Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Determinants for decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions in China

Abstract

Understanding how CO2 emissions and economic growth can be decoupled and what drives this relationship is key to achieving long-term sustainable development. Current methods to decompose emissions and growth usually follow an approach known as the index decomposition method, which essentially decomposes changes in the Tapio decoupling elastic index (TDEI), a commonly used index describing the decoupling relationship, into different factors. However, in this method, it is difficult to separate technical efficiency from behavioral effects. To address this problem, we developed a novel decomposition approach by combining the TDEI with production-theoretical decomposition analysis. We then investigated the determinants for decoupling economic growth from CO2 emissions in China from 2011 to 2016. The results showed that (1) the overall decoupling states changed for different consecutive years in this period; (2) the decoupling states between economic growth and potential carbon factor, potential energy intensity, and energy usage technological change were negative factors while the decoupling states between economic growth and per capita GDP, population scale, CO2 emission technological change, technical efficiencies of energy usage, and CO2 emission were positive factors for the overall decoupling state; and (3) the differences in decoupling states were associated with the driving factors for changes in CO2 emissions. The variations in the decoupling states may partially be attributed to industrial structure, the efficiency of energy usage in provinces, and the “new normal” period in which the economic growth slows down. We advise fostering of diversified environment-friendly consumption hotspots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Ang BW (2015) LMDI decomposition approach: a guide for implementation. Energy Policy 86:233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.007

  2. Chen J, Cheng S, Nikic V, Song M (2018a) Quo vadis? Major players in global coal consumption and emissions reduction. Transform Bus Econ 17(1):112–132

  3. Chen J, Xu C, Li K, Song M (2018b) A gravity model and exploratory spatial data analysis of prefecture-scale pollutant and CO2 emissions in China. Ecol Indic 90:554–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.057

  4. Chen J, Xu C, Cui L, Huang S, Song M (2019) Driving factors of CO2 emissions and inequality characteristics in China: a combined decomposition approach. Energy Econ 78:589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.011

  5. China’s Energy Statistical Yearbook. 2012-2017, China Statistics Press, Beijing

  6. Diakoulaki D, Mandaraka M (2007) Decomposition analysis for assessing the progress in decoupling industrial growth from CO2 emissions in the EU manufacturing sector. Energy Econ 29(4):636–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.005

  7. Duan H, Zhang G, Wang S, Fan Y (2019) Robust climate change research: a review on multi-model analysis. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf8f9

  8. Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Papadopoulos T, Childe SJ, Shibin KT, Wamba SF (2017) Sustainable supply chain management: framework and further research directions. J Clean Prod 142:1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.117

  9. Färe R, Primont D (1995) Multi-output production and duality: theory and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

  10. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CK, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev Econ Stat 71:90–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928055

  11. Goh T, Ang BW (2019) Tracking economy-wide energy efficiency using LMDI: approach and practices. Energy Effic 12(4):829–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9683-z

  12. Govindaraju VC, Tang CF (2013) The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, economic growth and coal consumption in China and India. Appl Energy 104:310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.042

  13. Guan D, Meng J, Reiner DM, Zhang N, Shan Y, Mi Z, Shao S, Liu Z, Zhang Q, Davis SJ (2018) Structural decline in China’s CO2 emissions through transitions in industry and energy systems. Nat Geosci 11:551–555

  14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: Volume 2 energy. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol2.html (accessed 12 May 2018)

  15. Kaya Y (1990) Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: interpretation of proposed scenarios. Paper presented to the IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group

  16. Kim K, Kim Y (2012) International comparison of industrial CO2 emission trends and the energy efficiency paradox utilizing production-based decomposition. Energy Econ 34(5):1724–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.02.009

  17. Liu Y, Lu Y (2015) The economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: a model-based scenario analysis. Appl Energy 141:96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.032

  18. Liu Y, Tan XJ, Yu Y, Qi SZ (2017) Assessment of impacts of Hubei Pilot emission trading schemes in China—a CGE-analysis using Term CO2 model. Appl Energy 189:762–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.085

  19. Lo AY (2016) Challenges to the development of carbon markets in China. Clim Pol 16(1):109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.991907

  20. Lu Q, Yang H, Huang X, Chuai X, Wu C (2015) Multi-sectoral decomposition in decoupling industrial growth from carbon emissions in the developed Jiangsu Province, China. Energy 82:414–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.052

  21. Luo Y, Long X, Wu C, Zhang J (2017) Decoupling CO2 emissions from economic growth in agricultural sector across 30 Chinese provinces from 1997 to 2014. J Clean Prod 159:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.076

  22. Maxim A, Dornean A (2018) Trends, challenges and perspectives of sustainable development. An empirical analysis for Romania. Transform Bus Econ 17:760–779

  23. Mi ZF, Pan SY, Yu H, Wei YM (2015) Potential impacts of industrial structure on energy consumption and CO2 emission: a case study of Beijing. J Clean Prod 103:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.011

  24. Mi Z, Meng J, Guan D, Shan Y, Liu Z, Wang Y, ... & Wei YM (2017). Pattern changes in determinants of Chinese emissions. Environ Res Lett 12(7), 074003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa69cf

  25. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2018) http://data.stats.gov.cn/ (accessed 12 July 2018)

  26. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2002. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. Sustainable development. SG/SD (2002)1/final. Website: http://www.olis.oecd.org/oils/2002doc.nsf/LinkTo/sg-sd(2002)1-final (final accessed August 28, 2010)

  27. Ren S, Yin H, Chen X (2014) Using LMDI to analyze the decoupling of carbon dioxide emissions by China’s manufacturing industry. Environ Dev 9:61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2013.11.003

  28. Shan Y, Liu J, Liu Z, Shao S, Guan D (2019) An emissions-socioeconomic inventory of Chinese cities. Sci Data 6:190027. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2019.27

  29. Sun J, Wang J, Wang T, Zhang T (2019) Urbanization, economic growth, and environmental pollution: partial differential analysis based on the spatial Durbin model. Manag Environ Qual: An International Journal 30(2):483–494 https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/MEQ-05-2018-0101. Accessed 12 March 2019

  30. Tang Z, Shang J, Shi C, Liu Z, Bi K (2014) Decoupling indicators of CO2 emissions from the tourism industry in China: 1990–2012. Ecol Indic 46:390–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.041

  31. Tapio P (2005) Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transp Policy 12(2):137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001

  32. Vehmas J, Malaska P, Luukkanen J, Kaivo-oja J, Hietanen O, Vinnari M, Ilvonen J (2003) Europe in the global battle of sustainability: rebound strikes back?—advanced sustainability analysis, in: Publications of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Series Discussion and Working Papers, 7

  33. Wang Q, Chiu YH, Chiu CR (2015) Driving factors behind carbon dioxide emissions in China: a modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 51:252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.07.009

  34. Wang H, Ang BW, Zhou P (2018) Decomposing aggregate CO2 emission changes with heterogeneity: an extended production-theoretical approach. Energy J 39(1). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.1.hwan

  35. Xu SC, He ZX, Long RY, Shen WX, Ji SB, Chen QB (2016) Impacts of economic growth and urbanization on CO2 emissions: regional differences in China based on panel estimation. Reg Environ Chang 16(3):777–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0795-0

  36. Zhang YJ, Da YB (2015) The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.021

  37. Zhang C, Lin Y (2012) Panel estimation for urbanization, energy consumption and CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Energy Policy 49:488–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.048

  38. Zhao X, Zhang X, Shao S (2016) Decoupling CO2 emissions and industrial growth in China over 1993–2013: the role of investment. Energy Econ 60:275–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.10.008

  39. Zheng X, Yu Y, Wang J, Deng H (2014) Identifying the determinants and spatial nexus of provincial carbon intensity in China: a dynamic spatial panel approach. Reg Environ Chang 14(4):1651–1661 https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/56088/. Accessed 12 March 2019

  40. Zhou P, Ang BW (2008) Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions: a production-theoretical approach. Energy Econ 30(3):1054–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.10.005

  41. Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2008) Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Econ 30(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.05.001

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Natural Science Foundation of China [grant no. 71934001]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant nos. 71471001, 41771568, 71533004, 71503001]; the National Key Research and Development Program of China [grant no. 2016YFA0602500]; Sichuan Province Social Science High Level Research Team Building Program; and the Program for Major Projects in Philosophy and Social Science Research under China’s Ministry of Education [grant number 14JZD031].

Author information

Correspondence to Malin Song.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Mitigation and adaptation strategies under uncertainties in East Asia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Xu, C. & Song, M. Determinants for decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions in China. Reg Environ Change 20, 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01605-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Decoupling analysis
  • CO2 emission
  • Economic growth
  • Production-theoretical decomposition analysis