Prolonged conservative treatment in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer after primary fertility-sparing therapy: 15-year experience
To evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of repeated treatment on patients with recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) after complete remission for primary fertility-preserving therapy.
Materials and methods
We performed a retrospective study of patients with presumed stage IA endometrial cancer who had recurrence after achieving complete remission by fertility-preserving management at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, from January 2003 to April 2018. For each patient, medical records and pathology reports were reviewed. The demographic features, treatment efficacy, tumor prognosis, and reproductive outcome were analyzed.
Of the 41 recurrent patients with a median disease-free interval period of 16 months (range, 5–55 months), 23 were diagnosed at recurrence as EC, and 18 were diagnosed as atypical hyperplasia (AH) or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). 26 patients received repeated fertility-preserving treatment, and 23 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The complete response (CR) rate of repeated treatment (19/23, 82.6%) was lower than that of primary fertility-preserving treatment (161/170, 94.7%) with borderline significance (P = 0.053). The CR rate of AH/EIN patients was higher than that of EC patients with no statistical difference (92.9% vs 66.7%, P = 0.260). Among 19 patients achieved CR, 3 got pregnant and delivered successfully, while 3 had a second relapse. Four cases failed to response to the repeated treatment and underwent definitive surgery. 15 patients referred to definitive surgery directly after recurrence and one of them had a pelvic recurrence after 120 months. All patients are alive without evidence of disease at last follow-up.
For patients with recurrent EC after primary fertility-preserving treatment, repeated fertility-preserving treatment can still achieve a promising response and patients have possibilities of completing childbirth.
KeywordsEndometrial cancer Recurrence Fertility-preserving therapy Oncofertility
The authors thank all of the faculty, nurses, and staff at Department of Obstetrics &Gynecology in Peking Union Medical College Hospital for the excellent care they provide patients. The authors also sincerely thank all the patients and their family members for their contribution to this research effort.
This work was supported by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine (CAMS-2017-I2M-1-002).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
- 10.Zhou H, Cao D, Yang J et al (2017) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or letrozole for fertility-preserving treatment of endometrial carcinoma and complex atypical hyperplasia in young women. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27(6):1178–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Scully RE, Young RH, Clement PB (1998) Tumors of the ovary, maldeveloped gonads, fallopian tube, and broad ligament, Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
- 18.Baker J, Obermair A, Gebski V et al (2012) Efficacy of oral or intrauterine device-delivered progestin in patients with complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia or early endometrial adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 125(1):263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kim MK, Yoon BS, Park H et al (2011) Conservative treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate plus levonorgestrel intrauterine system for early-stage endometrial cancer in young women: pilot study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21(4):673–677Google Scholar
- 29.Kohlmann W, Gruber SB (2012) Lynch syndrome. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH et al (eds) GeneReviews. University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar