Advertisement

The anatomy of the parapharyngeal segment of the internal carotid artery for endoscopic endonasal approach

  • Xinyun Fang
  • Guangfu Di
  • Wei Zhou
  • Xiaochun JiangEmail author
Original Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) is a life-threatening complication of endoscopic endonasal approaches. The objective of this study is to illustrate the detail anatomy of the parapharyngeal segment of the ICA (PPICA) to safe endoscopic endonasal surgery. The anatomical dissection was performed in 10 cadaveric specimens and several crucial anatomical landmarks were identified and measured. In addition, 50 dry skulls were studied to further assess the relationship between the pharyngeal tubercle and carotid foramen. From the endoscopic endonasal perspective, in the median plane, the pharyngeal tubercle and the carotid foramen on both sides were located on a line. The average distance between the pharyngeal tubercle and anterior border of the external orifice of the carotid canal was measured as 25.2 ± 3.2 mm. In the paramedian plane, the PPICA was located between the levator veli palatini muscle (LVPM) and the stylopharyngeal muscle (SPM) in upper parapharyngeal space in all specimens, and the distance from the posterior border of the LVPM to the anterior border of the SPM was recorded as 15.1 ± 2.8 mm at the level of the carotid foramen. The distance from the attachment of the LVPM to the anterior border of the external orifice of the carotid canal was about 5.1 ± 0.2 mm. The fully developed stylopharyngeal fascia (SPhF) was observed in 10 cases, and the PPICA was always anteriorly enclosed by and adhered to the SPhF.

Keywords

Anatomy Parapharyngeal segment of the internal carotid artery Pharyngeal tubercle Levator veli palatini muscle Stylopharyngeal muscle Stylopharyngeal fascia 

Notes

Funding information

This study was supported by the Key research and development plan project of Anhui Province (1804h0802023).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest..

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Wannan Medical College.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Abuzayed B, Tanriover N, Gazioglu N, Akar Z (2010) Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the clival region. J Craniofac Surg 21:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouthillier A, van Loveren HR, Keller JT (1996) Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 38:425–433Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choudhri O, Mindea SA, Feroze A, Soudry E, Chang SD, Nayak JV (2014) Experience with intraoperative navigation and imaging during endoscopic transnasal spinal approaches to the foramen magnum and odontoid. Neurosurg Focus 36:E4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dallan I, Lenzi R, Bignami M, Battaglia P, Sellari-Franceschini S, Muscatello L, Seccia V, Castelnuovo P, Tschabitscher M (2010) Endoscopic transnasal anatomy of the infratemporal fossa and upper parapharyngeal regions: correlations with traditional perspectives and surgical implications. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ekici F, Tekbas G, Onder H, Gumus H, Cetincakmak MG, Palanci Y et al (2012) Course anomalies of extracranial internal carotid artery and their relationship with pharyngeal wall: an evaluation with multislice CT. Surg Radiol Anat 34:625–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feigl G, Anderhuber F, Fasel JH, Likar R (2007) Meaning of stylopharyngeal fascia in intraoral block techniques. Schmerz 21:28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Pant H, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Horo-witz MB (2013) Carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: incidence and outcomes. Neurosurgery 73:261–269Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ho B, Jang DW, VanRompaey J, Figueroa R, Brown JJ, Carrau RL et al (2014) Landmarks for endoscopic approach to the parapharyngeal internal carotid artery: a radiographic and cadaveric study. Laryngoscope 124:1995–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Thomas A, Gardner P, Zanation A, Duz B, Stefko ST, Byers K, Horowitz MB (2011) Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors’ initial 800 patients. J Neurosurg 114:1544–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khattar N, Koutourousiou M, Chabot JD, Wang EW, CohenGadol AA, Snyderman CH et al (2018) Endoscopic endonasal and transcranial surgery for microsurgical resection of ventral foramen magnum meningiomas: a preliminary experience. Oper Neurosurg 14:503–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kooshkabadi A, Choi PA, Koutourousiou M, Snyderman CH, Wang EW, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA (2015) Atlanto-occipital instability following endoscopic endonasal approach for lower clival lesions experience with 212 cases. Neurosurgery 77:888–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Labib MA, Prevedello DM, Carrau R, Kerr EE, Naudy C, Abou Al-Shaar H et al (2014) A road map to the internal carotid artery in expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches to the ventral cranial base. Neurosurgery 10:448–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee DL, McCoul ED, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2012) Endoscopic endonasal access to the jugular foramen: defining the surgical approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 73:342–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Little AS, Perez-Orribo L, Rodriguez-Martinez NG, Reyes PM, Newcomb AG, Prevedello DM et al (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after inferior-third clivectomy and intradural exposure of the foramen magnum: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base. J Neurosurg Spine 18:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu J, Pinheiro-Neto CD, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Hirsch BE et al (2015) Eustachian tube and internal carotid artery in skull base surgery: an anatomical study. Laryngoscope 124:2655–2664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Macchi C, Gulisano M, Giannelli F, Catini C, Pratesi C, Pacini P (1997) Kinking of the human internal carotid artery: a statistical study in 100 healthy subjects by echocolor Doppler. J Cardiovasc Surg 38:629–637Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morera VA, FernandezMiranda JC, Prevedello DM, Madhok R, BargesColl J, Gard-ner P et al (2010) “Far-medial” expanded endonasal approach to the inferior third of the clivus: the transcondylar and transjugular tubercle approaches. Neurosurgery 66:219–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oakley GM, Ebenezer J, Hamizan A, Sacks PL, Rom D, Sacks R et al (2018) Findin-g the Petroclival Carotid Artery: The Vidian–Eustachian junction as a reliable landmark. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 79:361–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ozgur Z, Celik S, Govsa F, Aktug H, Ozgur T (2007) A study of the course of the internal carotid artery in the parapharyngeal space and its clinical importance. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:1483–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paulsen F, Tillmann B, Christofides C, Richter W, Koebke J (2000) Curving and looping of the internal carotid artery in relation to the pharynx: frequency, embryology and clinical implications. J Anat 197:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rowan NR, Turner MT, Valappil B, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, Gardn-er PA et al (2018) Injury of the carotid artery during endoscopic endonasal surgery: surveys of skull base surgeons. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 79:302–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simon F, Vacher C, Herman P, Verillaud B (2016) Surgical landmarks of the nasopharyngeal internal carotid using the maxillary swing approach: a cadaveric study. Laryngoscope 126:1562–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun X, Yan B, Truong HQ, Borghei-Razavi H, Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda JC (2018) A comparative analysis of endoscopic-assisted transoral and transnasal approaches to parapharyngeal space: a cadaveric study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 79:229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang WH, Abhinav K, Wang E, Snyderman C, Gardner PA, FernandezMiranda JC (2015) Endoscopic endonasal transclival transcondylar approach for foramen magnum meningiomas: surgical anatomy and technical note. Oper Neurosurg 76:153–161Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zoli M, Rossi N, Friso F, Sturiale C, Frank G, Pasquini E et al (2018) Limits of endoscopic endonasal approach for cranio-vertebral junction tumors. J Neurosurg Sci 62:356–368Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurosurgery, Yijishan HospitalWannan Medical CollegeWuhuChina

Personalised recommendations