Advertisement

Early tumor shrinkage after first-line medical treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

  • Giuseppe A. CollocaEmail author
  • Antonella Venturino
  • Domenico Guarneri
Review Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) is a response-related endpoint of clinical trials of chemotherapy (CHT) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It identifies a dimensional reduction of tumor size by at least 20–30% after 6–8 weeks of CHT.

Methods

A literature search of randomized trials of systemic treatment including CHT with or without antiangiogenics or anti-EGFR inhibitors in patients with mCRC has been conducted, and studies reporting the results of the relationship of ETS with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were selected.

Results

Twelve trials, including 3117 patients, have been included; all data were retrospective and only 72% of the enrolled patients have been evaluated for ETS. Two meta-analyses, each including 20 study cohorts from the selected 12 trials, reported a strong relationship of ETS with OS (HR 0.62; CIs 0.55–0.69) and of ETS with PFS (HR 0.66; CIs 0.60–0.73). However, both meta-analyses displayed a high level of heterogeneity. Among nine possible moderators, three variables (median age, surgery of metastases, and publication year) were able to explain at least a part of this heterogeneity.

Conclusion

ETS is a simple and interesting intermediate endpoint for clinical practice and future trials of medical treatments of patients with mCRC, but a large prospective analysis and validation are mandatory.

Keywords

Early tumor shrinkage Chemotherapy Endpoint Prognosis Bevacizumab Cetuximab 

Notes

Funding

None.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Douhaier J, Ravipati A, Grams B et al (2017) Colorectal cancer—global burden, trends, and geographical variations. J Surg Oncol 15:619–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grothey A, Sargent D, Goldberg RM et al (2004) Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. J Clin Oncol 22:1209–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buyse M, Burzykowski T, Carroll K et al (2007) Progression-free survival is a surrogate for survival in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:5218–5224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heinemann V, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T et al (2014) FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1065–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colloca G, Venturino A, Guarneri D (2016) Analysis of clinical end points of randomised trials including bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Oncol 28(10):e155–e164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Piessevaux H, Buyse M, Schlichting M et al (2013) Use of early tumor shrinkage to predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 31:3764–3775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sommeijer DW, Shi Q, Saad ED et al (2014) Early predictors of prolonged overall survival in patients on first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: an ARCAD study with individual patient data data on 10,962 pts. J Clin Oncol 32(suppl):abstr 3538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saad ED, Coart E, Sommeijer DW et al (2014) Early predictors of improved long-term outcomes in first-line antiangiogenics plus chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of individual patient data from the ARCAD database. J Clin Oncol 32(suppl):abstr 3578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petrelli F, Pietrantonio F, Cremolini C et al (2015) Early tumour shrinkage as a prognostic factor and surrogate end-point in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Eur J Cancer 51:800–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Cutsem E, Kohne C-H, Lang I et al (2011) Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol 29:2011–2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J et al (2014) Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 25:1346–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Douillard JY, Siena S, Peeters M et al (2015) Impact of early tumour shrinkage and resection on outcomes in patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 51:1231–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischer von Weikersthal L, Schalhorn A et al (2011) Phase III trial of irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid versus irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 47:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giessen C, Laubender RP, Fischer von Weikersthal L et al (2013) Early tumor shrinkage in metastatic colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis from an irinotecan-based randomized first-line trial. Cancer Sci 104:718–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ye LC, Liu TS, Ren L et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial of cetuximab plus chemotherapy for patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases. J Clin Oncol 31:1931–1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ye LC, Wei Y, Zhu DX et al (2015) Impact of early tumor shrinkage on clinical outcome in wild-type KRAS colorectal liver metastases treated with cetuximab. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 30:674–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stintzing S, Modest DP, Fischer von Weikersthal L et al (2014) Independent radiological evaluation of objective response, early tumor shrinkage, and depth of response in FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) in the final RAS evaluable population. Ann Oncol 25(supplement 5):abstract LBA11Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loupakis F, Cremolini C, Masi G et al (2014) Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 371:1609–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Lonardi S et al (2014) Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and deepness of response (DoR) to predict progression-free, postprogression, and overall survival: results from the phase. III TRIBE trial. J Clin Oncol 32(suppl):abstr 89640Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yamazaki K, Nagase M, Tamagawa H et al (2016) Randomized phase III study of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WJOG4407G). Ann Oncol 27:1539–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nagase M, Yamazaki K, Tamagawa H et al (2015) The impact of early tumor shrinkage on survival in WJOG4407G trial, a randomized phase III trial of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(suppl):abstr 679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A et al (2009) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:663–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moosmann N, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Vehling-Kaiser U et al (2011) Cetuximab plus capecitabine and irinotecan compared with cetuximab plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: AIO KRK-0104—a randomized trial of the German AIO CRC study group. J Clin Oncol 29:1050–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Modest DP, Laubender RP, Stintzing S et al (2013) Early tumor shrinkage in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line treatment with cetuximab combined with either CAPIRI or CAPOX: an analysis of the German AIO KRK 0104 trial. Acta Oncol 52:956–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ducreux M, Adenis A, Pignon JP et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-based combination regimens in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: final results from a randomized phase II study of bevacizumab plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin plus irinotecan versus bevacizumab plus capecitabine plus irinotecan (FNCLCC ACCORD 13/0503 study). Eur J Cancer 49:1236–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ichante J, Adenis A, Malka D et al (2011) Impact of early tumor shrinkage on long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with 5FU plus irinotecan plus leucovorin (FOLFIRI) or capecitabine plus irinotecan XELIRI plus bevacizumab. J Clin Oncol 29(suppl):abstr e14041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schwartzberg LS, Rivera F, Karthaus M et al (2014) PEAK: a randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorinm and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:2240–2247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rivera F, Karthaus M, Hecht JR et al (2017) Final analysis of the randomised PEAK trial: overall survival and tumour responses during first-line treatment with mFOLFOX6 plus either panitumumab or bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:1179–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carrato A, Abad A, Massuti B et al (2017) First-line panitumumab plus FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI in colorectal cancer with multiple or unresectable liver metastases: a randomised, phase II trial (PLANET-TTD). Eur J Cancer 81:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tsuji A, Sunakawa Y, Ichikawa W et al (2016) Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response as predictors of favorable treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFOX plus cetuximab (JACCRO CC-05). Target Oncol 11(6):799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Piessevaux H, Buyse M, De Roock W et al (2009) Radiological tumor size decrease at week 6 is a potent predictor of outcome in chemorefractory metastatico colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab (BOND trial). Ann Oncol 20:1375–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Suzuki C, Blomqvist L, Sundin A et al (2012) The initial change in tumor size predicts response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with combination chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 23:948–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vanwynsberghe H, Verbeke X, Coolen J et al (2017) Predictive value of early tumor shrinkage and density reduction of lung metastases in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib. Clin Colorectal Cancer 16(4):377–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kogawa T, Doi A, Shimokawa M et al (2015) Early skin toxicity predicts better outcomes, and early tumor shrinkage predicts better response after cetuximab treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. Targ Oncol 10:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nakayama G, Fujii T, Murotani K et al (2016) Modified two-dimensional response as surrogate marker of overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci 107:1492–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ito M, Kusaba H, Mukaide S et al (2017) Early tumor shrinkage indicates a favorable response to bevacizumab-based first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Anti-cancer Drugs 20(10):1166–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sakamaki K, Kito Y, Yamazaki K et al (2017) Exploration of time points and cut-off values for early tumour shrinkage to predict survival outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy using a biexponential model for change in tumour size. ESMO Open 2:e000275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Krajewski KM, Guo M, Van den Abbeele AD et al (2011) Comparison of four early posttherapy imaging changes (EPTIC; RECIST 1.0, tumor shrinkage, computed tomography tumor density, Choi criteria) in assessing outcome to vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 59:856–862Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stintzing S, Modest DP, Rossius L et al (2016) FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a post-hoc analysis of tumour dynamics in the final RAS wild-type subgroup of this randomized open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:1426–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Qi W-X, Shen Z, Tang L-N et al (2014) Does the addiction of targeted biological agents to first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer increase complete response? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 16(9):O300–O307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chan DL, Pavlakis N, Shapiro J et al (2015) Does the chemotherapy backbone impact on the efficacy of targeted agents in metastatic colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. PloS One 10(8):e0135599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Modest DP, Stintzing S, Fischer von Weikersthal L et al (2017) Relation of early tumor shrinkage (ETS) observed in first-line treatment to efficacy parameters of subsequent treatment in FIRE-3 (AIOKRK0306). Int J Cancer 140:1918–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Society of Clinical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe A. Colloca
    • 1
    Email author
  • Antonella Venturino
    • 1
  • Domenico Guarneri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OncologyOspedale Civile di SanremoSanremoItaly

Personalised recommendations