Advertisement

Central European Journal of Operations Research

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 835–849 | Cite as

The role of foreign direct investment and labor productivity in explaining croatian regional export dynamics

  • Saša JakšićEmail author
  • Nataša Erjavec
  • Boris Cota
Original Paper

Abstract

The potential benefits of trade openness and export led growth strategy are well documented in the empirical literature. As previous researches found evidence that international trade does not support convergence in GDP per capita of Croatian regions towards average EU GDP per capita, this paper investigates the role of foreign direct investments (FDI) and labour productivity in describing Croatian regional export dynamics for the period from 2004 to 2015. The results of the estimated panel models confirm the importance of strengthening manufacturing as well as strong comovements of exports and imports as a consequence of the internalization of product chains. Furthermore, the obtained results indicate that the main obstacles towards strengthening of the Croatian regional exports are the lack of domestic demand effect and decreasing labour productivity. Moreover, as FDI inflows are mostly directed towards service sector it is not surprising that the overall impact of FDI inflows on exports is negative. Although one of the declared goals of Croatian policy makers is attracting FDI into export industries, the effects and, first of all, proper policy measures are yet to be seen.

Keywords

Regional export performance Croatia Exports of goods Panel models Foreign direct investment Labour productivity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been fully supported by Croatian Science Foundation under the project (IP-2014-09-5476).

References

  1. Andreß H, Golsch K, Schmidt-Catran A (2013) Applied panel data analysis for economic and social surveys. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arellano M (1993) On the testing of correlated effects with panel data. J Econ 59(1–2):87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econ 68:29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basarac M, Vučković V (2012) The analysis of export competitiveness of Croatian manufacturing industry. Ekon Pregl 62(12):729–751Google Scholar
  6. Belke A, Oeking A, Setzer R (2015) Domestic demand, capacity constraints and export dynamics: for vulnerable euro area countries. Econ Model 48:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackburne EF, Frank MW (2007) Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. Stata J 7:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87:115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Botrić V, Broz T (2016) Competitiveness, trade with the EU and labour markets: challenges for the Western Balkans. South East Eur J Econ Bus 11(2):20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bussière M, Chudik A, Sestieri G (2012) Modelling global trade flows: results from a GVAR model. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute. Working paper 119, DallasGoogle Scholar
  12. Buturac G (2008) Comparative advantages and export competitiveness of Croatian manufacturing. Ekon Istraž 21(2):47–59Google Scholar
  13. Buturac G (2009) Structural Characteristics of exports and imports of Croatian manufacturing. Ekon Pregl 60(9–10):432–457Google Scholar
  14. Buturac G, Gržinić J (2009) The competitiveness of Croatian export to EU markets. Zagreb Int Rev Econ Bus 12(1):39–51Google Scholar
  15. Buturac G, Lovrinčević Ž, Mikulić D (2014) Export competitiveness of Croatian textile industry—CMS analysis and importance for economy. J Text Appar 24(2):158–168Google Scholar
  16. Commission for Internationalisation of Croatia’s Economy (2014) Akcijski plan podrške izvozu 2014–2015. (Export Action Plan 2014–2015.) https://izvoz.gov.hr/UserDocsImages/dokumenti/Akcijski%20plan%20podrske-izvozu-2014-2015.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2018
  17. Croatian Government (2016) Program Vlade Republike Hrvatske za razdoblje 2016–2020. (The programme of the Government of the Republic of Croatia for the period 2016–2020.) https://vlada.gov.hr/UserDocsImages/ZPPI/Dokumenti%20Vlada/Program_Vlada_RH_2016_2020.pdf. Accessed 30 January 2018
  18. Croatian Parliament (2014) Industrijska strategija Republike Hrvatske 2014–2020. (Industrial strategy of Republic of Croatia from 2014–2020). NN 126Google Scholar
  19. Esteves S, Prades E (2016) On domestic demand and export performance in the euro area countries: does export concentration matter? Working paper series 1909, European Central BankGoogle Scholar
  20. European Commission (2012) A stronger European industry for growth and economic recovery. Industrial policy communication update. SWD (2012) 297 final, Commission Staff Working Document, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  21. Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jakšić S, Erjavec N (2017) What drives Croatian regional export? In: Proceedings of the 14th international symposium on operational research SOR’17. Slovenian Society Informatika, Section for Operational Research, Bled, pp 320–325Google Scholar
  23. Jakšić S, Žmuk B (2014) Modelling Croatian export dynamics using global macroeconometric model. In: Zagreb international review of economics and business 17, special conference Issue, pp 31–48Google Scholar
  24. Kovač I, Palić M, Mihanović D (2012) International trade of goods as a determinant of GDP growth in Croatia. Int J Bus Glob 9(2):134–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lovrinčević Ž, Buturac G, Mikulić D (2015) Export performance of the Croatian wood industry and its contribution to the overall Croatian economy. For Prod J 65(3–4):159–165Google Scholar
  26. Marin D (1992) Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for industrialized countries? Rev Econ Stat 74(4):678–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mikulić D, Galić Nagyszombaty A (2014) Direct and indirect impacts of exports on Croatian economy. In: Global business conference 2014 proceedings: questioning the widely-held Dogmas, Innovation Institute, Dubrovnik, pp 133–148Google Scholar
  28. Mikulić D, Galić Nagyszombaty A (2015) Does international trade cause regional growth differentials in Croatia? Zb rad Ekon fak Rij 33(1):81–102Google Scholar
  29. Mikulić D, Kovač I (2012) The role of international trade in convergence process. Montenegrin J Econ 8(4):7–26Google Scholar
  30. Mikulić D, Lovrinčević Ž, Galić Nagyszombaty A (2014) Regional convergence in the European union, new member states and Croatia. South East Eur J Econ Bus 8(1):9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paas T, Schlitte P (2007) Regional income inequality and convergence processes in the EU25. HWWI_Research_Paper, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  32. Rua A, Soares Esteves P, Staehr K, Bobeica E (2015) Exports and domestic demand pressure: a dynamic panel data model for the euro area countries. European Central Bank, Working paper series 1777, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  33. Sargan JD (1958) The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica 26:393–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stojčić N, Benić Đ, Karanikić P (2014) Regional determinants of export competitiveness in Croatian manufacturing industry. Zb rad Ekon fak Rij 32(2):193–212Google Scholar
  35. UNCTAD (2002) World investment report: transnational corporations and export competitiveness. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Vukšić G (2005) Impact of foreign direct investment on Croatian manufacturing exports. Financ Theory Pract 29(2):131–158Google Scholar
  37. Vukšić G (2017) Pre-crisis wage leadership in Croatia in the context of export competitiveness: any lessons for the future? Prague economic papers, pp 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.655
  38. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations