Advertisement

Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 1063–1069 | Cite as

Comparative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for adult androgenic alopecia: a system review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Kao-Hui Liu
  • Donald Liu
  • Yu-Tsung Chen
  • Szu-Ying ChinEmail author
Review Article
  • 357 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to explore the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of adult androgenic alopecia (AGA). A systematic search of studies on LLLT for AGA was conducted mainly in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Systematic Reviews. The standardized mean difference (SMD) in the changes of hair density treated by LLLT versus sham devices was analyzed. The meta-analysis included 8 studies comprising a total of 11 double-blinded randomized controlled trials. The quantitative analysis showed a significant increase in hair density for those treated by LLLT versus sham group (SMD 1.316, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.993 to 1.639). The subgroup analysis demonstrated that LLLT increases hair growth in both genders, in both comb- and helmet-type devices, and in short- and long-term treatment course. The subgroup analysis also showed a more significant increase of hair growth for the LLLT versus sham in the low-frequency treatment group (SMD 1.555, 95% CI 1.132 to 1.978) than in the high-frequency group (SMD 0.949, 95% CI 0.644 to 1.253). The review was limited by the heterogeneity of included trials. LLLT significantly increased hair density in AGA. The meta-analysis suggests that low treatment frequency by LLLT have a better hair growth effect than high treatment frequency. LLLT represents a potentially effective treatment for AGA in both male and female. The types of LLLT devices and LLLT treatment course duration did not affect the effectiveness in hair growth.

Keywords

Low-level laser therapy Adult androgenic alopecia Hair growth Meta-analysis 

Notes

Funding information

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 107-2314-B-038-052).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Cash TF (1999) The psychosocial consequences of androgenetic alopecia: a review of the research literature. Br J Dermatol 141(3):398–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rousso DE, Kim SW (2014) A review of medical and surgical treatment options for androgenetic alopecia. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 16(6):444–450.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2014.316 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delaney SW, Zhang P (2018) Systematic review of low-level laser therapy for adult androgenic alopecia. J Cosmet Laser Ther 20(4):229–236.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2017.1400170 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Afifi L, Maranda EL, Zarei M, Delcanto GM, Falto-Aizpurua L, Kluijfhout WP, Jimenez JJ (2017) Low-level laser therapy as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia. Lasers Surg Med 49(1):27–39.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22512 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang Y, Huang YY, Wang Y, Lyu P, Hamblin MR (2017) Photobiomodulation of human adipose-derived stem cells using 810nm and 980nm lasers operates via different mechanisms of action. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1861(2):441–449.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.10.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalia S, Lui H (2013) Utilizing electromagnetic radiation for hair growth: a critical review of phototrichogenesis. Dermatol Clin 31(1):193–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2012.08.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang X, Reddy DD, Nalawade SS, Pal S, Gonzalez-Lima F, Liu H (2018) Impact of heat on metabolic and hemodynamic changes in transcranial infrared laser stimulation measured by broadband near-infrared spectroscopy. Neurophotonics 5(1):011004.  https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.5.1.011004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang X, Tian F, Reddy DD, Nalawade SS, Barrett DW, Gonzalez-Lima F, Liu H (2017) Up-regulation of cerebral cytochrome-c-oxidase and hemodynamics by transcranial infrared laser stimulation: a broadband near-infrared spectroscopy study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 37(12):3789–3802.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X17691783 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gupta AK, Foley KA (2017) A critical assessment of the evidence for low-level laser therapy in the treatment of hair loss. Dermatol Surg 43(2):188–197.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000904 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang X, Tian F, Soni SS, Gonzalez-Lima F, Liu H (2016) Interplay between up-regulation of cytochrome-c-oxidase and hemoglobin oxygenation induced by near-infrared laser. Sci Rep 6:30540.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30540 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nct (2017) “iRestore” Light Therapy Apparatus. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/nct03331003. Accessed Oct 2018
  12. 12.
    Gupta AK, Mays RR, Dotzert MS, Versteeg SG, Shear NH, Piguet V (2018) Efficacy of non-surgical treatments for androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15081
  13. 13.
    Mella JM, Perret MC, Manzotti M, Catalano HN, Guyatt G (2010) Efficacy and safety of finasteride therapy for androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol 146(10):1141–1150.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2010.256 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adil A, Godwin M (2017) The effectiveness of treatments for androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 77(1):136–141.e135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.02.054 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Esmat SM, Hegazy RA, Gawdat HI, Abdel Hay RM, Allam RS, El Naggar R, Moneib H (2017) Low level light-minoxidil 5% combination versus either therapeutic modality alone in management of female patterned hair loss: a randomized controlled study. Lasers Surg Med 49(9):835–843.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22684 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Faghihi G, Mozafarpoor S, Asilian A, Mokhtari F, Esfahani AA, Bafandeh B, Nouraei S, Nilforoushzadeh MA, Hosseini SM (2018) The effectiveness of adding low-level light therapy to minoxidil 5% solution in the treatment of patients with androgenetic alopecia. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 84(5):547–553.  https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_1156_16 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leavitt M, Charles G, Heyman E, Michaels D (2009) HairMax LaserComb laser phototherapy device in the treatment of male androgenetic alopecia: a randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled, multicentre trial. Clin Drug Investig 29(5):283–292.  https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200929050-00001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim H, Choi JW, Kim JY, Shin JW, Lee SJ, Huh CH (2013) Low-level light therapy for androgenetic alopecia: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled multicenter trial. Dermatol Surg 39(8):1177–1183.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lanzafame RJ, Blanche RR, Bodian AB, Chiacchierini RP, Fernandez-Obregon A, Kazmirek ER (2013) The growth of human scalp hair mediated by visible red light laser and LED sources in males. Lasers Surg Med 45(8):487–495.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22173 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lanzafame RJ, Blanche RR, Chiacchierini RP, Kazmirek ER, Sklar JA (2014) The growth of human scalp hair in females using visible red light laser and LED sources. Lasers Surg Med 46(8):601–607.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22277 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Friedman S, Schnoor P (2017) Novel approach to treating androgenetic alopecia in females with photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy). Dermatol Surg 43(6):856–867.  https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000001114 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mai-Yi Fan S, Cheng YP, Lee MY, Lin SJ, Chiu HY (2018) Efficacy and safety of a low-level light therapy for androgenetic alopecia: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, self-comparison, sham device-controlled trial. Dermatol Surg 44(11):1411–1420.  https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000001577 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barikbin B, Khodamrdi Z, Kholoosi L, Akhgri MR, Haj Abbasi M, Hajabbasi M, Razzaghi Z, Akbarpour S (2017) Comparison of the effects of 665 nm low level diode laser hat versus and a combination of 665 nm and 808nm low level diode laser scanner of hair growth in androgenic alopecia. J Cosmet Laser Ther.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2017.1326609
  24. 24.
    Jimenez JJ, Wikramanayake TC, Bergfeld W, Hordinsky M, Hickman JG, Hamblin MR, Schachner LA (2014) Efficacy and safety of a low-level laser device in the treatment of male and female pattern hair loss: a multicenter, randomized, sham device-controlled, double-blind study. Am J Clin Dermatol 15(2):115–127.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-013-0060-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Najem I, Chen H (2018) Use of low-level laser therapy in treatment of the androgenic alopecia, the first systematic review. J Cosmet Laser Ther 20(4):252–257.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2017.1400174 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Freitas LF, Hamblin MR (2016) Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 22(3).  https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2561201

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kao-Hui Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Donald Liu
    • 1
  • Yu-Tsung Chen
    • 1
  • Szu-Ying Chin
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of DermatologyTaipei Medical University Shuang Ho HospitalNew Taipei CityTaiwan
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, College of MedicineTaipei Medical UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations