The utility of whole spine survey MRI in blunt trauma patients sustaining single level or contiguous spinal fractures
- 46 Downloads
To determine the utility of obtaining whole-spine survey MRI after a whole-spine CT diagnoses single level or contiguous fractures.
A retrospective search from 2015 to 2017 was performed using an institutional PACS database for consecutive patients who sustained spinal fractures from blunt injury. Only patients who received whole-spine CT followed by whole-spine MRI were included in the study. All cases had sagittal T2-weighted and Short TI (Tau) inversion recovery (STIR) imaging of the entire spine with additional T1 and T2-weighted axial imaging covering the known injury. Reports from the whole-spine CTs were compared to the reports of the whole-spine MRI to determine if additional bony and soft tissue injury were identified on subsequent MRI.
A total of 156 patients met the inclusion criteria, with an average age of 59.5 ± 20.6 years. Twenty-nine patients (18.5%) had a whole-spine MRI that demonstrated an additional bony ± soft tissue injury. A 95.1% of the additional injuries were osseous contusions or vertebral body compression fractures without significant loss of height. The distance between the original injury on CT and the additional injury on MR ranged from 1 to 13 vertebrae. A 82.8% of the additional injuries occurred within 1 to 8 vertebrae levels of the primary injury and most commonly in the thoracic spine.
Most additional bony injuries detected on MRI are bone contusions and mild compression fractures, which are unlikely to alter management. However, if screening MRI is performed for additional bony injuries, we posit that a targeted regional spinal MRI is adequate.
KeywordsWhole-spine CT Whole-spine MRI Screening MRI Single level fracture Contiguous fracture Blunt trauma
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Padayachee L, Cooper DJ, Irons S, Ackland HM, Thomson K, Rosenfeld J, Kossmann T (2006) Cervical spine clearance in unconscious traumatic brain injury patients: dynamic flexion-extension fluoroscopy versus computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction. J Trauma 60:341–345. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000195716.73126.12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Tomycz ND, Chew BG, Chang Y-F, Darby JM, Gunn SR, Nicholas DH, Ochoa JB, Peitzman AB, Schwartz E, Pape HC, Spiro RM, Okonkwo DO (2008) MRI is unnecessary to clear the cervical spine in obtunded/comatose trauma patients: the four-year experience of a level I trauma center. J Trauma 64:1258–1263. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318166d2bd CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Roos JE, Hilfiker P, Platz A, Desbiolles L, Boehm T, Marincek B, Weishaupt D (2004) MDCT in emergency radiology: is a standardized chest or abdominal protocol sufficient for evaluation of thoracic and lumbar spine trauma? Am J Roentgenol 183:959–968. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.4.1830959 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Panczykowski DM, Tomycz ND, Okonkwo DO (2011) Comparative effectiveness of using computed tomography alone to exclude cervical spine injuries in obtunded or intubated patients: meta-analysis of 14,327 patients with blunt trauma. J Neurosurg 115:541–549. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.4.JNS101672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Schoenfeld AJ, Bono CM, McGuire KJ et al (2010) Computed tomography alone versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of occult injuries to the cervical spine: a meta-analysis. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 68:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c0b67a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Adams JM, Cockburn MIE, Difazio LT et al (2006) Spinal clearance in the difficult trauma patient: a role for screening MRI of the spine. Am Surg 72:101–105Google Scholar
- 20.Choosing Wisely Initiative | ABIM Foundation. http://abimfoundation.org/what-we-do/choosing-wisely. Accessed 10 Jan 2019
- 21.Image Wisely. https://www.imagewisely.org/. Accessed 10 Jan 2019
- 22.ACR Appropriateness Criteria® | American College of Radiology. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria. Accessed 14 Jan 2019
- 23.Stiell IG, Clement CM, Grimshaw J, Brison RJ, Rowe BH, Schull MJ, Lee JS, Brehaut J, McKnight RD, Eisenhauer MA, Dreyer J, Letovsky E, Rutledge T, MacPhail I, Ross S, Shah A, Perry JJ, Holroyd BR, Ip U, Lesiuk H, Wells GA (2009) Implementation of the Canadian C-spine rule: prospective 12 Centre cluster randomised trial. BMJ 339:b4146. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Maung AA, Johnson DC, Barre K, Peponis T, Mesar T, Velmahos GC, McGrail D, Kasotakis G, Gross RI, Rosenblatt MS, Sihler KC, Winchell RJ, Cholewczynski W, Butler KL, Odom SR, Davis KA (2017) Cervical spine MRI in patients with negative CT: a prospective, multicenter study of the research consortium of New England centers for trauma (ReCONECT). J Trauma Acute Care Surg 82:263–269. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Moser N, Lemeunier N, Southerst D, Shearer H, Murnaghan K, Sutton D, Côté P (2018) Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck: part 2. A systematic review from the cervical assessment and diagnosis research evaluation (CADRE) collaboration. Eur Spine J 27:1219–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5301-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Sixta S, Moore FO, Ditillo MF, Fox AD, Garcia AJ, Holena D, Joseph B, Tyrie L, Cotton B, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (2012) Screening for thoracolumbar spinal injuries in blunt trauma: an eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:S326–S332. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31827559b8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.American College of Radiology (ACR) ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Suspected Spine Trauma. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69359/Narrative/. Accessed 17 Oct 2018
- 31.Wu X, Malhotra A, Geng B, Kalra VB, Abbed K, Forman HP, Sanelli P (2018) Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in cervical clearance of obtunded blunt trauma after a normal computed tomographic finding. JAMA Surg 153:625–632. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Samsani SR, Calthorpe D, Geutjens G (2003) Thoracic spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality in a skeletally mature patient. Spine 28:E78–E80. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000048508.72515.EC Google Scholar
- 34.Koizumi M, Ueda Y, Iida J, Matsuyama E, Yoshikawa T, Takakura Y, Hirai T, Murakami J (2002) Upper thoracic spinal cord injury without vertebral bony lesion: a report of two cases. Spine 27:E467–E470. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000030260.66622.FF CrossRefGoogle Scholar