Advertisement

Functional & Integrative Genomics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 43–60 | Cite as

SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 influences flowering time, lateral branching, oil quality, and seed yield in Brassica juncea cv. Varuna

  • Shikha Tyagi
  • Tanu Sri
  • Anupama Singh
  • Pratiksha Mayee
  • S. M. Shivaraj
  • Prateek Sharma
  • Anandita SinghEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

SOC1, a MADS-box type II transcription factor, integrates environmental and endogenous cues to promote flowering in angiosperms. Recent reports implicating SOC1 in roles beyond floral transition prompted functional characterization of SOC1 in polyploid rapeseed mustard genomes. Gene characterization in Brassicas necessitates analysis of composite homeolog function. While insertional mutagenesis is untenable in Brassicas owing to gene redundancy, gain-of-function approach entails serial characterization of individual homeologs. Herein, we demonstrate modulated floral promotive effects in natural variants of Brassica SOC1 and provide lateral branching as a probable outcome of polyploidy-induced gene diversification. Ectopic expression of two B genome specific SOC1 variants in Arabidopsis thaliana resulted in differential floral acceleration and manifestation of multiple vegetative rosettes. Characterization of composite homeolog function in B. juncea via introgression of Brassica SOC1 specific artificial miRNA, designed to target homeologs, also exhibited modifications in floral transition and lateral branching. Comprehensive analysis of field performance of B. juncea transgenics displayed altered fitness across 11 agronomic traits. Crucially, reduced SOC1 levels directly impacted two developmental traits, namely, flowering time and number of lateral branches which in turn influenced several dependent agronomic traits. While delayed flowering and crop maturity resulted in altered fatty acid composition with higher SFA and lower PUFA in transgenics relative to controls, reduction in overall count of lateral branches caused a concomitant decrease in silique count which ultimately impacted total seed yield in transgenics. Statistical analysis revealed number of secondary branches as the most critical trait influencing seed yield. Based on our findings, we propose enhancing levels Brassica SOC1, a key target, for achieving earliness in flowering, improved seed yield and oil quality, and studying trait trade-offs.

Keywords

Homeologs Artificial miRNA Natural variation Flowering time Oil quality Brassica crop 

Abbreviations

TLN

Total leaf number (at the time of flowering)

amiR-bjusoc1

Artificial miRNA designed to target B. juncea SOC1

DTF

Days taken to 50% flowering

DAS

Days after sowing

TFEB

Total free energy of binding

EDF

Energy gained after (miRNA-target) duplex formation

LF

Least fractionated

MF2

Most fractionated

MFE

Minimum free energy

GC-MS

Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry

RH

Relative humidity

NPF

National Phytotron Facility

SFA

Saturated fatty acid

MUFA

Monounsaturated fatty acids

PUFA

Polyunsaturated fatty acid

CTD

C-terminal domain

NLS

Nuclear localization signal

RQ

Relative quantification

WMD

Web MicroRNA Designer

LFY

LEAFY

AGL24

AGAMOUS-LIKE 24

Notes

Acknowledgements

Junior and Senior Research Fellowships to AS and ST, respectively, is acknowledged. Part of this data has appeared in the doctoral thesis of PM (Mayee 2016). Technical assistance from AIRF, JNU, New Delhi, and NPF, IARI, India, is appreciated. The contribution of Mr. Hari Ram Gupta in field-related activities is duly recognized. We are thankful to Mr. Subodh Kumar Budakoti (Sr. Application Chemist in Shimadzu Analytical (India) Pvt. Ltd.) for technical help in analysis of GC-MS data. Infrastructural support from TERI and TERI School of Advanced Studies is gratefully acknowledged.

Author contributions

ST, TS, AS, PM, and SMS performed experiments. ST coordinated and executed the fieldwork and was involved in overall compilation of data. ST, TS, and AS were involved in data acquisition and generation. ST, TS, AS, PS, and AS* analyzed the results and interpreted the findings. PS conceptualized statistical tests and was involved in data analysis and drawing critical inferences from field data. ST and AS* drafted the manuscript. AS* conceptualized, designed experiments and supervised the overall study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding information

This work was supported by grants received from Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India, towards the projects BT/PR10071/AGR/36/31/2007, BT/PR628/AGR/36/674/2011, and BT/PR 15052/16/908/2011. Financial assistance as JRF to TS from University Grants Commission, Govt. of India, is gratefully appreciated.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict interests.

Supplementary material

10142_2018_626_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Online Resource 1 (DOCX 12 kb)
10142_2018_626_MOESM2_ESM.docx (36 kb)
Online Resource 2 (DOCX 35 kb)
10142_2018_626_Fig7_ESM.png (1.9 mb)
Online Resource 3

(PNG 1937 kb)

10142_2018_626_MOESM3_ESM.tif (12.9 mb)
High Resolution Image (TIF 13165 kb)
10142_2018_626_Fig8_ESM.png (288 kb)
Online Resource 4

(PNG 288 kb)

10142_2018_626_MOESM4_ESM.tif (1.9 mb)
High Resolution Image (TIF 1964 kb)
10142_2018_626_MOESM5_ESM.docx (35 kb)
Online Resource 5 (DOCX 34 kb)
10142_2018_626_MOESM6_ESM.docx (50 kb)
Online Resource 6 (DOCX 49 kb)
10142_2018_626_MOESM7_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Online Resource 7 (DOCX 16 kb)
10142_2018_626_MOESM8_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Online Resource 8 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Andrés F, Coupland G (2012) The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat Rev Genet 13:627–639.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3291 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baux A, Colbach N, Allirand JM, Jullien A, Ney B, Pellet D (2013) Insights into temperature effects on the fatty acid composition of oilseed rape varieties. Eur J Agron 49:12–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanc G, Wolfe KH (2004) Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell 16:1679–1691.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.021410 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Borner R, Kampmann G, Chandler J, Gleissner R, Wisman E, Apel K, Melzer S (2000) A MADS domain gene involved in the transition to flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J 24:591–599.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00906.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bratzel F, Turck F (2015) Molecular memories in the regulation of seasonal flowering: from competence to cessation. Genome Biol 16:192.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0770-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Canvin DT (1965) The effect of temperature on the oil content and fatty acid composition of the oils from several oil seed crops. Can J Bot 43:63–69.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b65-008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen C, Ridzon DA, Broomer AJ, Zhou Z, Lee DH, Nguyen JT, Barbisin M, Xu NL, Mahuvakar VR, Andersen MR, Lao KQ, Livak KJ, Guegler KJ (2005) Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem–loop RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 33:e179–e179.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gni178 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng F, Liu S, Wu J, Fang L, Sun S, Liu B, Li P, Hua W, Wang X (2011) BRAD, the genetics and genomics database for Brassica plants. BMC Plant Biol 11:136.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-136 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng F, Mandáková T, Wu J, Xie Q, Lysak MA, Wang X (2013) Deciphering the diploid ancestral genome of the mesohexaploid Brassica rapa. Plant Cell 25:1541–1554.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.110486 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng F, Wu J, Fang L, Sun S, Liu B, Lin K, Bonnema G, Wang X (2012) Biased gene fractionation and dominant gene expression among the subgenomes of Brassica rapa. PLoS One 7:e36442.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036442 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng F, Wu J, Liang J, Wang X (2015) In: Wang X, Kole C (eds) “Genome triplication drove the diversification of Brassica plants” in The Brassica rapa Genome. Springer, Berlin, pp 115–120.  https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2014.24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cho LH, Yoon J, An G (2017) The control of flowering time by environmental factors. Plant J 90:708–719.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13461 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16:735–743.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cseke LJ, Zheng J, Podila GK (2003) Characterization of PTM5 in aspen trees: a MADS-box gene expressed during woody vascular development. Gene 318:55–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00765-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Deng X, Scarth R (1998) Temperature effects on fatty acid composition during development of low-linolenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). J Am Oil Chem Soc 75:759–766.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-998-0223-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dhakate P, Shivaraj SM, Singh A (2014) Design of artificial miRNA for redundant silencing of Brassica SHP1 and SHP2: transient assay-based validation of transcript cleavage from polyploid Brassicas. Acta Physiol Plant 36:2125–2135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1589-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dhakate P, Tyagi S, Singh A, Singh A (2017) Functional characterization of a novel Brassica LEAFY homolog from Indian mustard: expression pattern and gain-of-function studies. Plant Sci 258:29–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.02.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ding L, Wang Y, Yu H (2013) Overexpression of DOSOC1, an ortholog of arabidopsis SOC1, promotes flowering in the orchid Dendrobium Chao-parya smile. Plant Cell Physiol 54:595–608.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pct026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dorca-Fornell C, Gregis V, Grandi V et al (2011) The Arabidopsis SOC1-like genes AGL42, AGL71 and AGL72 promote flowering in the shoot apical and axillary meristems. Plant J 67:1006–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04653.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) A rapid total DNA preparation procedure for fresh plant tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  21. Elhiti M, Yang C, Chan A, Durnin DC, Belmonte MF, Ayele BT, Tahir M, Stasolla C (2012) Altered seed oil and glucosinolate levels in transgenic plants overexpressing the Brassica napus SHOOTMERISTEMLESS gene. J Exp Bot 63:4447–4461.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers125 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Falcone DL, Ogas JP, Somerville CR (2004) Regulation of membrane fatty acid composition by temperature in mutants of Arabidopsis with alterations in membrane lipid composition. BMC Plant Biol 4(17):17.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-4-17 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Fornara F, Montaigu A, Coupland G (2010) SnapShot: control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Cell 141:550–550.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gasparis S, Kała M, Przyborowski M, Orczyk W, Nadolska-Orczyk A (2017) Artificial microRNA-based specific gene silencing of grain hardness genes in polyploid cereals appeared to be not stable over transgenic plant generations. Front Plant Sci 7:2017.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.02017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Gregis V, Andrés F, Sessa A, Guerra RF, Simonini S, Mateos JL, Torti S, Zambelli F, Prazzoli GM, Bjerkan KN, Grini PE, Pavesi G, Colombo L, Coupland G, Kater MM (2013) Identification of pathways directly regulated by short vegetative phase during vegetative and reproductive development in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol 14:1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo Y, Hans H, Christian J, Molina C (2014) Mutations in single FT-and TFL1-paralogs of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and their impact on flowering time and yield components. Front Plant Sci 5:282.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00282
  27. Guo Y, Si P, Wang N, Wen J, Yi B, Ma C, Tu J, Zou J, Fu T, Shen J (2017) Genetic effects and genotype environment interactions govern seed oil content in Brassica napus L. BMC Genet 18(1):1.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0468-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Helliwell CA, Wood CC, Robertson M, James Peacock W, Dennis ES (2006) The Arabidopsis FLC protein interacts directly in vivo with SOC1 and FT chromatin and is part of a high-molecular-weight protein complex. Plant J 46:183–192.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02686.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hepworth SR, Valverde F, Ravenscroft D, Mouradov A, Coupland G (2002) Antagonistic regulation of flowering-time gene SOC1 by CONSTANS and FLC via separate promoter motifs. EMBO J 21:4327–4337.  https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf432 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Hiraoka K, Yamaguchi A, Abe M, Araki T (2013) The florigen genes FT and TSF modulate lateral shoot outgrowth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 54:352–368.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcs168 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Exp Station (Circ) 347:1-32 (2nd edit)Google Scholar
  32. Höfgen R, Willmitzer L (1988) Storage of competent cells for Agrobacterium transformation. Nucleic Acids Res 16:9877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hong JK, Kim SY, Kim KS, Kwon SJ, Kim JS, Kim JA, Lee SI, Lee YH (2013) Overexpression of a Brassica rapa MADS-box gene, BrAGL20, induces early flowering time phenotypes in Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol Rep 7:231–237.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-012-0254-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Immink RGH, Posé D, Ferrario S et al (2012) Characterization of SOC1’s central role in flowering by the identification of its upstream and downstream regulators. Plant Physiol 160:433–449.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.202614 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaudal M, Zhang L, Che C, Putterill J et al. (2015) Three Medicago MtFUL genes have distinct and overlapping expression patterns during vegetative and reproductive development and 35S: MtFULb accelerates flowering and causes a terminal flower phenotype in Arabidopsis. Front Genet 6:50.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00050 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Katahata SI, Futamura N, Igasaki T, Shinohara K (2014) Functional analysis of SOC1-like and AGL6-like MADS-box genes of the gymnosperm Cryptomeria japonica. Tree Genet Genomes 10:317–327.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-013-06869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kertesz M, Iovino N, Unnerstall U, Gaul U, Segal E (2007) The role of site accessibility in microRNA target recognition. Nat Genet 39:1278–1284.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng2135 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim HS, Abbasi N, Choi SB (2013) Bruno-like proteins modulate flowering time via 3′ UTR-dependent decay of SOC1 mRNA. New Phytol 198:747–756.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12181 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim KW, Shin JH, Moon J, Kim M, Lee J, Park MC, Lee I (2003) The function of the flowering time gene AGL20 is conserved in Crucifers. Mol Cells 16:136–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kimura Y, Aoki S, Ando E, Kitatsuji A, Watanabe A, Ohnishi M, Takahashi K, Inoue SI, Nakamichi N, Tamada Y, Kinoshita T (2015) A flowering integrator, SOC1, affects stomatal opening in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol (Special Focus Issue—Regular Paper Editor-in-Chief’s Choice, January) 56:640–649.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koncz C, Schell J (1986) The promoter of T L-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimaeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Mol Gen Genet 204:383–396.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00331014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lanna AC, José IC, Oliveira MGDA et al (2005) Effect of temperature on polyunsaturated fatty acid accumulation in soybean seeds. Braz J Plant Physiol 17:213–222.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202005000200004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee J, Lee I (2010) Regulation and function of SOC1, a flowering pathway integrator. J Exp Bot 61:2247–2254.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq098 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee J, Oh M, Park H, Lee I (2008) SOC1 translocated to the nucleus by interaction with AGL24 directly regulates LEAFY. Plant J 55:832–843.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03552.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee S, Kim J, Han JJ, Han MJ, An G (2004) Functional analyses of the flowering time gene OsMADS50, the putative SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1/AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (SOC1/AGL20) ortholog in rice. Plant J 38:754–764.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02082.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Li D, Liu C, Shen L, Wu Y, Chen H, Robertson M, Helliwell CA, Ito T, Meyerowitz E, Yu H (2008) A repressor complex governs the integration of flowering signals in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell 15:110–120 https://10.1016/j.devcel.2008.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu C, Chen H, Er HL, Soo HM, Kumar PP, Han JH, Liou YC, Yu H (2008) Direct interaction of AGL24 and SOC1 integrates flowering signals in Arabidopsis. Development 135:1481–1491.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.020255 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Liu C, Xi W, Shen L, Tan C, Yu H (2009) Regulation of floral patterning by flowering time genes. Dev Cell 16 (5):711–722.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.03.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Liu S, Ma T, Ma L, Lin (2016) Ectopic expression of PvSOC1, a homolog of SOC1 from Phyllostachys violascens, promotes flowering in Arabidopsis and rice. Acta Physiol Plant 38:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2186-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408.  https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. López-González L, Mouriz A, Narro-Diego L et al (2014) Chromatin-dependent repression of the Arabidopsis floral integrator genes involves plant specific PHD-containing proteins. Plant Cell 26:3922–3938.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.130781 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Mayee P (2016) Molecular and functional characterization of key regulatory elements, FT and SOC1 controlling development of flowering traits in Brassica species. (Doctoral Thesis). (New Delhi (India)): TERI UniversityGoogle Scholar
  53. Melzer S, Lens F, Gennen J, Vanneste S, Rohde A, Beeckman T (2008) Flowering-time genes modulate meristem determinacy and growth form in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet 40:1489–1492.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.253 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Menzel G, Apel K, Melzer S (1996) Identification of two MADS box genes that are expressed in the apical meristem of the long-day plant Sinapis alba in transition to flowering. Plant J 9:399–408.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.09030399.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Michaels SD, Ditta G, Gustafson-Brown C, Pelaz S, Yanofsky M, Amasino RM (2003) AGL24 acts as a promoter of flowering in Arabidopsis and is positively regulated by vernalization. Plant J 33:867–874.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01671.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Moon J, Suh SS, Lee H, Choi KR, Hong CB, Paek NC, Kim SG, Lee I (2003) The SOC1 MADS-box gene integrates vernalization and gibberellin signals for flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J 35:613–623.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01833.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Mouhu K, Kurokura T, Koskela EA, Albert VA, Elomaa P, Hytonen T (2013) The Fragaria vesca homolog of SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 represses flowering and promotes vegetative growth. Plant Cell 25:3296–3310.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.115055 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Mückstein U, Tafer H, Hackermüller J et al (2006) Thermodynamics of RNA–RNA binding. Bioinformatics 22:1177–1182.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Navabi ZK, Huebert T, Sharpe AG, O’Neill CM, Bancroft I, Parkin IAP (2013) Conserved microstructure of the Brassica B Genome of Brassica nigra in relation to homologous regions of Arabidopsis thaliana, B. rapa and B. oleracea. BMC Genomics 14:250.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-250 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Ó'Maoiléidigh DS, Graciet E, Wellmer F (2014) Gene networks controlling Arabidopsis thaliana flower development. New Phytol 201:16–30.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12444 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Ossowski S, Schwab R, Weigel D (2008) Gene silencing in plants using artificial microRNAs and other small RNAs. Plant J 53:674–690.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03328.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Pajoro A, Biewers S, Dougali E, Leal Valentim F, Mendes MA, Porri A, Coupland G, van de Peer Y, van Dijk ADJ, Colombo L, Davies B, Angenent GC (2014) The (r)evolution of gene regulatory networks controlling Arabidopsis plant reproduction: a two-decade history. J Exp Bot 65:4731–4745.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru233 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Pental D, Pradhan AK, Sodhi YS, Mukhopadhyay A (1993) Variation amongst Brassica juncea cultivars for regeneration from hypocotyl explants and optimization of conditions for Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation. Plant Cell Rep 12:462–467.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234713 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Pin PA, Nilsson O (2012) The multifaceted roles of FLOWERING LOCUS T in plant development. Plant Cell Environ 35:1742–1755.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02558.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Pose D, Yant L, Schmid M (2012) The end of innocence: flowering networks explode in complexity. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15:45–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2011.09.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Preston JC, Jorgensen SA, Jha SG (2014) Functional characterization of duplicated SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1-like genes in petunia. PLoS One 9:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pritchard FM, Eagles HA, Norton RM, Salisbury PA, Nicolas M (2000) Environmental effects on seed composition of Victorian canola. Aust J Exp Agric 40:679–685.  https://doi.org/10.1071/EA99146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Riboni M, Galbiati M, Tonelli C, Conti L (2013) GIGANTEA enables drought escape response via abscisic acid-dependent activation of the florigens and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1. Plant Physiol 162:1706–1719.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.217729 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Richter R, Bastakis E, Schwechheimer C (2013) Cross-repressive interactions between SOC1 and the GATAs GNC and GNL/CGA1 in the control of greening, cold tolerance, and flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 162:1992–2004.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.219238 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Ruokolainen S, Ng YP, Albert VA, Elomaa P, Teeri TH (2011) Over-expression of the Gerbera hybrida At-SOC1-like1 gene Gh-SOC1 leads to floral organ identity deterioration. Ann Bot 107:1491–1499.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr112 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Sá MELD, Lopes MJC, Campos MDA et al (2012) Transcriptome analysis of resistant soybean roots infected by Meloidogyne javanica. Genet Mol Biol 35:272–282.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572012000200008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Samach A, Onouchi H, Gold SE, Ditta GS, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Yanofsky MF, Coupland G (2000) Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science 288:1613–1616.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5471.1613 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Schwab R, Ossowski S, Riester M, Warthmann N, Weigel D (2006) Highly specific gene silencing by artificial microRNAs in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18:1121–1133.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.039834 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Seiler GJ (1983) Effect of genotype, flowering date, and environment on oil content and oil quality of wild sunflower seed. Crop Sci 23:1063–1068.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300060010x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Seo E, Lee H, Jeon J, Park H, Kim J, Noh YS, Lee I (2009) Crosstalk between cold response and flowering in Arabidopsis is mediated through the flowering-time gene SOC1 and its upstream negative regulator FLC. Plant Cell 21:3185–3197.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.063883 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Sharma SS, Islam MA, Negi MS, Tripathi SB (2015) Changes in oil content and fatty acid profiles during seed development in Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre. Indian J Plant Physiol 20:281–284.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-015-0160-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shekhawat K, Rathore SS, Premi OP et al (2012) Advances in agronomic management of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj & Cosson). An overview, Int J Agronomy 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/408284
  79. Shindo C, Aranzana MJ, Lister C, Baxter C, Nicholls C, Nordborg M, Dean C (2005) Role of FRIGIDA and FLOWERING LOCUS C in determining variation in flowering time of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 138:1163–1173.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.061309 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Shivaraj SM, Singh A (2016) Sequence variation in Brassica AP2 and analysis of interaction of AP2-miR172 regulatory module. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 125:191–206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0938-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Song HR, Song JD, Cho JN, Amasino RM, Noh B, Noh YS (2009) The RNA binding protein ELF9 directly reduces SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO1 transcript levels in Arabidopsis, possibly via nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Plant Cell 21:1195–1211.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.064774 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Song L, Axtell MJ, Fedoroff NV (2010) RNA secondary structural determinants of miRNA precursor processing in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 20:37–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.076 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Sri T, Mayee P, Singh A (2015) Sequence and expression variation in SUPPRESSOR of OVEREXPRESSION of CONSTANS 1 (SOC1): homeolog evolution in Indian Brassicas. Dev Genes Evol 225:287–303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-015-0513-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Tan FC, Swain SM (2007) Functional characterization of AP3, SOC1 and WUS homologues from citrus (Citrus sinensis). Physiol Plant 131:481–495.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00971.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Tang H, Woodhouse MR, Cheng F, Schnable JC, Pedersen BS, Conant G, Wang X, Freeling M, Pires JC (2012) Altered patterns of fractionation and exon deletions in Brassica rapa support a two-step model of paleohexaploidy. Genetics 190:1563–1574.  https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.137349 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Tao Z, Shen L, Liu C, Liu L, Yan Y, Yu H (2012) Genome-wide identification of SOC1 and SVP targets during the floral transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J 70:549–561.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04919.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Uddenberg D, Reimegård J, Clapham D et al (2013) Early cone setting in Picea abies acrocona is associated with increased transcriptional activity of a MADS box transcription factor. Plant Physiol 161:813–823.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.207746 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. van Dijk ADJ, Molenaar J (2017) Floral pathway integrator gene expression mediates gradual transmission of environmental and endogenous cues to flowering time. Peer J 5:e3197.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3197/supp-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Voogd C, Wang T, Varkonyi-Gasic E (2015) Functional and expression analyses of kiwifruit SOC1-like genes suggest that they may not have a role in the transition to flowering but may affect the duration of dormancy. J Exp Bot 66:4699–4710.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv234 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Wang JW, Czech B, Weigel D (2009) miR156-regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 138:738–749.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Wang X, Wang H, Wang J et al (2011) The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat Genet 43:1035–1039.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.919 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang Y, Liu C, Yang D, Yu H, Liou YC (2010) Pin1At encoding a Peptidyl-Prolylcis/trans Isomerase regulates flowering time in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell 37:112–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Warthmann N, Chen H, Ossowski S, Weigel D, Hervé P (2008) Highly specific gene silencing by artificial miRNAs in rice. PLoS One 3:e1829.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001829 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Wei J, Liu D, Liu G, Tang J, Chen Y (2016) Molecular cloning, characterization, and expression of MiSOC1: a homolog of the flowering gene SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 from mango (Mangifera indica L). Front Plant Sci 7:1758.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01758 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Wendel JF, Jackson SA, Meyers BC, Wing RA (2016) Evolution of plant genome architecture. Genome Biol 17:37.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0908-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Williams JP, Khan MU, Mitchell K, Johnson G (1988) The effect of temperature on the level and biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids in diacylglycerols of Brassica napus leaves. Plant Physiol 87:904–910.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.87.4.904 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Yang J, Liu D, Wang X, Ji C, Cheng F, Liu B, Hu Z, Chen S, Pental D, Ju Y, Yao P, Li X, Xie K, Zhang J, Wang J, Liu F, Ma W, Shopan J, Zheng H, Mackenzie SA, Zhang M (2016) The genome sequence of allopolyploid Brassica juncea and analysis of differential homoeolog gene expression influencing selection. Nat Genet 48:1225–1232.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3657 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Yoo SK, Chung KS, Kim J, Lee JH, Hong SM, Yoo SJ, Yoo SY, Lee JS, Ahn JH (2005) CONSTANS activates SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 through FLOWERING LOCUS T to promote flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139:770–778.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.066928 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Zhao S, Luo Y, Zhang Z, Xu M, Wang W, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Fan Y, Wang L (2014) ZmSOC1, a MADS-box transcription factor from Zea mays, promotes flowering in Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci 15:19987–20003.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151119987 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. Zuker M, Stiegler P (1981) Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamic and auxiliary information. Nucl Acid Res 9:133–148.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/9.1.133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shikha Tyagi
    • 1
  • Tanu Sri
    • 1
  • Anupama Singh
    • 1
  • Pratiksha Mayee
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. M. Shivaraj
    • 1
    • 3
  • Prateek Sharma
    • 4
  • Anandita Singh
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyTERI School of Advanced StudiesNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of ResearchAnkur Seeds Pvt. Ltd.NagpurIndia
  3. 3.Département de Phytologie–Faculté des Sciences de l’Agriculture et de l’AlimentationUniversité LavalQuébecCanada
  4. 4.Department of Energy and EnvironmentTERI School of Advanced StudiesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations