Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 233–243 | Cite as

Larch (Larix dahurica Turcz) growth response to climate change in the Siberian permafrost zone

  • Viacheslav I. KharukEmail author
  • Kenneth J. Ranson
  • Il’ya A. Petrov
  • Maria L. Dvinskaya
  • Sergei T. Im
  • Alexei S. Golyukov
Original Article


Larch-dominant communities are the most extensive high-latitude forests in Eurasia and are experiencing the strongest impacts from warming temperatures. We analyzed larch (Larix dahurica Turcz) growth index (GI) response to climate change. The studied larch-dominant communities are located within the permafrost zone of Northern Siberia at the northern tree limit (ca. N 67° 38′, E 99° 07′). Methods included dendrochronology, analysis of climate variables, root zone moisture content, and satellite-derived gross (GPP) and net (NPP) primary productivity. It was found that larch response to warming included a period of increased annual growth increment (GI) (from the 1970s to ca. 1995) with a follow on GI decline. Increase in GI correlated with summer air temperature, whereas an observed decrease in GI was caused by water stress (vapor pressure deficit and drought increase). Water stress impact on larch growth in permafrost was not observed before the onset of warming (ca. 1970). Water limitation was also indicated by GI dependence on soil moisture stored during the previous year. Water stress was especially pronounced for stands growing on rocky soils with low water-holding capacity. GPP of larch communities showed an increasing trend, whereas NPP stagnated. A similar pattern of GI response to climate warming has also been observed for Larix sibirica Ledeb, Pinus sibirica Du Tour, and Abies sibirica Ledeb in the forests of southern Siberia. Thus, warming in northern Siberia permafrost zone resulted in an initial increase in larch growth from the 1970s to the mid-1990s. After that time, larch growth increment has decreased. Since ca. 1990, water stress at the beginning of the vegetative period became, along with air temperature, a main factor affecting larch growth within the permafrost zone.


Larix dahurica Tree radial growth Larch forests Northern treeline Tree response to warming Larch and permafrost Growth index Climate impact on trees 



Authors thank P. Montesano and C.S.R. Neigh for help with field measurements.


This study was funded by Russian fund of fundamental investigations RFFI 18–05-00432\18 and NASA’s Terrestrial Ecology program supported Kutoy River field measurements.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Andreu-Hayles L, D’Arrigo R, Anchukaitis KJ, Beck PS, Frank D, Goetz S (2011) Varying boreal forest response to Arctic environmental change at the Firth River, Alaska. Environ Res Lett 6:041004. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartalev SA, Egorov VA, Ershov DV, Isaev AS, Loupian EA, Plotnikov DE, Uvarov IA (2011) The vegetation mapping over Russia using MODIS spectroradiometer satellite data. Contemporary Earth Remote Sensing from Space 8:285–302 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. Churakova SO, Saurer M, Bryukhanova MV, Siegwolf RT, Bigler C (2016) Site-specific water-use strategies of mountain pine and larch to cope with recent climate change. Tree Physiol 36:942–953. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coppola A, Leonelli G, Salvatore MC, Pelfini M, Baroni C (2012) Weakening climatic signal since mid-20th century in European larch tree-ring chronologies at different altitudes from the Adamello-Presanella massif (Italian alps). Quat Res 77(3):344–354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Arrigo R, Mashig E, Frank D, Wilson R, Jacoby G (2005) Temperature variability over the past millennium inferred from Northwestern Alaska tree rings. Clim Dyn 24:227–236. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Esper J, Cook ER, Krusic PJ, Peters K, Schweingruber FH (2003) Tests of the RCS method for preserving low-frequency variability in long tree-ring chronologies. Tree-Ring Res 59(2):81–98Google Scholar
  7. Esper J, Frank DC, Büntgen U, Verstege A, Hantemirov RM, Kirdyanov AV (2010) Trends and uncertainties in Siberian indicators of 20th century warming. Glob Chang Biol 16:386–398. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franceschini T, Bontemps J, Perez V, Leban J (2013) Divergence in latewood density response of Norway spruce to temperature is not resolved by enlarged sets of climatic predictors and their non-linearities. Agric Forest Meteorol 180:132–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harsch M, Hulme P, McGlone M, Duncan R (2009) Are treelines advancing? A global meta-analysis of treeline response to climate warming. Ecol Lett 12:1040–1049. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartmann DL, Klein Tank AMG, Rusticucci M, Alexander LV, Brönnimann S, Charabi Y, Dentener FJ, Dlugokencky EJ, Easterling DR, Kaplan A, Soden BJ, Thorne PW, Wild M, Zhai PM (2013) Observations: Atmosphere and Surface. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 159–254. Accessed 25 July 2018
  11. Kharuk VI, Dvinskaya ML, Ranson KJ, Im ST (2005) Expansion of evergreen conifers to the larch-dominated zone and climatic trends. Rus J Ecol 36:164–170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kharuk VI, Ranson KJ, Im ST, Dvinskaya ML (2006) Forest-tundra larch forests and climatic trends. Rus J Ecol 37(5):291–298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kharuk VI, Ranson KJ, Dvinskaya ML, Im ST (2011) Wildfires in northern Siberian larch dominated communities. Environ Res Lett 6:045208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kharuk VI, Ranson KJ, Im ST, Oskorbin PA, Ovchinnikov DV (2013) Tree line structure and dynamics at the northern limit of the larch forest: Anabar plateau, Siberia, Russia. Arct Antarct Alp Res 45:526–537. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kharuk VI, Ranson KJ, Im ST, Petrov IA (2015) Climate-induced larch growth response within Central Siberian permafrost zone. Environ Res Lett 10:125009. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kharuk VI, Dvinskaya ML, Petrov IA, Im ST, Ranson KJ (2016a) Larch forests of middle Siberia: long-term trends in fire return intervals. Reg Environ Chang 16:2389–2397. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kharuk VI, Im ST, Petrov IA, Golyukov AS, Ranson KJ, Yagunov MN (2016b) Climate-induced mortality of Siberian pine and fir in the Lake Baikal watershed, Siberia. For Ecol Manag 384:191–199. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kharuk VI, Im ST, Petrov IA, Dvinskaya ML, Fedotova EV, Ranson KJ (2017) Fir decline and mortality in the southern Siberian Mountains. Reg Environ Chang 17(3):803–812. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kharuk VI, Ponomarev EI (2017) Spatiotemporal characteristics of wildfire frequency and relative area burned in larch-dominated forests of Central Siberia. Russian J Ecol 48(6):507–512. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kharuk VI, Petrov IA, Dvinskaya ML, Im ST, Sushpanov AS (2018) Comparative reaction of larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb) radial increment to climate change in the forest-steppe and highlands of southern Siberia. Contemp Probl Ecol 11(4):388–395. (in Russian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirdyanov AV, Prokushkin AS, Tabakova MA (2013) Tree-ring growth of Gmelin larch under contrasting local conditions in the north of Central Siberia. Dendrochronologia 31:114–119. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koven CD, Lawrence DM, Riley WJ (2015) Permafrost carbon–climate feedback is sensitive to deep soil carbon decomposability but not deep soil nitrogen dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:3752–3757. Google Scholar
  23. Koropachinsky IYu, Vstovskaya TN (2012) Tree species of Russian Asia, 2nd edn. Geo, Novosibirsk, Russia (in Russian)Google Scholar
  24. Kullman L, Kjallgren L (2006) Holocene pine tree-line evolution in the Swedish Scandes: recent tree-line rise and climate change in a long-term perspective. Boreas 35:159–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lenoir J, Gegout JC, Marquet PA, de Ruffray P, Brisse H (2008) A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Science 320(5884):1768–1771. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lebourgeois F, Merian P, Courdier F, Ladier J, Dreyfus P (2012) Instability of climate signal in tree-ring width in Mediterranean mountains: a multi-species analysis. Trees 26:715–729. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lloyd AH, Bunn AG (2007) Responses of the circumpolar boreal forest to 20th century climate variability. Environ Res Lett 2:045013. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Long D, Longuevergne L, Scanlon BR (2014) Uncertainty in evapotranspiration from land surface modeling, remote sensing, and GRACE satellites. Water Resour Res 50:1131–1151. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu H, Williams AP, Allen CD, Guo D, Wu X, Anenkhonov OA, Liang E, Sandanov DV, Yin Y, Qi Z, Badmaeva NK (2013) Rapid warming accelerates tree growth decline in semi-arid forests of inner Asia. Glob Chang Biol 19:2500–2510. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McMahon SM, Parker GG, Miller DR (2010) Evidence for a recent increase in forest growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:3611–3615. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Novick KA, Ficklin DL, Stoy PC, Williams CA, Bohrer G, Oishi AC, Papuga SA, Blanken PD, Noormets A, Sulman BN, Scott RL, Wang L, Phillips RP (2016) The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes. Nat Clim Chang 6:1023–1027. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pachauri RK, Allen MR, Barros VR, Broome J, Cramer W, Christ R, Church JA, Clarke L, Dahe Q, Dasgupta P, Dubash NK, Edenhofer O, Elgizouli I, Field CB, Forster P, Friedlingstein P, Fuglestvedt J, Gomez-Echeverri L, Hallegatte S, Hegerl G, Howden M, Jiang K, Jimenez Cisneroz B, Kattsov V, Lee H, Mach KJ, Marotzke J, Mastrandrea MD, Meyer L, Minx J, Mulugetta Y, O'Brien K, Oppenheimer M, Pereira JJ, Pichs-Madruga R, Plattner GK, Pörtner HO, Power SB, Preston B, Ravindranath NH, Reisinger A, Riahi K, Rusticucci M, Scholes R, Seyboth K, Sokona Y, Stavins R, Stocker TF, Tschakert P, van Vuuren D, van Ypserle JP (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I. II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland Accessed 23 April 2018Google Scholar
  33. Restaino CM, Peterson DL, Littell J (2016) Increased water deficit decreases Douglas fir growth throughout western US forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:9557–9562. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richardson AD, Friedland AJ (2009) A review of the theories to explain Arctic and alpine treelines around the world. J Sustainable For 28:218–242. Google Scholar
  35. Rinn F (1996) Tsap V 3.6. Reference manual: computer program for tree-ring analysis and presentation. Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  36. Romanovsky VE, Smith SL, Shiklomanov NI, Streletskiy DA, Isaksen K, Kholodov AL, Christiansen HH, Drozdov DS, Malkova GV, Marchenko SS (2017) Terrestrial permafrost [in “state of the climate in 2016”]. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 98(8):147–149. Google Scholar
  37. Rossi S, Deslauriers A, Griçar J, Seo J-W, Rathgeber CBK, Anfodillo T, Morin H, Levanic T, Oven P, Jalkanen R (2008) Critical temperatures for xylogenesis in conifers of cold climates. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:696–707. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shiyatov SG, Terent’ev MM, Fomin VV, Zimmermann NE (2007) Altitudinal and horizontal shifts of the upper boundaries of open and closed forests in the Polar Urals in the 20th century. Russian J Ecol 38:223–227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schuur EAG, Bockheim J, Canadell JG, Euskirchen E, Field CB, Goryachkin SV, Hagemann S, Kuhry P, Lafleur PM, Mazhitova HLG, Nelson FE, Rinke A, Romanovsky VE, Shiklomanov N, Tarnocai C, Venevsky S, Vogel JG, Zimov SA (2008) Vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change: implications for the global carbon cycle. BioScience 58(8):701–714. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schuur EAG, McGuire AD, Schädel C, Grosse G, Harden JW, Hayes DJ, Hugelius G, Koven CD, Kuhry P, Lawrence DM, Natali SM, Olefeldt D, Romanovsky VE, Schaefer K, Turetsky MR, Treat CC, Vonk JE (2015) Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520:171–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sugimoto A, Yanagisawa N, Naito D, Fujita N, Maximov TC (2002) Importance of permafrost as a source of water for plants in east Siberian taiga. Ecol Res 17:493–503. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sullivan PF, Pattison RR, Brownlee AH, Cahoon SM, Hollingsworth TN (2016) Effect of tree-ring detrending method on apparent growth trends of black and white spruce in interior Alaska. Environ Res Lett 11:114007. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vaganov EA, Kirdyanov AV (2010) Denrochronology of larch trees growing on Siberian permafrost. In: Osawa A, Zyryanova OA, Matsuura Y, Kajimoto T, Wein RW (eds) Permafrost ecosystems: Siberian larch forests, Ecological Studies, vol 209. Heidelberg, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, NewYork, pp 347–363. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vicente-Serrano SM, Beguería S, López-Moreno JI (2010) A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J Clim 23:1696–1718. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang X, Ba X, Chang Y, Chen Z (2016) Increased sensitivity of Dahurian larch radial growth to summer temperature with the rapid warming in Northeast China. Trees 30:1799–1806. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sukachev Institute of Forest, Federal Scientific CenterRussian Academy of ScienceKrasnoyarskRussia
  2. 2.Siberian Federal UniversityKrasnoyarskRussia
  3. 3.NASA’s Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA
  4. 4.Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and TechnologyKrasnoyarskRussia

Personalised recommendations