Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Oncology

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 1204–1213 | Cite as

Skeletal muscle loss during systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer indicates treatment response: a pooled analysis of a multicenter clinical trial (KSCC 1605-A)

  • Shun Sasaki
  • Eiji OkiEmail author
  • Hiroshi Saeki
  • Takayuki Shimose
  • Sanae Sakamoto
  • Qingjiang Hu
  • Kensuke Kudo
  • Yasuo Tsuda
  • Yuichiro Nakashima
  • Koji Ando
  • Yoshito Akagi
  • Yoshihiro Kakeji
  • Hideo Baba
  • Yoshihiko Maehara
Article
  • 171 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Sarcopenia or degenerative loss of skeletal muscle mass is related to poor prognosis in patients with cancer. This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of skeletal muscle loss (SML) during chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods

A total of 249 patients who were secondarily registered in a pooled database of mCRC patients with the first-line systemic chemotherapy and prospectively enrolled in six clinical trials of Kyushu Study Group of Clinical Cancer were included in this study. Skeletal muscle area was calculated from computed tomography images before and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Baseline sarcopenia and SML (cut-off value = 9%) were evaluated.

Results

Baseline sarcopenia was observed in 135 of 219 patients who were evaluated before treatment. They tended to be male; older; and have lower body mass index, lower visceral and subcutaneous fat contents, and a lower waist circumference (P < 0.01); however, baseline sarcopenia was not associated with prognosis. SML at 3 months was associated with an incidence of adverse events (P = 0.01), poor objective response rate (ORR) (P < 0.01), and poor progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.03), and it was an independent predictive factor for poor ORR (P < 0.01) and PFS (P = 0.04).

Conclusion

SML at 3 months after systemic chemotherapy for mCRC was associated with poor treatment response. Thus, clarifying the importance of SML prevention guarantees a more effective chemotherapy.

Keywords

Cachexia Chemotherapy response Metastatic colorectal cancer Sarcopenia Skeletal muscle loss 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study received no financial or material support. The authors thank the following institutions and investigators who participated in this study: Baba H (Kumamoto University Hospital), Kakeji Y (Kobe University Hospital), Akagi Y (Kurume University Hospital), Ogata Y (Kurume University Hospital), Eguchi S (Nagasaki University Hospital), Nishimaki T (Ryukyu University Hospital), and Natsugoe S (Kagoshima University Hospital). We also thank Sakamoto S and the staff at the Clinical Research Support Center Kyushu (CReS Kyushu) for their excellent data collection and management and secretarial assistance. We thank Shimose T for the statistical analysis. This work was supported by CReS Kyushu with no funding. We would like to thank Editage (https://www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10147_2019_1460_MOESM1_ESM.docx (39 kb)
Supplementary file1 (DOCX 38 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Watanabe T, Muro K, Ajioka Y et al (2018) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 23:1–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1101-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scheithauer W, Rosen H, Kornek GV et al (1993) Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMJ 306:752–755.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117745788 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simmonds PC (2000) Palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. BMJ 321:531–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD et al (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1413–1418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02309-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saltz LB, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E et al (2008) Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 26:2013–2019.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9930 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adam R, Wicherts DA, de Haas RJ et al (2009) Patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases: is there a possibility of cure? J Clin Oncol 27:1829–1835.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosenberg IH (1997) Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. J Nutr 127:990S–S991.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/127.5.990S CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosenberg IH (1989) Epidemiologic and methodologic problems in determining nutritional status of older persons. Proceedings of a conference. Albuquerque, New Mexico, October 19–21, 1988. Am J Clin Nutr 50:1121–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM et al (2010) Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 39:412–423.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saeki H, Nakashima Y, Kudou K et al (2018) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with cT3/nearly T4 esophageal cancer: is sarcopenia correlated with postoperative complications and prognosis? World J Surg 42:2894–2901.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4554-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takamori S, Toyokawa G, Okamoto T et al (2018) Clinical impact and risk factors for skeletal muscle loss after complete resection of early non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 25:1229–1236.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6328-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nakanishi R, Oki E, Sasaki S et al (2018) Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of complications after colorectal cancer surgery. Surg Today 48:151–157.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1564-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kudou K, Saeki H, Nakashima Y et al (2017) Prognostic significance of sarcopenia in patients with esophagogastric junction cancer or upper gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 24:1804–1810.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5811-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harimoto N, Yoshizumi T, Shimokawa M et al (2016) Sarcopenia is a poor prognostic factor following hepatic resection in patients aged 70 years and older with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 46:1247–1255.  https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.12674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miyamoto Y, Baba Y, Sakamoto Y et al (2015) Negative impact of skeletal muscle loss after systemic chemotherapy in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer. PLoS ONE 10:e0129742.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129742 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blauwhoff-Buskermolen S, Versteeg KS, de van der Schueren MA et al (2016) Loss of muscle mass during chemotherapy is predictive for poor survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:1339–1344.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.6043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oki E, Emi Y, Akagi Y et al (2013) Phase II trial of alternating mFOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI regimens in the first-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC0701). Oncology 84:233–239.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000346690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miwa K, Oki E, Emi Y et al (2016) Phase II trial of an alternating regimen consisting of first-line mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: FIREFOX plus bevacizumab trial (KSCC0801). Int J Clin Oncol 21:110–117.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0850-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beppu T, Emi Y, Tokunaga S et al (2014) Liver resectability of advanced liver-limited colorectal liver metastases following mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab (KSCC0802 Study). Anticancer Res 34:6655–6662Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ogata Y, Shimokawa M, Tanaka T et al (2016) A prospective study of XELOX plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC 0902). Int J Clin Oncol 21:335–343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0895-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oki E, Emi Y, Miyamoto Y et al (2015) Phase II trial of S-1 and oxaliplatin plus cetuximab for colorectal cancer patients with initially unresectable or not optimally resectable liver metastases (KSCC1002). Ann Surg Oncol 22(Suppl 3):S1067–S1074.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4771-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ando K, Emi Y, Suenaga T et al (2017) A prospective study of XELIRI plus bevacizumab as a first-line therapy in Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent colorectal cancer (KSCC1101). Int J Clin Oncol 22:913–920.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1140-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z et al (1985) (2004) Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J Appl Physiol 97:2333–2338.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00744.2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR et al (2008) A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 33:997–1006.  https://doi.org/10.1139/H08-075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB et al (1998) Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol (1985) 85:115–122.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.85.1.115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miller KD, Jones E, Yanovski JA et al (1998) Visceral abdominal-fat accumulation associated with use of indinavir. Lancet 351:871–875.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11518-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Prado CM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ et al (2008) Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 9:629–635.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70153-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oka R, Kobayashi J, Yagi K et al (2008) Reassessment of the cutoff values of waist circumference and visceral fat area for identifying Japanese subjects at risk for the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 79:474–481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2007.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD et al (2011) Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 12:489–495.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Skipworth RJ, Stewart GD, Dejong CH et al (2007) Pathophysiology of cancer cachexia: much more than host–tumour interaction? Clin Nutr 26:667–676.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2007.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhou T, Wang B, Liu H et al (2018) Development and validation of a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in advanced cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 9:306–314.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barret M, Antoun S, Dalban C et al (2014) Sarcopenia is linked to treatment toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Nutr Cancer 66:583–589.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2014.894103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jung HW, Kim JW, Kim JY et al (2015) Effect of muscle mass on toxicity and survival in patients with colon cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 23:687–694.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2418-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Coussens LM, Werb Z (2002) Inflammation and cancer. Nature 420:860–867.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barton BE (2001) IL-6-like cytokines and cancer cachexia: consequences of chronic inflammation. Immunol Res 23:41–58.  https://doi.org/10.1385/IR:23:1:41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Argiles JM, Lopez-Soriano FJ (1999) The role of cytokines in cancer cachexia. Med Res Rev 19:223–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Naito T, Okayama T, Aoyama T et al (2017) Skeletal muscle depletion during chemotherapy has a large impact on physical function in elderly Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 17:571.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3562-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Koelwyn GJ, Quail DF, Zhang X et al (2017) Exercise-dependent regulation of the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Cancer 17:620–632.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Friedenreich CM, Neilson HK, Farris MS (2016) Physical activity and cancer outcomes: a precision medicine approach. Clin Cancer Res 22:4766–4775.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gannon NP, Vaughan RA, Garcia-Smith R et al (2015) Effects of the exercise-inducible myokine irisin on malignant and non-malignant breast epithelial cell behavior in vitro. Int J Cancer 136:E197–E202.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shao L, Li H, Chen J et al (2017) Irisin suppresses the migration, proliferation, and invasion of lung cancer cells via inhibition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 485:598–605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.12.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shi G, Tang N, Qiu J et al (2017) Irisin stimulates cell proliferation and invasion by targeting the PI3K/AKT pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 493:585–591.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.08.148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Aoi W, Naito Y, Takagi T et al (2013) A novel myokine, secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), suppresses colon tumorigenesis via regular exercise. Gut 62:882–889.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fukushima H, Kataoka M, Nakanishi Y et al (2018) Posttherapeutic skeletal muscle mass recovery predicts favorable prognosis in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Urol Oncol 36:156.e9–156.e16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shachar SS, Williams GR, Muss HB et al (2016) Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Cancer 57:58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Society of Clinical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shun Sasaki
    • 1
  • Eiji Oki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hiroshi Saeki
    • 1
  • Takayuki Shimose
    • 2
  • Sanae Sakamoto
    • 2
  • Qingjiang Hu
    • 1
  • Kensuke Kudo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Yasuo Tsuda
    • 1
  • Yuichiro Nakashima
    • 1
  • Koji Ando
    • 1
  • Yoshito Akagi
    • 4
  • Yoshihiro Kakeji
    • 5
  • Hideo Baba
    • 6
  • Yoshihiko Maehara
    • 1
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Kyushu Study Group of Clinical CancerFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Endoscopy and Endoscopic SurgeryFukuoka Dental CollegeFukuokaJapan
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryKurume University School of MedicineKurumeJapan
  5. 5.Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of SurgeryKobe University Graduate School of MedicineKobeJapan
  6. 6.Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan
  7. 7.Department of SurgeryKyushu Central HospitalFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations