Advertisement

Cognition, Technology & Work

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 317–326 | Cite as

The evaluation of emotional experience on webpages: an event-related potential study

  • Weilin LiuEmail author
  • Xiaoning Liang
  • Xueshuang Wang
  • Fu Guo
Original Article
  • 221 Downloads

Abstract

Different webpage appearances may induce different emotional experiences of users. What may happen in users’ brain from when they see the webpage to when they reveal emotional experience is still unknown. Thus, this study requires the participants to evaluate their emotional experience on webpages by pressing the mouse, with their electroencephalogram being recorded. By analyzing the average amplitude of event-related potentials, we find that at the early stage of cognitive process, parietal N1 component is sensitive to the arousal of emotional experiences. The P2 can distinguish webpages with medium emotional experience from those with good emotional experience. The late positive potential (LPP) shows enhanced responses to webpages with both good and poor emotional experiences, while the emotional processing represented by LPP shows cerebral lateralization at the frontal and fronto-central areas. The findings can not only help to better understand the emotional processing from the perspective of electrophysiology, but also provide reference measures to evaluate webpage design and assess its impact on users’ emotion.

Keywords

Webpage design Emotional experience Event-related potentials Cerebral lateralization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, P.R. China (Grant no. ZR2018PG001), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 71471033) and Research Center for Smart City Construction and Management. Thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and advice. In addition, thank Mr. Fantao Liu for helping us to modify the format during the revision stage.

References

  1. Ahern GL, Schwartz GE (1979) Differential lateralization for positive versus negative emotion. Neuropsychologia 17(6):693–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amrhein C, Muhlberger A, Pauli P, Wiedemann G (2004) Modulation of event-related brain potentials during affective picture processing: a complement to startle reflex and skin conductance response. Int J Psychophysiol 54(3):231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anokhin AP, Golosheykin S, Sirevaag E, Kristjansson S, Rohrbaugh JW, Heath AC (2006) Rapid discrimination of visual scene content in the human brain. Brain Res 1093(23):167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonnardel N, Piolat A, Bigot LL (2011) The impact of colour on website appeal and users’ cognitive processes. Displays 32(2):69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borod JC, Cicero BA, Obler LK, Welkowitz J, Erhan HM, Santschi C, Grunwald IS, Agosti RM, Whalen JR (1998) Right hemisphere emotional perception: evidence across multiple channels. Neuropsychology 12(3):446–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley MM (2000) Emotion and motivation. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG (eds) Handbook of psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 602–642Google Scholar
  7. Bradley MM (2009) Natural selective attention: orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology 46(1):1–11MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley MM, Hamby S, Low A, Lang PJ (2007) Brain potentials in perception: picture complexity and emotional arousal. Psychophysiology 44:364–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carretie L, Mercado F, Tapia M, Hinojosa JA (2001) Emotion, attention, and the ‘negativity bias’, studied through event-related potentials. Int J Psychophysiol 41(1):75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carretie L, Hinojosa JA, Mercado F (2003) Cerebral patterns of attentional habituation to emotional visual stimuli. Psychophysiology 40:381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carretie L, Hinojosa JA, Martin-Loeches M, Mercado F, Tapia M (2004) Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates. Hum Brain Mapp 22(4):290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carretie L, Hinojosa JA, Albert J, Mercado F (2006) Neural response to sustained affective visual stimulation using an indirect task. Exp Brain Res 174(4):630–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(3):201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crites SL, Cacioppo JT, Gardner WL, Berntson GG (1995) Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorization: II. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of attitude registration rather than attitude report. J Personal Soc Psychol 68(6):997–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cuthbert BN, Schupp HT, Bradley MM, Birbaumer N, Lang PJ (2000) Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biol Psychol 52(2):95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delplanque S, Lavoie ME, Hot P, Silvert L, Sequeira H (2004) Modulation of cognitive processing by emotional valence studied through event-related potentials in humans. Neurosci Lett 356(1):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Russo F, Taddei F, Apnile T, Spinelli D (2006) Neural correlates of fast stimulus discrimination and response selection in top-level fencers. Neurosci Lett 408(2):113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dirin A, Laine TH, Nieminen M (2017) Sustainable usage through emotional engagement: a user experience analysis of an adaptive driving school application. Cogn Technol Work 19:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ernst LH, Ehlis AC, Dresler T, Tupak SV, Weidner A, Fallgatter AJ (2013) N1 and N2 ERPs reflect the regulation of automatic approach tendencies to positive stimuli. Neurosci Res 75(3):239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Esteves F, Parra C, Dimberg U, Ohman A (1994) Nonconscious associative learning: Pavlovian conditioning of skin conductance responses to masked fear-relevant facial stimuli. Psychophysiology 31(4):75–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foti D, Hajcak G, Dien J (2009) Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. Psychophysiology 46(3):521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo F, Cao Y, Ding Y, Liu W, Zhang X (2014) A multimodal measurement method of users’ emotional experiences shopping online. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 25(5):585–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guo F, Wang XS, Liu W, Ding Y (2018) Affective preference measurement of product appearance based on event-related potentials. Cogn Technol Work 20(2):299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Handy TC, Smilek D, Geiger L, Liu C, Schooler JW (2010) ERP evidence for rapid hedonic evaluation of logos. J Cogn Neurosci 22(1):124–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herbert C, Kissler J, Junghofer M, Peyk P, Rockstroh B (2006) Processing of emotional adjectives: evidence from startle EMG and ERPs. Psychophysiology 43(2):197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Höfel L, Jacobsen T (2007) Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: spontaneous or intentional processes? Int J Psychophysiol 65(1):20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hsieh YC, Chen KH (2011) How different information types affect viewer’s attention on internet advertising. Comput Hum Behav 27(2):935–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ito TA, Cacioppo JT (2000) Electrophysiological evidence of implicit and explicit categorization processes. J Exp Soc Psychol 36(6):660–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Killgore WDS, Yurgelun-Todd DA (2007) The right-hemisphere and valence hypotheses: could they both be right (and sometimes left)? Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2(3):240–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lang P, Bradley M, Cuthbert B (1998) Emotion and motivation: measuring affective perception. J Clin Neurophysiol 15(5):397–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leite J, Carvalho S, Galdo-Alvarez S, Alves J, Sampaio A, Gonçalves ÓF (2012) Affective picture modulation: valence, arousal, attention allocation and motivational significance. Int J Psychophysiol 83(3):375–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li R, Qin R, Zhang J, Wu J, Zhou C (2014) The esthetic preference of Chinese typefaces—an event-related potential study. Brain Res 1598:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lin YC, Yeh CH, Wei CC (2013) How will the use of graphics affect visual aesthetics? A user-centered approach for web page design. Int J Hum Comput Stud 71(3):217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu W, Guo F, Ye G, Liang X (2016) How homepage aesthetic design influences users’ satisfaction: evidence from China. Displays 42:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luck SJ, Woodman GF, Vogel EK (2000) Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn Sci 4(11):432–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mehrabian A, Russell JA (1974) An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Nasoz F, Alvarez K, Lisetti CL, Finkelstein N (2004) Emotion recognition from physiological signals using wireless sensors for presence technologies. Cogn Technol Work 6(1):4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nieuwenhuis S, Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD (2005) Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychol Bull 131(4):510–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Norman DA (2003) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Olofsson JK, Polich J (2007) Affective visual event-related potentials: arousal, repetition, and time-on-task. Biol Psychol 75(1):101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Olofsson JK, Nordin S, Sequeira H, Polich J (2008) Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biol Psychol 77:247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Partala T, Surakka V (2003) Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. Int J Hum Comput Stud 59(1–2):185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pastor MC, Bradley MM, Löw A, Versace F, Moltó J, Lang PJ (2008) Affective picture perception: emotion, context, and the late positive potential. Brain Res 1189(3):145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Picard RW, Healey J, Vyzas E (2001) Toward machine emotional intelligence analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 23(10):1175–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Righi S, Orlando V, Marzi T (2014) Attractiveness and affordance shape tools neural coding: insight from ERPs. Int J Psychophysiol 91(3):240–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rugg MD, Coles MGH (1995) Electrophysiology of mind: event-related brain potentials and cognition. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Russell JA, Mehrabian A (1977) Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. J Res Personal 11(3):273–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schupp HT, Cuthbert BN, Bradley MM, Cacioppo JT, Ito T, Lang PJ (2000) Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology 37(2):257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schupp HT, Flaisch T, Stockburger J, Junghofer M (2006a) Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. Prog Brain Res 156(2):31–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schupp HT, Stockburger J, Codispoti M, Junghöfer M, Weike AI, Hamm AO (2006b) Stimulus novelty and emotion perception: the near absence of habituation in the visual cortex. Neuroreport 17(4):365–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schupp HT, Stockburger J, Codispoti M, Junghöfer M, Weike AI, Hamm AO (2007) Selective visual attention to emotion. J Neurosci 27(5):1082–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schupp HT, Schmälzle R, Flaisch T, Weike AI, Hamm AO (2012) Affective picture processing as a function of preceding picture valence: an ERP analysis. Biol Psychol 91(1):81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwarz N (1990) Feelings as information: informational and motivational functions of affective states. In: Higgins ET, Sorrentino RM (eds) Handbook of motivation and cognition: foundation of social behavior, vol 2. Guilford Press, New York, pp 527–561Google Scholar
  54. Smith NK, Cacioppo JT, Larsen JT, Chartrand TL (2003) May I have your attention, please: electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. Neuropsychologia 41(2):171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sperry RW (1961) Cerebral organization and behavior: the split brain behaves in many respects like two separate brains, providing new research possibilities. Science 133(3466):1749–1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Spreckelmeyer KN, Kutas M, Urbach TP, Altenmüller E, Münte TF (2006) Combined perception of emotion in pictures and musical sounds. Brain Res 1070(1):160–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vanderhaegen F (2017) Towards increased systems resilience: new challenges based on dissonance control for human reliability in Cyber-Physical & Human Systems. Annu Rev Control 44:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vogel EK, Luck SJ (2000) The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology 37(2):190–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wedding D, Stalans L (1985) Hemispheric differences in the perception of positive and negative faces. Int J Neurosci 27(3–4):277–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Winckler M, Bernhaupt R, Bach C (2016) Identification of UX dimensions for incident reporting systems with mobile applications in urban contexts: a longitudinal study. Cogn Technol Work 18(4):673–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management EngineeringQingdao University of TechnologyQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Trinity Business School, Trinity College DublinThe University of DublinDublin 2Ireland
  3. 3.School of Business AdministrationNortheastern UniversityShenyangChina
  4. 4.School of Business AdministrationNortheastern UniversityShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations