Advertisement

Journal of Wood Science

, Volume 64, Issue 6, pp 758–766 | Cite as

Relationship between crack propagation and the stress intensity factor in cutting parallel to the grain of hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa)

  • Masumi Minagawa
  • Yosuke Matsuda
  • Yuko Fujiwara
  • Yoshihisa Fujii
Original Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

The method of digital image correlation (DIC) was applied to the digital image of orthogonal cutting parallel to the grain of hinoki, and the strain distribution near the cutting edge was evaluated. The wood fracture associated with chip generation was considered as mode I fracture, and the stress intensity factor KI for fracture mode I was calculated from the strain distribution according to the theory of linear elastic fracture mechanics for the anisotropic material. The calculated KI increased prior to crack propagation and decreased just after the crack propagation. The change in KI before and after crack propagation, ΔKI, decreased in accordance with the crack propagation length, although the variance in ΔKI should depend on the relationships between the resolution of DIC method and the dimensions of cellular structure. The calculated KI in this study was almost on the same order as reported in the literatures. It was also revealed, for the case of chip generation Type 0 or I, the stress intensity factor for fracture mode II could be negligible due to the higher longitudinal elastic properties of wood in the tool feed direction than the one radial ones, and the mode I fracture was dominant.

Keywords

Orthogonal cutting Crack propagation Stress intensity factor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to express sincere thanks to Kanefusa Corporation for providing the cutting tools.

References

  1. 1.
    Franz NC (1955) Analysis of chip formation in wood machining. For Prod J 5:332–336Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Franz NC (1958) Analysis of the wood-cutting process. Dissertation, University of Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McKenzie WM (1967) The basic wood cutting process. In: Proceedings of the second wood machining seminar. Oct 10–11 1967, Richmond, pp 3–8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wyeth DJ, Goli G, Atkins AG (2009) Fracture toughness, chip types and the mechanics of cutting wood. A review COST Action E35 2004–2008: Wood machining–micromechanics and fracture. Holzforschung 63:168–180.  https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2009.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orlowski KA, Ochrymiuk T, Akins A, Chuchala D (2013) Application of fracture mechanics for energetic effects predictions while wood sawing. Wood Sci Technol 47:949–963.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-013-0551-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Orlowski KA, Ochrymiuk T, Sandak J, Sandak A (2013) Estimation of fracture toughness and shear yield stress of orthotropic materials in cutting with rotating tools. Eng Fract Mech 178:433–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orlowski KA, Ochrymiuk T (2014) Fracture mechanics model of cutting power versus widespread regression equations while wood sawing with circular saw blades. Ann WULS SGGW For Wood Technol 85:168–174Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nairn JA (2015) Numerical simulation of orthogonal cutting using the material point method. Eng Fract Mech 149:262–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hlásková L, Kopecký Z (2015) Fracture toughness and shear stresses determining od chemically modified beech. Ann WULS SGGW For Wood Technol 90:73–78Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams JG, Patel Y (2016) Fundamentals of cutting. Interface Focus 6:20150108CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nairn JA (2016) Numerical modelling of orthogonal cutting: application to woodworking with a bench plane. Interface Focus 6:20150110CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Merhar M, Bučar B (2012) Cutting force variability as a consequence of exchangeable cleavage fracture and compressive breakdown of wood tissue. Wood Sci Technol 46(5):965–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ohya S, Ohta M, Okano T (1992) Analysis of wood slicing mechanism along the grain I. Previous check occurrence conditions. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 38:1098–1104Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Triboulot P, Asano I, Ohta M (1983) An application of fracture mechanics to the wood-cutting process. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 29:111–117Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matsuda Y, Fujiwara Y, Fujii Y (2015) Observation of machined surface and subsurface structure of hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa) produced in slow-speed orthogonal cutting using X-ray computed tomography. J Wood Sci 61:128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu EM (1963) Application of fracture mechanics to orthotropic plates. TAM Rept 248Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Corten HT (1972) Fracture mechanics of composites. In: Liebowitz H (ed) Fracture of nonmetals and composites. Academic Press, New York, pp 675–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Conrad MPC, Smith GD, Fernlund G (2003) Fracture of solid wood: a review of structure and properties at different lenght. Wood Fiber Sci 35(4):570–584Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Merhar M, Bučar DG, Bučar B (2013) Mode I critical stress intensity factor of beech wood (Fagus Sylvatica) in a TL configuration: a comparison of different method. Drvna Ind 64(3):221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prokopskit G (1993) The application of fracture mechanics to the testing of wood. J Mater Sci 28:5995–5999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tokuda M (1998) Relationship between critical stress-intensity factor KIC and crack size induced by nailing for different typical wood species of timber construction (in Japanese). J Soc Mat Sci 47:356–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sato K, Yamamoto H, Taya A, Okuyama H (2000) Influence of moisture content on critical stress intensity factor of wood (in Japanese). J Soc Mat Sci 49:365–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoshihara H (2007) Simple estimation of critical stress intensity factors of wood by tests with double cantilever beam and three-point end-notched flexure. Holzforschung 61:182–189.  https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2007.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoshihara H (2010) Examination of the Mode I critical stress intensity factor of wood obtained by single-edge-notched bending tests. Holzforschung 64:501–509Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yoshihara H (2010) Influence of bending conditions on the measurement of mode I critical stress intensity factor for wood and medium density fiberboard by the single-edge-notched tension test. Holzforschung 64:734–735Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yoshihara H, Usuki A (2011) Mode I critical stress intensity factor of wood and medium-density fiber board measured by compact tension test. Holzforschung 65:729–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yoshihara H, Ataka N, Maruta M (2017) Measurement of the Mode I critical stress intensity factor of solid wood and medium-density fiberboard by four-pint single-edge-notched bending (4SENB) test (in Japanese). J Soc Mat Sci 66:323–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ochiai Y, Aoki K, Inayama M (2017) Fundamental research of an evaluation method of splitting failure in timber I. Differences of wood species and evaluation method of splitting failure by the CT test specimen (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 63:269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pitti RM, Chazal C, Labesse-Jied F, Lapusta Y (2017) Stress intensity factors for viscoelastic axisymmetric problems applied to wood. Exp Appl Mech 4:89–96Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barrett JD, Foschi RO (1977) Mode II stress-intensity factors for cracked wood beams. Eng Fract Mech 9(2):371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Murphy JF (1988) Mode II wood test specimen: beam with center slit. J Test Eval 16(4):364–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yoshihara H (2008) Mode II fracture mechanics properties of wood measured by asymmetric four-point bending test using a single-edge-notched specimen. Eng Fract Mech 75:4727–4739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yoshihara H, Sato A (2009) Shear and crack tip deformation correction for the double cantilever beam and three-point end-notched flexure specimen for mode I and mode II fracture toughness measurement of wood. Eng Fract Mech 76:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yoshihara H (2010) Mode I and mode II initiation fracture toughness and resistance curve of medium density fiberboard measured by double cantilever beam and three-point bend end-notched flexure tests. Eng Fract Mech 77:2537–2549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yoshihara H (2012) Mode II critical stress intensity factor of wood measured by the asymmetric four-point bending test using single-edge-notched specimen while considering an additional crack length. Holzforschung 66:989–992Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yoshihara H (2013) Mode II critical stress intensity factor of medium density fiberboard measured by asymmetric four-point bending test analysis of kink crack formation. BioResources 8(2):1771–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    McNeill SR, Peters WH, Sutton MA (1987) Estimation of stress intensity factor by digital image correlation. Eng Fract Mech 28:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yoneyama S, Takashi M (2001) Automatic determination of stress intensity factor utilizing digital image correlation (in Japanese). J JSEM 1:202–206Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Samarasinghe S, Kulasiri D (2004) Stress intensity factor of wood from crack-tip displacement fields obtained from digital image processing. Silva Fenn 38(3):267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhao J, Zhao D (2013) Evaluation of mixed-mode stress intensity factor of wood from crack-tip displacement fields utilizing digital image correlation. WSEAS Trans Appl Theor Mech 8(4):282–291Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tukiainen P, Hughes M (2016) The cellular level mode I fracture behavior of spruce and birch in the RT crack propagation system. Holzforschung 70:157–165Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Matsuda Y, Fujiwara Y, Murata K, Fujii Y (2017) Residual strain analysis with digital image correlation method for subsurface damage evaluation of hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa) finished by slow-speed orthogonal cutting. J Wood Sci 63:615–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nakato K (ed) (1985) Shinpen mokuzai kōgaku (in Japanese). Yōkendō, Tokyo, p 142Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Smith I, Landis E, Gong M (2003) Fracture and fatigue in wood. Wiley, West Sussex, p 242Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Wood Research Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masumi Minagawa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yosuke Matsuda
    • 3
  • Yuko Fujiwara
    • 1
  • Yoshihisa Fujii
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Daiken CorporationOkayamaJapan
  3. 3.Forestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations