Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

What difference does disaster risk reduction make? Insights from Vanuatu and tropical cyclone Pam

  • 5 Accesses

Abstract

Donors, governments, non-government organisations and humanitarian agencies are increasingly investing in disaster risk reduction (DRR) but there is limited understanding of the outcomes of these investments at community and household levels. This paper presents empirical data from nine communities across three islands in Vanuatu that experienced a direct hit from category 5 tropical cyclone Pam in 2015. The research compared the actions taken by communities that had engaged in a mid- to long-term DRR program with those that had not. The DRR program prioritised disability inclusion and women’s participation in, and leadership of, the community. Early warnings were widely heard across all communities but the communities that had engaged with the DRR program had greater understanding of, and trust in, the early warnings. They took earlier and more coordinated action and were safer during the cyclone. Compared with their past experiences, there was increased respect for women’s voices and roles, women and men collaborated more, and people with disability were supported by the whole community. The research concludes that tropical cyclone early warnings are necessary but not sufficient to ensure there is community and household preparation. There is a strong case for investments in mid- to long-term DRR focused on community and household capacity, prioritising women’s active and equal participation as community leaders, and disability inclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Aldrich D (2017) The importance of social capital in building community resilience. In: Yan W and W Galloway (eds) Rethinking resilience, adaptation and transformation in a time of change. Springer, pp: 357-364. ISBN 978-3-319-50171-0

  2. Alfieri L, Salamon P, Pappenberger F, Wetterhall F, Thielen J (2012) Operational early warning systems for water-related hazards in Europe. Environ Sci Pol 21:35-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.008

  3. Arora-Jonsson S (2011) Virtue and vulnerability: discourses on women, gender and climate change. Glob Environ Chang 21:744-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.005

  4. Ayers J, Forsyth T (2009) Community-based adaptation to climate change. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 51(4):22-31. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENV.51.4.22-31

  5. Barber R (2015) One size doesn’t fit all. Tailoring the international response to the national need following Vanuatu’s cyclone Pam. Save the Children Australia, CARE Australia, Oxfam Australia and World Vision Australia https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Reflections%20on%20Cyclone%20Pam_WHS%20Report.pdf

  6. Benson C, Twigg J (2007) Tools for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction: guidance notes for development organisations. ProVention Consortium Secretariat. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/1066_toolsformainstreamingDRR.pdf

  7. Bimal P (2009) Why Relatively Fewer People Died? The Case of Bangladesh's Cyclone Sidr. Natural Hazards. 50. 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9340-5

  8. Birnbaum ML, Daily EK, O’Rourke AP, Loretti A (2016) Research and evaluations of the health aspects of disasters, part I: an overview. Prehosp Disaster Med 5:512-522. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X15005129

  9. CARE International in Vanuatu (2015a) After action review for CARE Vanuatu’s response to the 2015 cyclone pam: a light presence response, Port Vila, Vanuatu. Provided to the author by CARE International in Vanuatu in June 2016

  10. CARE International in Vanuatu (2015b) Tropical cyclone Pam, Vanuatu rapid accountability review, Port Vila, Vanuatu. Provided to the author by CARE International in Vanuatu in June 2016

  11. Carr E, Thomspon M (2014) Gender and climate change adaptation in agrarian settings: current thinking, new directions, and research frontiers. Geogr Compass 8(3):182-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12121

  12. Cash DW, Clark W, Alcock F, Disckson N, Eckley N, Guston D, Jager J (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(14):8086-8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100

  13. Chambers R (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. J World Dev 22(7):953-969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4

  14. Chambers L, Lui S, Plotz R, Hiriasia D, Malsale P, Pulehetoa-Mitiepo R, Natapei M, Sanau N, Waiwai M, Tahani L, Willy A, Finaulahi S, Loloa F, Fa’anunu O’f (2019) Traditional or contemporary weather and climate forecasts: reaching Pacific communities. Reg Environ Chang 19(5):1521-1528 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10113-019-01487-7

  15. Chant S (2014) Exploring the feminisation of poverty in relation to women’s work and home-based enterprise in slums of the Global South. Int J Gend Entrep 6(3):296-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-09-2012-0035

  16. Ensor J (2016) Interpreting community perceptions of vulnerability, knowledge and power for community-based adaptation programming: adaptation and resilience in Vanuatu. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/adaptation-and-resilience-in-vanuatu-interpreting-community-perceptions-of-vulnerability-knowledge-and-power-for-community-based-adaptation-programming/

  17. Ensor J, Harvey B (2015) Social learning and climate change adaptation: evidence for international development practice. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 6(5):509-522. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.348

  18. Fergusson DM, Horwood L, Boden JM, Mulder RT (2014) Impact of a major disaster on the mental health of a well-studied cohort. JAMA Psychiatry 71(9):1025-1031 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/1888682

  19. Ferraro PJ (2009) Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy. N Dir Eval 2009(122):75-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.297

  20. Gaillard JC, Sanz K, Balgos BC, Dalisay S, Gorman-Murray A, Smith F, Toelupe V (2016) Beyond men and women: a critical perspective on gender and disaster. J Disasters 41(3):429-447. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12209

  21. Global Facility for Disaster Risk Reduction, GFDRR (2016a) The small island states resilience initiative (SISRI) SISRI knowledge note no. 1. Small island states resilience initiative, the World Bank and Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, Washington DC. USA. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/SISRI%20Knowlege%20Note%201%20new.pdf

  22. Global Facility for Disaster Risk Reduction, GFDRR (2016b) Reviewing the impact of capacity building in GFDRR, report prepared by University College London’s (UCL) city leadership initiative (CLI) and Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction (IRDR), Washington DC, USA. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/835691487965785652/pdf/113059-WP-p154509-v1-PUBLIC-CapBld-FULLDOC-Report-Web.pdf

  23. Giardino A, Nederhoff K, Vousdoukas M (2018) Coastal hazard risk assessment for small islands: assessing the impact of climate change and disaster reduction measures on Ebeye (Marshall Islands). Reg Environ Chang 18:2237-2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1353-3

  24. Government of Vanuatu (2015) Post disaster needs assessment TC pam march 2015. Port Vila, Vanuatu. https://reliefweb.int/report/vanuatu/post-disaster-needs-assessment-tropical-cyclone-pam-march-2015

  25. Hagedoorn LC, Brander LM, van Beukering PJH, Dijkstra HM, Franco C, Hughes L, Gilders I, Segal B (2019) Community-based adaptation to climate change in small island developing states: an analysis of the role of social capital. Clim Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1562869

  26. Handmer J, Iverson H (2017) Cyclone pam in Vanuatu: learning from the low death toll. Aust J Emerg Manag 32(2):60-65 Available at http://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:45131

  27. Hemingway L, Priestley M (2014) Natural hazards, human vulnerability and disabling societies: a disaster for disabled people? Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, [online] 2(3). Available at: https://www.rdsjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/337

  28. Holland J (2013) Who counts? The power of participatory statistics. Practical action publishing, United Kingdom. ISBN 978 1 85339 772 1

  29. Horita F, Albuquerque J, Marchezini V, Mendiondo E (2016) A qualitative analysis of the early warning process in disaster management. short paper - community engagement and practitioner studies proceedings of the ISCRAM 2016 Conference - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298341195_A_qualitative_analysis_of_the_early_warning_process_in_disaster_management

  30. IPCC (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5°C. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds.). An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways. World Meteorological Organization; Geneva, Switzerland, pp: 32. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

  31. Jachimowicz J, Chafik S, Munrat S, Prabhu JC, Weber EU (2017) Community trust reduces myopic decisions of low-income individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114(21):5401-5406 https://collaborate.princeton.edu/en/publications/community-trust-reduces-myopic-decisions-of-low-income-individual

  32. Kellett J, Caravani A (2013) Financing disaster risk reduction: a 20 year story of international aid. World Bank, Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery and Overseas Development Institute. London, United Kingdom. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/8574.pdf

  33. MacGregor S (2010) A stranger silence still: the need for feminist social research on climate change. In: Carter B, Charles N (eds) The Sociological Review Special Issue: Sociological Review Monograph Series: Nature, Society and Environmental Crisis 57(2), pp: 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01889

  34. Mcleod E, Arora-Jonsson S, Masuda Y, Bruton-Adams M, Emaurois CO, Gorong B (2018) Raising the voices of Pacific Island women to inform climate adaptation policies. Mar Policy 93:178-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.011

  35. Mechler R (2016) Reviewing estimates of the economic efficiency of disaster risk management: opportunities and limitations of using risk-based cost-benefit analysis. Nat Hazards 81:2121-2147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2170-y

  36. Moosa C, Tuana N (2014) Mapping a research agenda concerning gender and climate change: a review of the literature. Hypatia 29(3):677-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12085

  37. Morgan W (2013) Overlapping authorities: governance, leadership and accountability in contemporary Vanuatu. J South Pacific Law 2013: A1-22. https://www.usp.ac.fj/index.php?id=18254

  38. Mycoo MA (2018) Beyond 1.5°C: vulnerabilities and adaptation strategies for Caribbean Small Island developing states. Reg Environ Chang 18:2341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1248-8

  39. Nalau J, Handmer J, Dalesa M (2017) The role and capacity of government in a climate crisis: cyclone pam in Vanuatu. In: Leal FW (ed) Climate change adaptation in Pacific countries: fostering resilience and improving the quality of life. Springer, Berlin, pp 151-161 ISBN 978-3-319-50094-2

  40. Naupa A (2017) Making the invisible seen: putting women’s rights on Vanuatu’s land reform agenda. https://doi.org/10.22459/KPI.03.2017.10

  41. Nunn PD, Aalbersberg W, Lata S, Gwilliam M (2014) Beyond the core: community governance for climate-change adaptation in peripheral parts of Pacific Island countries. Reg Environ Chang 14:221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0486-7

  42. Nurse, LA, McLean RF, Agard J, Briguglio, LP, Duvat-Magnan V, Pelesikoti N, Tompkins E, Webb A (2014) Small islands. In: Barros, VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp: 1613-1654. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/

  43. Paul BK (2009) Why relatively fewer people died? The case of Bangladesh’s cyclone Sidr. J International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards 50(2):289-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9340-5

  44. Pillay H, Carrington S, Duke J, Chandra S, Heeraman J, Tones M, Mani R (2015) National profiles of in-country capacity to support disability-inclusive education: Fiji, Samoa, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. ISBN-10: 0646939823 ISBN-13: 978-0-646-93982-7

  45. Quail J, Barker R, West C (2018) Experiences of individuals with physical disabilities in natural disasters: an integrative review. Aust J Emerg Manag 33(3):58-63 https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/54944/1/54944_Quail%20et%20al_2018.pdf

  46. Relief Web (2015) Overview tropical cyclone Pam March 2015. https://reliefweb.int/disaster/tc-2015-000020-vut

  47. Shyam KC (2013) Cost benefit studies on disaster risk reduction in developing countries. East Asia and Pacific disaster risk management team World Bank and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR). Working Paper Series. Number 27. https://www.preventionweb.net/publications/view/34593

  48. Sultana F (2013) Gendering climate change: geographical insights. Prof Geogr 66(3):372-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2013.821730

  49. Tavola H, Whippy N (2010) A report for UNICEF Pacific’s 2010 mid-term review: Pacific children with disabilities, Suva Fiji. https://www.unicef.org/pacificislands/Children_with_disabilities_final_report.pdf

  50. Taylor C (2016) Domestic violence and its prevalence in small island developing states. Pacific Journal of Reproducive Health 1(3):119-127 ISSN 2423-0820. http://repository.usp.ac.fj/9442/

  51. Twigg J (2015) Disaster risk reduction good practice review 9, humanitarian practice network overseas development Institute. United Kingdom. https://www.preventionweb.net/publications/view/46164

  52. Government of Vanuatu and United Nations Children’s Fund, UNICEF (2005) A situation analysis of children, women and youth in Vanuatu, Suva, Fiji. http://www.unicef.org/pacificislands/resources_10230.html

  53. United Nations University (2015) World risk report: focus on food security. United Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security in cooperation Universitat Stuttgart. (UNU-EHS). https://unu.edu/media-relations/releases/worldriskreport-2015-food-insecurity-increases-the-risk-of-disaster.html#info

  54. Vachette A (2017) Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in Vanuatu: the art and practice of building resilience to hazards. In: Filo WL (ed) Climate change adaption in Pacific countries: fostering resilience and improving the quality of life. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham, pp 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50094-2_7

  55. Visman E (2014) Knowledge is power: unlocking the potential for science and technology to enhance community resilience through knowledge exchange, Overseas Development Institute human practice network, network paper number 76. T https://www.odi.org/publications/8328-knowledge-power-unlocking-potential-science-and-technology-enhance-community-resilience-through

  56. Walshe R, Chang Seng D, Bumpus A, Auffray J (2018) "Perceptions of adaptation, resilience and climate knowledge in the Pacific", International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2017-0060

  57. Warrick O, Aalbersberg W, Dumaru P, McNaught R, Teperman K (2017) The ‘Pacific adaptive capacity analysis framework’: guiding the assessment of adaptive capacity in Pacific Island communities. Reg Environ Chang 17(4):1039-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1036-x

  58. Webb J (2017) Does gender responsive disaster risk reduction make a difference? A comparative study of category five tropical cyclone Pam in Vanuatu. CARE Australia, Canberra, Australia. https://www.care.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/CARE_Vanuatu_DRR_Impact_Study_3_FINAL_web_amend.pdf

  59. Webb J, Vorbach D, Boydell E, McNaught R, Sterrett C (2015) Tools for CBA: lessons from NGO collaboration in Vanuatu. Coast Manag 43(4):407-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2015.1046807

  60. White H, Sabarwal S (2014) Quasi-experimental design and methods. Methodological briefs: impact evaluation 8. UNICEF, Florence. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/753-quasi-experimental-design-and-methods-methodological-briefs-impact-evaluation-no.html

  61. Whitfield S (2015) Yumi ready 2 end of project evaluation. A disaster risk reduction project implemented by CARE International in Vanuatu. Provided to the author by CARE International in Vanuatu in June 2016

  62. Williams R, Kemp V (2016) Psychosocial and mental health care before, during and after emergencies, disasters and major events. In: Sellwood C, Wapling A (eds). Health emergency preparedness and response; CAB International UK and USA, pp 82-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.162915

  63. Woolf S, Twigg J, Parikh P, Karaoglou A, Cheaib T (2016) Towards measurable resilience: a novel framework tool for the assessment of resilience levels in slums. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 19:280-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.003

  64. World Bank (2012) Acting on climate change and disaster risk for the Pacific. World Bank Washington, USA. https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/EAP/Pacific%20Isl\ands/climate-change-pacific.pdf

  65. World Bank (2015) Advancing disaster risk financing & insurance in the Pacific: regional summary note and options for consideration. Washington, USA. https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/2015.06.25_PCRAFI_Combined-%5BCompressed%5D-rev-0.9.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the people of Aniwa, Erromango and Tanna who gave their time and shared their insights during the research. The Tafea Provincial Government and the Government of Vanuatu also contributed to the research. The staff from CARE International in Vanuatu that supported and implemented the research were professional and a pleasure to work with. Megan Chisholm and Charlie Damon from CARE International in Vanuatu were instrumental in the research design and also gave comments on drafts. The author would like to thank Tricia Wilden, Edward Boydell and particularly Dr Johanna Nalau for review and advice. The staff from CARE International in Vanuatu (Isaac Savua, Julia Marango, Marie Toto, Mala Silas, Sandra Sila, Eddy Maliliu, John Bill Charley) were professional and a pleasure to work with.

Funding

The DRR interventions studied were implemented by CARE International in Vanuatu and were jointly funded by the European Commission Humanitarian Office (ECHO), the Australian Government and the Australian public. The research was funded by CARE International in Vanuatu.

Author information

Correspondence to Julie Webb.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Communicated by Jamie Pittock

Appendix

Appendix

In the 3 years leading up to TC Pam, a DRR program was implemented with all the communities across the islands of Aniwa and Erromango. The program aimed to build household and community capacity in DRR, and it included activities that aimed at increasing women’s participation in, and leadership of, the CDCCCs and social inclusion. A standard package of activities was implemented in all the communities in both Aniwa and Erromango (Appendix).

When implementing the DRR program across Aniwa and Erromango, the standardised NDMO guidance about the roles and responsibilities of the CDCCC and the community Disaster Response Plan was used. The program went beyond this guidance, however, to require working towards equal representation of women on the CDCCC, and it implemented specific activities to support this. For example, CDCCC and community-wide training in inclusive approaches was provided, and mentoring was offered for the women that took on roles in the CDCCC to give them additional support in leadership and confidence.

Table 2 Disaster risk reduction program activities in Aniwa and Erromango

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Webb, J. What difference does disaster risk reduction make? Insights from Vanuatu and tropical cyclone Pam. Reg Environ Change 20, 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01584-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Climate change adaptation
  • Cyclone Pam
  • Disaster risk reduction
  • Gender
  • Resilience
  • Vanuatu