Advertisement

Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 53–63 | Cite as

Robotic-assisted stereotactic real-time navigation: initial clinical experience and feasibility for rectal cancer surgery

  • S. AtallahEmail author
  • E. Parra-Davila
  • A. G. F. Melani
  • L. G. Romagnolo
  • S. W. Larach
  • J. Marescaux
Multimedia Article

Abstract

Background

Real-time stereotactic navigation for transanal total mesorectal excision has been demonstrated to be feasible in small pilot series using laparoscopic techniques. The possibility of real-time stereotactic navigation coupled with robotics has not been previously explored in a clinical setting.

Methods

After pre-clinical assessment, and configuration of a robotic-assisted navigational system, two patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were selected for enrollment into a pilot study designed to assess the feasibility of navigation coupled with the robotic da Vinci Xi platform via TilePro interface. In one case, fluorescence-guided surgery was also used as an adjunct for structure localization, with local administration of indocyanine green into the ureters and at the tumor site.

Results

Each operation was successfully completed with a robotic-assisted approach; image-guided navigation provided computed accuracy of ± 4.5 to 4.6 mm. The principle limitation encountered was navigation signal dropout due to temporary loss of direct line-of-sight with the navigational system’s infrared camera. Subjectively, the aid of navigation assisted the operating surgeon in identifying critical anatomical planes. The combination of fluorescence with image-guided surgery further augmented the surgeon’s perception of the operative field.

Conclusions

The combination of stereotactic navigation and robotic surgery is feasible, although some limitations and technical challenges were observed. For complex surgery, the addition of navigation to robotics can improve surgical precision. This will likely represent the next step in the evolution of robotics and in the development of digital surgery.

Keywords

Digital surgery TaTME Rectal cancer Robotic colorectal Augmented reality Da Vinci navigation Stereotactic navigation Image-guided surgery Fluorescence-guided surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Laura Galorneau, Zack Demetriou, Meraj Baig, Tina Langaee, Meghann Vizintos, Janelle Abravaya, Brian Solomon, and Lauren Skesavage for there assistance with this research.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. S. Atallah reports consultancy (such as consulting fees, honoraria) from Medtronic, Applied Medical, ConMed, Inc, and Medrobotics. Dr. S. Larach holds stock options with Applied Medical. Dr. J. Marescaux is president of both IRCAD and IHU Strasbourg, which are partly funded by Karl Storz, Medtronic, and Siemens Healthcare though he has no direct conflict of interest with content discussed in this manuscript. Dr. A.G.F. Melani receives remuneration (payment for services not otherwise identified as salary such as consulting fees, honoraria) from Medtronic, Ethicon, Intuitive Surgical, and Verb Surgical though he has no direct conflicts of interest with content discussed in this manuscript. Dr. E. Parra-Davila receives remuneration (payment for services not otherwise identified as salary such as consulting fees, honoraria) from Medtronic, Ethicon, Intuitive Surgical, and Verb Surgical though he has no direct conflicts of interest with content discussed in this manuscript. Dr. L. Romagnolo has received remuneration (honoraria) from Medtronic, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson.

Ethical approval

This research was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained in accordance with the standards set forth by hospital regulations.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 14,66,599 kB)

References

  1. 1.
    Mezger U, Jendrewski C, Bartels M (2013) Navigation in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:501–514Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts DW, Strohbehn JW, Hatch JF, Murray W, Kettenberger H (1986) A frameless stereotaxic integration of computerized tomographic imaging and the operating microscope. J Neurosurg 65(4):545–549Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barnett GH, Kormos DW, Steiner CP, Weisenberger J (1993) Intraoperative localization using an armless, frameless stereotactic wand. J Neurosurg 78(3):510–514Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atallah S, Nassif G, Larach S (2015) Stereotactic navigation for TAMIS-TME: opening the gateway to frameless, image-guided abdominal and pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc 29(1):207–211Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Larach S (2015) Image-guided real-time navigation for transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol 19(11):679–684.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1329-y Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atallah S, Larach SW, Monson JR (2016) Stereotactic navigation for TAMIS-TME. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 25(5):271–277Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wijsmuller AR, Giraudeau C, Leroy J, Kleinrensink GJ, Rociu E, Romagnolo LG, Melani AGF, Agnus V, Diana M, Soler L, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J, Mutter D (2018) A step towards stereotactic navigation during pelvic surgery: 3D nerve topography. Surg Endosc 32(8):3582–3591Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wijsmuller AR, Romagnolo LGC, Agnus V, Giraudeau C, Melani AGF, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2018) Advances in stereotactic navigation for pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc 32(6):2713–2720Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nijkamp J, Kuhlmann K, Sonke JJ, Ruers T (2016) Image-guided navigation surgery for pelvic malignancies using electromagnetic tracking and intra-operative imaging. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11:S107–S108Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atallah S, Tilahun Y, Monson JR (2016) Real-time stereotactic navigation for the laparoscopic excision of a pelvic neoplasm. Tech Coloproctol 20(8):599–600Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diana M, Marescaux J (2015) Robotic surgery. Br J Surg 102(2):e15–e28.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9711 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pigazzi A, Garcia-Aguilar J (2010) Robotic colorectal surgery: for whom and for what? Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):969–970Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Pinan J, Quinteros F, Schoonyoung H, Albert M, Larach S (2014) Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol 18(11):1047–1053Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gómez Ruiz M, Parra IM, Palazuelos CM, Martín JA, Fernández CC, Diego JC, Fleitas MG (2015) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 58(1):145–153Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Tong YS, Chen CC (2017) Combined robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (R-taTME) and single-site plus one-port (R-SSPO) technique for ultra-low rectal surgery-initial experience with a new operation approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 32(2):249–254.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2686-3 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Medina MG, Tsoraides SS, Dwyer AM3 (2018) Review and update: robotic transanal surgery (RTAS). Updates Surg 70(3):369–374Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hompes R (2015) Robotics and transanal minimal invasive surgery (TAMIS): the “sweet spot” for robotics in colorectal surgery? Tech Coloproctol 19(7):377–378Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huscher CG, Bretagnol F, Ponzano C (2015) Robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision: the key against the Achilles’ heel of rectal cancer? Ann Surg 261(5):e120–e121Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32(4):1636–1655Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hughes-Hallett A, Pratt P, Mayer E, Martin S, Darzi A, Vale J (2014) Image guidance for all–TilePro display of 3-dimensionally reconstructed images in robotic partial nephrectomy. Urology 84(1):237–242Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woo Y, Choi GH, Min BS, Hyung WJ (2014) Novel application of simultaneous multi-image display during complex robotic abdominal procedures. BMC Surg 15(14):13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-13 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Autorino R, Piana A, Bellin A, Piazzolla P, Massa F, Bollito E, Gned D, De Pascale A, Fiori C (2018) Augmented-reality robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hyper-accuracy three-dimensional reconstruction (HA3DTM) technology: a radiological and pathological study. BJU Int.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14549 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pessaux P, Diana M, Soler L, Piardi T, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2015) Towards cybernetic surgery: robotic and augmented reality-assisted liver segmentectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(3):381–385Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Furukawa J, Miyake H, Tanaka K, Sugimoto M, Fujisawa M (2014) Console-integrated real-time three-dimensional image overlay navigation for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with selective arterial clamping: early single-centre experience with 17 cases. Int J Med Robot 10(4):385–390Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Long JA, Lee BH, Guillotreau J, Autorino R, Laydner H, Yakoubi R, Rizkala E, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH, Haber GP (2012) Real-time robotic transrectal ultrasound navigation during robotic radical prostatectomy: initial clinical experience. Urology 80(3):608–613Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kenngott HG, Wegner I, Neuhaus J, Nickel F, Fischer L, Gehrig T, Meinzer HP, Müller-Stich BP (2013) Magnetic tracking in the operation room using the da Vinci(®) telemanipulator is feasible. J Robot Surg 7:59–64Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marescaux J, Diana M (2015) Inventing the future of surgery. World J Surg 39(3):615–622Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Atallah S, Zenoni S, Kelly J, Tilahun Y, Monson JR (2016) A blueprint for robotic navigation: pre-clinical simulation for transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). Tech Coloproctol 20(9):653–654Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spiegel EA, Wycis HT, Marks M, Lee AJ (1947) Stereotaxic apparatus for operations on the human brain. Science 106(2754):349–350Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Willems PW, van der Sprenkel JW, Tulleken CA, Viergever MA, Taphoorn MJ (2006) Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumours. J Neurol 253(9):1123–1136Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Willems PW, Taphoorn MJ, Burger H, Berkelbach van der Sprenkel JW, Tulleken CA (2006) Effectiveness of neuronavigation in resecting solitary intracerebral contrast-enhancing tumors: a randomized controlled trial. Neurosurg 104(3):360–368Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wirtz CR, Albert FK, Schwaderer M et al (2000) The benefit of neuronavigation for neurosurgery analyzed by its impact on glioblastoma surgery. Neurol Res 22:354–360Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kurimoto M, Hayashi N, Kamiyama H, Nagai S, Shibata T, Asahi T, Matsumura N, Hirashima Y, Endo S (2004) Impact of neuronavigation and image-guided extensive resection for adult patients with supratentorial malignant astrocytomas: a single-institution retrospective study. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 47(5):278–283Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Franchini Melani AG, Diana M, Marescaux J (2016) The quest for precision in transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 20(1):11–18Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rullier E (2015) Transanal mesorectal excision: the new challenge in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 58(7):621–622Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Atallah S (2015) The dawn of the digital operating theatre and the rise of the digital surgeon. Tech Coloproctol 19(9):499–501Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wagner M, Gondan M, Zöllner Wünscher C, Nickel JJ, Albala F, Groch L, Suwelack A, Speidel S, Maier-Hein S, Müller-Stich L, Kenngott BP HG (2016) Electromagnetic organ tracking allows for real-time compensation of tissue shift in image-guided laparoscopic rectal surgery: results of a phantom study. Surg Endosc 30(2):495–503Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Arlt F, Chalopin C, Müns A, Meixensberger J, Lindner D (2016) Intraoperative 3D contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): a prospective study of 50 patients with brain tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 158(4):685–694Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lindner D, Trantakis C, Renner C, Arnold S, Schmitgen A, Schneider J, Meixensberger J (2006) Application of intraoperative 3D ultrasound during navigated tumor resection. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49(4):197–202Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jafari MD, Wexner SD2, Martz JE3, McLemore EC, Margolin DA, Sherwinter DA, Lee SW, Senagore AJ8, Phelan MJ, Stamos MJ (2015) Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 220(1):82–92Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Boni L, David G, Dionigi G, Rausei S, Cassinotti E, Fingerhut A (2016) Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence to assess bowel perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 30(7):2736–2742Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mizrahi I, Wexner SD (2017) Clinical role of fluorescence imaging in colorectal surgery—a review. Exp Rev Med Dev 14(1):75–82Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mizrahi I, de Lacy FB, Abu-Gazala M, Fernandez LM, Otero A, Sands DR, Lacy AM, Wexner SD (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography. Tech Coloproctol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1869-z Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ris F, Yeung T, Hompes R, Mortensen NJ (2015) Enhanced reality and intraoperative imaging in colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 28(3):158–164Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Barnes TG, Volpi D, Cunningham C, Vojnovic B, Hompes R (2018) Improved urethral fluorescence during low rectal surgery: a new dye and a new method. Tech Coloproctol 22(2):115–119Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nagata J, Fukunaga Y, Akiyoshi T, Konishi T, Fujimoto Y, Nagayama S, Yamamoto N, Ueno M (2016) Colonic marking with near-infrared, light-emitting, diode-activated indocyanine green for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 59(2):e14–e18.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000542 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Atallah S, Mabardy A, Volpato AP, Chin T, Sneider J, Monson JRT (2017) Surgery beyond the visible light spectrum: theoretical and applied methods for localization of the male urethra during transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 21(6):413–424Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mondal SB, Gao S, Zhu N, Habimana-Griffin L, Akers WJ, Liang R, Gruev V, Margenthaler J, Achilefu S (2017) Optical see-through cancer vision goggles enable direct patient visualization and real-time fluorescence-guided oncologic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 24(7):1897–1903Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T, Wiestler OD, Zanella F, Reulen HJ, ALA-Glioma Study Group (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7(5):392–401Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ng WP, Liew BS, Idris Z, Rosman AK (2017) Fluorescence-guided versus conventional surgical resection of high grade glioma: a single-centre, 7-year, comparative effectiveness study. Malays J Med Sci 24(2):78–86Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jones JE, Busi SB, Mitchem JB, Amos-Landgraf JM, Lewis MR (2018) Evaluation of a tumor-targeting, near-infrared fluorescent peptide for early detection and endoscopic resection of polyps in a rat model of colorectal cancer. Mol Imaging.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1536012118790065 Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kim J, Do EJ, Moinova H, Bae SM, Kang JY, Hong SM, Fink SP, Joo J, Suh YA, Jang SJ, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, Ye BD, Byeon JS, Choe J, Yang SK, Markowitz SD, Kim SY, Myung SJ (2017) Molecular imaging of colorectal tumors by targeting colon cancer secreted protein-2 (CCSP-2). Neoplasia 19(10):805–816Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schiemer JF, Zimniak L, Hadzijusufovic E, Lang H, Kneist W (2018) Novel multi-image view for neuromapping meets the needs of the robotic surgeon. Tech Coloproctol 22(6):445–448Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schiemer JF, Zimniak L, Grimminger P, Lang H, Kneist W (2018) Robot-guided neuromapping during nerve-sparing taTME for low rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3126-3 Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chand M, Ramachandran N, Stoyanov D, Lovat L (2018) Robotics, artificial intelligence and distributed ledgers in surgery: data is key! Tech Coloproctol 22(9):645–648Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Guerriero L, Quero G, Diana M, Soler L, Agnus V, Marescaux J, Corcione F (2018) Virtual reality exploration and planning for precision colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 61(6):719–723Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schols RM, Bouvy ND, van Dam RM, Stassen LP (2013) Advanced intraoperative imaging methods for laparoscopic anatomy navigation: an overview. Surg Endosc 27(6):1851–1859.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2701-x Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Atallah
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. Parra-Davila
    • 2
  • A. G. F. Melani
    • 3
  • L. G. Romagnolo
    • 4
  • S. W. Larach
    • 1
  • J. Marescaux
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Colorectal Surgery, EndoSurgical Center of FloridaFlorida HospitalOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryGood Samaritan HospitalWest Palm BeachUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryIRCAD, Latin AmericaRio de JeneiroBrazil
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryIRCAD, Latin AmericaBarretosBrazil
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryIRCAD, FranceStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations