Advertisement

Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 34, Issue 7, pp 1325–1332 | Cite as

Effects of 1064-nm Nd:YAG long-pulse laser on polidocanol microfoam injected for varicose vein treatment: a controlled observational study of 404 legs, after 5-year-long treatment

  • Javier Moreno-Moraga
  • Mihail L. Pascu
  • Justo M. Alcolea
  • Adriana Smarandache
  • Josefina Royo
  • Fernández David
  • Mario A. TrellesEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Sclerotherapy continues to be the treatment of choice for varicose veins in the legs. However, isolated treatment using microfoam or lasers requires a high number of sessions to eliminate them. In 2013, we published results about the efficacy and safety 3 years after the combined treatment with microfoam injections and subsequent application of Nd:YAG laser. The aim of this paper is to clinically evaluate the treatment of varices in a control visit after 5 years, when polidocanol microfoam is used and is immediately irradiated in the tissue with 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser beam. The outcome persistence after 5 years was studied in the legs that had received combined treatment and had been studied 3 years after treatment. Patients were contacted by phone, interviewed, and examined with echo-Doppler. Out of the 259 patients who were contacted, 221 agreed to make the appointment, although in the end, only 202 came, which meant analysing 404 legs. At 5 years, the clearance rates were very high: patients were included in class CEAP C1 showing vessels of from 0.5 to 3 mm diameter. The patients showed a high level of satisfaction. Regarding adverse effects, only 4 cases of hypopigmentation described in the previous publication persisted. Although the action mechanisms between the microfoam and the Nd:YAG laser must still be elucidated, it is notable that combining microfoam with laser exposure obtained a complete, effective treatment of legs in only 2 sessions, with high clearance rates and high level of satisfaction among patients.

Keywords

Sclerotherapy Varicose veins Spider veins Reticular veins Microfoam polidocanol Nd:YAG laser 

Notes

Funding information

The authors Mihail L. Pascu and Adriana Smarandache were supported by MCI through the Nucleu Programme (ctr. no. 1813/2018) and CNCS/CCCDI - UEFISCDI project PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2016-0420.

Compliance with ethical standards

The interview and study methodology were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fundación Antoni de Gimbernat, and all patients who agreed to participate at control visit for evaluation of the results signed an informed consent form.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Mann MW (2011) Sclerotherapy: it is back and better. Clin Plast Surg 38(3):475–487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coleridge Smith P (2009) Sclerotherapy and foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Phlebology 24(6):260–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rabe E, Schliephake D, Otto J et al (2010) Sclerotherapy of telangiectases and reticular veins: a double-blind randomized, comparative clinical trial of polidocanol, sodium tetradecyl sulphate and isotonic saline (EASI study). Phlebology 25(3):124–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alós J, Carreño P, López JA et al (2006) Efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam: a controlled clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 31(1):101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sadick NS, Prieto VG, Shea CR et al (2001) Clinical and pathophysiologic correlates of 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser treatment of reticular veins and venulectasias. Arch Dermatol 137(5):613–617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sadick NS (2001) Long-term results with a multiple synchronized-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of leg venulectasias and reticular veins. Dermatol Surg 27(4):365–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moreno-Moraga J, Smarandache A, Pascu ML et al (2014) 1064 nm Nd:YAG long pulse laser after polidocanol microfoam injection dramatically improves the result of leg vein treatment: a randomized controlled trial on 517 legs with a three-year follow-up. Phlebology 29(10):658–666CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smarandache A, Trelles M, Pascu ML (2010) Measurement of the modifications of polidocanol absorption spectra after exposure to NIR laser radiation. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 12(9):1942–1945Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smarandache A (2012) Laser beams interaction with polidocanol foam: molecular background. Photomed Laser Surg 30(59):262–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moreno-Moraga J, Hernández E, Royo J et al (2013) Optimal and safe treatment of spider leg veins measuring less than 1.5 mm on skin type IV patients, using repeated low-fluence Nd:YAG laser pulses after polidocanol injection. Lasers Med Sci 28(3):925–933CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ross EV, Domankevitz Y (2005) Laser treatment of leg veins: physical mechanisms and theoretical considerations. Lasers Surg Med 36(2):105–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tessari L (2001) Extemporary sclerosing foam according to personal method: experimental clinical data and catheter usage. Int Angiol 20(Suppl 1):54Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tessari L, Cavezzi A, Frullini A (2001) Preliminary experience with a new sclerosing foam in the treatment of varicose veins. Dermatol Surg 27(1):58–60Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cavezzi A, Frullini A, Ricci S et al (2002) Treatment of varicose veins by foam sclerotherapy: two clinical series. Phlebology 17(1):13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Redondo P, Cabrera J (2005) Microfoam sclerotherapy. Semin Cutan Med Surg 24(4):175–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trelles MA, Allones I, Alvarez J et al (2006) The 800-nm diode laser in the treatment of leg veins: assessment at 6 months. J Am Acad Dermatol 54(2):282–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sadick N (2003) Laser treatment with a 1064-nm laser for lower extremity class I-III veins employing variable spots and pulse width parameters. Dermatol Surg 29(9):916–919PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mordon S, Brisot D, Fournier N (2003) Using a “non-uniform pulse sequence” can improve selective coagulation with a Nd:YAG laser (1.06 microm) thanks to met-hemoglobin absorption: a clinical study on blue leg veins. Lasers Surg Med 32(2):160–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levy J, Elbahr C, Jouve E, Mordon S (2004) Comparison and sequential study of long pulsed Nd:YAG 1064 nm laser and sclerotherapy in leg telangiectasias treatment. Lasers Surg Med 34(3):273–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heger M, Beek JF, Moldovan NI et al (2005) Towards optimization of selective photothermolysis: prothrombotic pharmaceutical agents as potential adjuvants in laser treatment of port wine stains: a theoretical study. Thromb Haemost 93(2):242–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Conrad P, Malouf GM, Stacey MC (1995) The Australian polidocanol (aethoxyskclerol) study. Results at 2 years. Dermatol Surg 21(4):334–336 discussion 337-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parlar B, Blazek C, Cazzaniga S et al (2015) Treatment of lower extremity telangiectasias in women by foam sclerotherapy vs. Nd:YAG laser: a prospective, comparative, randomized, open-label trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 29(3):549–554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Altshuler GB, Anderson RR, Manstein D, Zenzie HH, Smirnov MZ (2001) Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med 29(5):416–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bäumler W, Ulrich H, Hartl A, Landthaler M, Shafirstein G (2006) Optimal parameters for the treatment of leg veins using Nd:YAG lasers at 1064 nm. Brit J Dermatol 155(2):364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parlette EC, Groff WF, Kinshella MJ et al (2006) Optimal pulse durations for the treatment of leg telangiectasias with a neodymium YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med 38(2):98–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Murphy MJ, Torstensson PA (2014) Thermal relaxation times: an outdated concept in photothermal treatments. Lasers Surg Med 29(3):973–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eckmann DM (2009) Polidocanol for endovenous microfoam sclerosant therapy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 18(12):1919–1927CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sommer AP, Zhu D, Mester AR, Försterling H-D (2011) Pulsed laser light forces cancer cells to absorb anticancer drugs--the role of water in nanomedicine. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 39:169–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sommer AP, Caron A, Fecht HJ (2008) Tuning nanoscopic water layers on hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces with laser light. Langmuir 24(3):635–636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sommer AP, Bieschke J, Friedrich RP, Zhu D, Wanker EE, Fecht HJ, Mereles D, Hunstein W (2012) 670 nm laser light and EGCG complementarily reduce amyloid-β aggregates in human neuroblastoma cells: basis for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease? Photomed. Laser Surg 30:54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sommer AP, Haddad MK, Fecht HJ (2015) Light effect on water viscosity: implication for ATP biosynthesis. Sci Rep 5:12029CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nastasa V, Boni M, Stoicu A, Dinache A, Smarandache A, Pascu ML (2016) Lasers in foams and emulsions studies. In: Pascu ML (ed) Laser optofluidics in fighting multiple drug resistance. Bentham Science Publishers, Sharjah, pp 303–350Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Smarandache A, Staicu A, Nastasa V, Moreno-Moraga J, Royo de la Torre J, Trelles M, Pirvulescu R, Pascu ML (2015) Physical properties of laser irradiated sclerosing foams. Rom Rep Phys 67(4):1480–1490Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Médico LáserMadridSpain
  2. 2.Laser DepartmentNational Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation PhysicsBucharestRomania
  3. 3.Clínica AlcoleaBarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Fundación Antoni de GimbernatInstituto Médico VilafortunyTarragonaSpain

Personalised recommendations