Factors responsible for the development of carbon granuloma post transoral laser cordectomy
Our study was performed with an aim to analyse the factors responsible for the formation of a carbon granuloma (CG) following transoral laser microlaryngeal cordectomy (TLMC) for early glottic carcinoma. Our study comprises of retrospective data analysis of 78 patients who underwent TLMC for early glottic carcinoma between 2012 and 2017 with the laser settings of an acublade with scanning system, size 1–2 mm, depth 1–3 (250–750 μm), power 10 watts in a repeat mode with time off 0.25 s. A total of 19 patients had undergone type 1 cordectomy, 38 patients a type 2 cordectomy, 20 patients a type 3 cordectomy and 1 type 4 cordectomy. In the follow-up period, patients were divided into two groups—group A, who healed well and group B, who developed a CG. Both groups were analysed based on surgical factors (type of cordectomy, postoperative surface of vocal fold and cautery use) and healing factors (presence of diabetes mellitus and laryngopharyngeal reflux). Of 81 cordectomies, 15 (18.5%) developed a CG at an average period of 4 weeks postoperatively. All 15 patients were managed medically and by 4–8 weeks, 13 carbon granulomas resolved. Surgical excision in 2 patients who did not improve revealed granulation tissue. Of 40 type 2 cordectomies, 9 developed a CG (22.5%); of 20 type 3 cordectomies, 5 developed a CG (25%) and the 1 patient of type 4 cordectomy developed a CG (100%). Patients with cautery use, diabetes mellitus (DM) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) had a higher rate of CG formation. To summarise, in our study, a CG developed in 18.5% of our TLMC patients at an average postoperative duration of 4 weeks. An algorithm for treating and preventing this type of lesion is recommended.
KeywordsVoice/dysphonia Laryngology Larynx Head and neck Glottic cancer Carbon granuloma Healing granuloma Laser cordectomy
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Required ethical approval taken from Bombay Hospital Ethics Approval Committee.
Application for waiver of consent form given to the Bombay Hospital Ethics Committee and approved since our study is a retrospective observational study.
- 1.Chauhan JPS, Bharti B, Bhadouriya SS, Kumar A, Narain P, Singh J (2018) Laryngeal cancer: a clinicopathological study of 65 cases. Indian J Otolaryngol 4:163–168Google Scholar
- 4.Lin JRJ, Prisman E (2014) Transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic carcinoma. Surgery Curr Res 4(5):201–205Google Scholar
- 5.Bocciolini C, Presutti L, Laudadio P (2005) Oncological outcome after CO2 laser cordectomy for early stage glottic carcinoma. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 25:86–93Google Scholar
- 7.Steiner W (1988) Experience in endoscopic laser surgery of malignant tumours of the upper aero-digestive tract. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 39:135–144Google Scholar
- 10.Gregorie V, Hamoir M, Rosier JF, Counhoy H, Eeckhoudt L, Neymark N, Scalliet P (1999) Cost minimization analysis of treatment options for T1N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma: comparison between external radiotherapy, laser microsurgery and partial laryngectomy. Radiother Oncol 53:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Remacle M, He E, Antonelli A, Brasnu D, Chevalier D, Friedrich G, Olofsson J, Rudert HH, Thumfart W, de Vincentis M, Wustrow TP (2000) Endoscopic cordectomy: a proposal for a classification by the working committee, European laryngeal society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Adams D (1976) The granulomatous inflammatory response- a review. Am J Pathol 84:164–191Google Scholar
- 15.Ansari MA, Erfanzadeh M, Mohajerani E (2013) Mechanisms of laser-tissue interaction: II. Tissue Thermal Properties. J Lasers Med Sci 4:99–106Google Scholar
- 17.Betlejewski S, Sinkiewicz A, Mackiewicz H, Owczarek A, Dalke K (2005) Carbon granuloma- an unwanted effect of laryngeal laser micro surgery. Pol Merkur Lekarski 19:417–419Google Scholar
- 20.Rosenberg CS (1990) Wound healing in patients with diabetes mellitus. Nurs Clin N Am 25:247–261Google Scholar
- 22.Andrea MC, Jaqueline P, Rebecca HT, Tatiana M, Aida RA (2014) Laryngopharyngeal reflux: diagnosis, treatment and latest research. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 18:184–191Google Scholar