Advertisement

An integrated social-ecological assessment of ecosystem service benefits in the Kagera River Basin in Eastern Africa

  • Ahmed S. Khan
  • Hongmei Yi
  • Linxiu Zhang
  • Xiubo Yu
  • Erasme Mbanzamihigo
  • Gisele Umuhumuza
  • Thierry Ngoga
  • Sedami Igor Armand Yevide
Original Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Sustaining multiple ecosystem service benefits in transboundary river basins is a complex and challenging task in the developing world. This can be attributed to conflicting conservation and human development needs and exacerbated by climate change impacts, especially episodic drought and flooding events. We use a case study from Rwanda in the Kagera River Basin in Eastern Africa to contextualize and examine how land use cover change, water access, and agro-ecosystems are vulnerable to myriad human and natural drivers of change. An integrated framework is employed for a nested social-ecological assessment of ecosystem service benefits drawing upon landscape and vulnerability mapping, agro-commodity value chains, and institutional analyses. The conceptual framework and case study provide leverage points for vertical and horizontal linkages that include cross-sectoral partnerships, multi-level governing networks, integrated water resource management, and livelihood security. Moreover, synergy between development and conservation outcomes can be achieved through joint adaptation planning and stewardship initiatives at the local district level with full participation of resource users and community leaders. These lessons from Rwanda and the Kagera River Basin provide opportunities for mainstreaming adaptation and development planning and building resilience towards regional environmental change in Eastern Africa.

Keywords

Ecosystem services Land use cover change Climate change Livelihoods Vulnerability mapping Value chains Kagera River Basin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author also acknowledges financial contribution under the Young International Scientist Fellow program (grant no. 2012 Y1ZA0010). The research assistantship by Shaoxia Xia, Ling Ge, and Suqun Qu are greatly appreciated. Adrie Mukashema and Stephane Mugabo provided statistical data and shape files that made the livelihood vulnerability mapping possible. Thanks to Andrew Song for providing materials on preference ranking and to Jeremy Pittman for providing useful suggestions. Two anonymous reviewers provided critical comments and suggestions that strengthened the paper.

Funding information

This research was jointly funded by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (grant nos. 31161140355 and 31361140360) and the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resource Research (CAS Grant no. 2012SJ005).

Supplementary material

10113_2018_1356_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (335 kb)
Annex 1 (PDF 334 kb)
10113_2018_1356_MOESM2_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Annex 2 (DOCX 19 kb)
10113_2018_1356_MOESM3_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Annex 3 (DOCX 25 kb)

References

  1. Alexander SM, Andrachuk M, Armitage D (2016) Navigating governance networks for community-based conservation. Front Ecol Environ 14(3):155–164.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertilsson P, Jagerskog A (2006) Integrated water, sanitation, and natural resources initiative in the Lake Victoria region. Fact finding report based on activities at the national and local levels. Stockholm. Paper no. 10, SIWI, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  4. Biemans H, Speelman LH, Ludwig F, Moors EJ, Wiltshire AJ, Kumar P, Gerten D, Kabat P (2013) Future water resources for food production in five South Asian river basins and potential for adaptation—a modeling study. Sci Total Environ 468:S117–S131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2008) Management of natural resources at the community level: exploring the role of social capital and leadership in a rural fishing community. World Dev 36:2763–2779.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bralirwa (2011) Bralirwa annual report 2011. Brasseries et limondaries du Rwanda, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  7. Braat L, de Groot R (2012) The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst Serv 1:4–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TK, Mooney HA (2007) The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:67–98.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryan BA (2013) Incentives, lands use and ecosystem services: synthesizing complex linkages. Environ Sci Policy 27:124–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clay DC, Lewis LA (1990) Land use, soil loss, and sustainable agriculture in Rwanda. Hum Ecol 18:147–161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conklin EJ (2005) Dialogue mapping: building shared understanding of wicked problems. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. District of Bugesera (2012) Bugesera District development plan 2008–2012. Translated by the JICA Study Team, NyamataGoogle Scholar
  13. Enfors EI, Gordon LJ (2008) Dealing with drought: the challenge of using water system technologies to break dry land poverty traps. Glob Environ Chang 18:607–616.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fu BJ, Lei GC, Yu XB, Wang YK, Lu Y, Li D (2014) Chinese case studies. In: Chen YY, Jessel B, Fu BJ, Yu XB, Pittock J (eds) Ecosystem services and management strategy in China. Springer, New York, pp 73–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (2012) FAO GEF transboundary agro-ecosystem management program (TAMP) for the Kagera Basin region. http://wwwfaoorg/in-action/kagera/home/en/ Accessed 2 September 2017
  17. Gakura F (2013) Report on the analysis of cassava value chain in the cassava agriculture business cluster in Bugesera. Support project to food security in Bugesera – PASAB. Caritas Rwanda, NyamataGoogle Scholar
  18. Gordon LJ, Finlayson CM, Falkenmark M (2010) Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agric Water Manag 97:512–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.03.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grundmann R (2016) Climate change as a wicked social problem. Nat Geosci 9:562–563.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacomy M, Venturini T, Heymann S, Bastian M (2014) ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi Software. PLoS ONE 9(6):e98679.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kabalisa V (2006) Contextual analysis of integrated water resources management in Rwanda, Working Paper for Protos NGO (Final Report), KigaliGoogle Scholar
  22. Kagarama J, Bisoza A, Kayigamba C (2011) Assessment of the performance of the revenue sharing program during 2005–2010. Program implemented in the National Parks of Akagera, Nyungwe and Volcanoes. A consulting report. Rwanda Development Board, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  23. Karamage F, Zhang C, Ndayisaba F, Shao H, Kayiranga A, Fang X, Nahayo L, Muhire Nyesheja E, Tian G (2016) Extent of cropland and related soil erosion risk in Rwanda. Sustainability 8:609.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kathiresan A (2012) Farm land use consolidation in Rwanda. Assessment from the perspective of the agriculture sector. Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources, Republic of Rwanda, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  25. Kazoora C (2013) Towards PES: watershed management for water supply in Rwanda. Consulting Report by Sustainable Development Centre, KampalaGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelly V, Murekezi A (2000) Fertilizer response and profitability in Rwanda. Synthesis findings from MINAGRI studies conducted by the Food Security Research Project and the FAO Soil Fertility Initiative. Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Resources, and Forestry, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  27. Khan AS, Charles T, Armitage D (2016) Place-based or sector-based adaptation? A case study of municipal and fishery policy integration. Clim Pol 18:14–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1228520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khan AS, Amelie V (2015) Assessing climate change readiness in Seychelles: implications for ecosystem-based adaptation mainstreaming and marine spatial planning. Reg Environ Chang 15(4):721–733.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0662-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khan AS (2011) Is rebuilding collapsed fisheries a wicked problem? Lessons from a Fish Chain Analysis of Northern Gulf Cod Fisheries. Dissertation. Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’sGoogle Scholar
  30. Lebel L, Nikitina E, Pahl-Wostl C, Knieper C (2013) Institutional fit and river basin governance: a new approach using multiple composite measures. Ecol Soc 18(1):1.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05097-180101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ludwig D, Mangel M, Haddad B (2001) Ecology, conservation and public policy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:481–517.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lwasa S (2015) A systematic review of research on climate change adaptation policy and practice in Africa and South Asia deltas. Reg Environ Chang 15(5):815–824.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0715-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Metzger MJ, Schröter D, Leemans R, Cramer W (2008) A spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of ecosystem service change in Europe. Reg Environ Chang 8(3):91–107.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0044-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Musahara H, Rao R (2009) Socioeconomic development and benefit sharing project final report. Policy on brown water due to environmental degradation and sustainable resource use in the Nile Basin countries. Faculty of Economics and Management, National University of Rwanda & REMA, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  35. MA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: our human planet. Summary for decision makers. Island Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  36. Nicols A (2009) The Nile: moving beyond cooperation. UNESCO, IHP, WWAP, technical documents in hydrology. PC-CP series no. 16. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  37. NISR (2012) EICV 3 household living survey report. DFID, EU, UN Rwanda and NISR, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  38. NISR (2007) EICV 2 household living survey report. DFID, EU, UN Rwanda and NISR, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  39. Nyasimi M, Radeny M, Hansen JW (2016) Review of climate service needs and opportunities in Rwanda. CCAFS Working Paper no. 180. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). Copenhagen, Denmark. Available online at: www.ccafs.cgiar.org
  40. Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paavola J, Hubacek K (2013) Ecosystem services, governance, and stakeholder participation: an introduction. Ecol Soc 18(4):42.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06019-180442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reuveny R (2007) Climate change-induced migration and violent conflicts. Polit Geogr 26:656–673.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming GS, Elmqvist T, Hejnowicz AP, Polasky S (2013) Getting the measures of ecosystem services: a social-ecological approach. Front Ecol Evol 11(5):268–273.  https://doi.org/10.1890/120144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rittel H, Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. REMA (2011a) Atlas of Rwanda’s changing environment: implications for climate change resilience. REMA, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  47. REMA (2011b) Lake Victoria environmental management project phase II: environmental and social management framework for Rwanda under LVEMP II. REMA, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  48. REMA (2007a) Guidelines for mainstreaming environment in the economic development and poverty reduction strategy. Poverty Environment Initiative. UNDP, UNEP, REMA, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  49. REMA (2007b) Pilot integrated ecosystem service assessment of Bugesera. Poverty Environment Initiative. UNDP, UNEP, REMA, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  50. RoR (2013) EPDRS 2. Shaping our Development. MINICOFIN, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  51. RoR (2012) About crop intensification program- CIP. Ministry of Agriculture and animal resources, Republic of Rwanda, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  52. RoR (2011) Green growth and climate resilience: national strategy for climate change and low carbon development. DFID, University of Oxford in collaboration with Government of Rwanda, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  53. RoR (2010a) Rwanda natural resources authority. Rwanda land use and development master plan. RNRA, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  54. RoR (2010b) National Forestry Policy. Ministry of Forestry and Mines, KigaliGoogle Scholar
  55. Swallow BM, Sang JK, Nyabenge M, Bundotich DK, Duraiappah AK, Yatich TB (2009) Tradeoffs, synergies and traps among ecosystem services in the Lake Victoria Basin. Environ Sci Policy 12:504–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thebo AL, Drechsel P, Lambin EF (2014) Global assessment of urban and peri-urban agriculture: irrigated and rainfed croplands. Environ Res Lett 9:114002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/114002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tolo CU, Majule EA, Perfect J (2012) Changing trends of natural resources degradation in Kagera Basin: case study of Kagera Sub-basin, Uganda. Nat Resour 3:95–106.  https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2012.33014 Google Scholar
  58. Tuvendal M, Elmqvist T (2011) Ecosystem services linking social and ecological systems: river brownification and the response of downstream stakeholders. Ecol Soc 16(4):21.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04456-160421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. UNEP (2011) Rwanda: from post-conflict to environmentally sustainable development. UNEP, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  60. Wasige JE, Groen TA, Smaling E, Jetten V (2013) Monitoring basin scale land cover changes in Kagera Basin of Lake Victoria using ancillary and remote sensing. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 21:32–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Head B, Xiang W-N (2016) Working with problems in socio-ecological systems: more awareness, greater acceptance, and better adaptation. Landsc Urban Plan 154:1–3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yevide AI, Wu B, Khan AS, Zeng Y, Liu J (2016) Bibliometric analysis of ecosystem monitoring-related research in Africa: implications for ecological stewardship and scientific collaboration. Int J Sust Dev World 23:412–422.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1129998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang W, Rickets HT, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton SM (2007) Ecosystem service and disservice to agriculture. Ecol Econ 64:253–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmed S. Khan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hongmei Yi
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Linxiu Zhang
    • 1
    • 3
  • Xiubo Yu
    • 1
    • 5
  • Erasme Mbanzamihigo
    • 1
    • 6
  • Gisele Umuhumuza
    • 7
  • Thierry Ngoga
    • 6
    • 8
  • Sedami Igor Armand Yevide
    • 1
    • 9
    • 10
  1. 1.United Nations Environment Program- International Ecosystem Management Partnership (UNEP-IEMP), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Khan & Associates Sustainability Consulting Inc.FloridaUSA
  3. 3.United Nations Environment Program- International Ecosystem Management Partnership, & Centre for Chinese Agricultural Policy, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.School of Advanced Agricultural SciencesPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  5. 5.United Nations Environment Program- International Ecosystem Management Partnership & Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  6. 6.Rwanda Natural Resources AuthorityKigaliRwanda
  7. 7.Rwanda Environment Management AuthorityKigaliRwanda
  8. 8.Growth Consultant for ChangeLondonUK
  9. 9.United Nations Environment Program- International Ecosystem Management Partnership & Key Lab of Digital Earth Sciences, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital EarthChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  10. 10.Proforest Africa OfficeAccraGhana

Personalised recommendations