Advertisement

Variability in practice patterns among emergency physicians in the evaluation of patients with a suspected diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

  • Leila SalehiEmail author
  • Prashant Phalpher
  • Marc Ossip
  • Christopher Meaney
  • Rahim Valani
  • Mathew Mercuri
Original Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the inter-physician variability in the utilisation rate and diagnostic yield of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) among a group of emergency department (ED) physicians working in a similar clinical environment.

Methods

We collected data on all CTPA studies ordered by ED physicians at three affiliated sites during a 2-year period between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017. For each physician, we calculated individual CTPA utilisation rate (total number of CTPAs ordered per 1000 ED visits) and diagnostic yield (percentage of CTPAs that were positive for PE). Additional analysis was carried out in order to identify the highest orderers of CTPA and their diagnostic yield.

Results

Seventy-seven ED physicians who collectively ordered a total of 2788 CTPAs were included in the study. Utilisation rates ranged from 1.1 to 22.2 CTPA per 1000 ED visits (median: 5.2 CTPA/1000 ED visits; 25%ile: 3.6 CTPA/1000 ED visits; 75%ile: 7.9 CTPA/1000 ED visits) and the CTPA diagnostic yields ranged from 0% to 33% (median: 9.1%; 25%ile: 5.2%; 75%ile: 16.1%). Those physicians in the lower quartile for ordering rate had a higher mean diagnostic yield when compared to the higher quartiles.

Conclusion

The findings of this study demonstrate variability in CTPA ordering patterns and diagnostic yields among physicians working within the same clinical environment. There is some suggestion that those physicians who order disproportionately higher numbers of CTPAs have lower diagnostic yields.

Keywords

Pulmonary embolism Diagnostic imaging Physicians practice patterns Computed tomography Biomarkers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Oscar Karbi, Mr. Ishmail Sheri, Mr. Daniel Levay, Mr. Shaun Ghanny, Ms. Desa Marin, Ms. Priscilla Matthews and the Brampton Civic Hospital Emergency Department Governance Committee for their contributions to this manuscript. The authors acknowledge support from the CanVECTOR Network; the Network receives grant funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Funding Reference: CDT-142654).

Funding

No external funding was secured for this study. Institutional support was provided by William Osler Health System, the Brampton Civic Hospital Emergency Department Governance Committee, McMaster University Department of Medicine and University of Toronto Department of Family and Community Medicine.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have any conflict of interest to report.

References

  1. 1.
    Venkatesh AK, Agha L, Abaluck J, Rothenberg C, Kabrhel C, Raja AS (2018) Trends and variation in the utilization and diagnostic yield of chest imaging for Medicare patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210(3):572–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weir ID, Drescher F, Cousin D, Fraser ET, Lee R, Berman L, Strauss E, Wang Y, Fine JM (2010) Trends in use and yield of chest computed tomography with angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in a Connecticut hospital emergency department. Conn Med 74(1):5–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S (2011) Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med 171(9):831–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298(3):317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, Kruger RL, Hornbrook MC, Roblin D, Solberg LI, Vanneman N, Weinmann S, Williams AE (2012) Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. Jama 307(22):2400–2409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hutchinson BD, Navin P, Marom EM, Truong MT, Bruzzi JF (2015) Overdiagnosis of pulmonary embolism by pulmonary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205(2):271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anjum O, Bleeker H, Ohle R (2019) Computed tomography for suspected pulmonary embolism results in a large number of non-significant incidental findings and follow-up investigations. Emerg Radiol 26(1):29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh B, Mommer SK, Erwin PJ, Mascarenhas SS, Parsaik AK (2013) Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) in pulmonary embolism--revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Med J 30(9):701–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stojanovska J, Carlos RC, Kocher KE, Nagaraju A, Guy K, Kelly AM, Chughtai AR, Kazerooni EA (2015) CT pulmonary angiography: using decision rules in the emergency department. J Am Coll Radiol 12(10):1023–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drescher FS, Chandrika S, Weir ID, Weintraub JT, Berman L, Lee R, Van Buskirk PD, Wang Y, Adewunmi A, Fine JM (2011) Effectiveness and acceptability of a computerized decision support system using modified Wells criteria for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med 57(6):613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV, Huisman PM, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW, Kramer MH, Kruip MJ, Kwakkel-van Erp JM, Leebeek FW et al (2006) Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. Jama 295(2):172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walen S, de Boer E, Edens MA, van der Worp CAJ, Boomsma MF, van den Berg JWK (2016) Mandatory adherence to diagnostic protocol increases the yield of CTPA for pulmonary embolism. Insights Imaging 7(5):727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agarwal A, Persaud J, Grabinski R, Rabinowitz D, Bremner A, Mendelson R (2012) Pulmonary embolism: are we there yet? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 56(3):270–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gupta A, Raja AS, Khorasani R (2014) Examining clinical decision support integrity: is clinician self-reported data entry accurate? J Am Med Inform Assoc 21(1):23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ong CW, Malipatil V, Lavercombe M, Teo KGW, Coughlin PB, Leach D, Spanger MC, Thien F (2013) Implementation of a clinical prediction tool for pulmonary embolism diagnosis in a tertiary teaching hospital reduces the number of computed tomography pulmonary angiograms performed. Intern Med J 43(2):169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kline JA, Courtney DM, Beam DM, King MC, Steuerwald M (2009) Incidence and predictors of repeated computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med 54(1):41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Corwin MT, Donohoo JH, Partridge R, Egglin TK, Mayo-Smith WW (2009) Do emergency physicians use serum D-dimer effectively to determine the need for CT when evaluating patients for pulmonary embolism? Review of 5,344 consecutive patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(5):1319–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yin F, Wilson T, Della Fave A, Larsen M, Yoon J, Nugusie B, Freeland H, Chow RD (2012) Inappropriate use of D-dimer assay and pulmonary CT angiography in the evaluation of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Med Qual 27(1):74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen Z, Deblois S, Toporowicz K, Boldeanu I, Francoeur M-O, Sadouni M, Lepanto L, Chartrand-Lefebvre C (2019) Yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: short report. BMC Res Notes 12(1):41–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Costa AF, Basseri H, Sheikh A, Stiell I, Dennie C (2014) The yield of CT pulmonary angiograms to exclude acute pulmonary embolism. Emerg Radiol 21(2):133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen YA, Gray BG, Bandiera G, MacKinnon D, Deva DP (2015) Variation in the utilization and positivity rates of CT pulmonary angiography among emergency physicians at a tertiary academic emergency department. Emerg Radiol 22(3):221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Groth M, Henes FO, Mayer U, Regier M, Adam G, Begemann PGC (2012) Age-related incidence of pulmonary embolism and additional pathologic findings detected by computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Eur J Radiol 81(8):1913–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Le Gal G, Meyer G, Gourdier AL, Furber A, Revel MP, Howarth N, Davido A et al (2005) Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 352(17):1760–1768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Booker MT, Johnson JO (2017) Optimizing CT pulmonary angiogram utilization in a community emergency department: a pre- and postintervention study. J Am Coll Radiol 14(1):65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Raja AS, Ip IK, Dunne RM, Schuur JD, Mills AM, Khorasani R (2015) Effects of performance feedback reports on adherence to evidence-based guidelines in use of CT for evaluation of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: a randomized trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205(5):936–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chong J, Lee TC, Attarian A, Sivakumaran L, Troquet J-M, McDonald EG, Gallix B (2018) Association of lower diagnostic yield with high users of CT pulmonary angiogram. JAMA Intern Med 178(3):412–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abaluck J, Agha L, Kabrhel C, Raja A, Venkatesh A (2016) The determinants of productivity in medical testing: intensity and allocation of care. Am Econ Rev 106(12):3730–3764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Buchanan I, Teeples T, Carlson M, Steenblik J, Bledsoe J, Madsen T (2017) Pulmonary embolism testing among emergency department patients who are pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria negative. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med 24(11):1369–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Burge AJ, Freeman KD, Klapper PJ, Haramati LB (2008) Increased diagnosis of pulmonary embolism without a corresponding decline in mortality during the CT era. Clin Radiol 63(4):381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kindermann DR, McCarthy ML, Ding R, Frohna WJ, Hansen J, Maloy K, Milzman DP, Pines JM (2014) Emergency department variation in utilization and diagnostic yield of advanced radiography in diagnosis of pulmonary embolus. J Emerg Med 46(6):791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Richardson S, Lucas E, Cohen S, Zhang M, Qiu G, Khan S, McGinn T (2019) Predictors of overtesting in pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Acad RadiolGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Emergency Radiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Family MedicineMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.William Osler Health SystemBramptonCanada
  4. 4.Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of MedicineMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations