Outcomes of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT): a systematic review
- 426 Downloads
Pilonidal sinus is a common disease of the natal cleft, which can lead to complications including infection and abscess formation. Various operative management options are available, but the ideal technique is still debatable. More recently minimally invasive approaches have been described. Our aim was to review the current literature on endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) and its outcomes.
A systematic literature review was conducted and reported in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library was conducted in November 2017. Full-text studies on the use of endoscopy for the treatment of pilonidal sinus were included in the review.
Initial search results returned 52 articles. Eight studies (eight case series and one randomised control trial) were included in the final qualitative synthesis. These studies demonstrated that EPSiT has good complete healing rates and low recurrence rates. There was also a high level of patient satisfaction and little time taken off work. Two studies reported modifications to the original technique. The main limitation was the lack of comparative studies.
Initial studies on EPSiT have shown promising results. However, there is a need for a standardised technique and more comparative studies to validate this novel procedure.
KeywordsPilonidal sinus Endoscopic surgery Coloproctology Endoscopy
No funding was obtained.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 2.McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J (2007) Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst RevGoogle Scholar
- 3.Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S, Haboubi N (2003) Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol 7:3–8Google Scholar
- 4.Segre D, Pozzo M, Perinotti R, Roche B (2015) The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol 19:607–613Google Scholar
- 6.Hull TL, Wu J (2002) Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am [Internet]. 82(6):1169–85. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12516846
- 7.Guner A, Ozkan OF, Kece C, Kesici S, Kucuktulu U (2013) Modification of the Bascom cleft lift procedure for chronic pilonidal sinus: results in 141 patients. Color Dis 15(7)Google Scholar
- 11.Gecim IE, Goktug UU, Celasin H (2017) Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment combined with crystalized phenol application may prevent recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum [Internet]. 60(4):405–7. http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00003453-201704000-00009
- 12.Giarratano G, Toscana C, Shalaby M, Buonomo O, Petrella G, Sileri P (2017) Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: long-term results of a prospective series. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg [Internet]. 21(3):e2017.00043. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5592432/
- 13.Milone M, Fernandez LMS, Musella M, Milone F (2016) Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus. JAMA Surg [Internet]. 151(6):547. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5233
- 17.Milone M, Bianco P, Musella M, Milone F (2014) A technical modification of video-assisted ablation for recurrent pilonidal sinus. Color Dis [Internet]. 16(11):O404–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12770
- 19.Hameed KK (2001) Outcome of surgery for chronic natal cleft pilonidal sinus: a randomized trial of open compared with closed technique. Med Forum Mon 12(5):20–23Google Scholar
- 20.McCallum IJD, King PM, Bruce J (2008) Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ [Internet] 336(7649):868–71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39517.808160.BE