Advertisement

Knowledge and Information Systems

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 399–424 | Cite as

Rough filters based on residuated lattices

  • Saeed Rasouli
  • Bijan DavvazEmail author
Regular Paper
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

The paper is devoted to introduce the notion of rough sets within the context of residuated lattices. By considering the notion of a residuated lattice, we concern a relationship between rough sets theory and residuated lattices theory. We shall introduce the notion of rough subalgebra (resp. filter) with respect to a filter of a residuated lattice, which is an extended notion of subalgebra (resp. filter) in a residuated lattice and investigate some of their properties.

Keywords

Rough set Lower approximation Upper approximation Residuated lattice Subalgebra Filter 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are highly grateful to referees for their valuable comments and suggestions which were helpful in improving this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Bahls P, Cole J, Galatos N, Jipsen P, Tsinakis C (2003) Cancellative residuated lattices. Algebra Univ 50:83–106MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biswas R, Nanda S (1994) Rough groups and rough subgroups. Bull Pol Acad Sci Math 42:251–254MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blount K, Tsinakis C (2003) The structure of residuated lattices. Int J Algebra Comput 13:437–461MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonikowski Z (1994) Algebraic structures of rough sets. In: Ziarko WP (ed) Rough sets, fuzzy sets and knowledge discovery. Springer, Berlin, pp 242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonikowski Z, Bryniarski E, Wybraniec-Skardowska U (1998) Extensions and intentions in rough set theory. Inf Sci 107:149–167MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Busneag D, Piciu D (2006) On the lattice of filters of a pseudo BL-algebra. J Mult Valued Log Soft Comput 10:1–32MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ciungu LC (2006) Classes of residuated lattices. Ann Univ Craiova Math Comput Sci Ser 33:189–207MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciungu LC (2009) Directly indecomposable residuated lattices. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 6(2):7–18MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davvaz B (2004) Roughness in rings. Inf Sci 164:147–163MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davvaz B, Mahdavipour M (2006) Roughness in modules. Inf Sci 176:3658–3674MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davvaz B (2008) A short note on algebraic T-rough sets. Inf Sci 178:3247–3252MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Nola A, Georgescu G, Iorgulescu A (2002) Pseudo BL-algebras, part I. Mult Valued Log 8:673–714MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di Nola A, Georgescu G, Iorgulescu A (2002) Pseudo BL-algebras, part II. Mult Valued Log 8:715–750zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J Gen Syst 17:191–209CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dvurec̆enskij A, Rachu̇nek J (2006) Probabilistic averaging in bounded R\(\ell \)-monoids. Semigroup Forum 72:190–206MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erne M, Klossowski E, Melton A, Strecker GE (1993) A primer on Galois connections. Ann NY Acad Sci Pap Gen Topol Appl 704:103–125MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Flondor P, Georgescu G, Iorgulescu A (2001) Pseudo t-norms and pseudo-BL algebras. Soft Comput 5:355–371CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feng F, Li C, Davvaz B, Irfan Ali M (2010) Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets: a tentative approach. Soft Comput 14:899–911CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Galatos N, Jipsen P, Kowalski T, Ono H (2007) Residuated lattices: an algebraic glimpse at substructural logics. Elsevier, AmsterdamzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ganter B, Wille R (1999) Formal concept analysis. Mathematical foundations. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gediga G, Duntsch I (2002) Modal-style operators in qualitative data analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE international conference in data mining, pp 155–162Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Georgescu G (2004) Bosbach states on fuzzy structures. Soft Comput 8:217–230MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gumm HP, Ursini A (1984) Ideals in universal algebras. Algebra Univ 19:45–55MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hájek P (1998) Metamathematics of fuzzy logic, Trends in logic studia logica library 4. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Irfan Ali M, Davvaz B, Shabir M (2013) Some properties of generalized rough sets. Inf Sci 224:170–179MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Iwinski T (1987) Algebraic approach to rough sets. Bull Pol Acad Sci Math 35:673–683MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jipsen P, Tsinakis C (2002) A survey of residuated lattices. In: Martinez J (ed) Ordered algebraic structures. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 19–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kowalski T, Ono H (2001) Residuated lattices: an algebraic glimpse at logics without contraction. Japan Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krull W (1924) Axiomatische Begrundung der allgemeinen Idealtheorie. Sitzungsberichteder Physikalisch Medizinischen Societatder Erlangen 56:47–63zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kuroki N, Wang PP (1996) The lower and upper approximations in a fuzzy group. Inf Sci 90:203–220MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kuroki N (1997) Rough ideals in semigroups. Inf Sci 100:139–163MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lai H, Zhang D (2009) Concept lattices of fuzzy contexts: formal concept analysis vs. rough set theory. Int J Approx Reason 50:695–707MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lianzhen L, Kaitai L (2007) Boolean filters and positive implicative filters of residuated lattices. Inf Sci 177:5725–5738MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ono H (2003) Substructural logics and residuated lattices—an introduction, 50 Years of Studia Logica, Trends in logic, vol 21. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 193–228Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Inf Comput Sci 11:341–356CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pomykala J, Pomykala JA (1988) The stone algebra of rough sets. Bull Pol Acad Sci Math 36:495–508MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rachånek J, S̆alounová D (2012) Roughness in residuated lattices. Adv Comput Intell 297:596–603Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rasouli S, Davvaz B (2010) Roughness in MV-algebras. Inf Sci 180:737–747MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rasouli S, Davvaz B (2014) An investigation on algebraic structure of soft sets and soft filters over residuated lattices. ISRN Algebra. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/635783
  40. 40.
    Rasouli S, Davvaz B (2015) An investigation on Boolean prime filters in BL-algebras. Soft Comput 19(10):2743–2750CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rasouli S, Radfar A (2017) PMTL filters, R\(\ell \) filters and PBL filters in residuated lattices. J Mult Valued Log Soft Comput 29(6):551–576MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rasouli S, Zarin Z, Hassankhani A (2018) Characterization of a new subquasivariety of residuated Lattice. J Appl Log IfCoLog J Log Appl 5(1):33–63Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Torkzadeh L, Ghorbani S (2011) Rough filters in BL-algebras. Int J Math Math Sci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/474375
  44. 44.
    Turunen E (1999) Mathematics behind fuzzy logic. Advances in soft computing. Physica, HeidelbergzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Van Gasse B, Deschrijver G, Cornelis C, Kerre EE (2010) Filters of residuated lattices and triangle algebras. Inf Sci 180:3006–3020MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ward M, Dilworth RP (1939) Residuated lattices. Trans Am Math Soc 45:335–354MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wille R (1982) Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: Rival I (ed) Ordered sets. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 445–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Xiaoa Q, Lia Q, Guo L (2014) Rough sets induced by ideals in lattices. Inf Sci 271:82–92MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yamaka S, Kazanci O, Davvaz B (2010) Generalized lower and upper approximations in a ring. Inf Sci 180:1759–1768MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yao YY (1998) Constructive and algebraic methods of the theory of rough sets. Inf Sci 109:21–47MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yao YY (2004) A comparative study of formal concept analysis and rough set theory in data analysis. In: Tsumoto S, Slowinski R, Komorowski J (eds) Proceedings of the fourth international conference on rough sets and current trends in computing, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3066. Springer, Berlin, pp 59–68Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsPersian Gulf UniversityBushehrIran
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsYazd UniversityYazdIran

Personalised recommendations