Advertisement

Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 22, Issue 8, pp 607–611 | Cite as

“Top down no-touch” technique in robotic complete mesocolic excision for extended right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis

  • I. Hamzaoglu
  • V. Ozben
  • I. Sapci
  • E. Aytac
  • A. Aghayeva
  • I. A. Bilgin
  • I. E. Bayraktar
  • B. Baca
  • T. Karahasanoglu
Multimedia Article

Abstract

Background

Proper identification of the mesocolic vessels is essential for achieving complete mesocolic excision (CME) in cases of colon cancer requiring an extended right hemicolectomy. In robotic procedures, we employed a “top down technique” to allow early identification of the gastrocolic trunk and middle colic vessels. The aim of our study was to illustrate the details of this technique in a series of 12 patients.

Methods

The top down technique consists of two steps. First, the omental bursa was entered to identify the right gastroepiploic vein. Tracing down this vein as a landmark, the gastrocolic trunk was exposed, branches of this trunk and the middle colic vessels were divided. Second, dissection was directed to the ileocolic region and proceeded in an inferior-to-superior direction along the superior mesenteric vein to divide the ileocolic and right colic vessels consecutively. The ileotranverse anastomosis was created intracorporeally.

Results

There were 8 males and 4 females with a mean age of 64.8 ± 16.9 years and a mean body mass index of 25.6 ± 3.7 kg/m2. All the procedures were completed successfully. No conversions occurred. The mean operative time and blood loss were 312.1 ± 93.9 min and 110.0 ± 89.9 ml, respectively. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 45.2 ± 11.1. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.6 ± 4.7 days. Two patients had intraoperative complications and two had postoperative complications. There was no disease recurrence at a mean follow-up period of 10.4 ± 7.1 months.

Conclusions

The top down technique appears to be useful in robotic CME for an extended right hemicolectomy. Early identification of the gastrocolic trunk and middle colic vessels via this technique may prevent inadvertent vascular injury at the mesenteric root of the transverse colon.

Keywords

No-touch technique Robotic surgery Complete mesocolic excision Extended right hemicolectomy 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 444354 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–364CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2010) Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 28:272–278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Søndenaa K, Quirke P, Kennedy RH et al (2014) The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery: proceedings of a consensus conference. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:419–428CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siani LM, Pulica C (2015) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right colon cancer: Long-term oncologic outcome between mesocolic and non-mesocolic planes of surgery. Scand J Surg 104:219–226CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mori S, Baba K, Yanagi M et al (2015) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk for right colon cancer. Surg Endosc 29:34–40CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Sugihara T, Magishi A, Yamaguchi T, Sano T (2017) Laparoscopic radical lymph node dissection for advanced colon cancer close to the hepatic flexure. Asian J Endosc Surg 10:23–27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Farinacci F et al (2013) Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:807–814CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozben V, Baca B, Atasoy D et al (2016) Robotic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer. Surg Endosc 30:4624–4625CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Kim NK (2015) Modified complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors. Ann Surg 261:708–715CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li H, He Y, Lin Z et al (2016) Laparoscopic caudal-to-cranial approach for radical lymph node dissection in right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401:741–746CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ignjatovic D, Stimec B, Finjord T, Bergamaschi R (2004) Venous anatomy of the right colon: three-dimensional topographic mapping of the gastrocolic trunk of Henle. Tech Coloproctol 8:19–21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Mitsutsuji M et al (2015) Cranial-to-caudal approach for radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 29:1001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Sumi Y et al (2017) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer using a cranial approach: anatomical and embryological consideration. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:139–141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benlice C, Baca B, Firidin SN, Muti A, Aytac E, Erguner I, Erdamar S, Senocak M, Turna H, Hamzaoglu I, Karahasanoglu T (2016) Increased caseload volume is associated with better oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26:49–53CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turnbull RB Jr, Kyle K, Watson FR, Spratt J (1967) Cancer of the colon: the influence of the no-touch isolation technic on survival rates. Ann Surg 166:420–427CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenberg J, Fischer A, Haglind E, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group (2012) Current controversies in colorectal surgery: the way to resolve uncertainty and move forward. Colorectal Dis 14:266–269CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Killeen S, Mannion M, Devaney A, Winter DC (2014) Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 16:577–594CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fujita J, Uyama I, Sugioka A, Komori Y, Matsui H, Hasumi A (2001) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with radical lymph node dissection using the no-touch isolation technique for advanced colon cancer. Surg Today 31:93–96CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Benz S, Tam Y, Tannapfel A, Stricker I (2016) The uncinate process first approach: a novel technique for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision. Surg Endosc 30:1930–1937CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koh FH, Tan KK (2016) A safe method for middle colic dissection and ligation at its origin in a laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 23(Suppl 5):665CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zou L, Xiong W, Mo D et al (2016) Laparoscopic radical extended right hemicolectomy using a caudal-to-cranial approach. Ann Surg Oncol 23:2562–2563CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Formisano G, Misitano P, Giuliani G, Calamati G, Salvischiani L, Bianchi PP (2016) Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy: technique and outcomes. Updates Surg 68:63–69CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mathew R, Kim SH (2013) Robotic right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision: technical detail. OA Rob Surg 1:6Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhao LY, Liu H, Wang YN, Deng HJ, Xue Q, Li GX (2014) Techniques and feasibility of laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 20:10531–10536CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Hamzaoglu
    • 1
  • V. Ozben
    • 1
  • I. Sapci
    • 2
  • E. Aytac
    • 1
  • A. Aghayeva
    • 1
  • I. A. Bilgin
    • 1
  • I. E. Bayraktar
    • 1
  • B. Baca
    • 1
  • T. Karahasanoglu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryAcibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of MedicineIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of MedicineIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations