Advertisement

Central European Journal of Operations Research

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 815–834 | Cite as

Spatial spillovers and European Union regional innovation activities

  • Andrea FurkováEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper explores the role of spatial spillovers in the innovation processes across 245 NUTS 2 European Union (EU) regions for the 2008–2012 period. The patent applications at the European Patent Office were chosen as a proxy for innovative activity. In the first step of the empirical analysis, the spatial pattern examination of the innovative activity based on the selected global and local indicators for spatial association confirmed the presence of a spatial dependence process in the distribution of innovative activity. Next, we attempted to model the behaviour of innovative activity at the EU regional level on the basis of extended regional knowledge production model. Spatial econometric analysis indicated the relevance of internal innovation inputs (R&D expenditure and human resources in science and technology) and we also found out that, the production of knowledge by EU regions seems to be also affected by spatial spillovers due to innovative activity performed in other regions.

Keywords

EU regions Research and development Innovation activities Spatial spillover impacts General Nesting Spatial econometric model 

References

  1. Acs ZJ, Anselin L, Varga A (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Res Policy 31:1069–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer Publisher, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin L (2003) Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers and spatial econometrics. Int Reg Sci Rev 26:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anselin L, Rey SJ (2014) Modern spatial econometrics in practice. GeoDa Press LLC, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Anselin L, Varga A (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J Urban Econ 42:422–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (2000a) Geographical spillovers and university research: a spatial econometric perspective. Growth Change 31:501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (2000b) Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Pap Reg Sci 79:435–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86:630–640Google Scholar
  9. Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (2004) Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Cities Geogr 4:2713–2739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barro RJ (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. J Political Econ 98:103–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bogataj M, Drobne S (2005) Does the improvement of roads increase the daily commuting? Numerical analysis of Slovenian interregional flows. In: Zadnik SL, Indihar Štemberger M, Ferbar L, Drobne S (eds) Selected Decision Support Models for Production and Public Policy Problems. Slovenian Society Informatika, Ljubljana, pp 185–206Google Scholar
  12. Charlot S, Crescenzi R, Musoleli A (2015) Econometric modelling of the regional knowledge production function in Europe. J Econ Geogr 15:1227–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chocholatá M (2017) Analýza mzdových disparít v okresoch Slovenska v období 2001–2015. In: 17th International Scientific conference AIESA—Building of Society based on KnowledgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Coe D, Helpman E (1995) International R&D spillovers. Eur Econ Rev 39:859–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conte A et al (2009) An analysis of the efficiency of public spending and national policies in the area of R&D European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication15847_en.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2015
  16. De Smith MJ, Goodchild MF, Longley PA (2009) Geospatial analysis a comprehensive guide to principles. Techniques and Software Tools Leicester, MatadorGoogle Scholar
  17. Drobne S, Bogataj M (2005) Intermunicipal gravity model of Slovenia. In: Zadnik Stirn L, Drobne S (eds) SOR ‘05 proceedings, proceedings of the 8th international symposium on operational research in Slovenia, Slovenian Society Informatika, Ljubljana, pp 207–212Google Scholar
  18. European Commission (2010) Europe 2020: a European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 5 Feb 2015
  19. Feldman MP (1994) The geography of innovation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldman MP, Florida R (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 84:210–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fujita M, Krugman PR, Venable AJ (1999) The spatial economy: cities, regions, and international trade. https://www.researchgatenet/publication/5182400_The_Spatial_Economy_Cities_Regions_and_International_Trade. Accessed 3 Feb 2017
  22. Furková A (2016) Spatial pattern of innovative activity in the EU regions: exploratory spatial data analysis and spatial econometric approach. In: Gomes O (ed) Advances in applied business research: the LABS initiative. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 159–186Google Scholar
  23. Getis A (2010) Spatial autocorrelation. In: Getis A (ed) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Software tools, methods and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibbons S, Overman HG (2012) Mostly pointless spatial econometrics? J Reg Sci 52:172–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J Econ 10:92–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  27. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/. Accessed 5 Feb 2015
  28. Ivaničová Z, Chocholatá M, Surmanová K (2012) Ekonometrické modelovanie. Ekonóm, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  29. Jaffe AB (1989) Real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79:957–970Google Scholar
  30. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 63:577–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (1998) A generalized spatial two stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. J Real Estate Finance Econ 17:99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khan BZ (2012) Of time and space: a spatial analysis of technological spillovers among patents and unpatented innovations in the nineteenth century. http://www.nberorg/papers/w20732. Accessed 3 Feb 2017
  33. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kumar I (2008) Innovation clusters: a study of patents and citations ESRI international user conference. https://www.pcrd.purdue.edu/files/media/Innovation-Clusters-A-Study-of-Patents-and-Citations.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2017
  35. LeSage J, Pace K (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman and Hall, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lucas RE Jr (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monetary Econ 22:3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin P, Ottaviano G (2001) Growth and agglomeration. Int Econ Rev 42:947–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moreno R, Paci R, Usai S (2005a) Spatial spillovers and innovation activity in European regions. Environ Plan A 37:1793–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moreno R, Paci R, Usai S (2005b) Innovation clusters in the European regions. http://www.crenos.unica.it/crenos/sites/default/files/wp/05-12.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2017
  40. Nijkamp P, Reggiani A (1992) Interaction, evolution, and chaos in space. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ottaviano GIP, Puga D (1997) Agglomeration in the global economy: a survey of the “new economic geography”. http://diegopuga.org/papers/dp0356.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2017
  42. Paas T (2000) The gravity approach for modelling international trade patterns for economies in transition. Int Adv Econ Res 6(4):633–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pakes A, Griliches Z (1980) Patents and R&D at the firm level: a first look. Econ Lett 4:377–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rebelo S (1991) Long-run policy analysis and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 99:500–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Romer PM (1986) Increasing return and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94:1002–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98:S71–S102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Solow RA (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1):65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Venables A, Puga D (1999) Trading arrangements and industrial development policy. https://elibraryworldbank.org/doi/pdf/101596/1813-9450-1787. Accessed 3 Feb 2017

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Operations Research and EconometricsUniversity of Economics in BratislavaBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations