Endovascular reconstruction of extracranial traumatic internal carotid artery dissections: a systematic review
- 192 Downloads
Extracranial internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) is a potential source of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients and requires high degree of suspicion for diagnosis after the initial presentation. Occasionally, if standard therapy is contraindicated, endovascular reconstruction is a treatment option. The aim of this systematic review was to report clinical and radiographic outcomes following endovascular repair of ICAD of traumatic and iatrogenic etiology. A comprehensive systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Twenty-four studies comprising 191 patients (204 lesions) were included; 179 underwent traditional carotid artery stenting (CAS), whereas 12 patients underwent flow diversion with the pipeline embolization device (PED). In total, 75.7% of the CAS group and 66.6% of the PED group presented with ICAD-related symptomatology. Concomitant pseudoaneurysms were identified in 61.9% and 78.5% of lesions in the CAS and PED group, respectively. Adverse event rates among CAS-treated lesions after 30-day follow-up were below 2.2% for stroke, transient ischemic attack, and mortality. During follow-up in the CAS group, there was no incidence of ICAD-related stroke or death and 2.2% of patients underwent a repeat CAS procedure. In the PED group, no patient suffered stroke or death in the reported follow-up. In the PED cohort, there was an adequate occlusion rate and no patient had to be retreated. Endovascular reconstruction of traumatic or iatrogenic ICAD appears safe. This approach demonstrated acceptable short- and long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in both groups.
KeywordsCarotid dissection Trauma Iatrogenic Stent Flow diversion
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 3.Bejjani GK, Aulissi EF, Sullivan BJ, Monsein L, Sattler L (1998) Stellung for traumatic vascular lesions of the cranial base. Skull Base Surg 8:2–3Google Scholar
- 4.Bejjani GK, Monsein LH, Laird JR, Satler LF, Starnes BW, Aulisi EF (1999) Treatment of symptomatic cervical carotid dissections with endovascular stents. Neurosurgery 44:751–755Google Scholar
- 5.Beletsky V, Nadareishvili Z, Lynch J, Shuaib A, Woolfenden A, Norris JW (2003) Cervical arterial dissection: time for a therapeutic trial? Stroke 34:2856–2860. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000098649.39767.BC CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Benninger DH, Georgiadis D, Kremer C, Studer A, Nedeltchev K, Baumgartner RW (2004) Mechanism of ischemic infarct in spontaneous carotid dissection. Stroke 35:482–485. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000109766.27393.52 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL, Cates CU, Creager MA, Fowler SB, Friday G, Hertzberg VS, EB MI, Moore WS, Panagos PD, Riles TS, Rosenwasser RH, Taylor AJ (2011) 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/american heart. Circulation 124:489–532. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820d8d78 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Cohen JE, Ben-Hur T, Rajz G, Umansky F, Gomori JM (2005) Endovascular stent-assisted angioplasty in the management of traumatic internal carotid artery dissections. Stroke 36:e45–e47. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000158910.08024.7f CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Cohen JE, Gomori JM, Itshayek E, Spektor S, Shoshan Y, Rosenthal G, Moscovici S (2012) Single-center experience on endovascular reconstruction of traumatic internal carotid artery dissections. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:216–221. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31823f630a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Goeggel Simonetti B, Hulliger J, Mathier E, Jung S, Fischer U, Sarikaya H, Slotboom J, Schroth G, Mordasini P, Gralla J, Arnold M (2017) Iatrogenic vessel dissection in endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Clin Neuroradiol 29:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-017-0639-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Hassan AE, Zacharatos H, Souslian F, Suri MFK, Qureshi AI (2012) Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with cervico-cranial dissections treated with stent placement: a meta-analysis of case series. J Neurotrauma 29:1342–1353. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.1963 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Jeon P, Kim BM, Kim DI, Shin YS, Kim KH, Park SI, Kim DJ, Suh SH (2010) Emergent self-expanding stent placement for acute intracranial or extracranial internal carotid artery dissection with significant hemodynamic insufficiency. Am J Neuroradiol 31:1529–1532. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2115 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Juszkat R, Liebert W, Stanisławska K, Tomczyk T, Wronka J, Wąsik N, Perek B (2015) Extracranial internal carotid artery dissection treated with self-expandable stents: a single-centre experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38:1451–1457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1101-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Lee DH, Park MS (2001) Treatment of internal carotid artery dissections with endovascular stent placement: report of two cases. 2Google Scholar
- 32.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol, In, pp e1–e34Google Scholar
- 34.Lyrer P, Engelter S (2004) Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection. Stroke 35:613–614. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000112970.63735.FC CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Malek AM, Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Phatouros CC, Lempert TE, Meyers PM, Smith WS, Stoney R (2000) Patient presentation, angiographic features, and treatment of strangulation-induced bilateral dissection of the cervical internal carotid artery. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 92:481–487. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.92.3.0481 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Matsuura JH, Rosenthal D, Jerius H, Clark MD, Owens DS (1997) Traumatic carotid artery dissection and pseudoaneurysm treated with endovascular coils and stent. J Endovasc Surg 4:339–343. https://doi.org/10.1583/1074-6218(1997)004<0339:TCADAP>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 44.Pham MH, Rahme RJ, Arnaout O, Hurley MC, Bernstein RA, Batjer HH, Bendok BR (2011) Endovascular stenting of extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissections: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurgery 68:856–866. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209ce03 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 49.Seth R, Obuchowski AM, Zoarski GH (2013) Endovascular repair of traumatic cervical internal carotid artery injuries: a safe and effective treatment option. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:1219–1226. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3337/rajnr.A3337Google Scholar
- 55.(2007) Antiplatelet therapy vs. anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection: rationale and design of the Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study (CADISS). Int J Stroke 2:292–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2007.00165.x