Advertisement

Gastric Cancer

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 138–146 | Cite as

Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of a randomized phase III study of first-line S-1 plus oxaliplatin vs. S-1 plus cisplatin

  • Tomohiro Nishina
  • Mizutomo Azuma
  • Kazuhiro Nishikawa
  • Masahiro Gotoh
  • Hideaki Bando
  • Naotoshi Sugimoto
  • Kenji Amagai
  • Keisho Chin
  • Yasumasa Niwa
  • Akihito Tsuji
  • Hiroshi Imamura
  • Masahiro Tsuda
  • Hirofumi Yasui
  • Hirofumi Fujii
  • Kensei Yamaguchi
  • Hisateru Yasui
  • Shuichi Hironaka
  • Ken Shimada
  • Hiroto Miwa
  • Terukazu Mitome
  • Hiroki Kageyama
  • Ichinosuke Hyodo
Original Article
  • 647 Downloads

Abstract

Background

We investigated early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) using data from the G-SOX study comparing S-1 plus oxaliplatin with S-1 plus cisplatin as the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods

ETS was determined as % decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions at the first evaluation of week 6 compared to baseline. DpR was the maximum % shrinkage during the study treatment. The impact of ETS (cutoff value 20%) and DpR (continuous value) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis including prognostic factors obtained in the G-SOX study; ECOG performance status, baseline sum of tumor diameters, disease status (recurrent/unresectable), and histology (diffuse/intestinal).

Results

Among 685 patients enrolled in the G-SOX study, 632 patients who had the first tumor evaluation were analyzed. Patients with ETS ≥ 20% had longer PFS (median 4.5 vs. 2.8 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (median 14.8 vs. 10.5 months, p < 0.0001) than those with ETS < 20%. Adjusted hazard ratios of ETS < 20 vs. ≥ 20% were 0.606 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.506–0.725) for PFS and 0.589 (95% CI 0.492–0.704) for OS. DpR was also significantly associated with PFS and OS (both p < 0.0001). These results were similar between the SOX and CS groups.

Conclusions

In AGC patients receiving the first-line therapy, ETS and DpR might be predictors for PFS and OS.

Keywords

Gastric cancer Early tumor shrinkage Depth of response Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Yakult Honsha. We would like to thank all of the patients, investigators, and support staff who participated in the G-SOX study. We are also grateful to Atsushi Sato, Kunihisa Miyakawa, Tohru Fukushima, Tsuyoshi Morimoto, and Shinjiro Sakaino for performing extramural review to assess the objective response and PFS. We sincerely acknowledge the contribution of the late Chikuma Hamada, the former statistical advisor of the G-SOX study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Tomohiro Nishina has received honoraria from Yakult Honsha and Taiho Pharmaceutical. Kazuhiro Nishikawa has received grants and personal fees from Yakult Honsha, personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly and EA Pharma. Masahiro Gotoh has received grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Taiho Pharmaceutical, non-financial support from Yakult Honsha, personal fees and non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Novartis Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Bayer and Ono Pharmaceutical. Hideaki Bando has received research funds from Astra-Zeneca and Chugai Pharmaceutical, honoraria from Taiho Pharmaceutical and Eli Lilly. Naotoshi Sugimoto has received honoraria from Yakult Honsha, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono and Chugai Pharmaceutical. Kenji Amagai has received research funding from Taiho Pharmaceutical and MSD. Akihito Tsuji has received honoraria from Yakult Honsha and Taiho Pharmaceutical. Kensei Yamaguchi has received personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Chugai Pharmaceutical and Takeda Pharmaceutical. Hisateru Yasui has received personal fees from Medicon. Hisateru Yasui has received honoraria from Yakult Honsha, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Medicon Inc. Shuichi Hironaka has received honoraria from Yakult Honsha, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Novartis Pharmaceutical. Ken Shimada has received honoraria from Yakult Honsha, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical and Kyowa Hakko Kirin. Terukazu Mitome and Hiroki Kageyama are employees of Yakult Honsha, which produced oxaliplatin used in the G-SOX study from which data were obtained for the present analysis. Ichinosuke Hyodo has received advisory fees and honoraria from Yakult Honsha, Taiho Pharmaceutical and Chugai Pharmaceutical. The other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Human rights statement and informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committees on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent or a substitute for it was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Suzuki C, Blomqvist L, Sundin A, Jacobsson H, Byström P, Berglund Å, et al. The initial change in tumor size predicts response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with combination chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):948–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giessen C, Laubender RP, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Schalhorn A, Modest DP, Stintzing S, et al. Early tumor shrinkage in metastatic colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis from an irinotecan-based randomized first-line trial. Cancer Sci. 2013;104(6):718–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piessevaux H, Buyse M, Schlichting M, Van Cutsem E, Bokemeyer C, Heeger S, et al. Use of early tumor shrinkage to predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(30):3764–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Modest DP, Laubender RP, Stintzing S, Giessen C, Schulz C, Haas M, et al. Early tumor shrinkage in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line treatment with cetuximab combined with either CAPIRI or CAPOX: an analysis of the German AIO KRK 0104 trial. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(5):956–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, Lonardi S, Masi G, Salvatore L, et al. Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: results from phase III TRIBE trial by the Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(6):1188–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsuji A, Sunakawa Y, Ichikawa W, Nakamura M, Kochi M, Denda T, et al. Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response as predictors of favorable treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFOX plus cetuximab (JACCRO CC-05). Target Oncol. 2016;11(6):799–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Modest DP, Giessen-Jung C, Michl M, Mansmann UR. Early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(14):1927–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Modest DP, Stintzing S, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, et al. Relation of early tumor shrinkage (ETS) observed in first-line treatment to efficacy parameters of subsequent treatment in FIRE-3 (AIOKRK0306). Int J Cancer 2017;140(8):1918–25.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Osumi H, Takahari D, Shinozaki E, Chin K, Ogura M, Wakatsuki T, et al. Associations between early tumor shrinkage and depth of response and clinical outcomes in patients treated with 1st-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(2):267–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee CK, Kim SS, Park S, Kim C, Heo SJ, Lim JS, et al. Depth of response is a significant predictor for long-term outcome in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with trastuzumab. Oncotarget. 2017;8:31169–79.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kadowaki S, Masuishi T, Eto T, Narita Y, Taniguchi H, Ura T, et al. Depth of response predicts the clinical outcome of advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer to trastuzumab-based first-line chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;80(4):807–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yamada Y, Higuchi K, Nishikawa K, Gotoh M, Fuse N, Sugimoto N, et al. Phase III study comparing oxaliplatin plus S-1 with cisplatin plus S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(1):141–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giobbie-Hurder A, Gelber RD, Regan MM. Challenges of guarantee-time bias. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(23):2963–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bonetti M, Gelber RD. A graphical method to assess treatment-covariate interactions using the Cox model on subsets of the data. Stat Med. 2000;19:2595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lazar AA, Cole BF, Bonetti M, et al. Evaluation of treatment-effect heterogeneity using biomarkers measured on a continuous scale: subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(29):4539–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Uno H, Cai T, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Wei LJ. On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Stat Med. 2011;30(10):1105–17.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar R, Indrayan A. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48(4):277–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomohiro Nishina
    • 1
  • Mizutomo Azuma
    • 2
  • Kazuhiro Nishikawa
    • 3
  • Masahiro Gotoh
    • 4
  • Hideaki Bando
    • 5
  • Naotoshi Sugimoto
    • 6
  • Kenji Amagai
    • 7
  • Keisho Chin
    • 8
  • Yasumasa Niwa
    • 9
  • Akihito Tsuji
    • 10
  • Hiroshi Imamura
    • 11
  • Masahiro Tsuda
    • 12
  • Hirofumi Yasui
    • 13
  • Hirofumi Fujii
    • 14
  • Kensei Yamaguchi
    • 15
  • Hisateru Yasui
    • 16
  • Shuichi Hironaka
    • 17
  • Ken Shimada
    • 18
  • Hiroto Miwa
    • 19
  • Terukazu Mitome
    • 20
  • Hiroki Kageyama
    • 20
  • Ichinosuke Hyodo
    • 21
  1. 1.Department of Gastrointestinal Medical OncologyNational Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer CenterMatsuyamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of GastroenterologyKitasato University East HospitalSagamiharaJapan
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryNational Hospital Organization Osaka National HospitalOsakaJapan
  4. 4.Cancer Chemotherapy CenterOsaka Medical College HospitalTakatsukiJapan
  5. 5.Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Digestive EndoscopyNational Cancer Center Hospital EastKashiwaJapan
  6. 6.Department of Clinical OncologyOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular DiseasesOsakaJapan
  7. 7.Department of GastroenterologyIbaraki Prefectural Central HospitalKasamaJapan
  8. 8.Department of GastroenterologyCancer Institute Hospital of JFCRTokyoJapan
  9. 9.Department of EndoscopyAichi Cancer Center HospitalNagoyaJapan
  10. 10.Department of Medical OncologyKochi Health Sciences CenterKochiJapan
  11. 11.Department of SurgerySakai City HospitalSakaiJapan
  12. 12.Department of Gastroenterological OncologyHyogo Cancer CenterAkashiJapan
  13. 13.Division of Gastrointestinal OncologyShizuoka Cancer CenterSunto-gunJapan
  14. 14.Department of Clinical OncologyJichi Medical UniversityShimotsukeJapan
  15. 15.Division of GastroenterologySaitama Cancer CenterKita-adachi-gunJapan
  16. 16.Department of Medical OncologyNational Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical CenterKyotoJapan
  17. 17.Clinical Trial Promotion DepartmentChiba Cancer CenterChibaJapan
  18. 18.Department of Internal MedicineShowa University Northern Yokohama HospitalYokohamaJapan
  19. 19.Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal MedicineHyogo College of MedicineNishinomiyaJapan
  20. 20.Pharmaceutical Research and Development DepartmentYakult Honsha Co., Ltd.TokyoJapan
  21. 21.Division of GastroenterologyUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations