middle ear sound transmission: a field of early interest to merle Lawrence. Am J Otolaryngol 7:120–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Voss SE, Allen J (1994) Measurement of acoustic impedance and reflectance in the human ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am 95:372–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Voss SE, Horton NJ, Woodbury RR, Sheffield KN (2008) Sources of variability in reflectance measurements on normal cadaver ears. Ear Hear 29:651–665PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Voss SE, Merchant GR, Horton NJ (2012) Effects of middle-ear disorders on power reflectance measured in cadaveric ear canals. Ear Hear 33:195–208PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zwislocki J (1962) Analysis of the middle-ear function. 1. Input impedance. J Acoust Soc Am 34:1514–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zwislocki J, Feldman AS (1970) Acoustic impedance in pathologic ears, vol 15. American Speech and Hearing Association Monograph, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Speech and Hearing Bioscience and TechnologyHarvard Division of Medical Sciences (formerly the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology)CambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Eaton-Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear InfirmaryBostonUSA
  3. 3.Boys Town National Research HospitalOmahaUSA
  4. 4.Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  5. 5.Department of Otology and LaryngologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations