Types of advanced optical microscopy techniques for breast cancer research: a review
A cancerous cell is characterized by morphological and metabolic changes which are the key features of carcinogenesis. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in cancer cells is primarily produced by aerobic glycolysis rather than oxidative phosphorylation. In normal cellular metabolism, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) is considered as a principle electron donor and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) as an electron acceptor. During metabolism in a cancerous cell, a net increase in NADH is found as the pathway switched from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis. Often during initiation and progression of cancer, the developmental regulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) is restricted and becomes disorganized. Tumor cell behavior is regulated by the ECM in the tumor micro environment. Collagen, which forms the scaffold of tumor micro-environment also influences its behavior. Advanced optical microscopy techniques are useful for determining the metabolic characteristics of cancerous, normal cells and tissues. They can be used to identify the collagen microstructure and the function of NADH, FAD, and lipids in living system. In this review article, various optical microscopy techniques applied for breast cancer research are discussed including fluorescence, confocal, second harmonic generation (SHG), coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS), and fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM).
KeywordsBreast cancer Confocal fluorescence microscopy Second harmonic generation Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering NADH Collagen
We would like to acknowledge Dr. K. Satyamoorthy, Director, School of Life Sciences for his encouragement and Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India for providing the infrastructure facilities. We thank Dr. K. K. Mahato, HoD, Department of Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, MAHE, Manipal, India for suggestion in preparing the review.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57–70Google Scholar
- 6.Lloyd-Lewis B, Davis FM, Harris OB, Hitchcock JR, Lourenco FC, Mathias P, Watson CJ (2016) Imaging the mammary gland and mammary tumors in 3D: optical tissue clearing and immunofluorescence methods. BioMed Central 18:1271–12717Google Scholar
- 19.Tilli MT, Parrish AR, Cotarla I, Jones LP, Johnson MD, Furth PA (2008) Comparison of mouse mammary gland imaging techniques and applications: reflectance confocal microscopy, GFP imaging, and ultrasound. BMC Cancer 8(21):1–15Google Scholar
- 22.Dobbs JL, Mueller JL, Krishnamurthy S, Shin D, Kuerer H, Yang W, Ramanujam N, Kortum RR (2015) Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues. Breast Cancer Res 17(105):1–14Google Scholar
- 43.Periasamy A, Mazumder N, Sun Y, Christopher KG, Day RN (2015) FRET microscopy: basics, issues and advantages of FLIM-FRET imaging. Springer Ser Chem Phys 111:249–276 Advanced Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting Applications, Springer International Publishing Series ISSN 0172–6218CrossRefGoogle Scholar