CT angiograms of the neck in strangulation victims: incidence of positive findings at a level one trauma center over a 7-year period
- 117 Downloads
To determine the incidence of acute findings diagnosed with computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the neck among emergency department patients presenting with strangulation injury.
Method and materials
This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective review was performed at our academic urban level 1 trauma center. The PACS database was queried for all consecutive patients who had CTAs of the neck performed for the exam indication of strangulation between January 1, 2009, and April 30, 2016, resulting in 142 included patients. Analysis of the individual cases was then performed, recording any positive results, with clinical findings classified using, when possible, standardized terminology found in the literature. Frequency of acute injury in the CTA neck examinations was determined with the calculation of 95% confidence interval (CI) and positive clinical findings were evaluated by calculation of prevalence. Additionally, two board certified radiologists with training in neuroradiology assessed the cases for vascular injury.
There were 142 patients who met inclusion criteria (average age, 32.6 years) and 116 (81.7%) patients were female. CTA of the neck revealed 21 patients to have acute injuries (15.5%, 95% CI 9.5, 21.4) including 6 initially reported vascular injuries (4.2%, 95% CI 0.9, 7.5). Although neck pain (73, 51.4%), loss of consciousness (67, 47.2%), and headache (31, 21.8%) were frequently reported in the ROS, their predictive value of vascular injury was weak (4.1%, 4.5%, and 3.2%, respectively). On physical exam, redness/bruising of the neck (73, 51.4%) and neck tenderness (47, 33.1%) were both the most common and had the highest prevalence (19.2% and 12.8%, respectively), however, when selecting for vascular injuries alone were found to have low predictive yield (vascular injury 4.1% and 2.1%, respectively). The above statistics were based on the initial radiologist report and Emergency Department findings. After retrospective review, 3 Grade 1 BIFFL vascular injuries were identified (2.1%), with one false negative case (0.7%).
Performing CTA of the neck after acute strangulation injury rarely identifies clinically significant findings, with vascular injuries proving exceedingly rare. As positive vascular injury could not be clinically predicted by history and physical examination, prospective validation of a clinical prediction rule in this population is warranted.
KeywordsCTA Angiogram Strangulation Strangled Vascular injury Trauma
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Funk M, Schuppel J (2003) Strangulation injuries. Wisc Med J 102:41–45Google Scholar
- 3.Stapczynski JS (2010) Strangulation injuries. Emerg Med Rep 31(17):193–203Google Scholar
- 4.Armstrong M, Strack GB (2016) Recognition and Documentation of Strangulation Crimes. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 142(9):891. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0293
- 9.Strack GB, Mcclane GE, Hawley D (2001) A review of 300 attempted strangulation cases part i: criminal legal issues.The Journal of Emergency Medicine 21(3):303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-4679(01)00399-7
- 10.Linden JA, Rivello RJ (2018) Sexual Assault . In:Rosen's Emergency Medicine - Concepts and Clinical Practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, p 737–752Google Scholar
- 12.Malek AM, Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Phatouros CC, Lempert TE, Meyers PM, Smith WS, Stoney R (2000) Patient presentation, angiographic features, and treatment of strangulation-induced dissection of the internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 92(3):481–487. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.92.3.0481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kiani SH, Simes DC (2000) Delayed bilateral internal carotid artery thrombosis following accidental strangulation. Br J Anaesth 84(4):521–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar