Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Oncology

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 211–221 | Cite as

Effect of combination of pre- and postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation on onset of postoperative pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study based on data from the diagnosis procedure combination database in Japan

  • Shuhei FujimotoEmail author
  • Takeo Nakayama
Original Article
  • 185 Downloads

Abstract

Background

To examine the effect of rehabilitation on postoperative pulmonary complication when it is conducted in combination of both before and after lung cancer surgery, as compared with either before or after surgery and no rehabilitation.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to examine the effect of rehabilitation before and after lung cancer surgery on the causes of postoperative pneumonia. Data were collected from the diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) database. Patients admitted who received operative treatment for a new primary (ICD codes: C34) were selected. The inclusion criteria were patients who had pneumonectomy, malignant tumor surgery for the lung (thoracotomy), or thoracoscopic surgery (endoscopic; treatment code: K511-00, K513-00~03, and K514-00, 02). The exclusion criteria were patients who had a lung transplantation (treatment code: K514-03~06), suspected diagnosis, and a pneumonia within 3 months before being diagnosed as having lung cancer. Main outcome was onset of postoperative pneumonia.

Results

Among 76,739 lung cancer patients, 15,146 who underwent lung cancer surgery were included in the analysis. In the combination of pre- and postoperative group, as compared with the preoperative [odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8, 1.8–4.4], postoperative (1.9, 1.6–2.3), and no rehabilitation group (2.5, 2.1–2.8), the onset of pneumonia was less frequent.

Conclusions

Combination of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitations significantly prevents postoperative pneumonia as compared with having preoperative, postoperative, or no rehabilitation.

Keywords

Cancer rehabilitation Postoperative complication Lung cancer 

Notes

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no companies in COI relationship that should be disclosed.

Supplementary material

10147_2018_1343_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (45 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 45 KB)

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    National Cancer Center Japan. http://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/stat/summary.html. Accessed Mar 2018
  3. 3.
    Sekine Y, Suzuki H, Nakajima T et al (2010) Risk quantification for pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery. Surg Today 40: 1027–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takenaka T, Katsura M, Shikada Y et al (2013) The impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on the outcome of surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 16:270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kearney DJ, Lee TH, Reilly JJ et al (1994) Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection. Importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest 105:753–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Busch E, Verazin G, Antkowiak JG et al (1994) Pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung carcinoma. Chest 105:760–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ, Piantadosi S et al (1994) Prospective assessment of 30-day operative morbidity for surgical resections in lung cancer. Chest 106:329S–330SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Algar FJ, Antonio A, Salvatierra A et al (2003) Predicting pulmonary complications after pneumonectomy for lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang JS (2003) Relationship of carbon monoxide pulmonary diffusing capacity to postoperative cardiopulmonary complications in patients undergoing pneu- monectomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 19:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schuurmans MM, Diacon AH, Bolliger CT (2002) Functional evaluation before lung resection. Clin Chest Med 23:159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Varela G, Ballesteros E, Jiménez MF et al (2006) Cost-effectiveness analysis of prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy in pulmonary lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29:216–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Algar FJ, Alvarez A, Salvatierra A et al (2003) Predicting pulmonary complications after pneumonectomy for lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cavalheri V, Granger C (2017) Preoperative exercise training for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD012020.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012020.pub2 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cavalheri V, Jenkins S, Cecins N et al (2017) Exercise training for people following curative intent treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther 21:58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pehlivan E, Turna A, Gurses A et al (2011) The effects of preoperative short-term intense physical therapy in lung cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 17:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sekine Y, Chiyo M, Iwata T et al (2005) Perioperative rehabilitation and physiotherapy for lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomas JA, McIntosh JM (1994) Are incentive spirometry, intermittent positive pressure breathing, and deep breathing exercise effective in the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications after upper abdominal surgery? A systematic overview and meta-analysis. Phys Ther 74:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hall JC, Tarala RA, Tap per J et al (1996) Preventionof respiratory complications after abdominal surgery:a randomised clinical trial. BMJ 312:148–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    The Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine. Guidelines for cancer rehabilitation. http://www.cancer-reha-wg.com/pdf/1404_cancerreha_guidelines.pdf. Accessed Mar 2018
  20. 20.
    Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT et al (2009) European Respiratory Society and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons joint task force on fitness for radical therapy. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). Eur Respir J 34:17–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brunelli A, Kim AW, Berger KI et al (2013) Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143:e166S–e190SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, RECORD Working Committee et al (2015) The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med 12:e1001885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Horiguchi H et al (2014) Application of the diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) data to clinical studies (in Japanese). J UOEH 36:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hideo Y (2016) Clinical epidemiological studies using the DPC data: challenges for the future (in Japanese). Iryo To Shakai 26:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/. Accessed 15 Dec 2017
  26. 26.
    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. http://www.iryohoken.go.jp/shinryohoshu/. Accessed 15 Dec 2017
  27. 27.
    McGuire A, Martin M, Lenz C et al (2015) Treatment cost of non-small cell lung cancer in three European countries: comparisons across France, Germany, and England using administrative databases. J Med Econ 18:525–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sekine Y, Yamada Y, Chiyo M et al (2007) Association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and tumor recurrence in patients with stage IA lung cancer after complete resection. Ann Thorac Surg 84:946–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kobayashi S, Karube Y, Nishihira M et al (2016) Postoperative pyothorax a risk factor for acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia following lung cancer resection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 64:476–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bornheimer R, Shea KM, Sato R et al (2017) Risk of exacerbation following pneumonia in adults with heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS One 12:e0184877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Di Pasquale M, Esperatti M, Crisafulli E et al (2013) Impact of chronic liver disease in intensive care unit acquired pneumonia: a prospective study Intensive. Care Med 39:1776–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chou CY, Wang SM, Liang CC et al (2014) Risk of pneumonia among patients with chronic kidney disease in outpatient and inpatient settings: a nationwide population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore) 93:e174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lanspa MJ, Peyrani P, Wiemken T et al (2015) Characteristics associated with clinician diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia: a descriptive study of afflicted patients and their outcomes. J Hosp Med 10:90–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Radu DM, Jauréguy F, Seguin A et al (2007) Postoperative pneumonia after major pulmonary resections: an unsolved problem in thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 84:1669–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hugh-Jones P, Lambert AV (1951) A simple standard exercise test and its use for measuring exertion dyspnoea. Br Med J 1:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Varela G, Novoa NM, Agostini P et al (2011) Chest physiotherapy in lung resection patients: state of the art. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 23:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bennett DA (2001) How can I deal with missing data in my study? Aust. N Z J Public Health 25:464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Allison PD (2005) Imputation of categorical variables with PROC MI. In: Presented at 30th meeting of SAS User group international, Philadelphia, PA, pp 10–13Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley Classics Library, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fang Y, Zhao Q, Huang D (2013) The impact of exercise training on surgery tolerability in lung cancer patients with impaired pulmonary function. Chin J Rehabil 28:619–623Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Divisi D, Di Francesco C, Di Leonardo G (2013) Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 43:293–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bobbio A, Chetta A, Ampollini L et al (2008) Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation in patients undergoing lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vagvolgyi A, Rozgonyi Z, Kerti M et al (2017) Effectiveness of perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 9:1584–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Benzo R, Wigle D, Novotny P et al (2011) Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation before lung cancer resection: results from two randomized studies. Lung Cancer 74:441–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Morano MT, Araújo AS, Nascimento FB et al (2013) Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation versus chest physical therapy in patients undergoing lung cancer resection: a pilot randomized con- trolled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hattori K, Matsuda T, Takagi Y et al (2017) Preoperative six-minute walk distance is associated with pneumonia after lung resection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivx310 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Saito H, Hatakeyama K, Konno H et al (2017) Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorac Cancer 8:451–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Liu W, Pan YL, Gao CX et al (2013) Breathing exercises improve post-operative pulmonary function and quality of life in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 5:1194–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mujovic N, Mujovic N, Subotic D et al (2015) Influence of pulmonary rehabilitation on lung function changes after the lung resection for primary lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Aging Dis 6:466–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bautmans I, Njemini R, De Backer J et al (2010) Surgery-induced inflammation in relation to age, muscle endurance, and self-perceived fatigue. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 65:266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Welvaart WN, Paul MA, Stienen GJ et al (2011) Selective diaphragm muscle weakness after contractile inactivity during thoracic surgery. Ann Surg 254:1044–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Juhl B, Frost N (1975) A comparison between measured and calculated changes in the lung function after operation for pulmonary cancer. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl 57:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Price D, Chisholm A, van der Molen T et al (2011) Reassessing the evidence hierarchy in asthma: evaluating comparative effectiveness. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 11:526–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Seymour JM, Moore L, Jolley CJ et al (2010) Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation following acute exacerbations of COPD. Thorax 65:423–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Adamson SL, Burns J, Camp PG et al (2016) Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on exacerbation number and severity in people with COPD: an historical cohort study using electronic health records. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 11:61–71Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Herland K, Akselsen JP, Skjønsberg OH et al (2005) How representative are clinical study patients with asthma or COPD for a larger “real life” population of patients with obstructive lung disease? Respir Med 99:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kanazawa N, Ueshima K, Tominari S et al (2017) Underuse of cardiac rehabilitation in workers with coronary artery disease—claims database survey in Japan. Circ J 81:1424–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yokoyama Y, Kakudate N, Sumida F et al (2016) Evidence-practice gap for dental sealant application: results from a dental practice-based research network in Japan. Int Dent J 66:330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D et al (2012) National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health 102:1274–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Santarius T, Lawton R, Kirkpatrick PJ et al (2008) The management of primary chronic subdural haematoma: a questionnaire survey of practice in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Br J Neurosurg 22:529–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    National Cancer Center, Center for Cancer Control and information services. https://hospdb.ganjoho.jp/kyotendb.nsf/xpTopPage.xsp. Accessed Dec 2017
  62. 62.
    Masako S, Noriko S, Susumu K et al (2017) Association between perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation and postoperative pneumonia in lung cancer resection patients—an analysis using Japanese administrative database. J Jpn Soc Healthc Admin 54:55–63Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Society of Clinical Oncology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health Informatics, Graduate School of Public HealthKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations