Evaluation of rebonding strengths of leucite and lithium disilicate veneers debonded with an Er:YAG laser
- 29 Downloads
Resin cements create a high bond between the tooth and ceramic surfaces, thus making it impossible to remove the restoration in one piece. The aims of this study were to evaluate (i) the efficiency of an Er:YAG laser for debonding, and (ii) the changes in the rebonding strength values of all-ceramic veneers, which were removed after laser application. A tooth reduction of 120 extracted human maxillary central incisors was made to provide two different bonding surfaces (60 enamel and 60 dentin). Sixty leucite and 60 lithium disilicate discs (1-mm thickness, 5-mm diameter) were cemented to prepared surfaces with a dual-cure resin cement. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 15): control and laser-irradiated. Er:YAG laser (2940 nm) was applied for 9 s at 3 W power (10 Hz, 300 mJ) with 100 μs pulse duration. Shear bond strength (SBS) test was made with a universal testing machine. After the tested laser-irradiated specimens had been rebonded, the SBS test was performed again and rebonding strengths were measured. The statistical evaluations were performed by using repeated measures one-way ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni tests (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found between the control and laser-irradiated groups (p < 0.001). While the required SBS values for control groups were between 30.04 and 24.66 MPa, the values for laser-irradiated groups were between 6.60 and 4.09 MPa. There was no significant difference between the control and rebonded groups. Er:YAG laser-irradiation is an effective method for removing all-ceramic restorations without affecting the rebonding strength.
KeywordsAll-ceramic Debonding Er:YAG laser Rebonding Shear bond strength
This study was supported in part by a research grant from the Scientific Research Projects Committee of Marmara University, Istanbul (Project no. SAG-C-DUP-170118-0004).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
This article only contains a study with test samples prepared by using extracted human maxillary central incisors that were previously extracted for periodontal reasons.
Although no human participants or animals performed, this study was approved by the university human research ethics committee and all procedures performed in studies (involving human participants) were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 1.Fabbri G, Zarone F, Dellificorelli G, Cannistraro G, De Lorenzi M, Mosca A, Sorrentino R (2014) Clinical evaluation of 860 anterior and posterior lithium disilicate restorations: retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 3 years and a maximum observational period of 6 years. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 34:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Van As G (2013) Using the erbium laser to remove porcelain veneers in 60 seconds. J Cosmetic Dent 28:20–34Google Scholar
- 22.Broome PJ (2007) Utilization of an Er, Cr:YSGG laser for the removal of all-ceramic restorations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 19:23–25Google Scholar
- 23.Cranska JP (2015) Laser removal of all-ceramic restorations. Solving a difficult clinical challenge. Dent Today 34:110–113Google Scholar
- 24.Cranska JP (2013) Removing all-ceramic restorations with lasers. Dent Today 32(101–102):104Google Scholar
- 25.Spath A, Smith C (2017) Removal of modern ceramics. Compend Contin Educ Dent 38:326–233Google Scholar
- 26.van As G (2012) Laser removal of porcelain veneers. Dent Today 31:84 86, 88-9Google Scholar
- 29.Elkamhawy NH, Elkadi AS, Alabbassy FH (2016) Shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers to enamel and enamel-dentine complex bonded with different adhesive luting systems. Alex Dent J 41:131–137Google Scholar
- 31.Zhang Y, Rocca J, Fornaini C, Zhen Y, Zhao Z, Merigo E (2018) Er:YAG laser debonding of porcelain laminate veneers. Preprints 2018060086. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201806.0086.v1
- 35.Bishara SE, Von Wald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ (2000) The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod 70:435–441Google Scholar
- 38.Sol E, Espasa E, Boj JR, Canalda C (2000) Effect of different prophylaxis methods on sealant adhesion. J Clin Pediatr Dent 24:211–214Google Scholar
- 39.Blixt M, Adamczak E, Lindén LA, Odén A, Arvidson K (2000) Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 13:221–226Google Scholar