The anatomy of the parapharyngeal segment of the internal carotid artery for endoscopic endonasal approach
- 16 Downloads
Injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) is a life-threatening complication of endoscopic endonasal approaches. The objective of this study is to illustrate the detail anatomy of the parapharyngeal segment of the ICA (PPICA) to safe endoscopic endonasal surgery. The anatomical dissection was performed in 10 cadaveric specimens and several crucial anatomical landmarks were identified and measured. In addition, 50 dry skulls were studied to further assess the relationship between the pharyngeal tubercle and carotid foramen. From the endoscopic endonasal perspective, in the median plane, the pharyngeal tubercle and the carotid foramen on both sides were located on a line. The average distance between the pharyngeal tubercle and anterior border of the external orifice of the carotid canal was measured as 25.2 ± 3.2 mm. In the paramedian plane, the PPICA was located between the levator veli palatini muscle (LVPM) and the stylopharyngeal muscle (SPM) in upper parapharyngeal space in all specimens, and the distance from the posterior border of the LVPM to the anterior border of the SPM was recorded as 15.1 ± 2.8 mm at the level of the carotid foramen. The distance from the attachment of the LVPM to the anterior border of the external orifice of the carotid canal was about 5.1 ± 0.2 mm. The fully developed stylopharyngeal fascia (SPhF) was observed in 10 cases, and the PPICA was always anteriorly enclosed by and adhered to the SPhF.
KeywordsAnatomy Parapharyngeal segment of the internal carotid artery Pharyngeal tubercle Levator veli palatini muscle Stylopharyngeal muscle Stylopharyngeal fascia
This study was supported by the Key research and development plan project of Anhui Province (1804h0802023).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest..
The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Wannan Medical College.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Bouthillier A, van Loveren HR, Keller JT (1996) Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 38:425–433Google Scholar
- 4.Dallan I, Lenzi R, Bignami M, Battaglia P, Sellari-Franceschini S, Muscatello L, Seccia V, Castelnuovo P, Tschabitscher M (2010) Endoscopic transnasal anatomy of the infratemporal fossa and upper parapharyngeal regions: correlations with traditional perspectives and surgical implications. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Pant H, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Horo-witz MB (2013) Carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: incidence and outcomes. Neurosurgery 73:261–269Google Scholar
- 14.Little AS, Perez-Orribo L, Rodriguez-Martinez NG, Reyes PM, Newcomb AG, Prevedello DM et al (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after inferior-third clivectomy and intradural exposure of the foramen magnum: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base. J Neurosurg Spine 18:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Macchi C, Gulisano M, Giannelli F, Catini C, Pratesi C, Pacini P (1997) Kinking of the human internal carotid artery: a statistical study in 100 healthy subjects by echocolor Doppler. J Cardiovasc Surg 38:629–637Google Scholar
- 24.Wang WH, Abhinav K, Wang E, Snyderman C, Gardner PA, FernandezMiranda JC (2015) Endoscopic endonasal transclival transcondylar approach for foramen magnum meningiomas: surgical anatomy and technical note. Oper Neurosurg 76:153–161Google Scholar
- 25.Zoli M, Rossi N, Friso F, Sturiale C, Frank G, Pasquini E et al (2018) Limits of endoscopic endonasal approach for cranio-vertebral junction tumors. J Neurosurg Sci 62:356–368Google Scholar