Endomucosal resection of a rectal polyp at the dentate line, an alternative to transanal endoscopic microsurgery

  • A. Le Saint-GrantEmail author
  • M. A. Potter
Trick of the Trade


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Trust and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.


  1. 1.
    Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1026–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rutter MD, Chattree A, Barbour JA, Thomas-Gibson A, Bhandari P et al (2015) British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large and non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut 64:1847–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barendse RM, Musters GD, de Graaf EJR, van den Broek FJC, Consten ECJ et al (2017) Randomised control trial of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND study). Gut 67(5):837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bignell MB, Ramwell A, Evans JR, Dastur N, Simson JNL (2010) Complications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS): a prospective audit. J Colorectal Dis 27:99–103Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryWestern General HospitalEdinburghUK
  2. 2.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  3. 3.School of MedicineUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations