Advertisement

Central European Journal of Operations Research

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 703–735 | Cite as

SEM–ANN based research of factors’ impact on extended use of ERP systems

  • Simona Sternad ZabukovšekEmail author
  • Zoran Kalinic
  • Samo Bobek
  • Polona Tominc
Original Paper

Abstract

The main objective of this research is to test the hypothesis that the two-step structural equation modelling (SEM) and artificial neural network (ANN) approach enables better in-depth research results as compared to the single-step SEM approach. This approach was used to determine which factors have statistically significant influence on extended use of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. The research model and the hypothesized relationships are based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Majority of research on ERP acceptance has been conducted with SEM based research approaches. The purpose of this paper is to extend basic TAM research which is traditionally based on SEM technique with ANN approach. In the first step of the present research the SEM technique was used to determine which factors have statistically significant influence on extended use of the ERP systems; in the second step, ANN models were used to rank the relative influence of significant predictors obtained from SEM. The main finding of this research is that the use of multi-analytical two step SEM–ANN approach provides two important benefits. First, it enables additional verification of the results obtained by the SEM analysis. Second, this approach enables capturing not only linear but also complex nonlinear relationships between antecedents and dependent variables and more precise measure of relative influence of each predictor.

Keywords

Structural equation modelling (SEM) Artificial neural network (ANN) Enterprise resource planning (ERP) Technology acceptance model (TAM) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, as a part of Research Project III-44010, titled: Intelligent Systems for Software Product Development and Business Support based on Models and by the Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding No. P5-0023).

References

  1. Ahani A, Rahim NZA, Nilasi M (2017) Forecasting social CRM adoption in SMEs: a combined SEM–neural network method. Comput Hum Behav 75:560–578.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.032 Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.032 Google Scholar
  3. Amoako-Gyampah K, Salam AF (2004) An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inf Manag 41:731–745.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.010 Google Scholar
  4. Bradley J, Lee CC (2007) ERP training and user satisfaction: a case study. Int J Enterp Inf Syst 3(4):33–55.  https://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2007100103 Google Scholar
  5. Bueno S, Salmeron JL (2008) TAM-based success modelling in ERP. Interact Comput 20(6):515–523.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.08.003 Google Scholar
  6. Calisir F, Gumussoy CA, Bayram A (2009) Predicting the behavioural intention to use enterprise resource planning systems—an exploratory extension of the technology acceptance model. Manag Res News 32(7):597–613.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170910965215 Google Scholar
  7. Chan FTS, Chong AYL (2012) A SEM–neural network approach for understanding determinants of interorganizational system standard adoption and performances. Decis Support Syst 54:621–630.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.009 Google Scholar
  8. Chin WW (1998) Issues and opinion on structural equation modelling. MIS Q 22(1):7–16Google Scholar
  9. Chin WW et al (1996) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo study and voice mail emotion/adoption study. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth international conference on information systems, Cleveland, OHGoogle Scholar
  10. Chong AYL (2013a) Predicting m-commerce adoption determinants: a neural network approach. Expert Syst Appl 40:523–530.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.068 Google Scholar
  11. Chong AYL (2013b) A two-staged SEM–neural network approach for understanding and predicting the determinants of m-commerce adoption. Expert Syst Appl 40(4):1240–1247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.067 Google Scholar
  12. Chong AYL, Bai R (2014) Predicting open IOS adoption in SMEs: an integrated SEM–neural network approach. Expert Syst Appl 41(1):221–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.023 Google Scholar
  13. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340Google Scholar
  15. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 Google Scholar
  16. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  17. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurements errors. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50Google Scholar
  18. Garson GD (2016) Partial least squares: regression and structural equation models. Statistical Associates Publishers, AsheboroGoogle Scholar
  19. Gnana Sheela K, Deepa SN (2013) Review on methods to fix number of hidden neurons in neural networks. Math Probl Eng 2013:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/425740 Google Scholar
  20. Hackle P, Wsestlud A (2000) On structural equation modelling for customer satisfaction measurement. Total Qual Manag 11:820–825Google Scholar
  21. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Chall Int Mark 20:277–319Google Scholar
  22. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant vaidity in variance-based structural equation modelling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 Google Scholar
  23. Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA (2016) Using PLS path modelling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Ind Manag Data Syst 116(1):2–20.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382 Google Scholar
  24. Hew T-S, Leong L-Y, Ooi K-B, Chong AY-L (2016) Predicting drivers of mobile entertainment adoption: a two-stage SEM–artificial-neural-network analysis. J Comput Inf Syst 56(4):352–370.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1164497 Google Scholar
  25. Hew J-J, Badaruddin MNBA, Moorthy MK (2017) Crafting a smartphone repurchase decision making process: do brand attachment and gender matter? Telemat Inform 34(4):34–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.12.009 Google Scholar
  26. Hew J-J, Leong L-Y, Tan GW-H, Lee V-H, Ooi K-B (2018) Mobile social tourism shopping: a dual-stage analysis of a multi-mediation model. Tour Manag 66:121–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.10.005 Google Scholar
  27. Hsieh JJPA, Wang W (2007) Explaining employees’ extended use of complex information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 16(3):216–227.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000663 Google Scholar
  28. Hsu S-H, Chen W-H, Hsieh M-J (2006) Robustness testing of PLS, LISREL, EQS and ANN-based SEM for measuring customer satisfaction. Total Qual Manag 17(3):355–371Google Scholar
  29. Hwang YJ (2005) Investigating enterprise systems adopting: uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation and the technology acceptance model. Eur J Inf Syst 14(2):150–161.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000532 Google Scholar
  30. Jimoh L, Eshiemokhai E, Hambali Z (2014) Bibliometric analysis of international journal of research in education, 2004–2012. Inf Knowl Manag 4(12):42–48Google Scholar
  31. Kwahk K-Y, Lee JN (2008) The role of readiness for change in ERP implementation: theoretical bases and empirical validation. Inf Manag 45(7):474–481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.07.002 Google Scholar
  32. Lee DH, Lee SM, Olson DL, Chung SH (2010) The effect of organizational support on ERP implementation. Ind Manag Data Syst 110(2):269–283.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011020340 Google Scholar
  33. Leong L-Y, Hew T-S, Tan GWH, Ooi KB (2013) Predicting the determinants of the NFC-enabled mobile credit card acceptance: a neural network approach. Expert Syst Appl 40:5604–5620.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.04.018 Google Scholar
  34. Leong L-Y, Hew T-S, Lee V-H, Ooi K-B (2015) An SEM–artificial-neural-network analysis of the relationships between SERVPERF, customer satisfaction and loyalty among low-cost and full service airline. Expert Syst Appl 42:6620–6634Google Scholar
  35. Li Y, He T, Song Y, Yang Z, Zhou R (2018) Factors impacting donors’ intention to donate to charitable crowd-funding projects in china: a UTAUT-based model. Inf Commun Soc 21(3):404–415.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1282530 Google Scholar
  36. Liébana-Cabanillas F, Marinković V, Kalinić Z (2017) A SEM–neural network approach for predicting antecedents of m-commerce acceptance. Int J Inf Manag 37:14–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.10.008 Google Scholar
  37. Liébana-Cabanillas F, Marinkovic V, Ramos de Luna I, Kalinic Z (2018) Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: a hybrid SEM–neural network approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change 5:254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.015 Google Scholar
  38. Liu L, Ma Q (2006) Perceived system performance: a test of an extended technology acceptance model. J Organ End User Comput 18(3):1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1161345.1161354 Google Scholar
  39. Lu J, Chun-Sheng Y, Liu C, Yao JE (2003) Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Res Electron Network Appl Policy 13(3):206–222.  https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240310478222 Google Scholar
  40. Mei B, Brown GTL, Teo T (2018) Toward an understanding of preservice english as a foreign language teachers’ acceptance of computer-assisted language learning 2.0 in the People’s republic of China. J Educ Comput Res 56(1):74–104.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117700144 Google Scholar
  41. Nah FF, Tan X, Teh SH (2004) An empirical investigation on end-users’ acceptance of enterprise systems. Inf Resour Manag J 17(3):32–53.  https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2004070103 Google Scholar
  42. Negnevitsky M (2011) Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent systems, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, EssexGoogle Scholar
  43. Ooi K-B, Tan GWH (2016) Mobile technology acceptance model: an investigation using mobile users to explore smartphone credit card. Expert Syst Appl 59:33–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.015 Google Scholar
  44. Panahian H (2011) Stock market index forecasting by neural networks models and nonlinear multiple regression modeling: study of Iran’s capital market. Am J Sci Res 18:35–51Google Scholar
  45. Priyadarshinee P, Raut RD, Jha MK, Gardas BB (2017) Understanding and predicting the determinants of cloud computing adoption: a two staged hybrid SEM–neural networks approach. Comput Hum Behav 76:341–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.027 Google Scholar
  46. Pu X, Chan FTS, Chong AYL (2016) Development of a unified open e-logistics standards diffusion model for manufacturing supply chain integrations. In: PACIS 2016 proceedings Pacific Asia conference on information systemsGoogle Scholar
  47. Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker J-M (2015) SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt. http://www.smartpls.com. Accessed 8 Feb 2016
  48. Roy SK, Balaji MS, Kesharwani A, Sekhon H (2017) Predicting Internet banking adoption in India: a perceived risk perspective. J Strateg Mark 25(5–6):418–438.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2016.1148771 Google Scholar
  49. Sánchez-Mena A, Martí-Parreño J, Aldás-Manzano J (2018) Teachers’ intention to use educational video games: the moderating role of gender and age. Innov Educ Teach Int.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1433547 Google Scholar
  50. Scherer R, Tondeur J, Siddiq F, Baran E (2018) The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: comparing structural equation modelling approaches. Comput Hum Behav 80:67–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003 Google Scholar
  51. Sezgin E, Özkan-Yildirim S, Yildirim S (2018) Understanding the perception towards using mHealth applications in practice: physicians’ perspective. Inf Dev 34(2):182–200.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916684180 Google Scholar
  52. Sharma SK (2017) Integrating cognitive antecedents into TAM to explain mobile banking behavioral intention: a SEM–neural network modelling. Inf Syst Front.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9775-x Google Scholar
  53. Sharma SK, Joshi A, Sharma H (2016) A multi-analytical approach to predict the Facebook usage in higher education. Comput Hum Behav 55:340–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.020 Google Scholar
  54. Shibata K, Ikeda Y (2009) Effect of number of hidden neurons on learning in large-scale layered neural networks. In: Proceedings of the ICROS-SICE international joint conference 2009 (ICCASSICE’09), pp 5008–5013Google Scholar
  55. Shih YY, Huang SS (2009) The actual usage of ERP systems: an extended technology acceptance perspective. J Res Pract Inf Technol 41(3):263–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.010 Google Scholar
  56. Shivers-Blackwell SL, Charles AC (2006) Ready, set, go: examining student readiness to use ERP technology. J Manag Dev 25(8):795–805.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610684268 Google Scholar
  57. Sim JJ, Tan GW-H, Wong JCJ, Ooi K-B, Hew T-S (2014) Understanding and predicting the motivators of mobile music acceptance—a multi stage MRA-Artificial neural network approach. Telemat Inform 31:569–584.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.11.005 Google Scholar
  58. Sternad S, Bobek S (2013) TAM-based external factors related to ERP solutions acceptance in organizations. Int J Inf Syst Proj Manag 1(4):25–38Google Scholar
  59. Sternad S, Bobek S (2014) ERP business solutions acceptance in companies. In: Chatterjee SR (ed) Managing in recovering markets (Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics). Springer, New Delhi, pp 283–294Google Scholar
  60. Sternad S, Gradišar M, Bobek S (2011) The influence of external factors on routine ERP usage. Ind Manag Data Syst 111(9):1511–1530.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111182818 Google Scholar
  61. Sun Y, Bhattacherjee A, Ma Q (2009) Extending technology usage to work settings: the role of perceived work compatibility in ERP implementation. Inf Manag 46(6):351–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2009.06.003- Google Scholar
  62. Tabachnick GB, Fidell LS (2013) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson, BostonGoogle Scholar
  63. Tan GW-H, Ooi K-B, Leong L-Y, Lin B (2014) Predicting the drivers of behavioral intention to use mobile learning: a hybrid SEM–neural networks approach. Comput Hum Behav 36:198–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.052 Google Scholar
  64. Teo A-C, Tan GW-H, Ooi K-B, Hew T-S, Yew K-T (2015) The effects of convenience and speed in m-payment. Ind Manag Data Syst 115(2):311–331.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2014-0231 Google Scholar
  65. Trenn S (2008) Multilayer perceptrons: approximation order and necessary number of hidden units. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 19(5):836–844Google Scholar
  66. Umble EJ, Haft RR, Umble MM (2002) Enterprise resource planning: implementation procedures and CSF. Eur J Oper Res 146(2):241–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00547-7 Google Scholar
  67. Uzoka FME, Abiola RO, Nyangeresi R (2008) Influence of product and organizational constructs on erp acquisition using an extended technology acceptance model. Int J Enterp Inf Syst 4(2):67–83.  https://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2008040105 Google Scholar
  68. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2011) Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsl 7(3):50–54Google Scholar
  69. Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci 39(2):273–315.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x Google Scholar
  70. Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–205.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 Google Scholar
  71. Wallace TF, Kremzar MH (2001) ERP: making it happen—the implementer’s guide to success with enterprise resource planning. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Yadav R, Sharma SK, Tarhini A (2016) A multi-analytical approach to understand and predict the mobile commerce adoption. J Enterp Inf Manag 29(2):222–237.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2015-0034 Google Scholar
  73. Youngberg E, Olsen D, Hauser K (2009) Determinants of professionally autonomous end user acceptance in an enterprise resource planning system environment. Int J Inf Manage 29(2):138–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.06.001 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simona Sternad Zabukovšek
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zoran Kalinic
    • 2
  • Samo Bobek
    • 1
  • Polona Tominc
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia
  2. 2.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of KragujevacKragujevacSerbia

Personalised recommendations