In vivo detection of oral precancer using a fluorescence-based, in-house-fabricated device: a Mahalanobis distance-based classification
- 44 Downloads
In vivo detection of oral precancer has been carried out by a fluorescence-based, in-house-developed handheld probe on three groups: oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), dysplastic (precancer), and control (normal). Measurements have been performed on a total of 141 patients and volunteers of different age groups. Excitation wavelength of 405 nm was used and fluorescence emission spectra were recorded in the scan range of 450.14 to 763.41 nm at very low incident power (122 μW) from different oral sites buccal mucosa (BM), lateral boarder of tongue (LBT), and dorsal surface of tongue (DST). Spectral profiles are found to vary among the three groups as well as among the different oral sites. Major and minor bands of flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and porphyrins near 500, 634, 676, 689, and 703 nm have been obtained. Porphyrin contribution is found to be more dominant than the FAD in OSCC and dysplastic groups as compared to the control group. A better classification has been observed using the entire spectral range rather than restricting to individual bands, by application of principal component analysis (PCA), Mahalanobis distance model, and receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC). ROC on Mahalanobis distance differentiates OSCC to normal, dysplastic to normal, and OSCC to dysplastic with sensitivities from 71% to 98%, 92% to 94% and 81% to 93% and specificities 91% to 100%, 86% to 100% and 79% to 97% for oral sites BM, LBT and DST. LBT and DST appear to be more sensitive to dysplasia detection as compared to BM.
KeywordsOral cancer Oral sites Fluorescence spectroscopy Principle component analysis Mahalanobis distance model Receiver operating characteristic analysis
We would like to acknowledge IMPRINT India, MHRD government, for the financial support.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Role of funding source
Facilities of Biophotonics lab at IIT Kanpur has been utilized in the study.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of GSVM Medical College Kanpur and IIT Kanpur and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent form was taken from all participating patients and volunteers.
- 1.Omar E (2015) Current concepts and future of noninvasive procedures for diagnosing oral squamous cell carcinoma--a systematic review. Head Face Med 11: 6Google Scholar
- 2.Varshitha A (2015) Prevalence of oral cancer in India. J Pharm Sci Res 7:845–848Google Scholar
- 5.Dikshit R, Gupta PC, Ramasundarahettige C, Gajalakshmi V, Aleksandrowicz L, Badwe R, Kumar R, Roy S, Suraweera W, Bray F, Mallath M, Singh PK, Sinha DN, Shet AS, Gelband H, Jha P, Million Death Study Collaborators (2012) Cancer mortality in India: a nationally representative survey. Lancet 379:1807–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Scully C, Bagan JV, Hopper C, Epstein JB (2008) Oral cancer: current and future diagnostic techniques. Am J Dent 21:199–209Google Scholar
- 9.Inaguma M, Hashimoto K (1999) Porphyrin-like fluorescence in oral cancer: in vivo fluorescence spectral characterization of lesions by use of a near-ultraviolet excited autofluorescence diagnosis system and separation of fluorescent extracts by capillary electrophoresis. Cancer 86:2201–2211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Ramanujam N, Mitchell MF, Mahadevan-Jansen A, Thomson SL, Staerkel G, Malpica A, Wright T, Atkinson N, Richardas-Kortum R (1996) Cervical precancer detection using a multivariate statistical algorithm based on laser-induced fluorescence spectra at multiple excitation wavelengths. Photochem Photobiol 64:720–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Singh SP, Deshmukh A, Chaturvedi P, Murali KC (2012) In vivo Raman spectroscopic identification of premalignant lesions in oral buccal mucosa. J Biomed Opt 17:105002Google Scholar
- 25.Majumder SK, Mahanty SK, Ghosh N, Gupta PK, Jain DK, Khan F (2000) A pilot study on the use of autofluorescence for diagnosis of the cancer of human oral cavity. Curr Sci 79:1089–1094Google Scholar