Advertisement

Performance of γ-aluminium oxide nanoparticles for arsenic removal from groundwater

  • Somaparna Ghosh
  • Roshan Prabhakar
  • S. R. Samadder
Original Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the applicability of γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles (NPs) adsorbent for removal of arsenite and arsenate from aqueous solution. The nano-adsorbent was characterized using zeta potential analysis, dynamic light scattering, field emission scanning microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Batch adsorption studies were carried out to optimize adsorption parameters such as contact time, stirring speed, initial arsenic concentration, adsorbent dose, pH and effect of different competing anions. Langmuir adsorption capacities obtained at 298 K are 769.23 µg/g and 1000 µg/g for As(III) and As(V) removal correspondingly. The adsorption mechanism was well established by pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Negative values of enthalpy (ΔH°) obtained during adsorption [− 29.12 kJ/mol and − 35.55 kJ/mol for As(III) and As(V), respectively] confirmed the process was exothermic in nature. The negative values of ΔG° [− 6.14 to − 3.86 kJ/mol for As(III) and − 9.32 to − 6.68 kJ/mol for As(V)] further affirmed that the adsorption process is spontaneous in nature. There was no requirement of additional external energy supply for the enhanced removal as the adsorption was less favoured at high temperature. Phosphate and sulphate had the profound effect on reduction in the removal efficiency. Good regenerating efficiency of γ-Al2O3 NPs up to fourth cycle implied economic feasibility of the adsorbent. The effectiveness of γ-Al2O3 was also proved for removal of arsenic from real arsenic-contaminated groundwater.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Adsorption Arsenate Arsenite γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles Isotherm models Field application 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are sincerely grateful to the SERB-DST (Project No. SB/EMEQ-010/2014) for their financial support for the present research work. We would like to thank Department of ESE/IIT(ISM) Dhanbad, for providing all support needed. The authors would also like to acknowledge Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, for allowing us to perform XRD analysis.

Supplementary material

10098_2018_1622_MOESM1_ESM.docx (612 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 612 kb)

References

  1. Al Hamouz OCS, Akintola OS (2017) Removal of lead and arsenic ions by a new series of aniline based polyamines. Process Saf Environ Prot 106:180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen SJ, Mckay G, Porter JF (2004) Adsorption isotherm models for basic dye adsorption by peat in single and binary component systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 280(2):322–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altundoğan HS, Altundoğan S, Tümen F, Bildik M (2002) Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solutions by activated red mud. Waste Manag 22(3):357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. APHA (2012) Standards for examination of water and waste water, 22nd edn. American Public Health Association, America Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentahar Y, Hurel C, Draoui K, Khairoun S, Marmier N (2016) Adsorptive properties of Moroccan clays for the removal of arsenic(V) from aqueous solution. Appl Clay Sci 119:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bose P, Sharma A (2002) Role of iron in controlling speciation and mobilization of arsenic in subsurface environment. Water Res 36(19):4916–4926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyd GE, Adamson AW, Myers LS Jr (1947) The exchange adsorption of ions from aqueous solutions by organic zeolites. II. Kinetics1. J Am Chem Soc 69(11):2836–2848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborti D, Mukherjee SC, Pati S, Sengupta MK, Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Basu GK (2003) Arsenic groundwater contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: a future danger? Environ Health Perspect 111(9):1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakraborti D, Rahman MM, Chatterjee A, Das D, Das B, Nayak B, Sengupta MK (2016) Fate of over 480 million inhabitants living in arsenic and fluoride endemic Indian districts: magnitude, health, socio-economic effects and mitigation approaches. J Trace Elem Med Biol 38:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chakraborti D, Das B, Rahman MM, Nayak B, Pal A, Sengupta MK, Saha KC (2017) Arsenic in groundwater of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC), India: critical review and modes of mitigation. Chemosphere 180:437–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaudhry SA, Ahmed M, Siddiqui SI, Ahmed S (2016) Fe(III)–Sn(IV) mixed binary oxide-coated sand preparation and its use for the removal of arsenite and arsenate from water: application of isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamics. J Mol Liq 224:431–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen CJ, Wang SL, Chiou JM, Tseng CH, Chiou HY, Hsueh YM, Lai MS (2007) Arsenic and diabetes and hypertension in human populations: a review. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 222(3):298–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chowdhury UK, Biswas BK, Chowdhury TR, Samanta G, Mandal BK, Basu GC, Roy S (2000) Groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India. Environ Health Perspect 108(5):393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dutta PK, Ray AK, Sharma VK, Millero FJ (2004) Adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on titanium dioxide suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 278(2):270–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. EPA (2000) Regulations on the disposal of arsenic residuals from drinking water treatment plants. Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA (EPA/600/R-00/025). http://www.epa.gov/ORD/WebPubs/residuals/index.htm
  16. Garelick H, Jones H, Dybowska A, Valsami-Jones E (2009) Arsenic pollution sources. In: Whitacre DM (ed) Reviews of environmental contamination, vol 197. Springer, New York, pp 17–60Google Scholar
  17. Giles DE, Mohapatra M, Issa TB, Anand S, Singh P (2011) Iron and aluminium based adsorption strategies for removing arsenic from water. J Environ Manag 92(12):3011–3022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goswami A, Raul PK, Purkait MK (2012) Arsenic adsorption using copper(II) oxide nanoparticles. Chem Eng Res Des 90(9):1387–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen HK, Núñez P, Grandon R (2006) Electrocoagulation as a remediation tool for wastewaters containing arsenic. Miner Eng 19(5):521–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho YS, McKay G (1998) The kinetics of sorption of basic dyes from aqueous solution by sphagnum moss peat. Can J Chem Eng 76(4):822–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Inaba K, Haga M, Ueda K, Itoh A, Takemoto T, Yoshikawa H (2016) New adsorbent for removal of inorganic arsenic(III) from groundwater. Chem Lett 46(1):58–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan TA, Chaudhry SA, Ali I (2013) Thermodynamic and kinetic studies of Arsenate removal from water by zirconium oxide-coated marine sand. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(8):5425–5440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim Y, Kim C, Choi I, Rengaraj S, Yi J (2004) Arsenic removal using mesoporous alumina prepared via a templating method. Environ Sci Technol 38(3):924–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim DH, Kim KW, Cho J (2006) Removal and transport mechanisms of arsenics in UF and NF membrane processes. J Water Health 4(2):215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar E, Bhatnagar A, Kumar U, Sillanpää M (2011) Defluoridation from aqueous solutions by nano-alumina: characterization and sorption studies. J Hazard Mater 186(2):1042–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lata S, Samadder SR (2016) Removal of arsenic from water using nano adsorbents and challenges: a review. J Environ Manag 166:387–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leupin OX, Hug SJ (2005) Oxidation and removal of arsenic(III) from aerated groundwater by filtration through sand and zero-valent iron. Water Res 39(9):1729–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin SH, Juang RS (2002) Heavy metal removal from water by sorption using surfactant-modified montmorillonite. J Hazard Mater 92(3):315–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lunge S, Singh S, Sinha A (2014) Magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles from tea waste for arsenic removal. J Magn Magn Mater 356:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mazumder DNG, Haque R, Ghosh N, De BK, Santra A, Chakraborti D, Smith AH (2000) Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India. Int J Epidemiol 29(6):1047–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mukherjee SC, Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Sengupta MK, Lodh D, Chanda CR, Chakraborti D (2003) Neuropathy in arsenic toxicity from groundwater arsenic contamination in West Bengal, India. J Environ Sci Health, Part A 38(1):165–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mukherjee SC, Saha KC, Pati S, Dutta RN, Rahman MM, Sengupta MK, Nayak B (2005) Murshidabad—one of the nine groundwater arsenic-affected districts of West Bengal, India. Part II: dermatological, neurological, and obstetric findings. Clin Toxicol 43(7):835–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murcott S (2012) Arsenic contamination in the world. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Nassar MY, Khatab M (2016) Cobalt ferrite nanoparticles via a template-free hydrothermal route as an efficient nano-adsorbent for potential textile dye removal. RSC Adv 6(83):79688–79705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nassar MY, Mohamed TY, Ahmed IS, Samir I (2017) MgO nanostructure via a sol–gel combustion synthesis method using different fuels: an efficient nano-adsorbent for the removal of some anionic textile dyes. J Mol Liq 225:730–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Naujokas MF, Anderson B, Ahsan H, Aposhian HV, Graziano JH, Thompson C, Suk WA (2013) The broad scope of health effects from chronic arsenic exposure: update on a worldwide public health problem. Environ Health Perspect 121(3):295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ning RY (2002) Arsenic removal by reverse osmosis. Desalination 143(3):237–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Owlad M, Aroua MK, Daud WAW, Baroutian S (2009) Removal of hexavalent chromium-contaminated water and wastewater: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 200(1–4):59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patra AK, Dutta A, Bhaumik A (2012) Self-assembled mesoporous γ-Al2O3 spherical nanoparticles and their efficiency for the removal of arsenic from water. J Hazard Mater 201:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ponder SM, Darab JG, Bucher J, Caulder D, Craig I, Davis L, Shuh DK (2001) Surface chemistry and electrochemistry of supported zerovalent iron nanoparticles in the remediation of aqueous metal contaminants. Chem Mater 13(2):479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prabhakar R, Samadder SR (2018) Low cost and easy synthesis of aluminium oxide nanoparticles for arsenite removal from groundwater: a complete batch study. J Mol Liq 250:192–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Mukherjee SC, Mondal BK, Paul K, Lodh D, Roy S (2001) Chronic arsenic toxicity in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India—a review and commentary. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 39(7):683–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rahman MM, Ng JC, Naidu R (2009) Chronic exposure of arsenic via drinking water and its adverse health impacts on humans. Environ Geochem Health 31(1):189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roy PK, Majumder A, Banerjee G, Roy MB, Pal S, Mazumdar A (2015) Removal of arsenic from drinking water using dual treatment process. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(4):1065–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sharma YC, Srivastava V, Singh VK, Kaul SN, Weng CH (2009) Nano-adsorbents for the removal of metallic pollutants from water and wastewater. Environ Technol 30(6):583–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith AH, Lopipero PA, Bates MN, Steinmaus CM (2002) Arsenic epidemiology and drinking water standards. Science 296(5576):2145–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Temkin MJ, Pyzhev V (1940) Recent modifications to Langmuir isotherms. Acta Phys Chim Sin 12:217–222Google Scholar
  48. Tofik AS, Taddesse AM, Tesfahun KT, Girma GG (2016) Fe–Al binary oxide nanosorbent: synthesis, characterization and phosphate sorption property. J Environ Chem Eng 4(2):2458–2468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang CH, Hsiao CK, Chen CL, Hsu LI, Chiou HY, Chen SY, Hsueh Y-M, Wu M-M, Chen CJ (2007) A review of the epidemiologic literature on the role of environmental arsenic exposure and cardiovascular diseases. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 222(3):315–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weber TW, Chakravorti RK (1974) Pore and solid diffusion models for fixed-bed adsorbers. AIChE J 20(2):228–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weber WJ, Morris JC (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J Sanit Eng Div 89(2):31–60Google Scholar
  52. Wen Z, Zhang Y, Dai C, Chen B, Guo S, Yu H, Wu D (2014) Synthesis of ordered mesoporous iron manganese bimetal oxides for arsenic removal from aqueous solutions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 200:235–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zeldowitsch J (1934) The catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide on manganese dioxide. Acta Physicochim URSS 1:364–449Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Somaparna Ghosh
    • 1
  • Roshan Prabhakar
    • 1
  • S. R. Samadder
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines)DhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations