Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Systems

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 457–486 | Cite as

The nexus between inventors’ mobility and regional growth across European regions

  • Roberta Capello
  • Camilla LenziEmail author
Original Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

The role of the spatial mobility of skilled individuals and knowledge workers on the innovative capacity of the recipient region has largely been highlighted, measured and proved in the literature, by positing a direct link from mobility to innovation. This paper enters this literature by explicitly examining and verifying whether innovation generated by inventors’ mobility is enough to enhance growth and whether such link depends on the innovative context. In fact, areas in which inventors can more easily enter, integrate and complement existing consolidated knowledge bases can be more easily affected by incoming inventors.

Keywords

Inventors’ mobility Regional patterns of innovation Regional growth 

JEL Classification

O31 R11 

Notes

References

  1. Abreu M, de Groot HLF, Florax RJGM (2005) A meta-analysis of β-convergence: the legendary 2%. Journal of Economic Surveys 19(3):389–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abreu M, Faggian A, McCann P (2015) Migration and inter-industry mobility of UK graduates. J Econ Geogr 15(2):353–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal A, Cockburn I, McHale J (2006) Gone but not forgotten: labour flows, knowledge spillovers, and enduring social capital. J Econ Geogr 6(5):571–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agrawal A, Kapur D, McHale J, Oettl A (2011) Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation. Journal of Urban Economics 69(1):43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arbia G, Basile RG, and Piras G (2005) Using spatial panel data in modelling regional growth and convergence. https://ebiblio.istat.it/digibib/Working_Papers/WP_55_2005_Arbia_Piras_Basile.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2018
  6. Asheim BT, Isaksen A (2002) Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer 27(1):77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Asheim BT, Grillitsch M, Trippl M (2016) Regional innovation systems: past-present-future. In: Shearmur R, Carrincazeaux C, Doloreux D (eds) Handbook on the geographies of innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1995) Economic growth. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Baum CF (2006) An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. StataCorp LP, College StationGoogle Scholar
  10. Baum CF, Schaffer ME (2012) ivreg2 h: Stata module to perform instrumental variables estimation using heteroskedasticity-based instruments. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457555.html. Accessed 13 June 2019
  11. Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2003) Instrumental variables and GMM: estimation and testing. Stata Journal 3(1):1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2007) Enhanced routines for instrumental variables/generalized method of moments estimation and testing. Stata Journal 7(4):465–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baum CF, Lewbel A, Schaffer ME and Talavera O (2012) Instrumental variables estimation using heteroskedasticity-based instruments. http://repec.org/usug2012/UK12_baum.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2019
  14. Beine M, Docquier F, Rapaport H (2008) Brain drain and human capital formation in developing countries: winners and losers. Econ J 118(528):631–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bellini E, Ottaviano GIP, Pinelli D, Prarolo G (2013) Cultural diversity and economic performance: evidence from European regions. In: Crescenzi R, Percoco M (eds) Geography, institutions and regional economic performance. Springer, Berlin, pp 121–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Borjas GJ, Doran KB (2015) Cognitive mobility: labor market responses to supply shocks in the space of ideas. Journal of Labor Economic 33(S1):S109–S145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brambor T, Clarck WR, Golder M (2006) Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14(1):63–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Breschi S, Lenzi C (2015) The role of external relations and gatekeepers for the expansion and renewal of US cities’ knowledge base, 1990–2004. Reg Stud 49(5):782–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Breschi S, Lenzi C (2016) Co-invention networks and inventive productivity in US cities. Journal of Urban Economics 92(1):66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Breschi S, Lenzi C, Lissoni F, Vezzulli A (2010) The geography of knowledge spillovers: the role of inventors’ mobility across firms and in space. In: Boschma R, Martin R (eds) Handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 353–369Google Scholar
  21. Breschi S, Lissoni F, Miguelez E (2017) Foreign-origin inventors in the USA: testing for diaspora and brain gain effects. J Econ Geogr 17(5):1009–1038Google Scholar
  22. Cainelli G, Ganau R, Modica M (2019) Industrial relatedness and regional resilience in the European Union. Papers in Regional Science 98(2):755–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Camagni R (2015) Towards creativity-oriented innovation policies based on a hermeneutic approach to the knowledge-space nexus. In: Cusinato A, Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos A (eds) Knowledge-creating milieus in Europe: firms, cities, territories. Springer, Berlin, pp 341–358Google Scholar
  24. Capello R, Lenzi C (2013a) Territorial patterns of innovation in Europe: a taxonomy of innovative regions. Annals of Regional Science 51(1):119–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Capello R, Lenzi C (2013b) Territorial patterns of innovation and economic growth in European regions. Growth and Change 44(2):195–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Capello R, Lenzi C (2016) Innovation modes and entrepreneurial behavioral characteristics in regional growth. Small Bus Econ 47(4):875–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Capello R, Lenzi C (2019) Structural dynamics of regional innovation patterns in Europe: the role of inventors’ mobility. Reg Stud 53(1):30–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Capello R, Caragliu A, Fratesi U (2015) Spatial heterogeneity in the costs of the economic crisis in Europe: are cities sources of regional resilience? J Econ Geogr 15(5):951–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Caragliu A, Del Bo C (2018) The economics of smart city policies. Science Regionali 17(1):81–104Google Scholar
  30. Carlino G, Kerr WR (2014) Agglomeration and innovation. Working Paper 14/26, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  31. Casi L, Resmini L (2017) Investimenti diretti esteri, identità regionali e crescita. Scienze Regionali 16(2):171–200Google Scholar
  32. Crescenzi R, Gagliardi L (2015) Moving people with ideas Innovation, inter-regional mobility and firm heterogeneity, Taubaman Center for State and Local Government Working Paper 2015-01, Harvard Kennedy School. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icbtopic1459278files/CRESCENZI-Riccardo_and_Gagliardi_Moving_People_with_Ideas_3-6-15.pdf. Accessed 23 Jul 2019
  33. Crescenzi R, Rodríguez-Pose A (2011) Innovation and regional growth in the European Union. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Elhorst PJ (2010) Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis 5(1):9–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Faggian A, McCann P (2008) Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British regions. Camb J Econ 33(2):317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fischer MM, Wang JF (2011) Spatial data analysis. Models, methods and techniques. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Florax RJGM, Folmer H, Rey SJ (2003) Specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry’s methodology. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33(5):557–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Foray D (2009) Understanding smart specialisation. In: Pontikakis D, Kyriakou D, van Bavel R (eds) The question of R&D specialisation. JRC, European Commission, Directoral General for Research, Brussels, pp 19–28Google Scholar
  39. Ganguli I (2015) Immigration & ideas: what did Russian scientists ‘bring’ to the US? J Labor Econ 33(S1):S257–S288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ge C, Huang KW, Png IP (2016) Engineer/scientist careers: patents, online profiles, and misclassification bias. Strateg Manag J 37(1):232–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grillitsch M, Trippl M (2014) Combining knowledge from different sources, channels and geographical scales. Eur Plan Stud 22(11):2305–2325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50:1029–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hunt J, Gauthier-Lauselle M (2010) How much does immigration boost innovation? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2(2):31–56Google Scholar
  44. Jensen MB, Johnson B, Lorenz E, Lundvall BA (2007) Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Res Policy 36(5):680–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kerr WR (2008) Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion. Rev Econ Stat 90(3):518–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kerr WR (2010) Breakthrough inventions and migrating clusters of innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 67(1):46–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kerr SP, Kerr WR (2017) Global collaborative patents. Economic Journal 128(612):F235–F272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kerr SP, Kerr WR, Özden Ç, Parsons C (2017) Global talent flows. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(4):83–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kleibergen F, Paap R (2006) Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition. Journal of Econometrics 133:97–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Le Gallo J, Fingleton B (2013) Regional growth convergence and empirics. In: Fischer MM, Njikamp P (eds) Handbook of regional science, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 291–315Google Scholar
  51. LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Taylor and Francis, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. LeSage JP, Pace RK (2014) Interpreting spatial econometric models. In: Fischer MM, Nijkamp P (eds) Handbook of regional science. Springer, Berlin, pp 1535–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lewbel A (2012) Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 30(1):67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Licht G (2009) How to better diffuse technologies in Europe. Knowledge Economy Policy Brief 7:1–5Google Scholar
  55. Lincoln W, Kerr W (2010) The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and US ethnic invention. J Labor Econ 28(3):473–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lissoni F (2018) International migration and innovation diffusion: an eclectic survey. Reg Stud 52(5):702–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22(1):3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mack E (2014) Broadband and knowledge intensive firm clusters: essential link or auxiliary connection? Papers in Regional Science 93(1):3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Maré DC, Fabling R, Stillman S (2014) Innovation and the local workforce. Papers in Regional Science 93(1):183–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marrocu E, Paci R, Usai S (2013) Productivity growth in the old and new Europe: the role of agglomeration externalities. Journal of Regional Science 53(3):418–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Marzucchi A, Antonioli D, Montresor S (2015) Industry-research cooperation within and across regional boundaries. What does innovation policy add? Papers in Regional Science 94(3):499–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miguélez E, Moreno R (2013) Research networks and inventors’ mobility as drivers of innovation: evidence from Europe. Reg Stud 47(10):1668–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Miguélez E, Moreno R (2014) What attracts knowledge workers? The role of space and social networks. Journal of Regional Science 54(1):33–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Miguélez E, Moreno R (2015) Knowledge flows and the absorptive capacity of regions. Res Policy 44(4):833–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Miguélez E, Moreno R, Surinach J (2013) Knowledge flows and regional knowledge creation. In: Capello R, Lenzi C (eds) Territorial patterns of innovation. An inquiry on the knowledge economy in European Regions. Routledge, Oxford, pp 210–229Google Scholar
  66. Mitchell MM (2012) Interpreting and visualizing regression models using Stata. Stata Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  67. Moser P, Voena A, Waldinger F (2014) German Jewish Émigrés and US Invention. Am Econ Rev 104(10):3222–3255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nathan M (2015) Same difference? Minority ethnic inventors, diversity and innovation in the UK. J Econ Geogr 15(1):129–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ott H, Rondé P (2019) Inside the regional innovation system black box: evidence from French data. Papers in Regional Science.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ozgen C, Nijkamp P, Poot J (2010) The effect of migration on income growth and convergence: meta-analytic evidence. Papers in Regional Science 89(3):537–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ozgen C, Peters C, Niebuhr A, Nijkamp P, Poot J (2014) Does cultural diversity of migrant employees affect innovation? Int Migrat Rev 48(s1):S377–S416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pavlínek P (2002) Transformation of central and east European passenger car industry: selective peripheral integration through foreign direct investment. Environment and Planning A 34(9):1685–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Peri G, Shih K, Sparber C (2015) STEM workers, H-1B visas, and productivity in US cities. J Labor Econ 33(S1):S225–S255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shea J (1997) Instrument relevance in multivariate linear models: a simple measure. Rev Econ Stat 49:348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Singh J, Agrawal AK (2011) Recruiting for ideas: how firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Manage Sci 57(1):129–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quart J Econ 70(1):65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In: Andrews DWK, Stock JH (eds) Identification and inference for econometric models: essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 80–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Trippl M, Grillitsch M, Isaksen A (2018) Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Prog Hum Geogr 42(5):687–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Varga A, Schalk H (2004) Knowledge spillovers, agglomeration and macroeconomic growth: an empirical approach. Reg Stud 38(8):977–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations