Physical properties of hydrogel wound dressing and its use in low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
- 48 Downloads
Hydrogel dressings are routinely used in the treatment of superficial skin wounds. Due to their excellent transparency, we decided to evaluate their usefulness in laser-based medical procedures. We focused on assessing selected physical properties of HydroAid hydrogel wound dressing, used for low-level laser therapy (LLLT) aka laser biostimulation procedures. For the two wavelengths of 660 and 808 nm used in the biostimulation laser POLARIS 2, a dressing transmittance of 92 and 98%, respectively, was determined. Using a FLIR i7 thermal imaging camera, the changes in temperature distribution across the surface of the dressing were assessed, during a 3-h period following its unpacking and placing on the skin of a patient or leaving it at the ambient temperature. The results of the thermal imaging, as well as temperature measurements using a digital thermometer, showed that the cooling properties of a hydrogel dressing were maintained throughout the entire experiment and that it was capable to keep the temperature at least 5° below the skin/ambient (room) temperature. During the 6-h observation using the holographic microscope, which provided indirect insight into the processes occurring within the hydrogel, only minimum topographical changes (observable at a micrometre scale) were recorded, although dressing thickness and its flexibility decreased significantly with time. Additionally, the possibility to regenerate the hydrogel dressing by treating it with distilled water or a physiological salt solution was tested.
KeywordsHydrogel wound dressing Low-level laser therapy Transmittance The holographic microscope
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Approval by Ethical Commission is not needed.
Not applicable since there are no patients involved.
- 2.Dumville JC, Stubbs N, Keogh SJ, Walker RM, Liu Z. (2015) Hydrogel dressings for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Feb 17:(2)Google Scholar
- 3.Saco M, Howe N, Nathoo R, Cherpelis B. (2016) Comparing the efficiencies of alginate, foam, hydrocolloid, hydrofiber, and hydrogel dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining how to dress for success. Dermatol Online J 15:22(8)Google Scholar
- 4.Bialik-Wąs K, Pielichowski K (2011) Polimerowe opatrunki hydrożelowe dla zastosowań biomedycznych. Czasopismo Techniczne, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej 10Google Scholar
- 6.He H, Xia D-L, Chen Y-P, Li X-D, Chen C, Wang Y-F, Shen L, Hu Y-L, Gu H-Y (2015) Evaluation of a two-stage antibacterial hydrogel dressing for healing in an infected diabetic wound. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2015:00BGoogle Scholar
- 7.Babavalian H, Latifi AM, Shokrgozar MA, Bonakdar S, Mohammadi S, Moosazadeh Moghaddam M (2015) Analysis of healing effect of alginate sulfate hydrogel dressing containing antimicrobial peptide on wound infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Jundishapur J Microbiol 9:7–8Google Scholar
- 11.Gil-Cazorla R, Teus MA, Hernández-Verdejo JL, De Benito-Llopis L, Garcia-González M (2008) Comparative study of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses used as bandage contact lenses after LASEK. Optom Vis Sci 85(9):884–888Google Scholar