Advertisement

Impact of connectivity between the pars triangularis and orbitalis on identifying the frontal language area in patients with dominant frontal gliomas

  • Taiichi Saito
  • Yoshihiro Muragaki
  • Manabu Tamura
  • Takashi Maruyama
  • Masayuki Nitta
  • Shunsuke Tsuzuki
  • Takakazu Kawamata
Original Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

We have previously revealed that identification of the frontal language area (FLA) can be difficult in patients with dominant frontal glioma involving the pars triangularis (PT). The present study added new cases and performed additional analyses. We noticed a new finding that the presence of extension to the pars orbitalis (POr) was associated with negative response to the FLA. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of PT involvement with extension to the POr on the failure to identify the FLA. From 2000 to 2017, awake craniotomy was performed on 470 patients. Of these patients, the present study included 148 consecutive patients with frontal glioma on the dominant side. We evaluated whether tumors involved the PT or extended to the POr. Thirty one of 148 patients showed involvement of the PT, and we examined the detailed characteristics of these 31 patients. The rate of negative response for the FLA was 61% in patients with involvement of the PT. In 31 patients with frontal glioma involving the PT, univariate analyses showed significant correlation between extension to the POr and failure to identify the FLA (P = 0.0070). Similarly, multivariate analysis showed only extension to the POr correlated significantly with failure to identify the FLA (P = 0.0129). We found new evidence that extension to the POr which impacts connectivity between the PT and POr correlated significantly with negative response to the FLA of patients with dominant frontal glioma.

Keywords

Awake craniotomy Language function Frontal glioma Pars triangularis Pars orbitalis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are extended to Dr. Takashi Komori, Ms. Soko Ikuta, Satoko Fukuchi, Asuka Komori, and Mr. Takashi Sakayori for valuable help with clinical work and data analysis.

Funding

This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant No. 18K09006.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee at the Tokyo Women’s Medical University (No. 3540).

Informed consent

Given the retrospective design, the institutional review board waived the requirement for informed consent. We took the opt-out method. To protect patient privacy, we removed all identifiers from our records upon completion of our analyses.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ardila A, Bernal B, Rosselli M (2016) How localized are language brain areas? A review of Brodmann areas involvement in oral language. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: the Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists 31:112–122.  https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acv081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ardila A, Bernal B, Rosselli M (2017) Should Broca's area include Brodmann area 47? Psicothema 29:73–77.  https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.11 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Catani M, Jones DK, ffytche DH (2005) Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Ann Neurol 57:8–16.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20319 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Damasio AR, Geschwind N (1984) The neural basis of language. Annu Rev Neurosci 7:127–147.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.07.030184.001015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duffau H (2005) Lessons from brain mapping in surgery for low-grade glioma: insights into associations between tumour and brain plasticity. Lancet Neurol 4:476–486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70140-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duffau H (2007) Contribution of cortical and subcortical electrostimulation in brain glioma surgery: methodological and functional considerations. Neurophysiologie Clinique = Clinical Neurophysiology 37:373–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2007.09.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duffau H (2014) The huge plastic potential of adult brain and the role of connectomics: new insights provided by serial mappings in glioma surgery. Cortex: J Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior 58:325–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Egger J, Kapur T, Fedorov A, Pieper S, Miller JV, Veeraraghavan H, Freisleben B, Golby AJ, Nimsky C, Kikinis R (2013) GBM volumetry using the 3D slicer medical image computing platform. Sci Rep 3:1364.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01364 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foundas AL, Eure KF, Luevano LF, Weinberger DR (1998) MRI asymmetries of Broca's area: the pars triangularis and pars opercularis. Brain Lang 64:282–296.  https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1998.1974 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foundas AL, Leonard CM, Gilmore RL, Fennell EB, Heilman KM (1996) Pars triangularis asymmetry and language dominance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:719–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foundas AL, Leonard CM, Heilman KM (1995) Morphologic cerebral asymmetries and handedness. The pars triangularis and planum temporale. Arch Neurol 52:501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Friederici AD (2015) White-matter pathways for speech and language processing. Handb Clin Neurol 129:177–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00010-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giussani C, Roux FE, Ojemann J, Sganzerla EP, Pirillo D, Papagno C (2010) Is preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging reliable for language areas mapping in brain tumor surgery? Review of language functional magnetic resonance imaging and direct cortical stimulation correlation studies. Neurosurgery 66:113–120.  https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000360392.15450.C9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kayama T, Guidelines Committee of the Japan Awake Surgery C (2012) The guidelines for awake craniotomy guidelines committee of the Japan Awake Surgery conference. Neurol Med Chir 52:119–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim SS, McCutcheon IE, Suki D, Weinberg JS, Sawaya R, Lang FF, Ferson D, Heimberger AB, DeMonte F, Prabhu SS (2009) Awake craniotomy for brain tumors near eloquent cortex: correlation of intraoperative cortical mapping with neurological outcomes in 309 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 64:836–845; discussion 345-836.  https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000342405.80881.81 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lemaire JJ, Golby A, Wells WM 3rd, Pujol S, Tie Y, Rigolo L, Yarmarkovich A, Pieper S, Westin CF, Jolesz F, Kikinis R (2013) Extended Broca's area in the functional connectome of language in adults: combined cortical and subcortical single-subject analysis using fMRI and DTI tractography. Brain Topogr 26:428–441.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0257-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114:97–109.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muragaki Y, Iseki H, Maruyama T, Kawamata T, Yamane F, Nakamura R, Kubo O, Takakura K, Hori T (2006) Usefulness of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for glioma surgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl 98:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muragaki Y, Iseki H, Maruyama T, Tanaka M, Shinohara C, Suzuki T, Yoshimitsu K, Ikuta S, Hayashi M, Chernov M, Hori T, Okada Y, Takakura K (2011) Information-guided surgical management of gliomas using low-field-strength intraoperative MRI. Acta Neurochir Suppl 109:67–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99651-5_11 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nossek E, Matot I, Shahar T, Barzilai O, Rapoport Y, Gonen T, Sela G, Korn A, Hayat D, Ram Z (2013) Failed awake craniotomy: a retrospective analysis in 424 patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor. J Neurosurg 118:243–249.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.10.JNS12511 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peraud A, Ilmberger J, Reulen HJ (2004) Surgical resection of gliomas WHO grade II and III located in the opercular region. Acta Neurochir 146:9–17; discussion 17-18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-003-0165-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rolston JD, Englot DJ, Benet A, Li J, Cha S, Berger MS (2015) Frontal operculum gliomas: language outcome following resection. J Neurosurg 122:725–734.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.11.JNS132172 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roux FE, Boulanouar K, Lotterie JA, Mejdoubi M, LeSage JP, Berry I (2003) Language functional magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of language areas: correlation with direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 52:1335–1345 discussion 1345-1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saito T, Muragaki Y, Maruyama T, Tamura M, Nitta M, Tsuzuki S, Konishi Y, Kamata K, Kinno R, Sakai KL, Iseki H, Kawamata T (2016) Difficulty in identification of the frontal language area in patients with dominant frontal gliomas that involve the pars triangularis. J Neurosurg 125:803–811.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.8.JNS151204 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saito T, Tamura M, Muragaki Y, Maruyama T, Kubota Y, Fukuchi S, Nitta M, Chernov M, Okamoto S, Sugiyama K, Kurisu K, Sakai KL, Okada Y, Iseki H (2014) Intraoperative cortico-cortical evoked potentials for the evaluation of language function during brain tumor resection: initial experience with 13 cases. J Neurosurg 121:827–838.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.JNS131195 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sanai N, Mirzadeh Z, Berger MS (2008) Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N Engl J Med 358:18–27.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa067819 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Southwell DG, Hervey-Jumper SL, Perry DW, Berger MS (2016) Intraoperative mapping during repeat awake craniotomy reveals the functional plasticity of adult cortex. J Neurosurg 124:1460–1469.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.5.JNS142833 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Szelenyi A, Bello L, Duffau H, Fava E, Feigl GC, Galanda M, Neuloh G, Signorelli F, Sala F, Workgroup for Intraoperative Management in Low-Grade Glioma Surgery Within the European Low-Grade Glioma N (2010) Intraoperative electrical stimulation in awake craniotomy: methodological aspects of current practice. Neurosurg Focus 28:E7.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.12.FOCUS09237 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tamura M, Muragaki Y, Saito T, Maruyama T, Nitta M, Tsuzuki S, Iseki H, Okada Y (2015) Strategy of surgical resection for glioma based on intraoperative functional mapping and monitoring. Neurol Med Chir 55:383–398.  https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2014-0415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yoshimitsu K, Suzuki T, Muragaki Y, Chernov M, Iseki H (2010) Development of modified intraoperative examination monitor for awake surgery (IEMAS) system for awake craniotomy during brain tumor resection. Conference Proceedings 2010:6050–6053.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627616 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryTokyo Women’s Medical UniversityShinjuku-kuJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Advanced Techno-SurgeryTokyo Women’s Medical UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations